Politicians & Agendas
Track individual politicians and their participation in various agenda items. See their speeches, voting patterns, and legislative contributions.
1-10 / 101 politicians
Jaak Aab
110 agenda items
110/110 with AI summaries (100.0%)
110/110 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Jaak Aab
Email: jaak.aab@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: jaak.aab@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 20h 16m
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 20h 16m
Agenda Items:
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a matter of national importance initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, titled "Why is food expensive?" The presenters—Jana Guzanova (initiator of the popular initiative), economist Heido Vitsur, and Lauri Laats (Chairman of the Centre Party faction)—addressed the sharp rise in food prices and its social and economic impact. Guzanova emphasized that the popular initiative, which garnered a record 100,000 signatures, demonstrates the acuteness of the problem, especially among lower-income people, and criticized the government’s refusal to lower the VAT on foodstuffs (which stands at 24% in Estonia). Vitsur asserted that the Estonian price level is anomalously high compared to incomes and that the cost of food affects the country's competitiveness. He considered lowering the VAT the most realistic short-term solution. Laats directly blamed the price increase on the government's tax hikes and political choices, highlighting the example of other European countries (e.g., Spain, Sweden) that have implemented VAT exceptions to mitigate inflation. During the negotiations, opinions were divided: the opposition supported lowering the VAT as a necessary measure, while the coalition representative (Eesti 200) deemed it ineffective and unfair. The sitting was extended until the agenda item was exhausted, but no substantive decisions were adopted.
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)
2025-10-14 13:10The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Law 725, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Public Transport Act. The goal of the draft, introduced by Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture Hendrik Johannes Terras, was to streamline the organization of taxi services, bringing it into line with the principles of the digital state. The main change involved ending data duplication by consolidating all data regarding taxi operation licenses, vehicle cards, and service provider cards into the Register of Economic Activities (MTR), thereby eliminating the outdated public transport register managed by the Transport Administration. This is expected to reduce administrative burden, costs, and security risks.
The proposal in the draft that generated the most controversy was the abolition of the requirement for a photo on the service provider card, which the minister justified by citing data protection and bureaucracy reduction, as it is not an identity document. However, Riigikogu members (Rene Kokk, Mart Maastik, Priit Sibul) emphasized that the photo is crucial for the customer's sense of security and verifying the driver's identity. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur for the Economic Affairs Committee, confirmed that the committee had reached a consensus that the photo should remain, and the minister promised to analyze the possibility of using a photo from the Population Register for the second reading. A question was also raised regarding the disregard of the proposal by the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities to grant local governments the right to carry out control transactions (test purchases) concerning platform service providers. Minister Terras justified this omission by citing the urgency and technical focus of the draft, promising to address the topic within the framework of broader amendments to the Public Transport Act.
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)
2025-10-13 21:2015th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: A debate on Interpellation No. 804 took place in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), submitted by Riigikogu members Züleyxa Izmailova, Tiit Maran, Tanel Kiik, Riina Sikkut, Heljo Pikhof, and Andre Hanimäe to Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general, binding nesting moratorium. The interpellators, led by Züleyxa Izmailova, emphasized that Estonia’s biodiversity indicators are in continuous decline, nearly 30% of species are endangered, and that 93% of the population supports a universal logging moratorium during the period from April 15 to July 15. They criticized the current recommended restrictions (including those implemented by RMK) as insufficient.
Minister Andres Sutt replied that the Ministry of Climate is awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in the legal dispute concerning the deliberate disturbance of birds during the nesting period. Until then, the current practice will continue. The Minister pointed out that RMK (State Forest Management Centre) has been implementing a voluntary logging moratorium for over 20 years, recently extending it until June 30, which covers about half of the forest land. Sutt defended the current legal framework and the breeding bird population density matrix adopted by the Environmental Board for risk-based supervision. The interpellators submitted several clarifying questions regarding the impact of the Supreme Court’s decision, the complexity of forest management under climate change conditions, and the mapping of the green network promised by the government. Izmailova expressed profound disappointment during the discussions regarding the minister's responses, deeming them vague and justifying inaction, and accused the government of neglecting nature conservation.
... and 105 more agenda items
Annely Akkermann
142 agenda items
142/142 with AI summaries (100.0%)
142/142 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Annely Akkermann
Email: annely.akkermann@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: annely.akkermann@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 23h 57m
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 23h 57m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2025 State Supplementary Budget (733 SE)
2025-10-13 18:2515th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Law 733 on the state's 2025 supplementary budget, initiated by the Government of the Republic. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi introduced the draft, emphasizing that this is the second supplementary budget this year, which reduces expenditures by 19.9 million and investments by 12 million, while increasing financing transactions by 72.3 million. The main focus of the budget is national defense, within which the budget of the Ministry of Defense is increased by 39 million euros. A significant part of the changes concerned comprehensive national defense, especially energy infrastructure: within the administrative area of the Ministry of Climate, Elering's share capital is increased by 45 million euros, of which 35 million is directed towards protecting transformers against hybrid threats. Also, the implementation of several major projects, such as activities related to the transition to Estonian-language education (60.5 million euros), is postponed because they cannot be realized this year.
During the debate, MPs asked questions regarding the financing of Elering, investments in hydrogen infrastructure, and the intended use of the 17.8 million euros distributed via SmartCap. Minister Ligi explained that strengthening Elering's capital is necessary for attracting foreign capital and admitted that the postponements of projects stem from the tendency of ministers to overestimate their capacity to implement their projects. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, introduced the committee's discussion, where it was decided to conclude the first reading of the draft law.
