By Agendas: Züleyxa Izmailova

Total Agendas: 62

Fully Profiled: 62

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-16
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponents are the Centre Party and Estonia 200, who are sharply criticized for hypocrisy and for decisions they failed to make while in government. The Centre Party is accused of not using their time as the prime minister's party to lower the VAT on food. Estonia 200 is branded hypocritical regarding the issue of targeted subsidies.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
809 On the Future of the Climate Law

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is directed at the minister and the government's policy, which might attempt to twist scientific facts in the draft climate law to fit ideological goals. The criticism targets the fundamental principles of the policy and the content of the draft bill, especially regarding the level of emissions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-13
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opposition is directed at the government led by the Reform Party and the responsible minister, who are being criticized for inaction, unpreparedness, and failing to honor their election promises. Separately, Prime Minister Kristen Michal is criticized for reformulating RMK’s (State Forest Management Centre) expectations, a change which rendered biodiversity protection "toothless." The criticism is based on policy and procedure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-09
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main criticism is directed against the Reform Party and the government, who are accused of abandoning right-wing politics and implementing unfair tax policies. Critics point to the government’s inconsistency in supporting the reduction of the gambling tax while simultaneously opposing the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs for fear of losing budget revenue. The government is also accused of taking out an SMS loan (payday loan) and supporting the wealthy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism targets procedural obstructionists—vocal individuals who are not members of the local community but who can indefinitely stall planning processes. The criticism is aimed at those who violate procedures, not at a specific political adversary.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponent is Minister Jürgen Ligi and the government, who are being criticized for the 2026 budget deficit and unfair tax policy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of favoring the wealthiest at the expense of the poor and questioning the minister's patriotism.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-07
Interpellation concerning the unspent budget funds of the Ministry of Education and Research (No. 805)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposition is aimed at the actions of the Ministry of Education and Research, specifically criticizing the ministry's failure to utilize its budget while simultaneously implementing negatively impactful cuts. The criticism is intense, centering on administrative inefficiency and the lack of impact assessments for the reforms.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The confrontation is directed at the policies and responses of the government or the responsible minister, criticizing insufficient state funding. The criticism is policy-driven, emphasizing the systemic injustice that deprives children of quality food.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is directed at the government and the minister, who are accused of causing chaos, incompetence, and lacking ideas. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the budget deficit and the distribution of taxes favoring the wealthy, and it is intense.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
The Chancellery of the Riigikogu agreement with the law firm Sorainen OÜ: "Deregulation and nature conservation restrictions in forest management – an international comparison and proposals for Estonia."

