Politicians & Agendas
Track individual politicians and their participation in various agenda items. See their speeches, voting patterns, and legislative contributions.
11-20 / 101 politicians
Ants Frosch
69 agenda items
69/69 with AI summaries (100.0%)
69/69 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Ants Frosch
Email: ants.frosch@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: ants.frosch@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 13h 28m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 13h 28m
Agenda Items:
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05 16:0315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 15m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"
2025-09-25 14:1215th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "The Impact of Price Increases on Economic Competitiveness and People's Well-being. What is to be done?". Presentations during the debate were given by Urmas Reinsalu, a member of the Isamaa faction, and economic experts Raivo Vare, Peeter Raudsepp, and Heido Vitsur. Reinsalu highlighted a 46.2% price increase spanning from the beginning of 2021 to the second quarter of 2025, emphasizing its unethical dimension and the government's systemic steps in accelerating inflation (tax hikes, growth in administrative spending). As solutions, he proposed a critical review of the indirect tax burden and a reduction in administrative costs. The experts confirmed the stagnation of the Estonian economy and the decline in competitiveness (33rd place in the IMD ranking; Lithuania and Latvia have overtaken Estonia). Peeter Raudsepp highlighted consumer barometer data showing the deterioration of people's purchasing power and financial security across all income quartiles. Heido Vitsur emphasized that Estonia's price level, especially for foodstuffs, is among the highest in Europe, which is inconsistent with our lower levels of productivity and prosperity. The experts recommended a bolder, more experimental economic policy, an audit of state expenditures, and a serious debate on taxation and regional policy, referencing the IMF's recommendation to consider a progressive income tax. The opposition (Centre Party, SDE, Isamaa) sharply criticized the coalition's absence from the debate and the government's regressive tax policy, which deepens inequality and slows down the economy.
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.
2025-09-10 17:0515th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 31m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the motion of no confidence filed against Social Minister Karmen Joller, which was signed by 21 members of the Riigikogu, primarily from the EKRE and Centre Party factions. Martin Helme, speaking on behalf of the initiators of the motion, accused the minister of evading political responsibility due to scandals at the Health Insurance Fund (including glamorous summer events and management bonuses), the catastrophic state of healthcare funding, and damaging Estonia’s foreign relations, calling Joller a "political activist" and "anti-science."
Minister Karmen Joller defended her actions, emphasizing that she had only been in office for a short time and was focused on solving systemic problems, such as establishing funding transparency and a quality system. She acknowledged the unethical nature of the Health Insurance Fund’s summer days but explained that the council was legally bound by prior agreements regarding the payment of performance bonuses. Joller stressed her commitment to evidence-based medicine and rejected accusations of harming US relations, regretting only one previous choice of words. During the debate, issues such as long treatment queues, underfunding in the social sector, and the lack of family policy measures were also raised. The Isamaa faction (Urmas Reinsalu) announced it would vote in favor of the motion, citing the minister’s managerial inadequacy and disregard for family policy. The Social Democrats (Tanel Kiik), however, stated they would support the minister for championing science-based medicine, but sharply criticized her inaction regarding additional healthcare funding and the rushing of social reforms. In the vote, the motion of no confidence failed to gain the support of the majority of the Riigikogu membership.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 3h 12m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading
2025-06-18 23:5515th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated, as agenda item 21, the first reading of Draft Act 670 on supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act, initiated by Riigikogu members Peeter Tali, Ando Kiviberg, Anti Haugas, and Mati Raidma. The purpose of the draft bill was to establish clear and lawful regulation for the use of Number Plate Recognition Cameras (NPRC) in the activities of the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), thereby reducing the existing legal ambiguity that had arisen based on the 2009 regulation. Presenter Anti Haugas emphasized that the cameras are a vitally important tool for detecting, preventing, and precluding crimes, and that legal clarity must be achieved quickly to maintain police credibility. He confirmed that the draft bill addresses previous remarks by the Data Protection Inspectorate and the Chancellor of Justice regarding the need for regulation at the level of law.
The debate was heated, focusing on the infringement of people's fundamental rights. Opponents, particularly Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa) and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart (Centre Party), criticized the bill as a hastily prepared "botched draft" that attempts to retroactively legalize unlawful activity and grants the PPA overly broad rights, including the possibility of identifying individuals in vehicles and using data to "terminate disturbances of public order." Supporters (Eesti 200, SDE) stressed that NPRC is a modern and necessary tool for solving serious crimes (citing examples of rape cases) and that the closure of the cameras by the Minister of the Interior was a mistake that endangers Estonia's security during the summer period. The Legal Affairs Committee proposed concluding the first reading so that the draft bill could be amended during the summer. The proposal by Isamaa and the Centre Party to reject the draft bill was voted down.