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)
2025-10-09 02:55The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 14m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 625 on amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The aim of the bill was to restore fairness and establish an exemption from the annual motor vehicle tax for vehicles owned by disabled persons. Presenter Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party) stressed that disabled people are separately protected by the Constitution and require an exception regarding personal transport due to their mobility restrictions. He criticized the government's actions, which initially removed the tax exemption for disabled people and replaced it with insufficient benefits, despite the recommendations of the President and the Chancellor of Justice. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, presented the committee's position, stating that the government does not support the bill. The government had decided to increase social benefits by 9.1 million euros annually instead of granting the tax exemption, justifying this decision with technical difficulties in reconciling the register of disabled persons and the database of the Transport Administration, as well as the desire to prevent misuse. During the debate, questions were raised regarding the inadequacy of the benefits and the late scheduling of the bill's discussion. The leading committee proposed rejecting the bill.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)
2025-10-09 01:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 2m
AI Summary: The agenda item was the first reading of draft bill 661 SE on amending the Value-Added Tax Act, initiated by the faction of the Social Democratic Party and members of the Riigikogu. The aim of the draft bill was to lower the VAT rate on basic foodstuffs (root and vegetables, dairy, meat, grain and fish products, and eggs) from 24% to 9%. The presenter, Lauri Läänemets (SDE), emphasized that food prices in Estonia have risen unprecedentedly in recent years, particularly affecting lower-income families, and that the tax reduction would stimulate domestic consumption and support Estonia's food security and agricultural sector. He criticized the government, which, in his estimation, prefers taking out loans to give financial gifts to the rich instead of supporting the wider population. Diana Ingerainen, representative of the Finance Committee, announced that the committee proposed rejecting the draft bill because there was no certainty that the tax reduction would reach the final consumer, and it would create a deficit of approximately 200 million euros in the state budget. During faction negotiations, the draft bill was supported by SDE, EKRE, and the Centre Party, although the latter two criticized the Social Democrats for previously supporting the VAT increase. The bill was rejected in the vote.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)
2025-10-08 17:08The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
14 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40m
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of the draft 2026 State Budget Act (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic. The report of the leading committee was presented by Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, who emphasized the reduction of income tax and the growth of national defense expenditures to over 5% of GDP as the budget's main priorities. She noted that budget revenues stand at 18.6 billion and expenditures at 19.5 billion euros, and the government sector's financing need reaches 1.7 billion euros. Akkermann defended the goal of abolishing the tax bracket system (or "tax hump"), arguing that it would bring the largest net salary increase specifically to those earning the average wage. The debate was heated, with the opposition criticizing the budget for irresponsibility, citing a record deficit (4.5% of GDP) and the use of borrowed funds to cover current expenses. Urmas Reinsalu and other opposition members questioned the government's mandate for increasing taxes and the debt burden, and criticized the tax gift to the wealthier, while social sectors (such as special welfare) remain underfunded. Coalition representatives (Õnne Pillak, Toomas Uibo) defended the choices, stressing the priority of ensuring security and promising to bring state finances into balance in the long term. At the conclusion of the negotiations, four opposition factions submitted a motion to reject the bill, which was voted down.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)
2025-10-06 20:40The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
10 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 21m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 677 SE on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Finance Committee. The bill was presented by the Chairman of the Finance Committee, Annely Akkermann. The impetus for initiating the draft act stemmed from the proposals made by the Chancellor of Justice on February 26, aimed at bringing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act into compliance with the Constitution. The substance of the draft act focuses on establishing grounds for shortening the taxation period in cases where a vehicle is removed from the traffic register or is declared wanted due to theft. This amendment is necessary so that the Tax and Customs Board can make corrections to the second tax notice before the payment deadline of December 15.
During the debate, the opposition (Social Democrats, Centre Party, Isamaa) sharply criticized the government's approach, calling it "cutting the tail off bit by bit." They questioned why all the shortcomings of the law were not being addressed simultaneously, such as the lack of a regional component, the unfair registration fee, and the absence of special provisions for disabled people. Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart and Anti Allas emphasized that the law remains in conflict with the Constitution even after cosmetic changes, particularly due to the unequal treatment of disabled people. Akkermann defended the committee's pace, explaining that they are dealing with the most urgent constitutional infringement, and other topics, such as the support system for disabled people, require the separate and more thorough preparation of a draft act. Aivar Kokk called for the complete abolition of the car tax, citing its failure and the state's wasteful budget policy.
... and 137 more agenda items
Yoko Alender
17 agenda items
17/17 with AI summaries (100.0%)
17/17 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Yoko Alender
Email: yoko.alender@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: yoko.alender@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 48m
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 48m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Earth Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (Development of renewable energy production in an area with a mining permit) (698 SE)
2025-10-15 21:31The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 698, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Earth's Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (development of renewable energy production in areas with a mining permit). The presenter was Andres Sutt, Minister of Energy and Environment. The main objective of the bill is to create a legal basis for the construction of renewable energy facilities (solar and wind parks) in areas subject to a mining permit, especially in exhausted quarries or peat production areas. This should accelerate the transition to climate neutrality and simplify the reclamation of mining areas by reducing bureaucracy for smaller mining plots (up to 15 ha) and peat production areas (up to 150 ha). Minister Sutt emphasized that the changes help diversify land use and stimulate economic activity without compromising the quality of reclamation.
Several critical questions arose during the debate. Rain Epler (EKRE) challenged the ideological focus of the bill, warning that it prioritizes the state's climate goals over economic expediency and potentially locks up active oil shale and peat reserves for 50 years under renewable energy developments, which threatens Estonia's energy security. Tiit Maran (SDE) acknowledged the necessity of the bill but considered it "underdeveloped," criticizing the Climate Ministry's analysis for its one-sided approach. He highlighted that the bill does not adequately consider biodiversity and climate aspects, especially concerning 150-hectare peat fields, where failure to rewet them could lead to significant CO2 emissions. Minister Sutt confirmed that the restoration obligation remains with the developer, and mining permit holders can decide for themselves whether they see commercial prospects in the area.
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)
2025-10-15 21:04The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Bill 697, initiated by the Government of the Republic, regarding the amendment of the Atmospheric Air Protection Act and other acts (transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive RED III). Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, introduced the draft bill, emphasizing its goal to simplify permit procedures for renewable energy projects by establishing a single point of contact in the form of the Estonian Building Register and setting deadlines for obtaining permits. The draft bill also addresses the transport sector by abolishing the 6% greenhouse gas emission reduction obligation for fuel suppliers and creating a framework for the wider use of hydrogen and liquefied biomethane. A significant amendment involves extending biomass sustainability criteria to smaller production units (starting from 7.5 MW). During the debate, opposition politicians (Rain Epler, Kalle Grünthal) expressed concern. Epler criticized the strictest possible transposition of the directive, which, in his assessment, promotes market consolidation and imposes excessive obligations on small enterprises. Grünthal raised the question of the safety of wind turbine infrasound, casting doubt on the validity of existing studies. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur of the lead committee, provided an overview of the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, which also addressed the requirement for bidirectional charging of electric cars, which the ministry wishes to make voluntary.
