Politicians & Agendas
Track individual politicians and their participation in various agenda items. See their speeches, voting patterns, and legislative contributions.
1-10 / 101 politicians
Jaak Aab
117 agenda items
117/117 with AI summaries (100.0%)
117/117 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Jaak Aab
Email: jaak.aab@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: jaak.aab@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 21h 20m
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 21h 20m
Agenda Items:
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 13m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 38m
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector
2025-11-06 00:3315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation.
In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.
Interpellation Concerning the Underfunding of Special Care Services (No. 826)
2025-11-03 22:08The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held an interpellation (No. 826) of Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller regarding the underfunding of special welfare services, initiated by the Social Democrats under the leadership of Helmen Kütt. The interpellation was prompted by the 2025 review from the National Audit Office, which brought to light serious deficiencies in the accessibility of special welfare services. Helmen Kütt stressed that waiting lists have nearly doubled between 2018 and 2024, now extending up to 53 months, and that court rulings concerning places in secure special welfare facilities have not been implemented. She pointed out that the Ministry of Social Affairs had requested €195 million from the government for special welfare over four years but was allocated only €4.2 million for the upcoming year.
Minister Karmen Joller acknowledged the chronic underfunding of special welfare and the increasing demand, particularly for round-the-clock services. She noted, however, that the budget has grown (from €22.7 million in 2015 to €57.7 million in 2026). Joller outlined three steps to improve the situation: increasing the remuneration for service providers by €4.2 million annually to facilitate a 10% salary increase; establishing a 10-day decision deadline for accepting a service placement to reduce the number of vacant spots; and opening new service placements in high-demand regions (Tallinn, Harju County, Tartu). Joller conceded that a situation where people must take the state to court just to receive services is neither humane nor appropriate for a state governed by the rule of law.
During the debate, the questioners (Tanel Kiik, Lauri Läänemets) focused on the government's priorities, contrasting the €4.2 million allocated for salary increases with the tax "gift" of over €100 million given to the wealthier segment of society by abolishing the progressive income tax system (the "tax hump"). Minister Joller defended the tax reform, arguing that it also benefits those earning an average salary and simplifies the tax system, while affirming that special welfare remains a continuing priority within her ministry.
Inquiry regarding the healthcare funding crisis (No. 811)
2025-11-03 20:26The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on an interpellation submitted to Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller concerning the healthcare funding crisis. The interpellation was presented by members of the Social Democratic Party and other opposition factions, led by Tanel Kiik. The interpellators highlighted the chronic deficit of the Health Insurance Fund (200–300 million euros) and the underfunding of Estonian healthcare compared to the OECD and EU averages, warning that government inaction would deepen waiting lists and inequality. Questions addressed ensuring sustainability, covering the 2026 deficit, involving private capital in primary care, and reducing patient co-payments. Minister Joller acknowledged the funding problem but stressed that the government's priority is first to streamline healthcare expenditures and optimize the hospital network to ensure funds are directed toward results-based objectives. She explained that the 2024 budget deficit was successfully reduced by 70 million euros due to better collection of social tax and efficiency measures. Joller criticized the opposition's focus solely on accessibility, emphasizing the importance of treatment quality. She confirmed that the government’s specific proposals for long-term funding would be presented in February, but conceded that finding a large volume of additional funds would necessitate new tax increases or the reallocation of resources from other priorities, such as national defense. The discussion also brought up concerns about two-tier medicine and the future of regional hospitals (e.g., Hiiumaa) within the context of optimizing the hospital network.
... and 112 more agenda items
Annely Akkermann
151 agenda items
151/151 with AI summaries (100.0%)
151/151 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Annely Akkermann
Email: annely.akkermann@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: annely.akkermann@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 26h 25m
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 26h 25m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector
2025-11-06 00:3315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation.
