By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

As the only clearly documented intervention during the plenary session on 2024-06-19, it references the preceding reading and the draft bill, and calls on other factions to vote against it. Information regarding other appearances during this period is limited; the primary objective is the objection to the aforementioned draft bill.

Appears in several speeches on the same day (14.06.2024), focusing on the criticism of the supplementary budget and the budget process. Highlights procedural points and the context of the debate taking place on the public channel, referencing internet broadcasts and public opinion. Establishes a permanent focus on economic and security issues in the criticism of the government's activities.

He has delivered a speech on the same topic at the plenary session for the second time; this points to a consistent focus on themes of inclusion and engagement.

This allows for several discussions and additional consultation, including the convening of an extended debate, the involvement of diplomats and experts, and the inclusion of a review of allied positions. Characteristically, there are repeated references to unhurried proceedings and the possibility of extraordinary summer sessions.

Highly active participation during the two plenary days (June 5–6), focusing on amendments and procedural issues regarding breaks. Frequent reference was made to specific amendments (Nos. 2, 6, 7, 12, 13), along with a desire to discuss them and either bring them to a vote or change the decision. Many speeches included calls for careful consideration and thorough decision-making, often requesting a recess or pause before the vote.

The address is a singular statement delivered during an information session, demonstrating a style that is directly critical and demands accountability. It does not indicate regularity or frequent occurrence; instead, it focuses on criticizing the actions of the current government and raising the issue of responsibility.