... and 64 more agenda items
Kalle Grünthal
221 agenda items
221/221 with AI summaries (100.0%)
221/221 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Kalle Grünthal
Email: kalle.grynthal@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: kalle.grynthal@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 79h 16m
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 79h 16m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Deployment of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in another international military operation led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or its member state, the European Union, or the United Nations Organization upon first contribution thereto" (705 DR)
2025-11-05 19:2915th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Resolution 705, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the use of the Defense Forces in international military operations for the first time, contributing up to 100 servicemen. Leo Kunnas, Vice-Chairman of the National Defense Committee, announced that no amendments had been submitted to the draft, and the committee had consensually approved the text, proposing to conclude the second reading and put the draft to a final vote.
During the debate, the question of the draft's constitutionality was repeatedly raised. MPs Rene Kokk and Varro Vooglaid argued against delegating the authorization to the Government of the Republic, emphasizing that Article 128 of the Constitution grants the right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces solely to the Riigikogu. They highlighted that the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act allows for convening extraordinary or supplementary sessions quickly enough (even by the next day), meaning there is no real need to give the government blank authorization. Additionally, granting decision-making power to a government with low public support was criticized. Leo Kunnas admitted that he lacked arguments to refute the possibility of quickly convening the Riigikogu. Alar Laneman defended the draft, citing the state's capability to act in unforeseen circumstances and the need for strategic depth. In the final vote, the draft was adopted as a resolution with 52 votes in favor, 6 against, and 1 abstention.
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04 12:07The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
10 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 25m
AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.
Second reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Vital Statistics Act, the Population Register Act, and the State Fees Act (687 SE)
2025-11-03 19:25The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 11m
AI Summary: Pipi-Liis Siemann, a member of the Constitutional Committee, presented a report on the second reading of Draft Act 687, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Vital Statistics Registration Act, the Population Register Act, and the State Fees Act. The committee handled the draft bill during two sittings, discussing the standpoints of the Ministry of the Interior and the proposals put forth by the Association of Estonian Cities and Rural Municipalities. The ministry did not support the latter proposals (such as the exception for digital signing by guardians and improvements to the booking system). The primary debate revolved around centralizing the authority for birth registration in county centers (in addition to Narva). The aim of this centralization is to ensure a higher level of competence in more complex cases and to avoid the continuous training of officials across 79 local governments, especially given the widespread use of e-services.
During the debate, Kalle Grünthal (Isamaa) sharply criticized the centralization of authority, arguing that it would increase costs and administrative burden for rural residents, and even compared the state's actions to a taxing "mafia." In her rebuttal, Pipi-Liis Siemann explained that most registrations are handled via e-services, and local governments are obligated to provide transport assistance to those who require in-person services. Amendment proposal No. 1 from the Isamaa faction was put to a vote and subsequently rejected. The leading committee then proposed concluding the second reading.
First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)
2025-10-15 21:04The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 2m
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Bill 697, initiated by the Government of the Republic, regarding the amendment of the Atmospheric Air Protection Act and other acts (transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive RED III). Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, introduced the draft bill, emphasizing its goal to simplify permit procedures for renewable energy projects by establishing a single point of contact in the form of the Estonian Building Register and setting deadlines for obtaining permits. The draft bill also addresses the transport sector by abolishing the 6% greenhouse gas emission reduction obligation for fuel suppliers and creating a framework for the wider use of hydrogen and liquefied biomethane. A significant amendment involves extending biomass sustainability criteria to smaller production units (starting from 7.5 MW). During the debate, opposition politicians (Rain Epler, Kalle Grünthal) expressed concern. Epler criticized the strictest possible transposition of the directive, which, in his assessment, promotes market consolidation and imposes excessive obligations on small enterprises. Grünthal raised the question of the safety of wind turbine infrasound, casting doubt on the validity of existing studies. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur of the lead committee, provided an overview of the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, which also addressed the requirement for bidirectional charging of electric cars, which the ministry wishes to make voluntary.
... and 216 more agenda items
Andre Hanimägi
107 agenda items
107/107 with AI summaries (100.0%)
107/107 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Andre Hanimägi
Email: andre.hanimagi@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: andre.hanimagi@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 22h 16m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 22h 16m
Agenda Items:
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
First reading of the Draft Act (726 SE) amending the Code of Enforcement Procedure and the Act on the Implementation of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Enforcement Procedure
2025-11-05 18:1315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 4m
AI Summary: During the first reading of the draft act [726], initiated by the Government of the Republic, which seeks to amend the Code of Enforcement Procedure and the Act on the Implementation of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Enforcement Procedure, the Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the main objectives of the bill. The central amendment of the bill is the interfacing of the Enforcement Register with the Data Tracker, which will be made mandatory for all databases. This step is intended to increase public trust in the register by guaranteeing people the right to see which state authorities (bailiffs, PPA [Police and Border Guard Board], etc.) have made inquiries regarding their bank account data.