In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Approval of the State's 2024 Financial Year Consolidated Report" (Bill 720 OE)
2025-11-06 00:0915th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 14m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the draft resolution on the approval of the State's 2024 consolidated annual economic report, submitted by the Government of the Republic, during its first reading. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the report, noting that 2024 was a difficult year for the economy, particularly concerning consumer confidence, although fundamental indicators were improving. The statistical deficit of the general government sector reached 601 million euros (1.5% of GDP), which was smaller than expected thanks to good tax revenue collection and cost savings. During the year, a negative supplementary budget was adopted, and a security tax was introduced, and the VAT rate was raised, the main impact of which will manifest in the coming years. The National Audit Office audited the report and found that it fairly reflected the state's financial position, but made remarks regarding the accounting of Ministry of Defence inventories and deficiencies in the internal control systems of the Centre for Defence Investments and the Defence Forces, noting that this is a recurring problem. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the leading committee, the Finance Committee, provided an overview of the debate, which focused primarily on the lack of connection between performance indicators (metrics) and funding. The Committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Second reading of the Draft Act on the State Supplementary Budget for 2025 (733 SE)
2025-11-06 00:0215th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Act 733 on the state's 2025 supplementary budget, initiated by the Government of the Republic. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, provided an overview of the committee's work, which took place on October 23 and November 3. According to the draft bill, expenditures will be reduced by 19.9 million and investments by 12 million, while financing transactions will be increased by 72.3 million euros. The reduction in expenditures is primarily due to the refinement of project timelines and the reallocation of funds to subsequent years. In addition, the budget of the Ministry of Defence will be increased by 39 million for assisting Ukraine and for defense procurements.
The committee discussed the amendment proposal submitted by Isamaa, which aimed to further reduce central government expenditures by 200 million (excluding national defense and the salaries of teachers, police officers, and rescue workers). The Finance Committee decided not to consider the proposal, as it did not comply with the requirements of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, lacking a precise numerical formulation within the budget framework. Aivar Kokk raised a question regarding the revenue forecasts for the motor vehicle tax registration fee, to which Akkermann replied that the Ministry of Finance would submit an amendment proposal concerning the reduction in revenues for the third reading. The leading committee proposed concluding the second reading and shortening the deadline for submitting amendments due to the need for a faster procedure.
... and 146 more agenda items
Yoko Alender
19 agenda items
19/19 with AI summaries (100.0%)
19/19 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Yoko Alender
Email: yoko.alender@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: yoko.alender@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 5h 19m
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 5h 19m
Agenda Items:
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Waste Act (Bill 676 SE)
2025-11-11 14:40XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: As part of the agenda item, the second reading of Draft Act 676 amending the Waste Act, initiated by the Government of the Republic, took place. The report was presented by Yoko Alender, Chairman of the Environment Committee. The main objective of the draft act is the transposition of the Batteries and Accumulators Directive and the improvement of the recycling of valuable materials, such as rare earth metals, from electronic and battery waste.
In preparation for the second reading, the Environment Committee reviewed four amendments focusing on electronic waste and the responsibility of digital platforms. The most significant amendment concerned digital platforms (e.g., Temu and other resellers operating outside the EU), creating the possibility for them to register as producers and fulfill Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) obligations on behalf of their thousands of merchants. This should introduce greater fairness into the system and increase the volume of materials entering the recycling stream. The report also emphasized the need to improve the fulfillment of battery collection targets (the goal is 65%, up from the current 40–42%) and to expand awareness campaigns regarding collection points in major shopping centers. The Environment Committee unanimously supported all amendments. Discussions were not opened, and all four amendments submitted by the lead committee were fully taken into account. The second reading of the draft act was concluded.
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Earth Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (Development of renewable energy production in an area with a mining permit) (698 SE)
2025-10-15 21:31The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 698, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Earth's Crust Act, the Land Cadastre Act, and the State Assets Act (development of renewable energy production in areas with a mining permit). The presenter was Andres Sutt, Minister of Energy and Environment. The main objective of the bill is to create a legal basis for the construction of renewable energy facilities (solar and wind parks) in areas subject to a mining permit, especially in exhausted quarries or peat production areas. This should accelerate the transition to climate neutrality and simplify the reclamation of mining areas by reducing bureaucracy for smaller mining plots (up to 15 ha) and peat production areas (up to 150 ha). Minister Sutt emphasized that the changes help diversify land use and stimulate economic activity without compromising the quality of reclamation.
Several critical questions arose during the debate. Rain Epler (EKRE) challenged the ideological focus of the bill, warning that it prioritizes the state's climate goals over economic expediency and potentially locks up active oil shale and peat reserves for 50 years under renewable energy developments, which threatens Estonia's energy security. Tiit Maran (SDE) acknowledged the necessity of the bill but considered it "underdeveloped," criticizing the Climate Ministry's analysis for its one-sided approach. He highlighted that the bill does not adequately consider biodiversity and climate aspects, especially concerning 150-hectare peat fields, where failure to rewet them could lead to significant CO2 emissions. Minister Sutt confirmed that the restoration obligation remains with the developer, and mining permit holders can decide for themselves whether they see commercial prospects in the area.
