By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats
Total Sessions: 150
Fully Profiled: 150
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The cooperative approach focuses on seeking expert opinion regarding the transformation of the tax system, suggesting hypothetical collaboration with the new prime minister. There is no information available concerning inter-party or cross-coalition cooperation.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Does not demonstrate willingness to cooperate with the governing coalition, but points to the principled support of ministry representatives for the idea of regulating the mobile communications market. Emphasizes the consistent work of his/her faction (the Centre Party) and the submission of draft legislation (e.g., lowering the VAT on foodstuffs).
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker emphasized the need for swift and effective inter-agency cooperation, calling on ministers to "get on the same page" and eliminate the problem. He sees the solution specifically in the joint effort of various agencies and through round table discussions.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is absolutely no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise; communication is limited to demanding explanations and accountability from the minister.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The text lacks any indication of cooperation with coalition partners or a readiness for compromise. Instead, the speaker urges the initiation of a broader tax policy debate, contrasting the government's stance with public expectations (such as a bank tax or reduced VAT on food items).
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Primarily oppositional and characterized by strong dissent; continued cooperation with the coalition is limited. Nevertheless, a certain openness emerges regarding the need for concessions or discussions (for instance, asking the rapporteur for compromises), but the overall tone remains critical and the willingness to cooperate is restricted.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
It seeks broad-based cooperation, inviting various political parties, along with Latvia and Lithuania, to the discussion table. It is ready for compromises and flexible decisions, provided the continuation of the project is seriously vetted, and if the parties agree to a trial period or an investigative commission. It emphasizes that cooperation and consensus are prerequisites for moving forward.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Seeks cooperation with other ministers and agencies (for example, the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Minister of Health), wants to establish a working group and engage in mutual consultation; while simultaneously emphasizing the need to implement concrete measures.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
An invitation is extended for cooperation and open discussion. Examples are cited where inquiries have been directed to various ministers; it is mentioned that members of the Center Party faction have submitted an inquiry, and the importance of direct communication and receiving ministerial responses is emphasized. A desire for broad-based cooperation and the joint resolution of problems is demonstrated, but critical oversight is simultaneously required. Multi-faceted coordination efforts are at the forefront.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Focuses on cooperation and constructive dialogue: invites colleagues to delve deeper into the matter, seeks the "green light" from the coalition, and emphasizes the need for the rapid implementation of joint measures. Shows readiness to cooperate with various political parties and to incorporate the views of young families through institutional analyses.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
It demonstrates a readiness for cooperation on several issues: a discussion with the insurance company about technical nuances and a peaceful attitude toward the integration of certain topics. In the fourth speech, it was noted that common ground can be found in the area of inter-party disagreements despite partisan differences; the potential for dialogue and compromise was highlighted.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Not enough data. Although some entries refer to the leader of other parties and the potential use of inclusive methods, there is no clear description of partnership or cooperative steps.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
He/She spoke about the importance of inclusion and cooperation: stakeholders, experts, civil society organizations, and coordination processes must be involved, and impact analyses must be conducted. This demonstrates a readiness to change the culture, fostering collaboration with various parties, and challenging the power structure that allows decisions directed solely at one faction without the necessity of broader consultation. It acknowledges that cooperation is vital between both the opposition and the coalition, and emphasizes the value of decision-based inclusion.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
It relies primarily on the faction's initiatives (parliamentary queries) and the ministers' receptiveness; it expresses a readiness for cooperation and seeks an official response and analysis, but does not claim widespread coalition consensus. It indicates some forward movement in the ministers' response, but the underlying tone is critical, not one of shared vision.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Seeking opportunities for cooperation and engagement: invites coalition members to contribute their ideas and jointly improve the bill; emphasizes the necessity of collaborative work to address youth welfare and resolve the demographic crisis. Demonstrates a willingness to accept proposed amendments and advance the bill to the second reading in conjunction with the coalition.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
