By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Emphasizing an inclusive approach: all ministers are called upon to follow Lauri's example and present their draft legislation in an open discussion. Readiness is demonstrated for cooperation and fostering dialogue between the coalition and the opposition, stressing that the best solutions are found through transparent explanations and shared objectives. Furthermore, it is noted that cooperation is essential even when dealing with critical issues.

It references colleagues' discussions and transcripts, but stresses the role of oversight and accountability; it raises questions for the cabinet, instead of demonstrating a clear willingness for broad cooperation.

Demonstrates readiness for cooperation and cross-party support in advancing the discussion on the bank tax; emphasizes the bill submitted by the Centre Party faction and the previously or repeatedly promised support from other factions. Simultaneously, he/she calls for broad participation and stresses solidarity among all members of the Riigikogu; showing a pragmatic approach rooted in repeated collaboration.

Demonstrates readiness for bipolar and multilateral cooperation; is willing to cooperate and seeks solutions through inter-factional collaboration (the joint statement mentioned between the leaders of EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party). Assumes and promotes constructive dialogue and topics that should be addressed jointly (the crisis of democracy, issues to be discussed jointly).

Seeks cooperation and broader consensus: calls on all members of the Riigikogu to support the statement; presents the idea of a bank tax as an accessible compromise for coalition partners, and emphasizes the need to jointly develop better and more transparent solutions.

The text lacks sufficient contextual information regarding specific cooperation or involvement; instead, more reflective and controlling questions are posed, and emphasis is placed on the oversight of institutional responsibility. Opportunities for cooperation or a fundamental cooperative stance with partners have not been clearly demonstrated.

The text notes characteristic factional unity and organizational cooperation, but fails to clearly indicate broader bipartisanship. It is mentioned that faction representatives were given the floor, but clear references to active cooperation across party lines are absent. The focus is on internal unity and the objective of gradually eliminating the need for compromise.

Less cooperative and pragmatically critical: highlights the government's working style and demands answers and clarity; suggests that ministers do not fully grasp all subjects and that cooperation is lacking; does not appear ready for immediate compromises, emphasizing the signaled rejection and the strength of the opposition's position.

Not enough data.

The cooperation version remains modest; it does not describe active partnership activities or coalition cooperation. The reference to "ministry statements" indicates some alignment with the positions of other government agencies, but a practical vision for cooperation is not presented.