Draft Law Amending the Waste Act (676 SE) – First Reading
2025-09-23 13:4515th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 676, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Waste Act. Minister of Infrastructure Kuldar Leis introduced the bill, the main objective of which is to transpose the requirements of the European Union Battery Regulation into Estonian law. The regulation covers all batteries and accumulators, ranging from small ones to those used in electric cars and large energy storage systems, aiming for more environmentally friendly production, durability, and material recycling. Key changes highlighted included the requirement for a digital product passport for batteries (containing data on origin and handling) and the obligation to ensure battery replaceability in devices starting from 2027. The bill is largely technical, removing duplicate provisions, but the substantive change concerns producer responsibility: henceforth, all importers of batteries for electric vehicles, light personal transport devices, and industrial use must also join the producers' association to prevent waste management costs from falling upon the state.
A lively discussion arose during the debate regarding costs and consumer rights. Kalle Grünthal expressed concern that the new regulation might limit the consumer's right to remove and repair batteries themselves, thereby serving the interests of large manufacturers. Minister Leis clarified that the regulation itself does not prohibit repair, but the complexity of removing batteries is rather a technical issue. Mart Maastik and Henn Põlluaas doubted the Minister's claim that the new obligations (e.g., the battery passport) would not lead to increased bureaucracy or costs for the consumer. The Minister confirmed that the obligation for the battery passport rests with the producer, and according to the European Union's impact assessment, the price of small batteries will increase by 0.5–2 euros, which will be factored into the product price. Yoko Alender, Chairman of the Environment Committee, confirmed that the system ensures free handling of all batteries for the consumer, and the collection network is already largely in place.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu work year began with the new calendar year, characterized by an exceptionally tight and intense work schedule that spanned several sessions. The sittings were accompanied by constant procedural disputes, especially during the confirmation of agendas, as the opposition (mainly EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party) extensively employed obstruction tactics. Numerous interpellations and draft bills were repeatedly postponed or removed from the agenda, often due to the impossibility of proceeding with the debate. The main discussion topics revolved around the government's tax hikes (especially the motor vehicle tax), energy policy (including subsidies for wind farms and the energy crisis), the teachers' salary crisis, and security issues. Political tensions culminated in several votes of no confidence against members of the government, highlighting a deep crisis of trust between the parliament and the executive power. The Riigikogu Board had to repeatedly explain its decisions, citing Supreme Court rulings and the necessity of ensuring the parliament's operational capacity.
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading
2025-06-16 18:58XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 50m
AI Summary: The agenda item was the first reading of Bill 657 on the amendment of the Waste Act and related amendments to other acts, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which was introduced by Infrastructure Minister Kuldar Leis. The bill, also referred to as the waste reform, aims to bring Estonia's waste sector into the 21st century by increasing the recycling rate from 38% to 65% by 2035 and reducing landfilling to below 1%. The Minister emphasized that the reform will help avoid large fines to the EU (currently 16–20 million euros per year) and will create a new industry. The changes include a unified collection standard (four containers in densely populated areas), the separation of transport and handling procurements to increase competition, and the digitalization of waste management. The Minister confirmed that the average monthly cost for households that sort waste separately will remain within five euros, and the state will be 20 million euros in surplus due to the reform.
The opposition (Centre Party, EKRE, Isamaa) sharply criticized the bill, calling it a "tax festival" and claiming it increases consumer costs (Aivar Kokk estimated the additional cost at 75 million euros per year) and bureaucracy for local governments (LGs). Specific criticism targeted the raising of landfill and incineration fees, and the right granted to LGs to add up to 50% of transport costs to cover waste management expenses. Supporters (Eesti 200, Reform Party) stressed that the reform is necessary to end the monopoly and meet recycling targets. During the vote, the proposal by the Centre Party and Isamaa factions to reject the bill at the first reading was voted down.
... and 12 more agenda items
Anti Allas
144 agenda items
144/144 with AI summaries (100.0%)
144/144 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Anti Allas
Email: anti.allas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: anti.allas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 25h 59m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 25h 59m
Agenda Items:
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a matter of national importance initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, titled "Why is food expensive?" The presenters—Jana Guzanova (initiator of the popular initiative), economist Heido Vitsur, and Lauri Laats (Chairman of the Centre Party faction)—addressed the sharp rise in food prices and its social and economic impact. Guzanova emphasized that the popular initiative, which garnered a record 100,000 signatures, demonstrates the acuteness of the problem, especially among lower-income people, and criticized the government’s refusal to lower the VAT on foodstuffs (which stands at 24% in Estonia). Vitsur asserted that the Estonian price level is anomalously high compared to incomes and that the cost of food affects the country's competitiveness. He considered lowering the VAT the most realistic short-term solution. Laats directly blamed the price increase on the government's tax hikes and political choices, highlighting the example of other European countries (e.g., Spain, Sweden) that have implemented VAT exceptions to mitigate inflation. During the negotiations, opinions were divided: the opposition supported lowering the VAT as a necessary measure, while the coalition representative (Eesti 200) deemed it ineffective and unfair. The sitting was extended until the agenda item was exhausted, but no substantive decisions were adopted.
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Earth Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (Development of renewable energy production in an area with a mining permit) (698 SE)
2025-10-15 21:31The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 698, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Earth's Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (development of renewable energy production in areas with a mining permit). The presenter was Andres Sutt, Minister of Energy and Environment. The main objective of the bill is to create a legal basis for the construction of renewable energy facilities (solar and wind parks) in areas subject to a mining permit, especially in exhausted quarries or peat production areas. This should accelerate the transition to climate neutrality and simplify the reclamation of mining areas by reducing bureaucracy for smaller mining plots (up to 15 ha) and peat production areas (up to 150 ha). Minister Sutt emphasized that the changes help diversify land use and stimulate economic activity without compromising the quality of reclamation.
Several critical questions arose during the debate. Rain Epler (EKRE) challenged the ideological focus of the bill, warning that it prioritizes the state's climate goals over economic expediency and potentially locks up active oil shale and peat reserves for 50 years under renewable energy developments, which threatens Estonia's energy security. Tiit Maran (SDE) acknowledged the necessity of the bill but considered it "underdeveloped," criticizing the Climate Ministry's analysis for its one-sided approach. He highlighted that the bill does not adequately consider biodiversity and climate aspects, especially concerning 150-hectare peat fields, where failure to rewet them could lead to significant CO2 emissions. Minister Sutt confirmed that the restoration obligation remains with the developer, and mining permit holders can decide for themselves whether they see commercial prospects in the area.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 35m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
Border Security
2025-10-15 16:06The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 4m
AI Summary: The discussion focused on security at the Estonian-Russian border, specifically the Saatse Boot road section in Southeast Estonia, which briefly crosses into Russian territory. Riigikogu member Anti Allas (SDE) questioned Prime Minister Kristen Michal as to why, a year after funding was allocated, construction of an alternative bypass road had not yet begun, especially considering the recent deterioration of the security situation and the Police and Border Guard Board’s (PPA) decision to close the road. Allas stressed that the Social Democrats had already demanded the allocation of these funds during the 2024 budget negotiations.