No data available
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Shows some readiness to cooperate on preserving regional services (e.g., "We will collectively do everything we can to ensure these services don't disappear"), but is simultaneously critical of the coalition and questions whether these issues have been raised in the Coalition Council. This style encourages opposition oversight and, if necessary, cross-party parliamentary action.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It demonstrates some degree of cooperation, inter-factional dialogue, and a willingness to collaborate, but at the same time often employs dense legalistic and protocol-following language; the proposals are not merely oppositional, but also seek procedural solutions (e.g., the investigative committee regarding Rail Baltic, submissions to various ministers). In some cases, it emphasizes cooperation and constructive debate, but the overall tone leans toward emphasizing control and accountability.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperative and dialogue-oriented; expressing a wish to speak with the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee before the vote, and ready to discuss matters collaboratively.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the private sector: a recommendation to engage directly with businesses and offer solutions on how to bring companies and capital into Estonia; it emphasizes the necessity of partnership and pragmatic solutions for economic revitalization.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Seeking broader networking and cross-party cooperation against the draft bill, they invite two or three members of the Reform Party and Eesti 200 to submit an objection. They demonstrate a willingness to compromise and establish a non-political common ground, but simultaneously explicitly support the critical position of their party and the coalition.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
It demonstrates a willingness to cooperate across different factions (Isamaa, Reformierakond, Keskerakond) and stresses that the criticism transcends the boundaries of partisanship. The necessity of a joint, comprehensive discussion and corresponding analysis is emphasized.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Seeks broad support (to jointly file a motion of no confidence); refers to other parliamentary groups (the Center Party, Eesti 200) and hopes they will join. At the same time, it notes that the Reform Party did not participate in the discussion, which indicates formal and limited cooperation; emphasizes the necessity of a unified counter-move against the government.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The stance on co-involvement and the potential for compromise is contradictory, yet simultaneously, a readiness for cooperation is evident: the faction has submitted numerous amendments and has actively sought to contribute to the improvement of the draft legislation. It emphasizes the necessity of considering the viewpoints of various factions, but it establishes the scope and conditions of its own proposals as key criteria. Consequently, it may be hesitant to find compromises if these criteria are not taken into consideration.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Parliamentary readiness for cooperation is limited, but the need to utilize procedural instruments (extraordinary session, interpellations) is emerging. Some multiparty conflict and mutual counter-arguments are noted, but there are no concrete signs regarding entry into coalitions; cooperation is primarily procedural and critical, rather than long-term bipartisan interaction.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
It demonstrates a readiness to provide guidance to the government and share expert opinions, focusing on cooperation within the large frameworks of "us" and "the government." It does not emphasize direct, widespread bipartisanship or formal coalition agreements, but stresses that expert advice and analysis must be taken into consideration. It likely favors constructive criticism coupled with the presentation of practical solutions.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
A collaborative and dialogue-oriented approach: emphasizes the necessity of cooperation among aviation operators, local governments, and the Minister in order to open new routes and enhance connectivity. The recommendations include reaching out to Ryanair and holding meetings with other airlines to expand Tallinn Airport's international reach. He/She also demonstrates a willingness to involve other colleagues and various government departments.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The data obtained shows that the speakers emphasize the unity of the opposition, stating: "everyone together here in the opposition," and point to inter-factional cooperation. There is no direct reference here to potential cooperation with the government; the primary focus is the cohesion of the opposition.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strictly focuses on the bill's topics and procedural rules, emphasizing the need to remain within the established parameters and discuss only the procedural aspects. It shows little direct willingness for broad cooperation prior to the final decision on the bill, but simultaneously stresses the requirement to remain on topic and ensure consistent action.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is a skeptical tone regarding the government, but a certain willingness to cooperate both within the parliament and with Brussels is noted. The text mentions the potential for bipartisan cooperation and the necessity of presenting well-reasoned proposals. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on basing opinions on facts and evidence, and in some sections, finding common ground with other parties is referenced (e.g., the Reform Party and Eesti 200).