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

The primary confrontation is directed at the Minister and the Government Office, who are being criticized for the procedure used to commission the analysis and the lack of internal trust within the ministry. The criticism is both procedural and political, casting doubt on the trustworthiness of state institutions' competence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-22
Request for information regarding the establishment of a business council and the potential conflicts of interest of its members (no. 788)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, who convened the Economic Growth Council for Entrepreneurs. The criticism is procedural and political, centered on the lack of transparency in member selection, the failure to prevent conflicts of interest, and the disregard for gender balance. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, framed as questions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
Inquiry regarding educational inequality (no. 795)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government/minister, who is being asked to provide an overview of the situation concerning students with special educational needs. The criticism is indirect and focuses on deficiencies in policy implementation or the absence of knowledge/data regarding the educational gap.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The standoff is directed against the minister and the executive branch, whose financial management practices (erroneous advance payments) are being criticized based on the findings of the State Audit Office. The criticism is procedural and focuses on administrative errors and the inability to ensure financial discipline.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the state and the government, particularly those falling under the purview of the Minister of Social Affairs. The criticism is policy- and finance-based, focusing on the state's failure to reimburse cancer treatment costs and the unfair taxation of charitable foundations. The intensity of the attack is moderate, framed as a question, but sharp in substance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry Regarding the Development of Nuclear Energy in Estonia (No. 786)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government, which is sharply criticized for a lack of focus, inconsistent policies, and the inability to deliver major projects. The criticism targets the inefficiency of the policies and the confusing messages, which are damaging the country’s reputation among investors. There is no expression of willingness to compromise; instead, the government’s systemic failure is being emphasized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-08
Inquiry regarding the government's plans to increase immigration (no. 791)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for viewing the increase of foreign labor as the primary solution while simultaneously ignoring the local unemployment crisis. The criticism is policy-driven, calling into question the rationale behind the government's plans. The speaker demands concrete steps to utilize the local workforce before opening the doors to foreign labor.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism is primarily aimed at the Riigikogu's poor organization of work (missing members, especially from the EKRE faction) and the inaction of the session chair. Strong opposition is also directed at the Prosecutor's Office's position, which questioned whether the rape constituted the infliction of health damage, demanding the resignation of the responsible prosecutors.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (630 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and the Reform Party, who are sharply criticized for shifting the responsibility of protecting citizens onto the private sector. The criticism is intense and accusatory, implying that the government is "once again defending the crooks" and has left the population unprotected.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is facing criticism both for the unsustainability of its economic policies and for breaking election promises. The criticism is intense and focuses on political failure and the avoidance of responsibility by hiding behind the autonomy of local municipalities. The attacks are policy- and performance-based, calling into question the Reform Party's economic competence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed more at the administration or procedural management (the Speaker) of the Riigikogu, rather than at political opponents. The opposition manifests as dissatisfaction with the air quality and poor ventilation in the chamber.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct opposition or personal criticism is not voiced, but the speaker challenges the effectiveness of the solution proposed by the government (the career model). The criticism is policy- and performance-based, questioning whether the draft bill can solve the shortage resulting from low salaries.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, who is facing sharp criticism for obstructing transparency and violating the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is both procedural and carries an ethical undertone, accusing the minister of impeding parliamentary oversight and withholding crucial information. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, accountability is being demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Draft Law Amending the Employment Contracts Act and Other Acts (602 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the government and the minister (Erkki Keldo), whose draft bill's content and presentation are sharply criticized. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy (reducing workers' incomes) and the minister's incompetence in responding. No willingness to compromise is apparent; rather, there is strong opposition to initiating the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government it leads, which is criticized for breaking its 2019 election promise and for making unfair tax policy decisions. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of serving narrow business interests at the expense of families with children. The pretext of funding national defense is being contrasted with the decision to lower the gambling tax.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Increasing logging in sacred sites.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The opposition is directed against the decision-making processes of the government and the prime minister, which appear to prioritize the pressure and interests of certain economic sectors. The criticism is both procedural and value-based, questioning whether the government has proceeded based on considerations that take cultural and natural values into account.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is the Minister/Ministry of Justice, who is criticized both for the substance of the policy (supporting monopolists, hindering fair competition) and for procedural errors (ignoring the opinion of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court). The criticism is intense and accusatory, hinting at dishonest motives ("why are you acting in the interests of monopolists...").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is directed at state institutions, particularly the Environmental Board, for their inability to ensure the enforcement of court decisions due to a lack of resources. The opposition is procedural and focuses on the inefficiency of the executive branch and the lack of oversight. The speaker criticizes a situation where decisions are not implemented, even though they serve to protect the environment and the public.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Establishment of Tallinn Hospital (no 762)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main adversary is the governing coalition, which is being fiercely criticized for its lack of consistency. The criticism targets the political failure to execute a strategic decision made six months ago, directly questioning what has changed. The confrontation is procedural and centers on the implementation of policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-03
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Safety of Care Homes (no. 750)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the care home operator, who failed to respond to complaints promptly. This indirectly challenges the stance of the Minister of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office, who concluded that the institution played no role in preventing the crimes.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry regarding the qualification requirements for youth workers (no. 745)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

There is too little data
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
Inquiry Regarding the Pihlakodu Case and the Prosecutor's Office Activities (no 748)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main targets of criticism are the Prosecutor's Office and Minister of Justice Liisa-Ly Pakosta. The Prosecutor's Office is sharply criticized for making assessments that conflict with the established value framework and for failing to hold the legal entity accountable. The Minister is criticized for inaction, lack of proposals, and avoiding responsibility within her administrative domain, with the situation being described as "very sad."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main adversary is the government, the Minister of Energy and Environment, and the Reform Party, who are accused of ignoring science-based decisions and serving narrow business interests. The criticism is intense and systemic, addressing both political lack of ambition and the erosion of democratic processes (the reduction of the Environmental Board, the marginalization of scientists).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Forestry

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The opposition is targeting the Prime Minister and the Minister of Energy and Environment, Andres Sutt, directly, criticizing the rationale behind the forestry framework they presented. The criticism is policy-driven, calling into question the selection of the specific 70% figure and warning that this move opens the door to further demands from the timber industry (e.g., the removal of restrictions on logging volumes).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is the Reform Party and its leadership (Kristen Michal), along with the Minister of Finance, who faces criticism for incompetence and outdated tax policies. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, questioning the opposition's ability to elevate Estonia to the status of AAA-rated nations. Opponents are further accused of setting unclear and contradictory goals.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-20
Inquiry Regarding Electrical Power Generation Capacities (No. 746)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism targets the state's inaction or inadequate support concerning the acceleration of planning and permitting processes. There is mention of stakeholders complaining that the state should offer more assistance, which points to procedural opposition against the government's current course of action.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding Estonian Environmental Policy (No. 743)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Michal’s government, who stand accused of deceiving the public and eroding democracy. The criticism is intense, alleging that the government is serving narrow business interests and granting an unfair advantage to tycoons, particularly timber industrialists connected to foreign parent companies. The opposition is both political and procedural, focusing on the lack of transparency and the weakening of oversight.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
An inquiry regarding the illegal alteration of the order of protection of natural objects (no. 738)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary adversary is "the current government," which is being criticized for the method used to adopt the logging decision. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural shortcomings (a lack of inclusion), accusing the government of presenting the public with a fait accompli.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
The Minister of Education and Research's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

No direct opposition is voiced, but the role is supervisory, with questions being posed to the minister regarding the activities and quality of support for students with special educational needs. The criticism is aimed at the expected effectiveness and the planning of activities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party, which is accused of neglecting the situation and long-term inaction in fulfilling Natura obligations since 2004. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government’s governance failures and procedural shortcomings, which have led to the necessity of avoiding infringement proceedings.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