Prime Minister Michal explained that preparations for construction began in 2024 and the necessary funds were secured in 2025. He deemed the PPA’s decision to close the road for security purposes to be the only correct course of action. Michal confirmed that the government would discuss the situation and the threat assessment at its next session, and that they were working on widening the RMK road as a temporary solution to ensure local residents maintain access. Regarding a permanent solution, the goal is to accelerate the completion of the new road from the originally planned 2027 to 2026. To achieve this acceleration, legislative amendments are being considered, including changes to the Nature Conservation Act, or the utilization of national defense exceptions. In a follow-up question, Tiit Maran inquired about how environmental values (Natura areas) would be handled under the accelerated construction timeline. The Prime Minister responded that security and national defense interests outweigh environmental restrictions in this specific situation, which dictates the priority.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)
2025-10-14 13:10The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Law 725, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Public Transport Act. The goal of the draft, introduced by Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture Hendrik Johannes Terras, was to streamline the organization of taxi services, bringing it into line with the principles of the digital state. The main change involved ending data duplication by consolidating all data regarding taxi operation licenses, vehicle cards, and service provider cards into the Register of Economic Activities (MTR), thereby eliminating the outdated public transport register managed by the Transport Administration. This is expected to reduce administrative burden, costs, and security risks.
The proposal in the draft that generated the most controversy was the abolition of the requirement for a photo on the service provider card, which the minister justified by citing data protection and bureaucracy reduction, as it is not an identity document. However, Riigikogu members (Rene Kokk, Mart Maastik, Priit Sibul) emphasized that the photo is crucial for the customer's sense of security and verifying the driver's identity. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur for the Economic Affairs Committee, confirmed that the committee had reached a consensus that the photo should remain, and the minister promised to analyze the possibility of using a photo from the Population Register for the second reading. A question was also raised regarding the disregard of the proposal by the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities to grant local governments the right to carry out control transactions (test purchases) concerning platform service providers. Minister Terras justified this omission by citing the urgency and technical focus of the draft, promising to address the topic within the framework of broader amendments to the Public Transport Act.
... and 139 more agenda items
Arvo Aller
231 agenda items
231/231 with AI summaries (100.0%)
231/231 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Arvo Aller
Email: arvo.aller@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: arvo.aller@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 35h 56m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 35h 56m
Agenda Items:
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)
2025-10-08 22:58The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 19m
AI Summary: The first reading of Draft Bill 683, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Planning Act and related legislation, took place under this agenda item. The bill was introduced by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, Erkki Keldo, who emphasized the need to make the planning procedure clearer, faster, and more flexible to support investments and economic growth. The Minister highlighted several significant changes, including the abolishment of the local government special plan, the establishment of a 10-year validity period for new detailed plans (extendable by 5 years, applicable starting 2027), simplifying the completion of ongoing plans, and streamlining notification and public disclosure. The latter included eliminating the requirement for announcements in county and national newspapers, and shortening the advance notice period for public display from 14 days to one day. Keldo also stressed future amendments that would grant the Land and Spatial Planning Board (MaRu) the right of administrative supervision over the activities of local governments (LOAs) to ensure compliance with deadlines.
The debate was tense, with the faction of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE) (Rain Epler, Martin Helme, Rene Kokk, Arvo Aller) expressing strong opposition. The opposition viewed the bill as a "steamroller" policy that restricts community involvement and the rights of local authorities, especially concerning large developments such as wind farms. The inclusion of a provision regarding the consideration of climate change also drew criticism, as it was deemed vague and likely to increase the risk of official arbitrariness. Minister Keldo rejected the accusations, explaining that the amendments are aimed at reducing unnecessary bureaucracy and clarifying the process. The proposal of the leading committee (the Economic Affairs Committee) was to conclude the first reading. The proposal by the EKRE faction to reject the bill was voted down.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)
2025-10-08 17:08The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 11m
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of the draft 2026 State Budget Act (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic. The report of the leading committee was presented by Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, who emphasized the reduction of income tax and the growth of national defense expenditures to over 5% of GDP as the budget's main priorities. She noted that budget revenues stand at 18.6 billion and expenditures at 19.5 billion euros, and the government sector's financing need reaches 1.7 billion euros. Akkermann defended the goal of abolishing the tax bracket system (or "tax hump"), arguing that it would bring the largest net salary increase specifically to those earning the average wage. The debate was heated, with the opposition criticizing the budget for irresponsibility, citing a record deficit (4.5% of GDP) and the use of borrowed funds to cover current expenses. Urmas Reinsalu and other opposition members questioned the government's mandate for increasing taxes and the debt burden, and criticized the tax gift to the wealthier, while social sectors (such as special welfare) remain underfunded. Coalition representatives (Õnne Pillak, Toomas Uibo) defended the choices, stressing the priority of ensuring security and promising to bring state finances into balance in the long term. At the conclusion of the negotiations, four opposition factions submitted a motion to reject the bill, which was voted down.
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)
2025-10-07 13:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 41s
AI Summary: The sitting included the first reading of the draft 2026 State Budget Act (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, which was presented by Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi. The Minister emphasized that the budget was drafted in anticipation of accelerated economic growth, but it is characterized by a historically large deficit (4.5% of GDP), primarily due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditures (over 5% of GDP), which remains within the limits of the European Union exception. The budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and incomes. Ligi highlighted the decrease in the tax burden (from 36.6% to 35.2%), the increase of the tax-free minimum income to 700 euros, and the cancellation of several planned tax hikes, calling this an economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the wage fund in the education, culture, internal security, and special welfare sectors, as well as large investments in infrastructure.
During the question round, the opposition focused on the rapid growth of the budget deficit and national debt, accusing the government of fulfilling election promises with borrowed money (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme). Criticism was also leveled at directing tax relief towards higher-income individuals and the continuing deficit of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa). Minister Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit is mainly caused by external security factors and that reforming the tax system is necessary to ensure the competitiveness of the economy. Ligi also sharply criticized the negative sentiment prevalent in the public and the methodology used by the Estonian Institute of Economic Research (Konjunktuuriinstituut). During the sitting, the proposal by the Reform Party faction to extend the session until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 14:00, was put to a vote.
