By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Participation is active and takes the form of brief, focused remarks; he/she requests a recess and emphasizes the expectation of conducting negotiations with the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee.

The speeches were delivered during the same day (2025-06-18) and are part of the plenary session; several speeches include direct addresses to the Chair, colleagues, and the internet broadcast, emphasizing the temporal context of the dialogue. A recurring theme is criticism and demands for faster decisions, along with references to previous statements and rulings.

No data available

They actively participated in the plenary debates that day; submitted several short statements, and addressed the rapporteur and the commission directly. A plan was noted to take breaks for consultations with the coalition (a 10-minute recess) and to seek opportunities for opposition, referencing potential cooperation with other political parties.

Direct participation in a single plenary session on the same day (16.06.2025). The chronological sequence of several interventions included: questions to the minister, detailed criticism, and mutual clarifications. Reference was made to the ideas of leaders of other factions, and the necessity of a joint and multi-component response was underscored. Regular supplementary commentary and objections will follow the series of joint debates.

Active participation in the same plenary session, asking several questions and making lengthy interventions, requesting additional time on the record ("three extra minutes"). The primary criticism and debate focuses on raising issues with the draft legislation and the minister's activities; demonstrating continued activity regarding the motion of no confidence.

The frequency and pace of the talks are excellently defined: [the subject] participated in several extended segments of the plenary session on June 11 and 12, 2025, repeating comparisons and considering topics requiring attention. Repeated "please vote" calls were utilized, and amendments and alternatives were presented in several places, demonstrating a readiness to participate in discussions regarding procedures and setbacks. Systematic references to previous discussions and proposals indicate persistent and consistent work as a faction.

The speeches are scheduled for the same plenary session (09.06.2025), where several members of the Riigikogu represent their respective factions, and the ensuing debate is substantive and multi-faceted. Reference is made to the intention to convene an extraordinary session and introduce draft legislation and interpellations; exchanges with ministers and ministries are described, and the parliamentary mechanisms utilized (interpellations, bills, extraordinary sessions) are characterized as the primary tools.

The participant is recorded as having given two separate speeches on the same day (2025-06-05), addressing the XV Riigikogu plenary session on economic matters. The text of the addresses is characterized by a high density of facts and numerical examples, reflecting the standard presentation format used in parliamentary proceedings. The participant refers to prior debates and committee reports while proposing solutions, thereby demonstrating regular engagement in economic discussions.

He/She participated in the plenary session and raised a specific question regarding how to resolve the situation and whether the Commission has discussed potential measures.

He delivered several addresses during the same session, successively addressing various topics (aviation, Rail Baltic, roads, and traffic safety); he requested an additional three minutes for further information and follow-up. He supports the clarification of the minister's action plan, a timely response is being prepared, and he offered concrete next steps (Opening of flight routes, cooperation with Ryanair, dialogue with other airlines).