By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Although the main tone is critical, a certain willingness to cooperate is noted: the interplay of the polemical positions held by the Social Democrats and the coalition is mentioned (e.g., the bank tax, economic issues). The speech refers to the need for “debates” and jointly discussing certain political directions, but emphasizes that the coalition adheres to the policies of the Reform Party, and cooperation is limited regarding specific alternative solutions. It demonstrates a certain openness to an approach that is intertwined but primarily directed toward the opposition.

It indicates a certain readiness for discussion and potential cooperation (e.g., regarding the lowering of VAT on food), but simultaneously highlights the coalition's internal disagreements and divergent views. It points to opportunities for cooperation and discussion with the minister, while maintaining a critical stance toward the government coalition.

Engagement and Discussion Style: the speaker seeks to promote dialogue, directly asks for the prime minister's position, and emphasizes that cooperation and discussion in foreign policy are essential. The speaker refers to the need for a clear and unified response and shows readiness to continue cooperation if a firm direction is established. At the same time, there is a critical tone that compels the government to better explain its position.

There isn't enough data.

The speaker emphasizes parliamentary oversight and the involvement of committees when deviating from decisions, referencing the discussions held by the Foreign Affairs Committee. While there is no clear example of extensive joint drafting of proposals, there is a reflected readiness to involve the committee in the discussions. This demonstrates a desire to improve cooperation through the mechanism of oversight and debate.

Insufficient data.

Critical and largely oppositional regarding cooperation. It points to the coordination round and differing opinions, but does not demonstrate a broad willingness to compromise. Recommendations and proposed amendments are viewed through the context of assessments and the preservation of one's own decision.

Demonstrates readiness for cooperation at both the national and international levels: citing the NATO and 2% of GDP targets as a cross-party decision; emphasizing the need to follow the example of other member states. It also stresses the necessity of cooperating with local municipalities, being prepared to discuss allocations and compile analyses to avoid litigation regarding expenditures.

A predominantly oppositional and critical tone; cooperation is not overly emphasized. The need for dialogue between the coalition and the opposition is referenced only in the context where the bank tax issue could potentially affect the broader coalition. When cooperation is mentioned, it is conditional and rooted in political antagonism.

The focus is on engaging factions and interest groups; it demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and potential receptiveness to certain amendments, but remains firmly opposed to the current form of the draft bill. It states that the party plans to reject the draft law supplementing the Subsoil Act during the first reading, signaling a response to the point of tension between the coalition and the opposition.

Seeks active cooperation with Narva city authorities and local governments; emphasizes readiness to share resources, including financial aid, and to make agreements with the private sector (bus routes). It shows openness to compromises and finding informal solutions for better organization of activities taking place at the border.

Emphasizes cooperation with the involvement of committees and ministers; demonstrates a readiness to find consensus through substantive discussion.