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-09-24 21:17Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, Hendrik Johannes Terras, presented the 2025 report to the Riigikogu on the implementation of the country's long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," focusing on viable regional development and robust food security. The Minister emphasized that Estonia faces geopolitical instability, climate change, and an economic slowdown, which necessitates smart and often painful structural reforms. He highlighted a demographic tipping point where 60% of the population is concentrated in Harju and Tartu counties, creating a "golden circle" and an emptying periphery. To reverse this trend, the government aims to direct at least 40% of business support outside major cities and increase the financial autonomy of local governments. A key reform introduced was the smart and accessible mobility reform, designed to ensure flexible public transport (a unified ticketing system, fixed-interval timetables, and on-demand transport). Regarding agriculture, the Minister stressed the need to increase added value and reduce dangerous dependence on imported production inputs (fertilizers, feed). The goal was set at an 80% self-sufficiency level in key food groups, viewing this as part of comprehensive national defense. The crisis involving African Swine Fever (ASF) was addressed separately; it struck Estonia's largest pig farming complexes in August 2025, leading to restrictions and culling/layoffs affecting over 50,000 pigs. The Minister announced preparations for creating a national guarantee scheme for the agricultural sector to mitigate market risks against which private insurance offers no protection, alongside the necessity of a long-term wild boar population control plan. During the debate, the opposition criticized the government's slow response to the ASF crisis and the negative impact of tax increases on rural areas.
... and 226 more agenda items
Vladimir Arhipov
169 agenda items
169/169 with AI summaries (100.0%)
169/169 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Vladimir Arhipov
Email: vladimir.arhipov@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: vladimir.arhipov@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 26h 6m
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 26h 6m
Agenda Items:
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 38m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a matter of national importance initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, titled "Why is food expensive?" The presenters—Jana Guzanova (initiator of the popular initiative), economist Heido Vitsur, and Lauri Laats (Chairman of the Centre Party faction)—addressed the sharp rise in food prices and its social and economic impact. Guzanova emphasized that the popular initiative, which garnered a record 100,000 signatures, demonstrates the acuteness of the problem, especially among lower-income people, and criticized the government’s refusal to lower the VAT on foodstuffs (which stands at 24% in Estonia). Vitsur asserted that the Estonian price level is anomalously high compared to incomes and that the cost of food affects the country's competitiveness. He considered lowering the VAT the most realistic short-term solution. Laats directly blamed the price increase on the government's tax hikes and political choices, highlighting the example of other European countries (e.g., Spain, Sweden) that have implemented VAT exceptions to mitigate inflation. During the negotiations, opinions were divided: the opposition supported lowering the VAT as a necessary measure, while the coalition representative (Eesti 200) deemed it ineffective and unfair. The sitting was extended until the agenda item was exhausted, but no substantive decisions were adopted.
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)
2025-10-09 02:55The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 6m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 625 on amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The aim of the bill was to restore fairness and establish an exemption from the annual motor vehicle tax for vehicles owned by disabled persons. Presenter Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party) stressed that disabled people are separately protected by the Constitution and require an exception regarding personal transport due to their mobility restrictions. He criticized the government's actions, which initially removed the tax exemption for disabled people and replaced it with insufficient benefits, despite the recommendations of the President and the Chancellor of Justice. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, presented the committee's position, stating that the government does not support the bill. The government had decided to increase social benefits by 9.1 million euros annually instead of granting the tax exemption, justifying this decision with technical difficulties in reconciling the register of disabled persons and the database of the Transport Administration, as well as the desire to prevent misuse. During the debate, questions were raised regarding the inadequacy of the benefits and the late scheduling of the bill's discussion. The leading committee proposed rejecting the bill.
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)
2025-10-07 13:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The sitting included the first reading of the draft 2026 State Budget Act (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, which was presented by Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi. The Minister emphasized that the budget was drafted in anticipation of accelerated economic growth, but it is characterized by a historically large deficit (4.5% of GDP), primarily due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditures (over 5% of GDP), which remains within the limits of the European Union exception. The budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and incomes. Ligi highlighted the decrease in the tax burden (from 36.6% to 35.2%), the increase of the tax-free minimum income to 700 euros, and the cancellation of several planned tax hikes, calling this an economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the wage fund in the education, culture, internal security, and special welfare sectors, as well as large investments in infrastructure.
During the question round, the opposition focused on the rapid growth of the budget deficit and national debt, accusing the government of fulfilling election promises with borrowed money (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme). Criticism was also leveled at directing tax relief towards higher-income individuals and the continuing deficit of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa). Minister Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit is mainly caused by external security factors and that reforming the tax system is necessary to ensure the competitiveness of the economy. Ligi also sharply criticized the negative sentiment prevalent in the public and the methodology used by the Estonian Institute of Economic Research (Konjunktuuriinstituut). During the sitting, the proposal by the Reform Party faction to extend the session until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 14:00, was put to a vote.
Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)
2025-10-06 22:56The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 28m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation submitted by the Social Democratic faction regarding the insufficient state funding for school meals and the resulting inequality. Reili Rand, representing those who submitted the interpellation, stressed that due to the rapid rise in food prices, the state subsidy (€1 per child) has become outdated, forcing local municipalities (LMs) to cover their share by diverting funds from other areas or by passing costs on to families, which exacerbates social inequality. The significant role of school meals in Estonia's food security and in supporting local production was also highlighted.
Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas responded to the interpellation by repeatedly emphasizing the principle of Estonian state governance, which dictates that covering the costs of school meals is the responsibility of the school maintainer—i.e., the local municipality—and not the primary obligation of the state. The state merely supports this obligation. The Minister rejected the proposal to link the school meal subsidy amount to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), noting that her priority during state budget negotiations was increasing teachers' salaries. She confirmed that, according to the Ministry of Social Affairs, the new health requirements would not increase the price of school meals. The Minister acknowledged that she lacked an overview of the LMs' capacity to cover the shortfall, but stated that, to her knowledge, no child in Estonia goes without a warm meal at school due to their socio-economic status. During the debate, the questioners criticized the Minister's rigid stance on the division of responsibility and highlighted concerns about the declining quality of school meals resulting from insufficient funding.