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The text refers to the juxtaposition of views with other MPs and mentions the partially inclusive stance of the EKRE representative. It demonstrates a readiness to discuss and reference draft legislation proposed by other parties (e.g., Rain Epler). —However, it simultaneously highlights disagreements with the coalition and the government, which may suggest a limited willingness to cooperate.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
It stresses the necessity of cooperation at both the national and international levels, recommending the inclusion of Latvia and Lithuania and the formation of a special committee within the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) to constructively resolve issues. It demonstrates a readiness for compromise and open dialogue with the government.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The highest priority is broad-based dialogue and cooperation: it calls for consultation with coalition allies and, in order to overcome hesitation, demands the involvement of coalition deputies in pairs; simultaneously, it emphasizes the necessity of making amendments to ENMAK accompanied by a broad discussion.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Emphasis on Cooperation and Consultation: The necessity of cooperating with allies is stressed through sending a "polite notice" and a "polite letter" and initiating consultations when necessary. Reference is made to the need to involve partners, but simultaneously, there is criticism regarding the government's inadequate communication, which demonstrates a preference for formal and proper engagement.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The tone is critical of the coalition, with critical references made to the decisions of the coalition partners. While not clearly presenting offers of cooperation, the need for a comprehensive and rational approach is emphasized. Cooperation is viewed more as a challenge to the coalition's decisions than as genuine, broad-based collaboration.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
It is ready for cooperation and engagement: it recommends assigning the new minister the task of mapping the situation and identifying bottlenecks, so that these can subsequently be eliminated. The approach relies on cooperation with relevant sector institutions and parliamentary dialogue, but specific coalitions are not detailed.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Emphasis is placed on constructive work based on the principle of bipartisanship: a cross-party commission that invites experts from both domestic and international spheres. The inclusion of independent experts and specialists, along with the utilization of external experience, is highlighted as a crucial method of cooperation.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
A primarily oppositional and retrospective style of cooperation; a draft bill is introduced on their own initiative and support is solicited, but criticism of the coalition’s actions is emphasized. Attention is paid to the expertise and views of other parties, but cooperation is limited, and direct compromise is not a primary priority for the spokesperson.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
It points to the participation of other factions in submitting similar draft legislation and emphasizes the necessity of clarity and cooperation within the framework of energy policy; it demonstrates a readiness for discussion and finding the best solution, but leaves room for critical assessment regarding the government. It sees potential for cooperation in the initiatives put forward by the Isamaa faction, but clearly sets out its own demands and guidelines. A collaborative approach, but one maintained with critical oversight.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The need for constructive debate is publicly stressed, and a willingness to involve members of parliament is indicated, even though the strategies themselves are mainly critical of the government. While there is mention of a readiness to discuss and take collaborative steps, concrete, systematic mechanisms for cooperation are absent.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Cooperative Style: It still seeks cooperation and compromise, but warns that the coalition has repeatedly voted against its proposals. It calls on coalition members to consider better solutions and highlights international examples (Finland, Sweden) as a possible framework for reform.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Shows readiness for cooperation and seeking compromises (e.g., asks whether the Ministry of Finance will approve the proposed amendments), but at the same time is unwilling to change core positions. In various scenarios, he/she emphasizes understanding and cooperation, but sets boundaries where the principles have already been adopted.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A constructive debate is being launched, along with the establishment of the need for a joint discussion in the Riigikogu. This demonstrates a readiness for cooperation and an exchange of views with various colleagues, and at a higher level, with ministers. The aim is to resolve issues through open cooperation, rather than through indifference.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text mentions that discussions occurred at both the opposition and coalition levels, but fails to specify any concrete cooperation measures or joint proposals. This indicates a reference to cross-party dialogue, but the actual practices of collaboration are not detailed further.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The text supports the coalition’s collaboration with the Reform Party, referencing their prior history of working together. Nevertheless, it criticizes the internal disagreements within the partner party and the coalition as a whole, stressing the need for a responsible, cooperative approach. While ultimately emphasizing the importance of collaboration, the overall tone remains critical and controlling.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Calls for cooperation with all political parties and acknowledges that meetings and a roundtable among the parties have not taken place; presupposes the need for cooperation among the parties. Shows readiness for consensus-based deliberation and for re-discussing the draft law in cooperation between the opposition and the coalition.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
It does not directly refer to cooperation with specific types of groups, but expresses a readiness to listen and promote the adoption of the bill across party lines; the call to support the bill points to broader interests, not just those of a single coalition. It is noted, albeit briefly, that there is a need to increase cooperation and responsibility in the work of the committees.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The manifestations of the cooperation statement are primarily found in references to the views of colleagues and the decisions of the coalition, but a direct obligation for cooperation or compromise is not clearly emphasized; it utilizes references to the opinions of both coalition partners and other experts, which suggests an unreserved discussion rather than active cooperation.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
It seeks cooperation, but is simultaneously critical, demanding clear answers and transparency. It notes that the behavior of coalition partners can seem like that of the opposition, which demonstrates complex, but when necessary, constructive cooperation with various parties in the areas of energy policy and tax policy.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It calls for cooperation and broad-based engagement: expressing the desire that all factions would support the idea of holding snap elections and renewing the mandate. It highlights the coordinated activity of the faction and its colleagues, noting that various parliamentary groups could jointly consider improvements to tax policy. At the same time, it indicates the need for involving various stakeholders in the proposals and maintaining dialogue, even while remaining strongly critical.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Overall, it is a mix operating under the shadow of both cooperation and disagreement. It shows some cross-group collaboration regarding the funding of the school psychologists' helpline (inquiries were drafted by several members of parliament from different parties), while in energy policy, the approach is often critical and marked by the aesthetic interplay of competition. It is possible that cross-party involvement exists on certain topics, but the tone in energy debates is frequently confrontational.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Demonstrates limited willingness to cooperate with the coalition; stresses that coalition partners may not vote for a motion of no confidence and highlights insufficient engagement within the coalition. It calls upon the opposition to cooperate and unite, but does not show significant readiness to form a broader bipolar political divide in this context — rather, it emphasizes the need to focus on common goals among opposition parties and, where possible, the inclusion of other actors.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Critical and demanding, they do not clearly present cooperation proposals; they emphasize the need for responsibility and legal order, as well as increasing transparency between agencies. They do not demonstrate specific bipolar cooperation initiatives, but rather direct attention toward control, and substantive steps are being discussed.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Although the speaker delivers sharp criticism, they demonstrate a reasonable willingness to cooperate, referencing certain colleagues (Kaljulaid, Kross) and acknowledging the thoroughness of their contributions. The speaker highlights the necessity of finding answers and fostering discussions, even though the criticism is partly oppositional. The competent communication style leans toward critical oversight and cooperation based on parity.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Critical, but demanding accountability and concrete steps: calling on the minister to state what is actually going on, and asking the government to take responsibility and present a thorough analysis of the results. Cooperation is limited: he/she emphasizes accountability and discussion, but at the same time there is no visible backing or broad-based agreement, only a need for swift and concrete action.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
They emphasize the positions of their faction (the Centre Party) and have demonstrated a willingness to cooperate "with others" (e.g., by referencing a broader debate on the bank tax and tax installments). However, concrete cross-party partnerships or specific cooperation topics are not explicitly put forward; instead, they generally call for cooperation and discussion regarding directives and regulations. Their approach indicates cooperation that is constructive, yet focused and faction-based.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate: asks whether the issue has been raised within the government and refers to topics discussed in the committee. It seeks cooperation and the coordination of legislation.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data regarding the level of cooperation or bipartisan closeness.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Not enough data
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Not enough data
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and receptiveness to the opposition's proposals: "they [the proposals] are all welcome," and calls for a comprehensive debate and amendments prior to the second reading. However, the individual/party is critical when promises are not met; they seek constructive, transparent dialogue.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The core focus is the need for cross-party cooperation and unified action. Phrases such as “cross-party” and “cooperation” underscore the readiness for joint work, and the support or objections presented by various factions are framed as part of a wider search for consensus. This support has also been highlighted through official statements (e.g., Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats), and the call for a unified vote is a recurring theme.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