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)
2025-10-15 21:04The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Bill 697, initiated by the Government of the Republic, regarding the amendment of the Atmospheric Air Protection Act and other acts (transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive RED III). Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, introduced the draft bill, emphasizing its goal to simplify permit procedures for renewable energy projects by establishing a single point of contact in the form of the Estonian Building Register and setting deadlines for obtaining permits. The draft bill also addresses the transport sector by abolishing the 6% greenhouse gas emission reduction obligation for fuel suppliers and creating a framework for the wider use of hydrogen and liquefied biomethane. A significant amendment involves extending biomass sustainability criteria to smaller production units (starting from 7.5 MW). During the debate, opposition politicians (Rain Epler, Kalle Grünthal) expressed concern. Epler criticized the strictest possible transposition of the directive, which, in his assessment, promotes market consolidation and imposes excessive obligations on small enterprises. Grünthal raised the question of the safety of wind turbine infrasound, casting doubt on the validity of existing studies. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur of the lead committee, provided an overview of the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, which also addressed the requirement for bidirectional charging of electric cars, which the ministry wishes to make voluntary.
Draft Law Amending the Waste Act (676 SE) – First Reading
2025-09-23 13:4515th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 676, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Waste Act. Minister of Infrastructure Kuldar Leis introduced the bill, the main objective of which is to transpose the requirements of the European Union Battery Regulation into Estonian law. The regulation covers all batteries and accumulators, ranging from small ones to those used in electric cars and large energy storage systems, aiming for more environmentally friendly production, durability, and material recycling. Key changes highlighted included the requirement for a digital product passport for batteries (containing data on origin and handling) and the obligation to ensure battery replaceability in devices starting from 2027. The bill is largely technical, removing duplicate provisions, but the substantive change concerns producer responsibility: henceforth, all importers of batteries for electric vehicles, light personal transport devices, and industrial use must also join the producers' association to prevent waste management costs from falling upon the state.
A lively discussion arose during the debate regarding costs and consumer rights. Kalle Grünthal expressed concern that the new regulation might limit the consumer's right to remove and repair batteries themselves, thereby serving the interests of large manufacturers. Minister Leis clarified that the regulation itself does not prohibit repair, but the complexity of removing batteries is rather a technical issue. Mart Maastik and Henn Põlluaas doubted the Minister's claim that the new obligations (e.g., the battery passport) would not lead to increased bureaucracy or costs for the consumer. The Minister confirmed that the obligation for the battery passport rests with the producer, and according to the European Union's impact assessment, the price of small batteries will increase by 0.5–2 euros, which will be factored into the product price. Yoko Alender, Chairman of the Environment Committee, confirmed that the system ensures free handling of all batteries for the consumer, and the collection network is already largely in place.
... and 14 more agenda items
Anti Allas
159 agenda items
159/159 with AI summaries (100.0%)
159/159 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Anti Allas
Email: anti.allas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: anti.allas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 27h 33m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 27h 33m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)
2025-11-11 13:22XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector
2025-11-06 00:3315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation.
In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)
2025-11-05 22:2415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.
... and 154 more agenda items
Arvo Aller
239 agenda items
239/239 with AI summaries (100.0%)
239/239 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Arvo Aller
Email: arvo.aller@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: arvo.aller@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 36h 1m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 36h 1m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"
2025-11-10 17:19XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
Draft Act Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (677 SE), second reading
2025-11-05 21:0415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 677, the act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, which was initiated by the Finance Committee. The main objective of the bill was to bring the tax law into compliance with the Constitution, taking into account the remarks made by the Chancellor of Justice. The amendments concern shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register (due to destruction, theft, or export from the country). The changes will be applied retroactively starting from January 1st of this year. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, stressed that this was a necessary correction of errors and that adapting tax legislation is routine work.
The debate was extremely critical. Opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Center Party) accused the coalition of stubbornness, noting that the same flaws had been highlighted during the initial handling of the bill but were forcefully rejected. Critics argued that the amendments were only being made because the Chancellor of Justice intervened to prevent a constitutional crisis. The opposition repeatedly demanded the complete repeal of the motor vehicle tax, citing its unfairness, low revenue collection (half of what was forecast), and negative impact on rural life and the behavior of car buyers. Akkermann defended the tax as a fair way to collect money to cover the costs of roads and traffic management, noting that social benefits had already been increased using the tax revenue.