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)
2025-10-06 21:54The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Interpellation No. 803, which was addressed to Minister of the Interior Igor Taro and concerned the transfer of criminals from the Kingdom of Sweden to Estonia and their subsequent imprisonment at Tartu Prison. The questioners, led by Heljo Pikhof, voiced concerns regarding the impact of this government "business plan" on Estonia's internal security, especially in Southern Estonia, where the shortage of police officers and community constables is already severe. The opposition feared that recruiting prison guards would intensify competition between the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) and other internal security agencies, thereby weakening the overall system, and would also damage Estonia’s reputation. Questions were also raised about the project's actual economic benefits and the potential strain on the healthcare system. Minister of the Interior Igor Taro defended the government's stance, stressing that this was a long-term strategic decision designed to ensure the functioning of the underutilized Tartu Prison and bring a minimum of 30 million euros in revenue to the state budget. The Minister confirmed that the Ministry of the Interior, the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), and the Estonian Internal Security Service (KAPO) had been consulted, and identified risks (such as preventing organized crime and radicalization) had been mitigated. Taro highlighted that the project would create approximately 250 new jobs in Southern Estonia, calling it a regional policy win. He dismissed claims regarding worsening security, pointing to the planned salary increases for frontline workers and the growing popularity of the Estonian Academy of Security Sciences.
... and 164 more agenda items
Vadim Belobrovtsev
247 agenda items
247/247 with AI summaries (100.0%)
247/247 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Email: vadim.belobrovtsev@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: vadim.belobrovtsev@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 78h 41m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 78h 41m
Agenda Items:
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 2h 15m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a matter of national importance initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, titled "Why is food expensive?" The presenters—Jana Guzanova (initiator of the popular initiative), economist Heido Vitsur, and Lauri Laats (Chairman of the Centre Party faction)—addressed the sharp rise in food prices and its social and economic impact. Guzanova emphasized that the popular initiative, which garnered a record 100,000 signatures, demonstrates the acuteness of the problem, especially among lower-income people, and criticized the government’s refusal to lower the VAT on foodstuffs (which stands at 24% in Estonia). Vitsur asserted that the Estonian price level is anomalously high compared to incomes and that the cost of food affects the country's competitiveness. He considered lowering the VAT the most realistic short-term solution. Laats directly blamed the price increase on the government's tax hikes and political choices, highlighting the example of other European countries (e.g., Spain, Sweden) that have implemented VAT exceptions to mitigate inflation. During the negotiations, opinions were divided: the opposition supported lowering the VAT as a necessary measure, while the coalition representative (Eesti 200) deemed it ineffective and unfair. The sitting was extended until the agenda item was exhausted, but no substantive decisions were adopted.
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (625 SE)
2025-10-09 02:55The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 25m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 625 on amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The aim of the bill was to restore fairness and establish an exemption from the annual motor vehicle tax for vehicles owned by disabled persons. Presenter Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party) stressed that disabled people are separately protected by the Constitution and require an exception regarding personal transport due to their mobility restrictions. He criticized the government's actions, which initially removed the tax exemption for disabled people and replaced it with insufficient benefits, despite the recommendations of the President and the Chancellor of Justice. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, presented the committee's position, stating that the government does not support the bill. The government had decided to increase social benefits by 9.1 million euros annually instead of granting the tax exemption, justifying this decision with technical difficulties in reconciling the register of disabled persons and the database of the Transport Administration, as well as the desire to prevent misuse. During the debate, questions were raised regarding the inadequacy of the benefits and the late scheduling of the bill's discussion. The leading committee proposed rejecting the bill.
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"
2025-10-08 21:14The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda included Riigikogu Draft Resolution 658 OE, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic develop a plan to increase competition in the mobile communications market and speed up number portability. The bill's presenter, Lauri Laats, stressed that the prices of mobile communication services in Estonia are, on average, 30–35% higher than in neighboring Latvia and Lithuania, a situation exacerbated by the lengthy number transfer time between operators. This protracted process (which results in 50% of transfers being abandoned) allows operators to maintain abnormally high profit margins (approximately 20% of revenue). The draft resolution aimed to shorten the number transfer period to a maximum of one working day and establish a framework for real-time portability. During the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, it was revealed that the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs is already working on similar changes, planning to reduce number portability to a matter of hours, although technical implementation will require time. During the ensuing debate, issues regarding coverage in sparsely populated areas and the state's inability to guarantee high-quality data communication were also raised. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, requiring a majority of the Riigikogu membership for adoption.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)
2025-10-08 17:08The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of the draft 2026 State Budget Act (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic. The report of the leading committee was presented by Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, who emphasized the reduction of income tax and the growth of national defense expenditures to over 5% of GDP as the budget's main priorities. She noted that budget revenues stand at 18.6 billion and expenditures at 19.5 billion euros, and the government sector's financing need reaches 1.7 billion euros. Akkermann defended the goal of abolishing the tax bracket system (or "tax hump"), arguing that it would bring the largest net salary increase specifically to those earning the average wage. The debate was heated, with the opposition criticizing the budget for irresponsibility, citing a record deficit (4.5% of GDP) and the use of borrowed funds to cover current expenses. Urmas Reinsalu and other opposition members questioned the government's mandate for increasing taxes and the debt burden, and criticized the tax gift to the wealthier, while social sectors (such as special welfare) remain underfunded. Coalition representatives (Õnne Pillak, Toomas Uibo) defended the choices, stressing the priority of ensuring security and promising to bring state finances into balance in the long term. At the conclusion of the negotiations, four opposition factions submitted a motion to reject the bill, which was voted down.
Salaries
2025-10-08 16:11The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: Riigikogu member Vadim Belobrovtsev submitted an inquiry to Interior Minister Igor Taro regarding the salaries of rescue workers and police officers, emphasizing the dissatisfaction of frontline workers with the salary increase offered by the government. Belobrovtsev referred to the fact that although the government decided to raise the wage fund by up to 10%, this is insufficient considering the nearly 40% inflation over the last two years. He also highlighted the uncertainty regarding the salary policy for future years (2027/2028), which is the main reason for the planned demonstration by teachers and rescue workers.