It is noted that the Estonian Centre Party has submitted a bill aimed at improving budget transparency, which signals a willingness for cooperation between the opposition and the coalition. The question arises: what specific forms of cooperation and reforms can actually be implemented? This underscores the importance of mutual understanding and constructive dialogue.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A constructive and critically vigilant approach to cooperation: The necessity of working with the government through obtaining answers and engaging in discussions is stressed. [The group] awaits answers from the Prime Minister and is ready for dialogue, although it will continue critical oversight based on the interests of the faction.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary emphasis is on cooperation and listening to the voice of the people; the phrase "plenty of friends at the table" points to a good, cooperative attitude, but specific methods of cooperation or limitations have not been described.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It emphasizes the necessity of a broader and more comprehensive approach (such as a stronger implementation than the draft legislation proposed by the Centre Party). Simultaneously, it critically calls for transparency regarding representation costs and is prepared to cooperate, provided there are other binding proposals for a wider and fairer solution; it indicates a willingness for consensus, but fails to present concrete cooperation initiatives.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The text indicates a willingness to cooperate with the coalition by enhancing the transparency of draft legislation. However, the coalition's decisions—and the votes taken in committees—have been critically questioned. [The entity/party] is prepared to utilize parliamentary mechanisms (such as introducing bills and initiating debate) to achieve fiscal savings and greater transparency, but insists on receiving written explanations and responses.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Factional Approach: emphasizes cooperation with experts and colleagues and the necessity of listening to specialists, but simultaneously maintains a strictly oppositional stance, and the expression of any opinion favoring cooperation is limited. It refers to co-creative consultation but does not demonstrate a broader partnership with other political parties.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The regulation calls for cross-factional cooperation and a willingness to accept good proposals; it is emphasized that focus must remain on the common goal—transparency and clarity for the voter. The need is raised to agree on and evaluate compromises, provided they would increase transparency.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Seeks cooperation with both colleagues and various stakeholders: cooperation with the Central Union of Employers is mentioned, along with a recommendation to involve members of the Finance Committee in organizing an extraordinary session. It shows a willingness to find common ground and involve other party members in the name of compromise. Also described is the desire for the committee to appoint a spokesperson, which indicates a cooperative approach to finding solutions.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Not enough data.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The address positions itself as a cooperative Member of Parliament, stressing that all ideas and proposed amendments must be submitted in preparation for the second reading, and is open to collaboration across various coalitions and factions. It demonstrates a willingness to listen to and engage others, while simultaneously standing firmly by its core tenets and emphasizing solutions that must be pursued collectively.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Seeks cooperation and a broad-based coalition: emphasizes that they do not support halting the bill and wishes to involve other factions with their proposals; ready to add amendments and seek common ground.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Even though the speaker references both the coalition partners and the opposition (citing examples like the bank tax bill and platform taxation issues), the overall tone adopted by the faction he represents remains primarily oppositional. It is pointed out that the coalition partners and the Social Democrats hold differing views regarding support for certain options. Alternative taxes (specifically the bank tax) are proposed, and it is stressed that the focus of cooperation needs to be shifted. While the faction’s stance on collaboration is critical, they also demonstrate a willingness to engage in debates and put forward alternative solutions.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
While the role of partners and the need to understand their wishes are emphasized, the overall experience tends to be critical, raising questions regarding oversight and clarification. It acknowledges the nature of coalition cooperation (partners, shifting priorities), but fails to identify concrete opportunities for cooperation or pathways toward near-term reconciliation; instead focusing on questions raised to ensure parliamentary accountability and clarification.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It is noticeable that the speeches express a desire for cooperation with all parties, including the executive branch, in order to find solutions (e.g., the discussion regarding the future of Tartu Agro and legislative cooperation). They seek open debate and cooperation between different factions, emphasizing the shared goal of finding sensible solutions. However, this willingness to participate in partnerships is balanced by criticism, contingent on the results being demonstrably beneficial.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Efforts toward inclusion have been raised, but practical cooperation seems limited. The text calls for the necessity of a "cooperative society" and inclusive dialogue, yet simultaneously, the rhetoric directed at the coalition is often critical and confrontational. The overall tone indicates a demand for value-based collaboration, but specific opportunities for cooperation have not been outlined.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
Taking a critical, yet potentially cooperation-seeking stance. It acknowledges that Isamaa and the Centre Party are "getting closer," but emphasizes the need for broader inclusion and receptiveness to cooperation. At the same time, it is prepared to stand firm on its position and monitor decisions made concerning welfare and social policy. It encourages finding consensus but does not show a clear readiness for complete submission to the coalition.