Another significant amendment concerns the public disclosure of debtor data. The bill reverses a previous decision to make all debts public, stipulating that only the debts of legal persons will remain publicly visible. The blanket public disclosure of debts owed by private individuals (approximately 70,000 people) will be revoked to prevent stigmatization and difficulties in finding employment. During the debate, Riigikogu members raised questions regarding the technical quality of the bill (contradictions concerning the repeal and amendment of provisions) and the exemptions granted to the Estonian Internal Security Service and the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service from the Data Tracker notification obligation. Varro Vooglaid (EKRE) criticized the blanket exemption granted to security institutions and the lack of discretion afforded to banks when releasing extensive account data, proposing on behalf of his faction that the bill be rejected. The proposal did not receive support, and the first reading was concluded.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05 16:0315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (713 OE)
2025-11-03 18:33The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Draft Resolution 713, submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, which proposed raising the subsistence level for the Government of the Republic to at least 300 euros per month. Rapporteur Helmen Kütt emphasized that the current limit of 200 euros (which is set to rise to 220 euros starting in 2026) is insufficient and falls far below the absolute poverty line (345.80 euros). The goal of the draft resolution was to offer faster, needs-based support to single parents, the elderly, and low-income individuals, especially during the cold heating periods. The Social Democrats had also submitted a state budget amendment proposal to make the increase to 300 euros possible.
During the debate, it was pointed out that raising the subsistence level to 300 euros would entail an additional cost to the state budget of approximately 12–13 million euros per year, but this money would immediately return to the Estonian economy through consumption. Eero Merilind, representative of the Social Affairs Committee, confirmed that although the objective of the draft resolution is sound, the state budget's resources are limited. Opposition parties (Centre Party, EKRE) supported the proposal, but EKRE representative Rain Epler criticized the Social Democrats and the Reform Party for earlier tax increases that disproportionately affected poorer residents. In the final vote, the draft resolution failed to gain support, as only 28 Riigikogu members voted in favor, which was insufficient to achieve the required majority of the Riigikogu composition (51 votes).
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop the Procedure for Paying an Additional Annual Lump-Sum Pension Supplement to Pensioners" (678 OE)
2025-11-03 17:32The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 678, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic develop a procedure for paying pensioners an additional annual one-off pension supplement (€100). Rapporteur Lauri Laats emphasized that this was a deeply moral issue, as over 327,000 pensioners live in a situation where the cost of living has grown significantly faster than pensions in recent years, especially the prices of food and essential goods (a rise of over 40%). He highlighted that Estonia's pension replacement rate (around 34%) is the lowest in the European Union, and nearly 40% of the elderly are at risk of poverty. Laats argued that the support, costing 33 million euros, is affordable for the state and would help alleviate the financial difficulties faced by the elderly while simultaneously stimulating domestic consumption. As funding sources, the faction proposed introducing a bank tax and a progressive income tax, as well as savings from bureaucracy and green transition costs.
During the debate, questions were raised about the universality of the support, to which Laats replied that the draft resolution stipulated payment to all pensioners, but making exceptions was negotiable. Signe Riisalo, Chairman of the Social Affairs Committee, provided an overview of the committee's brief discussion, noting that the committee does not develop solutions but pointed to the need for an extraordinary increase in the national pension to reduce poverty among the elderly. During negotiations, Aleksandr Tšaplõgin and Mart Helme criticized the government, accusing it of neglecting the elderly and breaking election promises. Social Democrat Andre Hanimägi supported steps to assist the elderly but emphasized the need for systemic solutions. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, which required a majority of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes) for adoption. The draft resolution was rejected, receiving only 22 votes in favor.
... and 102 more agenda items
Anti Haugas
31 agenda items
31/31 with AI summaries (100.0%)
31/31 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Anti Haugas
Email: anti.haugas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: anti.haugas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 20m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 20m
Agenda Items:
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure (695 SE)
2025-10-09 01:00The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) began debating the first reading of Draft Act 695, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta introduced the draft, emphasizing its technical nature. The purpose of the draft is to bring Estonian domestic law into conformity with four different European Union legal acts, in respect of which the European Commission, during subsequent review, found that Estonian law requires further specification. The amendments concern making the preparation of computer crimes punishable (Section 137 of the Penal Code), harmonizing the grounds for the surrender of third-country nationals within the framework of the European Arrest Warrant, regulating the right to counsel and notification of detention, and clarifying the procedural safeguards for juvenile suspects, including more frequent review of decisions on detention. Member of Parliament Peeter Ernits posed questions regarding the technical complexity of the amendments and the continuous control process for the transposition of European Union law. The Minister explained that this is an ongoing harmonization process where legal acts are compared line by line, and that such specifications are necessary to ensure uniform applicability across Europe. Anti Haugas, a member of the leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the committee had discussed the draft and found that although infringement proceedings have been initiated, they will be terminated upon the rectification of the deficiencies. The committee proposed concluding the first reading.