No data available
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Gender pay gap

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The criticism is aimed at the government's action plan, questioning what measures are planned to reduce the unpaid care work gap in addition to the wage gap. The opposition is policy-based, challenging the sufficiency of the government's actions regarding the inequality of the care burden.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Conditions for Alienation of Land to the State

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the policies of the government, and specifically the party Eesti 200, accusing them of favoring logging over nature conservation (with a 70% felling rate). This criticism is politically substantive, centering on the failure to deliver promised legal certainty and the misplacement of priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The criticism is aimed at the Minister of Justice, who is held accountable for the moral conduct of the Prosecutor’s Office, and at a specific prosecutor whose viewpoint regarding the consequences of rape is unacceptable. The attack is intense and demands that the prosecutor’s continued tenure be questioned, pointing to a systemic and ethical failure.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Tax policy

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main confrontation is directed against the head of government (Prime Minister, Kristen Michal) and the administration's failure to curb rising food prices. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on the government's refusal to reduce the VAT (Value Added Tax) on foodstuffs, which is widely considered disproportionately high. The opposition also accuses the PM of being out of touch with reality ("Do you, esteemed Prime Minister, ever actually shop for groceries yourself?").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-18
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to improve migration proceedings) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the government’s plan and the commission’s representative, whose policy is being criticized as detrimental to local residents. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative economic repercussions stemming from the preferential treatment of foreigners through a lower wage threshold.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
Inquiry regarding the third year of record-low birth rates in Estonia (no. 703)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the new government’s policy, particularly its plan to increase the exploitation of natural resources and relax nature conservation restrictions. The opposition is strongly rooted in policy and fundamental models, questioning the government’s capacity to effectively address deepening crises.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and the prime minister, whose execution of bureaucracy reduction policies is being called into question. The criticism is procedural and focuses on the government's internal affairs, citing, for example, Finance Minister Ligi's difficulties in obtaining a security clearance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Draft law on accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning complaints procedures (534 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

No direct opposing group is criticized, but an indirect challenge is issued to the responsible politicians—both current and future—who have failed to address the climate crisis seriously enough. The criticism targets their inaction and the slow pace of implementing global climate measures, which only exacerbates the problem.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed more toward the misconceptions that have arisen surrounding the draft bill and the fears of colleagues regarding the easing of restrictions on working with children. The speaker categorically refutes these fears, confirming that the restrictions will remain in effect. Criticism is also aimed at systemic deficiencies, such as the growing workload of local municipalities (KOV) and the shortage of specialists.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

Neither opposing viewpoints nor groups subject to criticism are mentioned; the focus is exclusively on supporting the draft bill and highlighting its positive effects.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is actively working to debunk the misconceptions that have arisen surrounding the draft bill, particularly the fear that unsuitable individuals could gain access to jobs involving children. It is stressed that restrictions on working with children will remain in force, citing the assurances provided by colleague Eero Merilind. The criticism is directed against the erroneous understanding itself, rather than against specific political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition, which is accused of breaking an election promise and presenting an ineffective draft law on a climate-resilient economy. The criticism is both policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of irresponsibly increasing risks and delaying real measures for years. The speaker also points to a broader rhetoric that justifies minimal effort (We're doing fine as it is; let the big players make the effort!), even though Estonia leads the way in per capita pollution.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Social Welfare Act and the Value Added Tax Act (mental health services) – third reading (500 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no opposition; the speaker is focusing solely on supporting the bill and highlighting its positive aspects.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the bill's initiator and EKRE MPs, whose activities are being labeled a waste of time and resources. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political arguments (wrong priorities, substitute activities) and personal attacks (including references to the initiator's lack of a uterus). Furthermore, the opponents are accused of ignoring genuine threats, such as the environment and climate change.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at an external threat, namely the actions of Russia and the Kremlin regime, which are considered a threat to Estonia's Orthodox believers. Domestic political opponents are not criticized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

There is insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second Reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary criticism is aimed at the leaders of the Environment Committee, who are accused of restricting the right to speak and engaging in unethical behavior. Supporters of the draft bill are also being criticized regarding the quality of the legislative process (misinformation, ignoring proposed amendments) and for making the decision as a result of lobbying by one specific company. The opposition is intense and encompasses both procedural and ethical concerns.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the proponents of the draft bill and those responsible for the proceedings, faulting the superficiality and haste of the process. The opposition is procedural and centers on financial risks, demanding realistic cost projections and the correct regulatory sequence.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the ambition of the goals set out in the government's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035," but it has been presented to the minister as both a political and substantive issue. The opposition targets the low level of the objectives themselves, rather than individuals or procedures.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-20
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "On the Return to Ukraine of Children Deported by Russia" (375 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

No data available.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at European Union member states (specifically Austria) and their energy companies, who continue importing Russian gas, thereby contradicting EU objectives. The opposition is intense and politically motivated, focusing on preventing the funding of the war chest.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Water Act (346 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling