By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

He urged his colleagues to jointly adopt the bill—a move that was a direct invitation for the coalition and others to raise objections. This demonstrates a clear willingness to cooperate across party lines, but the ultimate goal is to limit the bill's impact on citizens.

The stance is primarily critical and anti-coalition, with limited scope for cooperation. It points to another faction (the Center Party) as aligning with the opposition's viewpoints, but generally does not emphasize new avenues for cooperation, focusing instead on confrontation with the coalition.

He/She expresses readiness for cooperation with colleagues who have raised important issues, and emphasizes the need to involve specialists and conduct thorough analyses. He/She demonstrates an understanding that good results require sustainable cooperation and is willing to engage in compromise.

The speakers emphasize cooperation and broad-based consensus: the goal is to involve diplomats, representatives of ministries, allies, and think tanks, and to organize an extended discussion. This demonstrates a readiness for compromise and multilateral dialogue among the various factions.

The desire for cooperation with colleagues and a broad-based discussion is clearly evident: colleagues are being called upon to think and jointly find the best solution, alongside an effort to shift the commission's decision in a positive direction. Several requests are being put forward for conducting votes, and the necessity of working closely together and coordinating the subsequent steps is being stressed.

No significant references to cooperation or compromise were provided; the emphasis is on confrontation and criticism. A limited or insufficient connection with colleagues and the coalition was noted, focusing on oppositional rhetoric.