Politicians & Agendas

Track individual politicians and their participation in various agenda items. See their speeches, voting patterns, and legislative contributions.

31-40 / 101 politicians

Tanel Kiik

140 agenda items
140/140 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Tanel Kiik
Email: tanel.kiik@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 31h 56m

Agenda Items:

Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia

2025-11-05 16:03
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 10m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.

Healthcare funding crisis

2025-11-05 15:28
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m

AI Summary: Member of the Riigikogu Tanel Kiik submitted an interpellation to Prime Minister Kristen Michal regarding the healthcare funding crisis, accusing the government of setting the wrong priorities. Kiik sharply criticized the government's decision to grant over 100 million euros in tax breaks to the wealthier segment of society amid a budget deficit, while the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa) is facing a deepening shortfall and the social sector, including special welfare services, is underfunded. Kiik asked why healthcare and the social sector have been relegated to the "role of the poor relation" and why a progressive income tax is not being implemented. Prime Minister Michal rejected the accusations of creating a historical deficit, shifting responsibility to previous governments. He defended the tax reform, emphasizing that abolishing the tax hump brings significant relief to average wage earners (teachers, police officers), essentially giving them an extra month's salary per year. Regarding healthcare funding, Michal noted that the Tervisekassa deficit is smaller than planned and reserves are not being depleted. He stressed that the solution lies not in injecting additional money, but in improving system efficiency, eliminating duplication, and increasing e-consultations. In a follow-up question, Reili Rand expressed concern about the optimization of the hospital network, fearing a decline in service availability in peripheral regions (such as Hiiumaa and Saaremaa). The Prime Minister confirmed that the Minister of Social Affairs is working on a plan, which will be finalized by the end of the year and will involve communities, based on common sense.

Interpellation Concerning the Underfunding of Special Care Services (No. 826)

2025-11-03 22:08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu held an interpellation (No. 826) of Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller regarding the underfunding of special welfare services, initiated by the Social Democrats under the leadership of Helmen Kütt. The interpellation was prompted by the 2025 review from the National Audit Office, which brought to light serious deficiencies in the accessibility of special welfare services. Helmen Kütt stressed that waiting lists have nearly doubled between 2018 and 2024, now extending up to 53 months, and that court rulings concerning places in secure special welfare facilities have not been implemented. She pointed out that the Ministry of Social Affairs had requested €195 million from the government for special welfare over four years but was allocated only €4.2 million for the upcoming year. Minister Karmen Joller acknowledged the chronic underfunding of special welfare and the increasing demand, particularly for round-the-clock services. She noted, however, that the budget has grown (from €22.7 million in 2015 to €57.7 million in 2026). Joller outlined three steps to improve the situation: increasing the remuneration for service providers by €4.2 million annually to facilitate a 10% salary increase; establishing a 10-day decision deadline for accepting a service placement to reduce the number of vacant spots; and opening new service placements in high-demand regions (Tallinn, Harju County, Tartu). Joller conceded that a situation where people must take the state to court just to receive services is neither humane nor appropriate for a state governed by the rule of law. During the debate, the questioners (Tanel Kiik, Lauri Läänemets) focused on the government's priorities, contrasting the €4.2 million allocated for salary increases with the tax "gift" of over €100 million given to the wealthier segment of society by abolishing the progressive income tax system (the "tax hump"). Minister Joller defended the tax reform, arguing that it also benefits those earning an average salary and simplifies the tax system, while affirming that special welfare remains a continuing priority within her ministry.

Inquiry regarding the healthcare funding crisis (No. 811)

2025-11-03 20:26
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 51m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on an interpellation submitted to Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller concerning the healthcare funding crisis. The interpellation was presented by members of the Social Democratic Party and other opposition factions, led by Tanel Kiik. The interpellators highlighted the chronic deficit of the Health Insurance Fund (200–300 million euros) and the underfunding of Estonian healthcare compared to the OECD and EU averages, warning that government inaction would deepen waiting lists and inequality. Questions addressed ensuring sustainability, covering the 2026 deficit, involving private capital in primary care, and reducing patient co-payments. Minister Joller acknowledged the funding problem but stressed that the government's priority is first to streamline healthcare expenditures and optimize the hospital network to ensure funds are directed toward results-based objectives. She explained that the 2024 budget deficit was successfully reduced by 70 million euros due to better collection of social tax and efficiency measures. Joller criticized the opposition's focus solely on accessibility, emphasizing the importance of treatment quality. She confirmed that the government’s specific proposals for long-term funding would be presented in February, but conceded that finding a large volume of additional funds would necessitate new tax increases or the reallocation of resources from other priorities, such as national defense. The discussion also brought up concerns about two-tier medicine and the future of regional hospitals (e.g., Hiiumaa) within the context of optimizing the hospital network.

First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Name Act and the State Fee Act (719 SE)

2025-10-22 18:54
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 719, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Name Act and the State Fees Act. Interior Minister Igor Taro introduced the bill, emphasizing its goal of bringing name changes into the 21st century by utilizing e-services, automated decisions, and automated entries. The Minister stressed that this is a technological step that reduces bureaucracy and increases trust, referring to it as the "freedom bill" and the "digital state strengthening bill." Taro also highlighted that the project is funded by the European Union's Recovery and Resilience Facility, noting that the amendments must be implemented before December 2025 to avoid the obligation to repay the funds. The most heated debate centered on the issue of name changes for criminals. MPs (Andre Hanimägi, Riina Solman, Tanel Kiik) expressed concern that the new automatic system must not simplify the concealment of a criminal past. The Minister confirmed that substantive restrictions designed to protect society (including ruling out the adoption of names of living persons) will be established in the new comprehensive Name Act bill, which will be finalized during the current calendar year. Under the current bill, automated decisions are only possible in simple cases related to lineage connections that can be verified based on registry data. Peeter Ernits (Centre Party) supported the content of the bill but criticized its rapid processing, which is necessitated by the European funding deadline (to avoid a fine of 120 million euros). Vilja Toomast (Legal Affairs Committee) provided an overview of the committee's discussion, confirming that names can still be changed in four regional vital statistics offices and that automatic name change is permitted once in a lifetime, while simultaneously preventing the use of names belonging to generally well-known individuals.

