By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The presenter demonstrates knowledge of the budget structure, specifically mentioning “activity-based budgeting” and expenditures categorized by program. Specific issues are highlighted (the costs of Rail Baltic, the poor readability of page numbering which makes tracking difficult) as well as the impact on Ülle Madise’s stance, illustrating the application of both technical and legal considerations. The overall impression is that the speaker engages with and utilizes economic and budgetary discourse, emphasizing the necessity for clarity and control in funding.

He demonstrates an understanding of taxation and public finances, citing research conducted by Turuuuringute AS and referencing the budget procedure. He poses specific questions regarding the future of taxes and service charges, demanding concrete commitments extending until 2028. This touches upon issues related to the regional economy and the accessibility of services, thereby showcasing financial and economic competence.

It discusses the taxation of banks, the impact of Euribor, and the regulation of the financial sector, utilizing specific data points (such as the 41% share of consumption taxes in the state budget) and references to the European Central Bank's monetary policy. It highlights the regulatory background and the connections between bank profits and the costs of servicing loans, demonstrating economic insight within a wider context. The illustrative reference to Scandinavian lending behavior and loan-related payment discipline suggests a profound grasp of the subjects.

The crucial theme revolves around care and elderly services, the financing of local municipalities, and the cost implications arising from legal requirements and financial distribution (Supreme Court, in the context of judicial rulings). It brings forward specific figures (the 2025 share of consumption taxes) and draws comparisons between regions/countries (Lithuania, Finland, Latvia). The detailed economic analysis concentrates on the effects of care expenses, the budget, and changes in taxation.

It uses data from history and economics: mentioning approximately 200,000 Crimean Tatars during the deportation and a 47% mortality rate, as well as the share of consumption tax in GDP (9.2%) and in total tax revenue (about 41%). It presents the 2025–2026 budget figures (6.5 billion, or 2.5 billion related to taxes) and discusses exactly where the money will be directed.

The demonstration concerning central finances uses specific data regarding the budget and losses (540 claims, approximately 3 million euros in the first example year; 270 claims and 1.5 million euros in losses) and refers to legislative changes (Draft Bill 507, the Family Benefits Act, explanatory memorandum page 16). It demonstrates knowledge of healthcare financing (Health Insurance Fund deficit), budgetary policy, and the potential impacts of tax policy.

Includes strong data-driven argumentation: refers to the distribution shares in the explanatory memorandum (households 74.9%, construction 3.2%, business/public services 14.5%, other 7.4%). Poses questions and highlights who will bear the greatest burden from the tax increase. Adequate economic or tax analytical background, relying on documents and calculations.

Addresses the budgetary and economic impacts: It refers to the 2026 budget position (€−224.6 million) and the additional €51.4 million generated by the draft bill, which would increase the deficit (€−195.4 million). Specific figures are cited (1.3 million people, 1.85 million doctor visits, 130,000 hospital bed-day fees, ~900,000 prescription fees) and reference is made to page 16 of the explanatory memorandum concerning the inadequacy of the substantive impact of the draft bill. It notes the economic phrasing and relevant data to justify the opposition.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of agricultural and regional policy, including issues of subsidies and competition within the European Union, and addresses the impact of taxes on agriculture. He specifically highlights the long-term lease agreement (Tartu Agro) and the question of its sustainability, as well as topics concerning the organization of land improvement works and public auctions. Furthermore, he mentions the EU's decision regarding additional tariffs on electric vehicles originating from China, demonstrating a broader contextual awareness for political discussion.

The text utilizes data based on the Telia report: 2023 net profit of €63 million, turnover of €384 million, with profit constituting approximately 20% of turnover. It also mentions all revenues and the cost metric, including the volume of investments for 2023–2021 (€54.5 million, €60.5 million, €53 million). The report highlights the analysis of investment trends and EBIT (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) of €135.8 million, demonstrating the robustness of the financial analysis. There is a clear focus on the context of the financial data and capital utilization.