Bank of Estonia 2024 Report
2025-09-18 13:0115th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 50s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the Bank of Estonia’s 2024 annual report, which was presented by central bank president Madis Müller. In his presentation, Müller emphasized the fulfillment of the Bank of Estonia’s core tasks, especially ensuring price stability in the euro area. He noted that the slowdown of inflation in the euro area has allowed the European Central Bank to begin lowering interest rates, resulting in both the central bank's main interest rate and the 6-month EURIBOR dropping by half from their record highs. The Estonian economy is showing signs of revival, although the recovery is slow. The central bank forecasts a 5–6% price increase in Estonia for 2025, a third of which stems from tax hikes.
Müller highlighted risks to financial stability, particularly due to Estonia's rapid loan growth (nearly 10% annually), which is why the countercyclical capital buffer is being maintained at 1.5%. A significant part of the presentation focused on crisis resilience, including ensuring the continuity of cash circulation and payment systems, as well as the digital euro project. The central bank also stressed the importance of sound public finances as a cornerstone of economic growth, warning against a persistent budget deficit that would fuel inflation. Furthermore, proposals were introduced to improve competition in the housing loan market, such as eliminating the requirement for notarization and fees for early contract termination during refinancing. During the discussions between parliamentary groups, the work of the Bank of Estonia was praised, and the need for a responsible fiscal policy was emphasized, especially in finding permanent coverage for defense expenditures.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
7 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 46m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading
2025-06-18 23:5515th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
16 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated, as agenda item 21, the first reading of Draft Act 670 on supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act, initiated by Riigikogu members Peeter Tali, Ando Kiviberg, Anti Haugas, and Mati Raidma. The purpose of the draft bill was to establish clear and lawful regulation for the use of Number Plate Recognition Cameras (NPRC) in the activities of the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA), thereby reducing the existing legal ambiguity that had arisen based on the 2009 regulation. Presenter Anti Haugas emphasized that the cameras are a vitally important tool for detecting, preventing, and precluding crimes, and that legal clarity must be achieved quickly to maintain police credibility. He confirmed that the draft bill addresses previous remarks by the Data Protection Inspectorate and the Chancellor of Justice regarding the need for regulation at the level of law.
The debate was heated, focusing on the infringement of people's fundamental rights. Opponents, particularly Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa) and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart (Centre Party), criticized the bill as a hastily prepared "botched draft" that attempts to retroactively legalize unlawful activity and grants the PPA overly broad rights, including the possibility of identifying individuals in vehicles and using data to "terminate disturbances of public order." Supporters (Eesti 200, SDE) stressed that NPRC is a modern and necessary tool for solving serious crimes (citing examples of rape cases) and that the closure of the cameras by the Minister of the Interior was a mistake that endangers Estonia's security during the summer period. The Legal Affairs Committee proposed concluding the first reading so that the draft bill could be amended during the summer. The proposal by Isamaa and the Centre Party to reject the draft bill was voted down.
... and 26 more agenda items
Helle-Moonika Helme
261 agenda items
261/261 with AI summaries (100.0%)
261/261 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Helle-Moonika Helme
Email: helle-moonika.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: helle-moonika.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 74h 7m
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 74h 7m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)
2025-11-11 13:22XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading
2025-11-06 14:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 24m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.
... and 256 more agenda items
Mart Helme
247 agenda items
247/247 with AI summaries (100.0%)
247/247 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Mart Helme
Email: mart.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: mart.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 55h 57m
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 55h 57m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)
2025-11-11 13:22XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 16m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Inquiry concerning the intention to deploy the Defense Forces to Ukraine (No. 814)
2025-11-10 19:39XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 24m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation (No. 814) submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the intention to deploy the defense forces to Ukraine, which was filed by Varro Vooglaid and other members of the EKRE faction. The impetus for the interpellation was a statement by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, in which he confirmed Estonia's readiness to contribute up to a company-sized ground combat unit to ensuring Ukraine's security.
The rapporteur for the interpellators, Varro Vooglaid (pid: _wD0jSQ0aWg), emphasized that pursuant to § 128 of the Constitution, the sole right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces belongs to the Riigikogu, not the government or the foreign minister. He criticized the public confirmations made by the government representative in a situation where Parliament had neither adopted the relevant decision nor even discussed it. Vooglaid asked whether the government considers Tsahkna's confirmations binding, whether a risk analysis has been conducted, and whether the government relies on the blanket authorization (up to 100 defense personnel) granted annually by the Riigikogu when deploying the Defense Forces.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal replied that Estonia has informed its allies of its readiness to contribute training instructors and staff officers within the framework of a coalition of the willing, but repeatedly stressed that any deployment of a unit to Ukraine requires a mandate from the Riigikogu before the operation is launched. Michal rejected the interpellators' question about seeking Russia's consent, deeming it "bizarre" and noting that one does not need to ask the aggressor state for permission to support Ukraine. He affirmed that the government has no plans to abandon support for Ukraine. During the debate, the interpellators (especially Martin Helme and Mart Helme) accused the Prime Minister of evading answers and violating the constitutional order, stressing that sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine would mean Estonia entering the war with Russia, which EKRE considers irresponsible. The Prime Minister concluded the discussions by suggesting that the interpellators' views on the necessity of Russia's consent resemble the positions of Russian officials (Peskov, Lavrov).