Minister Igor Taro confirmed that the administrative area of the Ministry of the Interior received 28.9 million euros for increasing the wage fund during budget negotiations, which was his priority. He stressed that this was a significant achievement, as most ministries had to implement cuts. Taro conceded that the 10% increase would not solve all problems, but explained that institution heads have been instructed to direct a larger salary increase (over 10%) to where "the shoe pinches the most," i.e., frontline positions. In addition, the minister pointed out that the abolition of the tax hump will have the greatest percentage impact precisely on those receiving the average salary, including rescue workers, thereby increasing their actual income. In a clarifying question, Lauri Laats raised the problem of wage poverty faced by rescue workers and police officers and called for a comprehensive review of the system. Minister Taro thanked the rescue workers for keeping the topic alive and confirmed that the government is working to improve the economy so that better salary increases can be ensured in the future.
... and 242 more agenda items
Enn Eesmaa
13 agenda items
13/13 with AI summaries (100.0%)
13/13 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Enn Eesmaa
Email: enn.eesmaa@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: enn.eesmaa@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 22 years
Total Speaking Time: 46m
Parliament Seniority: 22 years
Total Speaking Time: 46m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) "Extension of the Term of Use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union's military assistance mission in Mozambique" (706 OE)
2025-09-24 20:30Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 706, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the extension of the term of use of the Estonian Defence Forces for fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in the European Union Military Assistance Mission in Mozambique (EUTM Mozambique). The rapporteur was Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur.
Minister Pevkur explained that the mission was initiated in July 2021, and although the security situation has improved, the 11 participating countries see the need to continue the mission. Estonia would contribute one officer to the mission, and the operation costs are approximately 40,000 euros. Enn Eesmaa, a member of the National Defence Committee, provided an overview of the committee's work, emphasizing that this is Estonia's only mission on the African continent and that the contribution is made in solidarity with other EU member states. The draft resolution confirms readiness to continue contributing until 2026 with up to three servicemen, although, in reality, the plan is to send one legal advisor whose task is to advise the mission commander and train the local armed forces on human rights issues. The National Defence Committee supported the draft resolution unanimously.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu work year began with the new calendar year, characterized by an exceptionally tight and intense work schedule that spanned several sessions. The sittings were accompanied by constant procedural disputes, especially during the confirmation of agendas, as the opposition (mainly EKRE, Isamaa, and the Centre Party) extensively employed obstruction tactics. Numerous interpellations and draft bills were repeatedly postponed or removed from the agenda, often due to the impossibility of proceeding with the debate. The main discussion topics revolved around the government's tax hikes (especially the motor vehicle tax), energy policy (including subsidies for wind farms and the energy crisis), the teachers' salary crisis, and security issues. Political tensions culminated in several votes of no confidence against members of the government, highlighting a deep crisis of trust between the parliament and the executive power. The Riigikogu Board had to repeatedly explain its decisions, citing Supreme Court rulings and the necessity of ensuring the parliament's operational capacity.
Draft law amending § 5 of the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (530 SE) – First Reading
2025-01-30 12:02Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Today, the first reading of the draft law amending section 5 of the Local Government Council Elections Act, initiated by Member of the Riigikogu Leo Kunnas, was considered. The draft's aim was to link the right to vote in local governments to the Riigikogu’s declaration identifying Russia's actions as terrorism – a question of considerable power in the current security situation, which tests the constitution's resilience and the extent of voting rights. The discussion during the first reading focused on the stamping of legal consistency and its pragmatic effect on voter loyalty and potential societal influence.
In the second part, there was an introduction and discussion by the Constitutional Committee, where, in cooperation with the government, the legitimacy of the draft law and potential side effects were considered; the committee decided to raise the draft to the plenary agenda and at the same time reject the draft, as presented by both members participating in the discussion and representatives of the committee. Thirdly, an inter-faction discussion took place, with the central tone being the context of national and allied relations, and the question of the boundaries of voting rights for stateless persons and citizens of other third countries. Finally, a joint agreement was reached that the draft 530 should be rejected in the first reading and it was confirmed by a vote of 41–5–0, as a result of which the draft is removed from proceedings. The session concluded with the determination of the official outcome and subsequent procedures.
... and 8 more agenda items
Rain Epler
285 agenda items
285/285 with AI summaries (100.0%)
285/285 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Rain Epler
Email: rain.epler@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: rain.epler@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 91h 58m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 91h 58m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Earth Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (Development of renewable energy production in an area with a mining permit) (698 SE)
2025-10-15 21:31The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 16m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 698, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Earth's Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (development of renewable energy production in areas with a mining permit). The presenter was Andres Sutt, Minister of Energy and Environment. The main objective of the bill is to create a legal basis for the construction of renewable energy facilities (solar and wind parks) in areas subject to a mining permit, especially in exhausted quarries or peat production areas. This should accelerate the transition to climate neutrality and simplify the reclamation of mining areas by reducing bureaucracy for smaller mining plots (up to 15 ha) and peat production areas (up to 150 ha). Minister Sutt emphasized that the changes help diversify land use and stimulate economic activity without compromising the quality of reclamation.
Several critical questions arose during the debate. Rain Epler (EKRE) challenged the ideological focus of the bill, warning that it prioritizes the state's climate goals over economic expediency and potentially locks up active oil shale and peat reserves for 50 years under renewable energy developments, which threatens Estonia's energy security. Tiit Maran (SDE) acknowledged the necessity of the bill but considered it "underdeveloped," criticizing the Climate Ministry's analysis for its one-sided approach. He highlighted that the bill does not adequately consider biodiversity and climate aspects, especially concerning 150-hectare peat fields, where failure to rewet them could lead to significant CO2 emissions. Minister Sutt confirmed that the restoration obligation remains with the developer, and mining permit holders can decide for themselves whether they see commercial prospects in the area.