... and 234 more agenda items
Vladimir Arhipov
180 agenda items
180/180 with AI summaries (100.0%)
180/180 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Vladimir Arhipov
Email: vladimir.arhipov@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: vladimir.arhipov@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 28h 1m
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 28h 1m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)
2025-11-11 13:22XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 15m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)
2025-11-05 22:2415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.
Draft Act Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (677 SE), second reading
2025-11-05 21:0415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 677, the act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, which was initiated by the Finance Committee. The main objective of the bill was to bring the tax law into compliance with the Constitution, taking into account the remarks made by the Chancellor of Justice. The amendments concern shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register (due to destruction, theft, or export from the country). The changes will be applied retroactively starting from January 1st of this year. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, stressed that this was a necessary correction of errors and that adapting tax legislation is routine work.
The debate was extremely critical. Opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Center Party) accused the coalition of stubbornness, noting that the same flaws had been highlighted during the initial handling of the bill but were forcefully rejected. Critics argued that the amendments were only being made because the Chancellor of Justice intervened to prevent a constitutional crisis. The opposition repeatedly demanded the complete repeal of the motor vehicle tax, citing its unfairness, low revenue collection (half of what was forecast), and negative impact on rural life and the behavior of car buyers. Akkermann defended the tax as a fair way to collect money to cover the costs of roads and traffic management, noting that social benefits had already been increased using the tax revenue.
The Impact of Rising Prices on the People of Estonia
2025-11-05 15:4015th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 3m
AI Summary: The session addressed the response of Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller to the question posed by Riigikogu member Vladimir Arhipov regarding the impact of price increases and the care reform. Arhipov criticized the care reform, claiming that it had not reduced the burden on local governments but had instead increased costs, making nursing homes more expensive and putting families under pressure. He asked why local governments must pay an increasingly larger share of the costs and how the state ensures the availability of services amid rising prices.
Minister Joller emphasized that the reform had been successful, allowing over a thousand people to move into nursing homes, which demonstrates improved accessibility. She highlighted that the state has allocated approximately 76 million euros in support to local governments and that the personal contribution of individuals to the cost of nursing home care has significantly decreased (81% covered). Joller promised to review all proposals for increasing the funding of local authorities (KOVs) by the end of next year. In a supplementary question, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart leveled sharp criticism at the minister regarding the handling of sensitive data and the expenditures of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) (advertising, consulting). Joller responded that Kovalenko-Kõlvart had exceeded the mandate of the Special Committee on Anti-Corruption by attempting to illegally demand special categories of personal data over which she has no right of supervision. The minister accused Kovalenko-Kõlvart of unethical conduct and ignorance of the law, after which the chairman of the session concluded the discussion of the topic, as it went beyond the scope of the registered question.
... and 175 more agenda items
Vadim Belobrovtsev
253 agenda items
253/253 with AI summaries (100.0%)
253/253 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Email: vadim.belobrovtsev@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: vadim.belobrovtsev@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 81h 2m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 81h 2m
Agenda Items:
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
14 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 47m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 44s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Cybersecurity Act and Other Acts (Transposition of the Cybersecurity 2 Directive) (Bill 739 SE)
2025-10-23 13:1015th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, presented Bill 739, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Cybersecurity Act and other acts (transposition of the NIS2 directive), to the Riigikogu at its first reading. The Minister emphasized the necessity of the act due to the rapid growth of cyber threats, citing the successful international police operation SIMCARTEL and cyberattacks against Estonian hospitals as examples. The main goal of the bill is to raise the level of cybersecurity in the European Union and harmonize the rules.
The bill extends the application of stricter cybersecurity requirements to approximately 3,000 new organizations, increasing the total number of affected entities in Estonia to around 6,500. Another significant change is that the entire organization will henceforth be responsible for cybersecurity, not just a specific vital service. The Minister confirmed that the goal was to avoid "gold-plating" European Union law and introduced a new "traffic light" table to help assess the accuracy of the transposition. During the discussions, questions were raised regarding the complex wording of the bill (referencing criticism from the Bar Association and ITL) and the lack of an economic impact analysis. The Minister responded that it is difficult to estimate the exact cost, but the state will offer the new entities a three-year transition period, support measures, and free online courses.