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 41m
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"
2025-11-10 17:19XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.
... and 242 more agenda items
Martin Helme
232 agenda items
232/232 with AI summaries (100.0%)
232/232 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Martin Helme
Email: martin.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: martin.helme@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 73h 25m
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 73h 25m
Agenda Items:
Inquiry concerning the intention to deploy the Defense Forces to Ukraine (No. 814)
2025-11-10 19:39XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation (No. 814) submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the intention to deploy the defense forces to Ukraine, which was filed by Varro Vooglaid and other members of the EKRE faction. The impetus for the interpellation was a statement by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, in which he confirmed Estonia's readiness to contribute up to a company-sized ground combat unit to ensuring Ukraine's security.
The rapporteur for the interpellators, Varro Vooglaid (pid: _wD0jSQ0aWg), emphasized that pursuant to § 128 of the Constitution, the sole right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces belongs to the Riigikogu, not the government or the foreign minister. He criticized the public confirmations made by the government representative in a situation where Parliament had neither adopted the relevant decision nor even discussed it. Vooglaid asked whether the government considers Tsahkna's confirmations binding, whether a risk analysis has been conducted, and whether the government relies on the blanket authorization (up to 100 defense personnel) granted annually by the Riigikogu when deploying the Defense Forces.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal replied that Estonia has informed its allies of its readiness to contribute training instructors and staff officers within the framework of a coalition of the willing, but repeatedly stressed that any deployment of a unit to Ukraine requires a mandate from the Riigikogu before the operation is launched. Michal rejected the interpellators' question about seeking Russia's consent, deeming it "bizarre" and noting that one does not need to ask the aggressor state for permission to support Ukraine. He affirmed that the government has no plans to abandon support for Ukraine. During the debate, the interpellators (especially Martin Helme and Mart Helme) accused the Prime Minister of evading answers and violating the constitutional order, stressing that sending Estonian soldiers to Ukraine would mean Estonia entering the war with Russia, which EKRE considers irresponsible. The Prime Minister concluded the discussions by suggesting that the interpellators' views on the necessity of Russia's consent resemble the positions of Russian officials (Peskov, Lavrov).
Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)
2025-11-10 18:37XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 11m
AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming.
Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.
Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"
2025-11-10 17:19XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 9m
AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05 16:0315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 20m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.
Security
2025-11-05 15:1015th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session addressed the fifth question, which was posed by Mart Helme (later joined by Martin Helme with a clarifying question) to Prime Minister Kristen Michal regarding security. Mart Helme began by discussing the leaked report from the National Defence Committee, claiming it exposed the collapse of the Reform Party’s long-standing myth of "security in safe hands" and pointed to serious security gaps. He demanded accountability for omissions and the irresponsible spending of funds. Furthermore, he raised the issue of civil defense, asking about the state's readiness to evacuate hundreds of thousands of people from Tallinn to rural areas in a crisis situation. Helme also highlighted the problem of internal security, referring to the repeated vandalisms of the Sinimäe Legionnaires' complex and asking why Estonia, as an e-state, is unable to identify and prevent such anti-Estonian activity. Prime Minister Michal rejected the accusations that Estonia was unprotected and affirmed that Estonian security is well guaranteed, relying on his own experience and the functioning of the NATO alliance relationship. He emphasized that the report should be handled constructively, focusing on proposals for improvement rather than emotional accusation. Michal listed the government's major investments in comprehensive national defense (including 219 million euros in 2025–2027), which are aimed at increasing evacuation capability, creating the Police and Border Guard Board's crisis reserve, and increasing hospitals' trauma reserves. Regarding the Sinimäe incidents, Michal confirmed that they are being investigated by the police and are often linked to the propaganda of a hostile neighboring state. Finally, Michal stressed that responsibility for security rests collectively with the parliament, the government, and himself, but the Estonian state is well cared for.
... and 227 more agenda items
Lauri Hussar
16 agenda items
16/16 with AI summaries (100.0%)
16/16 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Lauri Hussar
Email: lauri.hussar@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: lauri.hussar@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 3h 1m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 3h 1m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)
2025-10-15 19:06The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
15 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 5m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 684 on Amendments to the Act on the Election of the President of the Republic, which was initiated by 37 members of the Riigikogu. The bill was presented by Riigikogu Speaker Lauri Hussar, who emphasized the need to improve the transparency and credibility of the electoral process. The main substantive changes concern bringing forward the deadlines for nominating presidential candidates both in the Riigikogu (12–9 days instead of the current 4–2 days) and in the Electoral College (7–5 days). Furthermore, the bill grants candidates the right to address both the Riigikogu and the Electoral College to present their views and to record the process for historical purposes. The bill also includes a technical correction, replacing the non-existent "State Register of Estonian Citizens Entitled to Vote" in the current law with the Population Register.