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)
2025-10-15 21:04The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 15m
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Bill 697, initiated by the Government of the Republic, regarding the amendment of the Atmospheric Air Protection Act and other acts (transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive RED III). Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, introduced the draft bill, emphasizing its goal to simplify permit procedures for renewable energy projects by establishing a single point of contact in the form of the Estonian Building Register and setting deadlines for obtaining permits. The draft bill also addresses the transport sector by abolishing the 6% greenhouse gas emission reduction obligation for fuel suppliers and creating a framework for the wider use of hydrogen and liquefied biomethane. A significant amendment involves extending biomass sustainability criteria to smaller production units (starting from 7.5 MW). During the debate, opposition politicians (Rain Epler, Kalle Grünthal) expressed concern. Epler criticized the strictest possible transposition of the directive, which, in his assessment, promotes market consolidation and imposes excessive obligations on small enterprises. Grünthal raised the question of the safety of wind turbine infrasound, casting doubt on the validity of existing studies. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur of the lead committee, provided an overview of the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, which also addressed the requirement for bidirectional charging of electric cars, which the ministry wishes to make voluntary.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Social Welfare Act and Other Acts (732 SE)
2025-10-15 20:27The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 6m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held the first reading of Bill 732, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Social Welfare Act and other acts. The purpose of the bill is to make the application process for subsistence benefits clearer and fairer, to enable remote sign language interpretation and writing interpretation services for people with hearing loss through permanent state funding, and to specify the obligations of care service providers regarding the provision of hygiene supplies. Furthermore, the establishment of the payment rate for the benefit for pensioners living alone will be made more flexible, and the Social Insurance Board will be authorized to expand the functions of the pension calculator (including the third pillar). Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller emphasized that the changes to the subsistence benefit system, which affect approximately 28,000 people, will reduce bureaucracy and support 18–19-year-old students.
Several critical questions were raised during the debate. Rain Epler (EKRE) challenged the amendment in the bill that replaces "dignified livelihood" with "primary subsistence" in the basis for calculating the subsistence benefit, arguing that this lowers the social standard. Helmen Kütt (SDE) focused on two concerns: first, that the text of the law lacks a provision regarding the savings limit (two subsistence limits, or 440 euros for a person living alone), which she considers too small an amount (the so-called "coffin money") and creates insecurity among people. Secondly, Kütt asked about the legalization and funding of audio description services for the visually impaired, which the bill does not include. Signe Riisalo, Chairman of the Social Affairs Committee, confirmed that an increase in the subsistence limit is planned for the coming years and that the methodology for the subsistence minimum is currently under review.
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 2m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
The Prime Minister's Plan and Statements at the European Council (Climate Targets, Migration)
2025-10-15 16:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 4m
AI Summary: The discussion focused on Prime Minister Kristen Michal's plans for the upcoming European Council, particularly concerning migration policy and climate goals. Riigikogu member Rain Epler posed a very specific question: whether Estonia, similar to Poland, intends to seek an exemption from the EU Migration Pact's quota system or financial obligations, citing the large number of war refugees from Ukraine. Prime Minister Michal avoided a direct answer regarding seeking the exemption, noting that Estonia supports the rapid implementation of the Returns Directive and expects the large number of refugees in Estonia to be taken into account in various activities. Epler also asked whether Estonia plans to cooperate with Poland to challenge the burdensome LULUCF obligations and the 2040 climate goals. The Prime Minister confirmed that Estonia's positions on climate goals are conditional (requiring the existence of technology, funding, and a review clause) and that proposals to change the LULUCF methodology have been made repeatedly. Martin Helme criticized the Prime Minister for a lack of initiative, accusing her of relying on other countries, which the Prime Minister sharply rejected, emphasizing Estonia's active participation in debates and clear national positions.
... and 280 more agenda items
Peeter Ernits
132 agenda items
132/132 with AI summaries (100.0%)
132/132 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Peeter Ernits
Email: peeter.ernits@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: peeter.ernits@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 39h 17m
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 39h 17m
Agenda Items:
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 35m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a matter of national importance initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, titled "Why is food expensive?" The presenters—Jana Guzanova (initiator of the popular initiative), economist Heido Vitsur, and Lauri Laats (Chairman of the Centre Party faction)—addressed the sharp rise in food prices and its social and economic impact. Guzanova emphasized that the popular initiative, which garnered a record 100,000 signatures, demonstrates the acuteness of the problem, especially among lower-income people, and criticized the government’s refusal to lower the VAT on foodstuffs (which stands at 24% in Estonia). Vitsur asserted that the Estonian price level is anomalously high compared to incomes and that the cost of food affects the country's competitiveness. He considered lowering the VAT the most realistic short-term solution. Laats directly blamed the price increase on the government's tax hikes and political choices, highlighting the example of other European countries (e.g., Spain, Sweden) that have implemented VAT exceptions to mitigate inflation. During the negotiations, opinions were divided: the opposition supported lowering the VAT as a necessary measure, while the coalition representative (Eesti 200) deemed it ineffective and unfair. The sitting was extended until the agenda item was exhausted, but no substantive decisions were adopted.
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 46m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
First Reading of the Draft Legislation (736 SE) on the Amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act Amending the State Budget Act
2025-10-13 19:4715th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 7m
AI Summary: This agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Act 736, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act amending the State Budget Act. Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi introduced the objectives of the draft act, which included the transposition of a European Union Council Directive to increase the state's short-term fiscal policy flexibility, as well as the improvement of the clarity and transparency of the state budget. A significant change is the integration of the activity-based and economic perspectives in the 2026 state budget, along with limiting the size of the government reserve to 3% of the volume of budget expenditures and investments. Furthermore, the grounds for granting and reclaiming domestic subsidies are specified. Regarding the financing of local governments, the distribution principles of the equalization fund and the support fund are being changed to increase financing flexibility and reduce bureaucracy. The debate focused on the increase in bureaucracy associated with the new rules and the question of how EU fiscal supervision affects the democratic decision-making process. Minister Ligi emphasized the importance of expertise and rationality in curbing political populism.
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the Act on the Repeal of the Security Tax Act and the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (Bill 734 SE)
2025-10-13 18:4215th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 41m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Bill 734, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the simplified taxation of business income, amendments to the Income Tax Act, and the repeal of the Security Tax Act. The main objective of the bill is to cancel the income tax rate increase to 24% planned by the previous government coalition, leaving the rate at the current level of 22%. Furthermore, the 2% taxation of private individual income starting from the first euro will be dropped, and the tax rate for the business account will be maintained at 20%. Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi emphasized that the changes improve the competitiveness of the tax system and stimulate the economic environment, although they will create a shortfall of nearly 250 million euros in the budget position. Additionally, the income tax exemption for donations made to specific NGOs assisting Ukraine will be extended by two years (until the end of 2027).
During the debate, the opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Aivar Kokk, Riina Sikkut) criticized the government for deepening the budget deficit and damaging political trust, particularly in connection with the negative net position of foreign investments. The issue of lowering the VAT on foodstuffs was also repeatedly raised (Peeter Ernits), to which Minister Ligi responded with a categorical denial, calling it a foolish and socially misdirected tax policy decision, citing international recommendations. Caution regarding granting tax benefits to NGOs assisting Ukraine was also discussed, as this is a risky area open to abuse.
... and 127 more agenda items