Kalev Stoicescu, Chairman of the National Defence Committee, supported the general principles of the bill, noting the need to align the draft with other laws currently under deliberation. The Committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Second Reading of the Draft Act (692 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Sultanate of Oman for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion, and the Protocol thereto
2025-10-23 13:0115th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 692, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Sultanate of Oman for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion. Diana Ingerainen reported on behalf of the Finance Committee, stating that the committee discussed the bill on October 14 and 21, and unanimously decided to conclude the second reading and proceed to the final vote.
During the debate, several questions were raised focusing on the economic rationale of the agreement and the level of trade between Estonia and Oman. MPs (Vadim Belobrovtsev, Lauri Laats, Peeter Ernits, Rene Kokk, Priit Sibul) inquired about the specific additional benefits for Estonia, the volume of trade, and which types of businesses were interested in the agreement. The rapporteur, Diana Ingerainen, admitted that the committee neither requested nor received an overview of specific financial figures or a broader economic perspective, but she mentioned that the initiative to conclude the agreement came primarily from IT companies. Peeter Ernits criticized the committee's work, accusing it of acting as a "rubber stamp" for the government. The question was also raised regarding the suitability of concluding such an agreement in the context of Oman's authoritarian regime and human rights restrictions. Since no amendments were submitted, the bill was moved to the final vote.
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Public Holidays and Anniversaries Act (669 SE)
2025-10-22 18:02XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
18 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 47m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on the first reading of Draft Bill 669, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which sought to amend the Law on Holidays and Commemorative Dates. The bill's objective was to designate June 1 (Children's Day) as a national holiday and a day off. The bill's rapporteur, Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party), emphasized that this was a family-friendly step that would strengthen family relationships and give parents the opportunity to spend time with their children. He highlighted that 36 reputable organizations supported the idea and noted that Estonia has few days off compared to the European Union average. Belobrovtsev criticized the government's opposition, which was presented by the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, primarily citing the lack of an impact analysis, even though the idea itself was acknowledged as positive. Several MPs (SDE, Isamaa) expressed strong support for the bill, emphasizing the importance of valuing children and improving the demographic situation. The rapporteur for the Constitutional Committee, Jaak Valge (EKRE), explained that the committee was unable to adopt a decision regarding the rejection of the bill (the vote was 4 in favor, 4 against). Since no faction made a proposal in the plenary session to reject the bill, the first reading was concluded without a vote, based on the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act.
... and 248 more agenda items
Enn Eesmaa
14 agenda items
14/14 with AI summaries (100.0%)
14/14 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Enn Eesmaa
Email: enn.eesmaa@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: enn.eesmaa@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 22 years
Total Speaking Time: 46m
Parliament Seniority: 22 years
Total Speaking Time: 46m
Agenda Items:
Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (706 OE) "Extension of the Term for the Use of the Defence Forces in Fulfilling the International Obligations of the Estonian State in the European Union Military Assistance Mission in Mozambique"
2025-11-05 19:5915th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the second reading of Draft Resolution 706, submitted by the Government of the Republic, which extends the term for the use of the Defence Forces in the European Union Military Assistance Mission in Mozambique (EUMAM Mozambique). Enn Eesmaa, a member of the National Defence Committee, reported that the lead committee had approved the draft resolution unanimously and proposed concluding the second reading and submitting the bill for final vote, as no amendments had been submitted. The draft resolution extends the term for the deployment of up to three servicemen until December 31, 2026.
During the debates, Rain Epler spoke, explaining the background of the mission, which is linked to the gas deposits discovered in Mozambique's Cabo Delgado province and the local population's insurgency due to the unequal distribution of revenues. Epler criticized the mission as an example of European hypocrisy, where the need for fossil fuels outweighs previously emphasized human rights protection, given the cooperation with a corrupt government. In the final vote, the decision was adopted with 53 votes in favor.
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) "Extension of the Term of Use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union's military assistance mission in Mozambique" (706 OE)
2025-09-24 20:30Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 706, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the extension of the term of use of the Estonian Defence Forces for fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in the European Union Military Assistance Mission in Mozambique (EUTM Mozambique). The rapporteur was Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur.