During the debate, several Riigikogu members (including Peeter Ernits and Varro Vooglaid) criticized the bill as "cosmetic," arguing that it failed to address the main problem—the introduction of direct presidential elections. The issue of the proportions within the Electoral College following the administrative reform was also repeatedly raised, as the number of representatives from local governments has decreased, making the composition of the Electoral College almost equal to the number of Riigikogu members. Lauri Hussar confirmed that restoring the proportions of the Electoral College was considered, but due to the complexity of finding a common model, it was excluded from the current draft bill. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, which focused on the length of the speaking time (10 minutes) and the application of deadlines in the event of an extraordinary election. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)
2025-10-08 22:58The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item covered the first reading of Draft Act 683, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Planning Act and related legislation. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo introduced the draft, stating that its main objective is to make the planning procedure clearer, faster, and more flexible by reducing bureaucracy and enhancing legal certainty. Key amendments highlighted by the minister include abolishing the local government special plan and replacing it with a detailed plan, as well as establishing a 10-year validity period for new detailed plans (starting in 2027) if their implementation has not yet commenced. Furthermore, the advance notice period for public display will be shortened from 14 days to one day, and the requirement to publish notices in county and national newspapers will be eliminated, granting local governments discretion in this matter. The draft also introduces a requirement that planning must take into account the principles of climate change and high-quality spatial design.
The debate was intense, particularly concerning issues of public involvement and notification. The EKRE faction (Rain Epler, Martin Helme, Arvo Aller) sharply criticized the proposals, viewing them as a "steamroller" designed to limit community involvement and push through large development projects (such as wind farms). Minister Keldo stressed that the amendments are intended to boost efficiency, support economic growth, and prevent unnecessary delays, confirming that the Land and Spatial Planning Board will oversee adherence to deadlines. The leading committee proposed concluding the first reading, but the EKRE faction submitted a motion to reject the draft, which was subsequently voted down (5 in favor, 45 against).
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Chemical Act (701 SE)
2025-10-08 22:42The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 701, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Chemicals Act. The draft act was introduced by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, Erkki Keldo. The main objective of the amendments is to resolve the infringement procedure initiated by the European Commission regarding the deficient transposition of the EU Directive (Seveso III), and to prevent major accidents involving hazardous chemicals. There are 133 such establishments in Estonia (e.g., fuel terminals, fertilizer storage facilities). The amendments focus on three topics: specifying the tasks of the authorities (the Rescue Board, TTJA) following an accident, clarifying the obligations of operators (including cooperation in the event of a domino effect risk and informing neighbors), and reducing the administrative burden. To reduce the administrative burden, all required documents will be submitted electronically via the TTJA information system. Furthermore, the state will assume responsibility for hazard notification (sirens and e-alarms/SMS notifications) so that operators do not have to create expensive systems themselves. During the debate, Rain Epler (Cjw223MbyUk) raised questions regarding unlimited liability for remedial measures and the operator's liability if state notification systems (e-alarms) fail during an accident. Minister Keldo confirmed that limits on liability are not considered reasonable and that disputes will be resolved in court in a state governed by the rule of law. Regarding notification liability, the minister promised to clarify whether the operator's obligation is considered fulfilled upon the transmission of information to the Emergency Response Centre. Mait Klaassen (RqbcXTim2Pc), representative of the Environment Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion, confirming that the draft act resolves the infringement procedure and reduces the administrative burden. The committee made a consensus proposal to conclude the first reading.
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)
2025-10-06 18:35The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The third item on today's agenda was the first reading of Bill 694, the draft act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Government of the Republic. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi introduced the bill, the main objective of which is to alleviate the tax burden on families with children by reducing the motor vehicle tax liability by up to 100 euros per child annually. This measure is expected to reduce tax revenue by 16.3 million euros. Additionally, there are plans to reduce the tax rate for M-category vehicles with more than seven seats, taxing them at the N-category rate, which is significantly lower and affects large families and people with disabilities. The amendments are scheduled to enter into force on January 1, 2025.
The debate was extremely emotional and focused heavily on the political background and fairness of introducing the car tax. The opposition (Centre Party, EKRE, Isamaa) criticized the tax as a whole, demanding its repeal, citing the negative impact on the economy, regional inequality, and the situation of people with disabilities. Minister Ligi defended the necessity of the tax for meeting state budget and environmental goals. Technical questions were also raised during the debate, such as whether taxes already paid would be refunded to a bank account or remain in a prepayment account. Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, confirmed that the committee proposes concluding the first reading.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 38m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
... and 11 more agenda items
Diana Ingerainen
19 agenda items
19/19 with AI summaries (100.0%)
19/19 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Diana Ingerainen
Email: diana.ingerainen@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: diana.ingerainen@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Total Speaking Time: 1h 2m
Total Speaking Time: 1h 2m
Agenda Items:
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector
2025-11-06 00:3315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation.
