By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Cooperative and dialogue-oriented; expressing a wish to speak with the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee before the vote, and ready to discuss matters collaboratively.

Not enough data

Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with the private sector: a recommendation to engage directly with businesses and offer solutions on how to bring companies and capital into Estonia; it emphasizes the necessity of partnership and pragmatic solutions for economic revitalization.

Seeking broader networking and cross-party cooperation against the draft bill, they invite two or three members of the Reform Party and Eesti 200 to submit an objection. They demonstrate a willingness to compromise and establish a non-political common ground, but simultaneously explicitly support the critical position of their party and the coalition.

It demonstrates a willingness to cooperate across different factions (Isamaa, Reformierakond, Keskerakond) and stresses that the criticism transcends the boundaries of partisanship. The necessity of a joint, comprehensive discussion and corresponding analysis is emphasized.

Seeks broad support (to jointly file a motion of no confidence); refers to other parliamentary groups (the Center Party, Eesti 200) and hopes they will join. At the same time, it notes that the Reform Party did not participate in the discussion, which indicates formal and limited cooperation; emphasizes the necessity of a unified counter-move against the government.

The stance on co-involvement and the potential for compromise is contradictory, yet simultaneously, a readiness for cooperation is evident: the faction has submitted numerous amendments and has actively sought to contribute to the improvement of the draft legislation. It emphasizes the necessity of considering the viewpoints of various factions, but it establishes the scope and conditions of its own proposals as key criteria. Consequently, it may be hesitant to find compromises if these criteria are not taken into consideration.

Parliamentary readiness for cooperation is limited, but the need to utilize procedural instruments (extraordinary session, interpellations) is emerging. Some multiparty conflict and mutual counter-arguments are noted, but there are no concrete signs regarding entry into coalitions; cooperation is primarily procedural and critical, rather than long-term bipartisan interaction.

It demonstrates a readiness to provide guidance to the government and share expert opinions, focusing on cooperation within the large frameworks of "us" and "the government." It does not emphasize direct, widespread bipartisanship or formal coalition agreements, but stresses that expert advice and analysis must be taken into consideration. It likely favors constructive criticism coupled with the presentation of practical solutions.

Not enough data

A collaborative and dialogue-oriented approach: emphasizes the necessity of cooperation among aviation operators, local governments, and the Minister in order to open new routes and enhance connectivity. The recommendations include reaching out to Ryanair and holding meetings with other airlines to expand Tallinn Airport's international reach. He/She also demonstrates a willingness to involve other colleagues and various government departments.