2024-11-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
A distinctly collegial style: the address refers to a colleague by name (Kalle) and solicits his opinion. It demonstrates a willingness for discussion and collaboration regarding the precise implementation and oversight of the draft bill.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Demonstrates a willingness for cooperation and compromise: proposing that the draft legislation could be handled jointly in the committee, and stressing the necessity of finding consensus between the opposition and the coalition. It leverages the theme of cooperation, such as the potential for collaboration, to discuss alternative names, and seeks dialogue with the respected officials.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
This indicates the necessity of involving stakeholders in the process and preparing for cabinet discussion. It is critical that none of the participants were engaged in the earlier stage. While a clear starting point for collaboration is not presented, the text strongly emphasizes the need for a cooperative discussion.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
It emphasizes the need for broad-based cooperation: a "cross-parliamentary" agreement spanning both the coalition and the opposition. It recommends cooperation between the parliaments of the Baltic States, and even potential joint work with Lithuania on Rail Baltic issues. It also seeks cooperation with the special anti-corruption committee and the involvement of various parliamentary factions.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It focuses on control, accountability, and emphasizing public notification; direct cooperation or joint proposals are not indicated, but the transparency of institutions and the opening of debate are stressed. Coalition or partnership-based solutions are not the primary focus, although the synergy of different forces and mutual discussion are mentioned.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The initiative by the Centre Party (lowering VAT on food) is referenced at the level of studies and drafts, but precise forms of cooperation and the details of broader cross-party agreements are not mentioned. Thus, the appropriate note is: details regarding the forms of cooperation are absent, but the party initiative has been noted.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The focus is placed on the expectation of previous commitments and the involvement of ministries, yet specific forms of cooperation or compromise measures are not presented. It indicates that all ministries should act diligently, but does not put forward precise cooperation strategies or mechanisms.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The confrontational style of cooperation focuses on government accountability and honest answers; obtaining direct answers is the priority. It contains few direct signs of potential for cooperation or compromise, emphasizing parliamentary control and scrutinized responses.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Emphasizing an inclusive approach: all ministers are called upon to follow Lauri's example and present their draft legislation in an open discussion. Readiness is demonstrated for cooperation and fostering dialogue between the coalition and the opposition, stressing that the best solutions are found through transparent explanations and shared objectives. Furthermore, it is noted that cooperation is essential even when dealing with critical issues.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
It references colleagues' discussions and transcripts, but stresses the role of oversight and accountability; it raises questions for the cabinet, instead of demonstrating a clear willingness for broad cooperation.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation and cross-party support in advancing the discussion on the bank tax; emphasizes the bill submitted by the Centre Party faction and the previously or repeatedly promised support from other factions. Simultaneously, he/she calls for broad participation and stresses solidarity among all members of the Riigikogu; showing a pragmatic approach rooted in repeated collaboration.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Demonstrates readiness for bipolar and multilateral cooperation; is willing to cooperate and seeks solutions through inter-factional collaboration (the joint statement mentioned between the leaders of EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party). Assumes and promotes constructive dialogue and topics that should be addressed jointly (the crisis of democracy, issues to be discussed jointly).
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Seeks cooperation and broader consensus: calls on all members of the Riigikogu to support the statement; presents the idea of a bank tax as an accessible compromise for coalition partners, and emphasizes the need to jointly develop better and more transparent solutions.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The text lacks sufficient contextual information regarding specific cooperation or involvement; instead, more reflective and controlling questions are posed, and emphasis is placed on the oversight of institutional responsibility. Opportunities for cooperation or a fundamental cooperative stance with partners have not been clearly demonstrated.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The text notes characteristic factional unity and organizational cooperation, but fails to clearly indicate broader bipartisanship. It is mentioned that faction representatives were given the floor, but clear references to active cooperation across party lines are absent. The focus is on internal unity and the objective of gradually eliminating the need for compromise.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Less cooperative and pragmatically critical: highlights the government's working style and demands answers and clarity; suggests that ministers do not fully grasp all subjects and that cooperation is lacking; does not appear ready for immediate compromises, emphasizing the signaled rejection and the strength of the opposition's position.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Not enough data.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The cooperation version remains modest; it does not describe active partnership activities or coalition cooperation. The reference to "ministry statements" indicates some alignment with the positions of other government agencies, but a practical vision for cooperation is not presented.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Although the main tone is critical, a certain willingness to cooperate is noted: the interplay of the polemical positions held by the Social Democrats and the coalition is mentioned (e.g., the bank tax, economic issues). The speech refers to the need for “debates” and jointly discussing certain political directions, but emphasizes that the coalition adheres to the policies of the Reform Party, and cooperation is limited regarding specific alternative solutions. It demonstrates a certain openness to an approach that is intertwined but primarily directed toward the opposition.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