In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04 12:07The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.
Second Reading of the Draft Act (692 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Sultanate of Oman for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion, and the Protocol thereto
2025-10-23 13:0115th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
16 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 6m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 692, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Sultanate of Oman for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion. Diana Ingerainen reported on behalf of the Finance Committee, stating that the committee discussed the bill on October 14 and 21, and unanimously decided to conclude the second reading and proceed to the final vote.
During the debate, several questions were raised focusing on the economic rationale of the agreement and the level of trade between Estonia and Oman. MPs (Vadim Belobrovtsev, Lauri Laats, Peeter Ernits, Rene Kokk, Priit Sibul) inquired about the specific additional benefits for Estonia, the volume of trade, and which types of businesses were interested in the agreement. The rapporteur, Diana Ingerainen, admitted that the committee neither requested nor received an overview of specific financial figures or a broader economic perspective, but she mentioned that the initiative to conclude the agreement came primarily from IT companies. Peeter Ernits criticized the committee's work, accusing it of acting as a "rubber stamp" for the government. The question was also raised regarding the suitability of concluding such an agreement in the context of Oman's authoritarian regime and human rights restrictions. Since no amendments were submitted, the bill was moved to the final vote.
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate on the topic "Why is food expensive?" took place at the initiative of the Estonian Centre Party faction. The purpose of the debate was to address the rise in the price of foodstuffs and potential ways to mitigate it, focusing on lowering the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate.
The first speaker was Jana Guzanova, the initiator of the popular initiative to reduce the VAT rate on foodstuffs, whose petition gathered nearly 100,000 signatures. Guzanova highlighted the sharp increase in the cost of the food basket and emphasized that 25% of the Estonian population lives in poverty, making the high VAT rate (24%) unfair and particularly painful for low-income individuals. She pointed to restaurant closures and the rise in food thefts as signs of a deepening crisis.
Economist Heido Vitsur confirmed that Estonian food prices are disproportionately high compared to incomes, placing Estonia among the wealthiest European countries. He explained that the price of food largely determines the wage level and thus the country's competitiveness. Vitsur agreed with the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) recommendation to make the tax system more flexible but found that, due to political rigidity, lowering the VAT rate is currently the only real lever for influencing prices.
The third speaker, Lauri Laats, chairman of the Centre Party faction, sharply criticized the tax policy of the Reform Party-led government, which, according to him, has driven food prices 57% higher since 2019. Laats highlighted alternative revenue measures, such as a bank tax, and referred to the success of other EU countries (e.g., Spain and Latvia) in implementing VAT exceptions. During the discussions, the Social Democrats (Züleyxa Izmailova) and the Centre Party (Vadim Belobrovtsev) supported lowering the VAT, while Eesti 200 (Diana Ingerainen) considered it ineffective and unfair, preferring targeted subsidies. Isamaa (Riina Solman) emphasized the need for comprehensive tax reform. No decision was adopted at the conclusion of the debate, but the session was extended until the agenda item was exhausted.
... and 14 more agenda items
Züleyxa Izmailova
63 agenda items
63/63 with AI summaries (100.0%)
63/63 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Züleyxa Izmailova
Email: zuleyxa.izmailova@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: zuleyxa.izmailova@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 13h 40m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 13h 40m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04 12:07The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 42m
AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.
Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.
2025-10-16 13:01XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate on the topic "Why is food expensive?" took place at the initiative of the Estonian Centre Party faction. The purpose of the debate was to address the rise in the price of foodstuffs and potential ways to mitigate it, focusing on lowering the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate.
The first speaker was Jana Guzanova, the initiator of the popular initiative to reduce the VAT rate on foodstuffs, whose petition gathered nearly 100,000 signatures. Guzanova highlighted the sharp increase in the cost of the food basket and emphasized that 25% of the Estonian population lives in poverty, making the high VAT rate (24%) unfair and particularly painful for low-income individuals. She pointed to restaurant closures and the rise in food thefts as signs of a deepening crisis.
Economist Heido Vitsur confirmed that Estonian food prices are disproportionately high compared to incomes, placing Estonia among the wealthiest European countries. He explained that the price of food largely determines the wage level and thus the country's competitiveness. Vitsur agreed with the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) recommendation to make the tax system more flexible but found that, due to political rigidity, lowering the VAT rate is currently the only real lever for influencing prices.
The third speaker, Lauri Laats, chairman of the Centre Party faction, sharply criticized the tax policy of the Reform Party-led government, which, according to him, has driven food prices 57% higher since 2019. Laats highlighted alternative revenue measures, such as a bank tax, and referred to the success of other EU countries (e.g., Spain and Latvia) in implementing VAT exceptions. During the discussions, the Social Democrats (Züleyxa Izmailova) and the Centre Party (Vadim Belobrovtsev) supported lowering the VAT, while Eesti 200 (Diana Ingerainen) considered it ineffective and unfair, preferring targeted subsidies. Isamaa (Riina Solman) emphasized the need for comprehensive tax reform. No decision was adopted at the conclusion of the debate, but the session was extended until the agenda item was exhausted.