Minister Pevkur explained that the mission was initiated in July 2021, and although the security situation has improved, the 11 participating countries see the need to continue the mission. Estonia would contribute one officer to the mission, and the operation costs are approximately 40,000 euros. Enn Eesmaa, a member of the National Defence Committee, provided an overview of the committee's work, emphasizing that this is Estonia's only mission on the African continent and that the contribution is made in solidarity with other EU member states. The draft resolution confirms readiness to continue contributing until 2026 with up to three servicemen, although, in reality, the plan is to send one legal advisor whose task is to advise the mission commander and train the local armed forces on human rights issues. The National Defence Committee supported the draft resolution unanimously.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
... and 9 more agenda items
Rain Epler
304 agenda items
304/304 with AI summaries (100.0%)
304/304 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Rain Epler
Email: rain.epler@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: rain.epler@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 96h 35m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 96h 35m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 31m
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Inquiry concerning the intention to deploy the Defense Forces to Ukraine (No. 814)
2025-11-10 19:39XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation (No. 814) submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the intention to deploy the defense forces to Ukraine, which was filed by Varro Vooglaid and other members of the EKRE faction. The impetus for the interpellation was a statement by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, in which he confirmed Estonia's readiness to contribute up to a company-sized ground combat unit to ensuring Ukraine's security.
The rapporteur for the interpellators, Varro Vooglaid (pid: _wD0jSQ0aWg), emphasized that pursuant to § 128 of the Constitution, the sole right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces belongs to the Riigikogu, not the government or the foreign minister. He criticized the public confirmations made by the government representative in a situation where Parliament had neither adopted the relevant decision nor even discussed it. Vooglaid asked whether the government considers Tsahkna's confirmations binding, whether a risk analysis has been conducted, and whether the government relies on the blanket authorization (up to 100 defense personnel) granted annually by the Riigikogu when deploying the Defense Forces.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal replied that Estonia has informed its allies of its readiness to contribute training instructors and staff officers within the framework of a coalition of the willing, but repeatedly stressed that any deployment of a unit to Ukraine requires a mandate from the Riigikogu before the operation is launched. Michal rejected the interpellators' question about seeking Russia's consent, deeming it "bizarre" and noting that one does not need to ask the aggressor state for permission to support Ukraine. He affirmed that the government has no plans to abandon support for Ukraine. During the debate, the interpellators (especially Martin Helme and Mart Helme) accused the Prime Minister of evading answers and violating the constitutional order, stressing that sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine would mean Estonia entering the war with Russia, which EKRE considers irresponsible. The Prime Minister concluded the discussions by suggesting that the interpellators' views on the necessity of Russia's consent resemble the positions of Russian officials (Peskov, Lavrov).
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"
2025-11-10 17:19XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
... and 299 more agenda items
Peeter Ernits
164 agenda items
164/164 with AI summaries (100.0%)
164/164 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Peeter Ernits
Email: peeter.ernits@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: peeter.ernits@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 49h 4m
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 49h 4m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Inquiry concerning the intention to deploy the Defense Forces to Ukraine (No. 814)
2025-11-10 19:39XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 6m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation (No. 814) submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the intention to deploy the defense forces to Ukraine, which was filed by Varro Vooglaid and other members of the EKRE faction. The impetus for the interpellation was a statement by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, in which he confirmed Estonia's readiness to contribute up to a company-sized ground combat unit to ensuring Ukraine's security.
The rapporteur for the interpellators, Varro Vooglaid (pid: _wD0jSQ0aWg), emphasized that pursuant to § 128 of the Constitution, the sole right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces belongs to the Riigikogu, not the government or the foreign minister. He criticized the public confirmations made by the government representative in a situation where Parliament had neither adopted the relevant decision nor even discussed it. Vooglaid asked whether the government considers Tsahkna's confirmations binding, whether a risk analysis has been conducted, and whether the government relies on the blanket authorization (up to 100 defense personnel) granted annually by the Riigikogu when deploying the Defense Forces.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal replied that Estonia has informed its allies of its readiness to contribute training instructors and staff officers within the framework of a coalition of the willing, but repeatedly stressed that any deployment of a unit to Ukraine requires a mandate from the Riigikogu before the operation is launched. Michal rejected the interpellators' question about seeking Russia's consent, deeming it "bizarre" and noting that one does not need to ask the aggressor state for permission to support Ukraine. He affirmed that the government has no plans to abandon support for Ukraine. During the debate, the interpellators (especially Martin Helme and Mart Helme) accused the Prime Minister of evading answers and violating the constitutional order, stressing that sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine would mean Estonia entering the war with Russia, which EKRE considers irresponsible. The Prime Minister concluded the discussions by suggesting that the interpellators' views on the necessity of Russia's consent resemble the positions of Russian officials (Peskov, Lavrov).
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 36m
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
... and 159 more agenda items