By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Active participation in the plenary sessions of the full assembly, focusing on the budget debate. In the address, they promise to continue the debate for several months and for Green leaders to participate, stating, "we are processing this budget," thereby hinting at a substantive discussion and potential amendments. This represents a single speech delivered (2024-09-26) and demonstrates a plan to participate in the ongoing discussion throughout the entire procedure.

Actively participates in multiple speeches during the same sitting; represents the Centre Faction and consistently voices criticism against the coalition on several issues. The text reflects sequential participation and the repeated presentation of these topics during a single plenary sitting.

The subject matter of both addresses falls within the scope of the information hour held on September 25, 2024; the ongoing topics are foreign policy and the UN resolution. The speaker references the previous information hour and consistently raises questions regarding the Prime Minister’s stance, thereby demonstrating regular attention and follow-up within the broader governmental discussion. A persistent pattern of inquiries and debates on foreign policy issues is emerging.

Insufficient data

Three speeches were held during the plenary session on the same day (September 23, 2024), centering on the foreign policy review and oversight matters. The speaker referenced the role of the committees and the necessity of participating in debates before decisions are made, characterizing parliamentary oversight as an ongoing practice. Furthermore, he/she cited current events (the UN vote, the location of the embassy) as catalysts for this discussion.

Insufficient data.

Actively participated in the plenary sessions on 18.09.2024, presenting several comments within the same context, and highlighted the need for additional time (three minutes) and a floor vote. Repeatedly referenced the coordination cycle and the divergence of discussions, demonstrating long-term persistence on the energy topic.

Appearances during the Question Hour are regular and frequent: multiple speeches are given on the same day, and the main topics covered are taxation, budget balance, and social spending. He/She consistently references analyses and requests specific economic indicators and impact forecasts (2025–2026) from the government. A recurring tactic is the question, "Where are the materials and analysis?" along with recommendations for presenting allocations and tables to local stakeholders.

They appear at Riigikogu plenary sessions and are capable of addressing both ministers and colleagues; arguing with figures and emphasizing limits is standard practice; they have garnered significant attention due to their critical and direct style. Oddly, specific time periods (2022, 2020–2022) are also mentioned, as is experience gained in the context of three-hour-long discussions.

The core unit's high level of involvement in numerous speeches on the same topic during a single day demonstrates frequent participation in plenary sessions and sustained criticism of the draft bill. Emphasis is placed on the importance of consultation rounds and the inclusion of interest groups. Specific companies are referenced, and alternative measures are proposed (e.g., rejecting the bill during the first reading). This indicates persistent activism and a unified position across the faction.

Not enough data

Delivers two speeches on the same day; emphasizes the parliamentary work process and the role of committees; refers to previous decisions and their shortcomings.