809 On the Future of the Climate Law
2025-10-13 21:5115th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the interpellation (No. 809) submitted to Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, concerning the future of the Climate Law. The interpellation was submitted by Tiit Maran, Züleyxa Izmailova, Tanel Kiik, Riina Sikkut, and Heljo Pikhof. Tiit Maran, the representative of the questioners, criticized the long delay in drafting the law and the shift in focus. He recalled that the Climate Law was originally a central theme of the coalition, and public consultations were promised by June 2024. Instead, a significantly narrower draft bill—the "Climate-Resilient Economy Law"—was presented in August 2024. In Maran's assessment, this draft did not meet international obligations and practically ignored the adaptation aspect (preparing the population for inevitable changes). Maran also highlighted the confusion that arose after the change of government in 2025, where Minister Sutt initially expressed doubt about the introduction of a single law but later confirmed it.
Minister Andres Sutt confirmed that climate policy remains a government priority, emphasizing the impact of climate change (e.g., the exceptionally heavy precipitation in the summer of 2025). He explained that the new Climate-Resilient Economy Law is a short, specific, and realistic framework law that sets nationwide and sector-specific emission reduction targets. A significant difference from the previous draft is that the implementing details will be moved into sectoral roadmaps, which will be prepared in cooperation with stakeholders and should be finalized by the end of the year. Sutt stressed that this approach ensures flexibility and allows for avoiding constant amendments to the law. The Minister promised that the draft bill would reach the Riigikogu for proceedings during the current year. Follow-up questions addressed the unfairness of LULUCF (land use) requirements and the process of changing them at the EU level, as well as the potential relaxation of emission reduction targets, which the Minister denied, confirming the commitment to the goal of climate neutrality by 2050.
Interpellation concerning the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general quiet period during the breeding season (No. 804)
2025-10-13 21:2015th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 31m
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned Inquiry No. 804 submitted by Riigikogu members Züleyxa Izmailova, Tiit Maran, Tanel Kiik, Riina Sikkut, Heljo Pikhof, and Andre Hanimäe to the Minister of Energy and Environment, Andres Sutt, regarding the necessity and timeliness of establishing a general nesting peace. Züleyxa Izmailova, speaking on behalf of the petitioners, emphasized that Estonia's biodiversity indicators are in continuous decline, nearly 30% of species are endangered, and bird populations are decreasing. She referred to a 2022 study, according to which 93% of people support the establishment of nesting peace in both private and state forests. Izmailova criticized the fact that Estonia lacks a binding and universal nesting peace, and the recommended restrictions by RMK (State Forest Management Centre) are insufficient, especially on private lands.
Minister Andres Sutt responded that the Ministry of Climate is awaiting the Supreme Court's decision concerning the legal dispute between OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva and the Environmental Board, which relates to the intentional disturbance of birds during the nesting period. Until then, the current practice will continue. Sutt noted that RMK implements a voluntary logging truce (in recent years, until June 30) in state forests, which covers about half of the forest land. He stressed that the associated socio-economic impact must be considered when establishing a general nesting peace. Sutt explained that the Environmental Board uses a breeding bird population density matrix for risk-based supervision, which has helped direct control to areas of greater impact. During the debate, Izmailova criticized the minister's answers as vague and non-committal, accusing the government of ignoring nature conservation issues. Minister Sutt rejected the accusations, highlighting that 18–19% of forests in Estonia are under strict protection, which is significantly more than in neighboring countries.
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)
2025-10-09 01:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of the draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (661 SE), initiated by the parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party, the aim of which was to lower the VAT rate on basic foodstuffs from 24% to 9%. Rapporteur Lauri Läänemets emphasized that the rise in food prices in Estonia has been unprecedented (over 50%) and that implementing a lower VAT rate would help alleviate the burden of the regressive tax, support people with lower incomes, stimulate domestic consumption, and improve the competitiveness of the domestic agricultural sector. Läänemets highlighted that Estonia is one of the few EU countries where a reduced rate is not applied to food, and he criticized the government's plan to take out a loan to distribute income tax concessions to the wealthier population, offering the VAT reduction as a better alternative.
Diana Ingerainen, the representative of the Finance Committee, presented the committee's position, according to which the rejection of the draft bill was supported primarily because the tax reduction would create a deficit of nearly 200 million euros in the state budget, and there was no certainty that this reduction would reach the final consumer. During the debate, the Social Democrats were accused of hypocrisy, as they had previously supported VAT increases while in government and had voted against similar draft bills proposed by the Centre Party. Despite the support of the opposition and several professional associations, the draft bill was voted down in the first reading.
... and 58 more agenda items