By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The focus is at the national level, addressing national tax and social policy issues. There is no defined regional concentration, and references to specific counties or regional projects are absent. The main emphasis lies on budgetary and tax policy decisions occurring at the national level.

It clearly focuses attention on regional policy and the welfare of rural areas; it highlights regional inequality and the intractable divide between the "two Estonias." Specific examples include the disparity between Southeast Estonia and the Tallinn-Harju region, as well as general regional economic gaps.

The greatest attention is focused on international ideas and decisions, specifically: the UN, the Israel-Palestine issue, and the foreign policies of the USA, the European Union, Germany, and Great Britain. Regional domestic Estonian issues are not directly addressed; instead, the focus is on the global context and the positions of our allies.

Insufficient data.

The focus is international, not domestic. Georgia, China, Jerusalem, the UN, and Middle East politics are mentioned, which demonstrates a broad geographical scope and the context of international diplomacy. At the core is the coordination of Estonian foreign policy on global issues.

National level; no regional references.

Focus on Regional Impact at Sea and on Islands: emphasizes the interests of island residents and fishermen who may lose or see changes to their jobs due to offshore wind farms. It notes the importance of protecting the marine environment and fisheries, and intensifies focus on local communities.

At the national level, the discussion centers on budget, tax, and social policy; regionally, however, no data is provided regarding specific regional focuses. While the financing and concerns of local governments are mentioned, the central emphasis remains on the nationwide and international context.

A national/state-level focus; there is no separate regional emphasis or specific regional projects.

The analyses are comprehensive and focus on the national economy and the development of sectors (e.g., the chemical industry, the circular economy); Viru Keemia Grupp and Kiviõli Keemiatööstus are cited as influential factors in the coordination paper, and the discussion covers the impact of these companies' long-term plans. A clear agenda concerning the local region is absent; the focus is maintained on the national context and sector-based interests.

The focus is on the city of Narva and the mitigation of the situation occurring at the border. Emphasis is placed on the local context and the role of local resources and infrastructure.

Insufficient data.