It indicates a certain readiness for discussion and potential cooperation (e.g., regarding the lowering of VAT on food), but simultaneously highlights the coalition's internal disagreements and divergent views. It points to opportunities for cooperation and discussion with the minister, while maintaining a critical stance toward the government coalition.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Engagement and Discussion Style: the speaker seeks to promote dialogue, directly asks for the prime minister's position, and emphasizes that cooperation and discussion in foreign policy are essential. The speaker refers to the need for a clear and unified response and shows readiness to continue cooperation if a firm direction is established. At the same time, there is a critical tone that compels the government to better explain its position.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There isn't enough data.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes parliamentary oversight and the involvement of committees when deviating from decisions, referencing the discussions held by the Foreign Affairs Committee. While there is no clear example of extensive joint drafting of proposals, there is a reflected readiness to involve the committee in the discussions. This demonstrates a desire to improve cooperation through the mechanism of oversight and debate.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Critical and largely oppositional regarding cooperation. It points to the coordination round and differing opinions, but does not demonstrate a broad willingness to compromise. Recommendations and proposed amendments are viewed through the context of assessments and the preservation of one's own decision.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation at both the national and international levels: citing the NATO and 2% of GDP targets as a cross-party decision; emphasizing the need to follow the example of other member states. It also stresses the necessity of cooperating with local municipalities, being prepared to discuss allocations and compile analyses to avoid litigation regarding expenditures.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
A predominantly oppositional and critical tone; cooperation is not overly emphasized. The need for dialogue between the coalition and the opposition is referenced only in the context where the bank tax issue could potentially affect the broader coalition. When cooperation is mentioned, it is conditional and rooted in political antagonism.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The focus is on engaging factions and interest groups; it demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and potential receptiveness to certain amendments, but remains firmly opposed to the current form of the draft bill. It states that the party plans to reject the draft law supplementing the Subsoil Act during the first reading, signaling a response to the point of tension between the coalition and the opposition.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
Seeks active cooperation with Narva city authorities and local governments; emphasizes readiness to share resources, including financial aid, and to make agreements with the private sector (bus routes). It shows openness to compromises and finding informal solutions for better organization of activities taking place at the border.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Emphasizes cooperation with the involvement of committees and ministers; demonstrates a readiness to find consensus through substantive discussion.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Demonstrates readiness for cooperation and engagement: calling on the coalition to review the matter, promising to submit amendments (amendment proposals for the first reading), and take the legal analysis into account. At the same time, it maintains a strong backbone in its fundamental opposition and seeks to find compromises that do not lead to the implementation of the car tax.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
He urged his colleagues to jointly adopt the bill—a move that was a direct invitation for the coalition and others to raise objections. This demonstrates a clear willingness to cooperate across party lines, but the ultimate goal is to limit the bill's impact on citizens.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
The stance is primarily critical and anti-coalition, with limited scope for cooperation. It points to another faction (the Center Party) as aligning with the opposition's viewpoints, but generally does not emphasize new avenues for cooperation, focusing instead on confrontation with the coalition.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
He/She expresses readiness for cooperation with colleagues who have raised important issues, and emphasizes the need to involve specialists and conduct thorough analyses. He/She demonstrates an understanding that good results require sustainable cooperation and is willing to engage in compromise.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speakers emphasize cooperation and broad-based consensus: the goal is to involve diplomats, representatives of ministries, allies, and think tanks, and to organize an extended discussion. This demonstrates a readiness for compromise and multilateral dialogue among the various factions.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The desire for cooperation with colleagues and a broad-based discussion is clearly evident: colleagues are being called upon to think and jointly find the best solution, alongside an effort to shift the commission's decision in a positive direction. Several requests are being put forward for conducting votes, and the necessity of working closely together and coordinating the subsequent steps is being stressed.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No significant references to cooperation or compromise were provided; the emphasis is on confrontation and criticism. A limited or insufficient connection with colleagues and the coalition was noted, focusing on oppositional rhetoric.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Although representing the opposition, [the individual/group] shows a certain willingness to cooperate: they wish the Finance Committee would discuss the issues and involve colleagues more broadly. However, the tone remains critical, and attention is drawn to the fact that cooperation must involve debate and ultimately pave the way for the adoption of draft legislation.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Emphasis is placed on cooperation, consensus-building, and parliamentary oversight as tools of diplomacy. No specific joint proposals were presented, but the necessity of dialogue and a coordinated approach in foreign policy is stressed. Diplomacy and talks with the government are utilized as tools to achieve mutual understanding.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Emphasizes dialogue with entrepreneurs and is ready for cooperation and seeking compromises, but does not support the current draft bill. It seeks broader cooperation between parliament and the private sector and the development of a clear, transparent plan.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Critical, but open to dialogue: questions are being raised, and the government and members of the Riigikogu are being called upon to review their decisions and continue the discussion; the necessity of reviewing funding and policies, and cooperating to find future solutions, is stressed, but no specific cooperation agreements or joint actions are being highlighted. The discussion is primarily focused on oversight and rectification.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Emphasizes close cooperation between allies, the European Union, and member states; promotes a concerted and coordinated approach and indispensable consensus at the EU level before the adoption of aggressive measures. Takes strong meddiy "coosto" and compromise as a central priority.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
It demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, emphasizing "our proposal" and "Let us jointly task the government," and presents its own draft bill, yet ultimately maintains its specific partisan position; it seeks every opportunity for coalition involvement but remains committed to the direction of its own draft.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The importance of cooperation and the willingness to cooperate have been highlighted: discussions, a communication plan, and finding balance among various stakeholders are recommended. This demonstrates a readiness to engage and consult, and to avoid polarization.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
This approach demonstrates a readiness for a pause and consultation (recess, council of elders) as well as the preparation of a communication strategy; it expresses a global and cooperative principle, but is relatively skeptical regarding the steps concerning the adoption of the *vissu* bill.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Announces cooperation with colleagues, referencing "good colleague Anastassia," and calling for the motor vehicle tax not to be implemented; emphasizes the need to find funding through a bank tax, demonstrates a willingness to cooperate to influence the broader coalition and seek compromises, but simultaneously stresses their critical position.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Stresses adherence to rules and proper procedure within the Riigikogu; demonstrates a willingness to engage in debate with the opposing side, but is often critical of coalition initiatives. It highlights that the opposition has correctly submitted its proposals and emphasizes the need for oversight and transparency, rather than vague, unconditional cooperation.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
Seeks cooperation and discussion with various parties: mentions the proposals put forward by the Centre Party and is ready to review and integrate them into a comprehensive program. Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and seek common solutions at the parliamentary level.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Mentions alignment with colleague Mart and reflects a readiness to implement the proposed alternatives and flexible solutions. Shows willingness to cooperate (e.g., “I also agree with Mart”) and desires a bipartisan, practice-based approach to energy policy; questioning regarding the issue of football halls, but without strong opposition.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Demonstrates willingness to cooperate in discussions with the government and readiness to receive clarifications; uses questions to advance the discussion and verify the methodology.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The subject demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, repeatedly submits proposals, and seeks the government's favor. He/She stresses the necessity of considering the government's vision and remains prepared to continue collaborating with competitors or colleagues to advance food and energy policy. This approach stems from a measured willingness to cooperate, yet simultaneously underscores the importance of firm objectives and intervention.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The approach demonstrated is informative and communicative regarding other political parties, referencing discussions with the Centre Party and stressing the necessity of cooperation and transparency (including the submission of an interpellation for oversight). Although the tone is critical, the emphasis remains firmly on dialogue and opportunities for bipartisan collaboration.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Open discussion and a readiness to continue and incorporate other formats; emphasis is placed on streamlining administrative processes and fostering cooperation with both internal and external partners (Nordic countries, southern neighbors) in network development. The speaker demonstrates a desire to include various stakeholders and seek solutions through consensus and multi-format deliberation.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It calls upon the coalition to listen to and consider proposals (e.g., concerning a bank tax, and specifically, avoiding the further increase of the general tax burden). It does not rule out cooperation, but emphasizes that solutions must be transparent, open to discussion, and inclusive of diverse opinions. It refers to historical experiences and challenges as the foundational basis for establishing cooperation.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
They reference their own draft legislation and the coalition's draft, indicating a willingness to cooperate, but simultaneously stress the necessity for quicker action. They are open to dialogue, yet use continuous pressure to facilitate cooperation at an accelerated pace.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Constructive and collaborative: presents a concrete proposal (directing additional revenue from CO2 quotas to Narva) and seeks the government’s opinion, demonstrating readiness for dialogue and cooperation between various stakeholders.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Not enough data.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
It references the Association of Cities and Rural Municipalities and other stakeholders as a cooperation channel that is attentive to their will, yet fails to outline specific collaborative activities or coalitions. The text highlights the need for dialogue and suggests that cooperation is grounded in continuous attention to existing issues (such as road funding), though the specific format of this cooperation remains undescribed.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Moving toward inclusive collaboration: the emphasis is placed on the necessity of involving local governments, communities, and both local and international experts; the objective is a broad-based discussion leading to consensus. An open, multifaceted dialogue is sought between coalitions and colleagues.