By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Stands up for the dignity and quality of life of the residents; criticizes the situation where people have to approach the social services department and beg for charity, which, in their view, is humiliating. Acknowledges the impact of burdens on the elderly and multi-generational families; stresses the need to prevent the displacement of older residents from their homes and defends social justice.

Not enough data

Insufficient data.

Support was given to democracy and civil society, and within the context of international cooperation, emphasis is placed on the character of Georgian citizens and society; detailed social or social rights issues have not been widely addressed. Emotional and value-based approaches are primarily situated within the foreign policy context.

A social priority is access to services without excessive costs and reducing the burden resulting from family-related fees; examples include the idea of solemnizing marriage without a state fee and the broader impact on people's economic well-being. Furthermore, fines and service prices raise social issues concerning quality of life and access to rights.

Data is lacking concerning social issues (such as abortion, LGBTQ+ matters, immigration, weapons, and similar topics) or civil rights themes. No specific social resourcefulness is cited.