By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Not enough data.

The economic viewpoints center on the question of the stability of tax policy: there is opposition to permanent tax regulation, and it is argued that the burden on vulnerable individuals is increasing. Emphasis is placed on solving basic livelihood problems (a critique of the "solidarity" ethics often characteristic of political speeches). Furthermore, the necessity of regulating the quick loan market and the importance of consumer protection have been highlighted; all of this points to criticism of the coalition policy implemented by the Reform Party and Eesti 200.

The critical stance towards state green subsidies and the government's role in energy policy is based on economic indicators; emphasis is placed on price volatility within Nord Pool and the need to move away from subsidies. A market-based approach is desired, along with the involvement of companies in attracting investments and the better direction of state money to draw in Estonian businesses and capital.

Economic considerations are highlighted: questions are raised concerning the lifetime cost of creating and maintaining the data warehouse, and the origin of the sources; there is no support for cuts or praise for economic benefits, but rather an emphasis on potential costs and the uncertainty of budgetary support. While no clear pro- or anti-economic platform is articulated, the criticism focuses on cost accounting and budget subsidies.

The relevant economic perspective is critical: the draft legislation will lead to price increases and tax burdens, highlighting a reduction in consumer purchasing power and a rise in consumer prices. It also references TOT and unbalanced financial analysis, concluding that the cumulative burden of taxes and waste management costs will negatively impact the economy.

Criticism regarding the absence of economic impact data and assessments; emphasizes the necessity of demonstrating direct profit and revenue flowing into the state budget. The cost-effectiveness of the narratives is questioned (specifically, balancing tourism revenue against detention costs), and it is stressed that the impact on the state budget must be clearly quantified. Highlights the requirement for economic figures and impact analysis before proceeding with major decisions.

The economic approach is conservative, focusing on cost control and resisting tax hikes. This involves opposing tax increases, emphasizing the reduction of bureaucracy, and cutting budgetary spending. They advocate for lowering the VAT on food (a point specifically highlighted by the party/speaker), abolishing kindergarten fees, and criticizing the overall tax structure and the redistribution of subsidies. In energy policy, a critical view is presented regarding the green transition and the ENMAK bill, highlighting market volatility and the imbalance of investments.

A critical assessment of economic policy focuses on the tax burden, inflation, and the cost of living. The opposition emphasizes that while the tax curve is decreasing, its impact does not fully offset the combined effects of inflation and consumption taxes. They prioritize structural reforms, support measures in family and social policy, and economic stability. The rise in prices and the burden placed on the poor are highlighted as the government's responsibility, coupled with a call to strengthen economic competitiveness by ensuring transparency and the rule of law.

Tax policy must be sustainable, and consumption-based taxation should be reformed; the tax policy currently under discussion is increasing inflation and burdening the poor and middle-income individuals. It is argued that economic growth appeared to materialize thanks to the car tax, but the actual impact on the real economy is negative. The speaker prefers an energy-inspired approach but criticizes the lack of sustainability in the green energy direction and wishes to focus on oil shale and consider a nuclear power plant, which requires thorough analysis. Recommendations include investments in high technology and higher education, as well as the restructuring of the economy through retraining. The balance between fiscal discipline and growth is at the heart of the priorities.

Not enough data.

Crucial from an economic standpoint is infrastructure that facilitates economic activity and the establishment of commercial flight routes, alongside increasing real jobs and tax revenue through the aviation sector. At the same time, emphasis is placed on the sustainability of funding and the transparency of costs; road investments are shown at a sub-risk level, and increasing teacher salaries is difficult to achieve; the necessity of balancing economic growth and costs is emphasized.