... and 135 more agenda items

Meelis Kiili

17 agenda items
17/17 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Meelis Kiili
Email: meelis.kiili@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 47m

Agenda Items:

Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Extension of the Term for the Use of the Defence Forces in Fulfilling the International Obligations of the Estonian State in the UN Peacekeeping Operation in Lebanon" (Bill 710 OE)

2025-11-05 20:26
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: Draft Resolution 710 of the Riigikogu, submitted by the Government of the Republic, was item 13 on the agenda. It concerned the extension of the term for the use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Estonian state in the UN peacekeeping operation in Lebanon (UNIFIL). The draft resolution was introduced by Meelis Kiili, a member of the National Defence Committee. He noted that the first reading of the draft took place on September 24, and no proposals were received by the deadline for submitting amendments. Kiili emphasized that the UN Security Council has extended the UNIFIL mandate until December 31, 2026, and Estonia will continue its contribution with up to three members of the Defence Forces next year as well. The lead committee (the National Defence Committee) decided unanimously to propose to the Riigikogu that the second reading of the draft resolution be concluded and that it immediately be put to the final vote. Following the presentation, debate was not opened, as no requests to speak were submitted. The draft resolution was put to the final vote, where it was adopted with 55 votes in favor, 2 against, and 1 abstention.

First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the internationally binding obligations of the Republic of Estonia on a UN peacekeeping operation in Lebanon" (710 OE).

2025-09-24 20:48
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Resolution 710 of the Riigikogu, submitted by the Government of the Republic, "Extension of the term of deployment of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Estonian state in the UN peacekeeping operation in Lebanon," as the 12th item on the agenda. The rapporteur, Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, explained that the Lebanon operation (UNIFIL) is extensive, but Estonia's contribution is modest—currently, one staff officer serves there in the city of Naqoura. The draft resolution requests a mandate for the use of up to three active servicemen, although an increase in the composition is not foreseen. The annual costs of the mission remain below 60,000 euros. Meelis Kiili, a member of the National Defence Committee, provided an overview of the committee's sessions, where the draft resolution and the security situation were discussed. He emphasized that UNIFIL is a classic UN peacekeeping operation, established in 1978, involving over 10,300 peacekeepers from 47 countries. Kiili confirmed that the National Defence Committee unanimously decided to propose to the Riigikogu that the first reading of the draft resolution be concluded. Debates were not opened, and the Riigikogu agreed with the proposal of the lead committee.

Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

2025-06-04 17:06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: This agenda item concerned the departure of draft law 642, initiated by the Government of the Republic, from the Ottawa Convention, which prohibits the use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requires their destruction. The purpose of the draft law is to increase Estonia's security sensitivity in response to Russia's full-scale aggression in Ukraine and to provide the Defence Forces with additional opportunities and freedom to choose suitable weapon systems in a characteristic dangerous situation. The practical context included Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Finland taking similar steps, as well as the Baltic states’ joint public awareness campaign. In the second reading, the National Defence Committee unanimously approved the text of the draft law and its explanatory memorandum and designated a proposal to bring it to the agenda and final vote of the Riigikogu (Parliament) as a whole.

Third reading of the draft law amending the Defence Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (Strengthening Maritime Security) (565 SE)

2025-04-09 20:29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The agenda for the third reading includes draft law no. 565, amending the Defence Forces Order Act and the Economic Zone Act (strengthening maritime security), initiated by the Government of the Republic of Estonia. The draft law’s purpose is to modernize the legal environment so that the Defence Forces have additional law enforcement and military rights applicable for the protection of vital national defense objects and infrastructure, and for ensuring maritime security. The focus of the reviews was the need to strengthen capabilities and legality, while emphasizing that the improvement does not completely eliminate the danger, but provides the state with better tools to reduce it and keep the risk under control. The discussion also highlighted the importance of international law and cooperation with allies, the possibility of expanding the adjacent zone area, and strengthening navigation results in the Gulf of Finland, if possible in accordance with the political and legal framework. The drafting and discussion of the draft law reflected a broad consensus effort to maintain a safe and functional maritime space and Estonia's long-term security bedrock. The second part of the discussion concerned funding and preparedness issues, emphasizing the need to coordinate the implementation of the law and increase the Navy's capabilities as needed and in cooperation with allies.

Second reading of the draft law amending the Defence Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (strengthening maritime security) (565 SE)

2025-03-26 19:32
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: Under agenda item seven, the draft law amending the Defence Forces Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (strengthening maritime security) 565 was discussed in its second reading. The draft law was initiated by the Government (January 21, 2025), the first reading concluded on February 19, 2025, and no amendments were submitted by the external guiding committee. The National Defence Committee submitted two amendment proposals, and discussions on the draft law took place at lunchtime and previous sessions on March 17 and 24. The discussions highlighted the greater importance of maritime law and the protection of the continental shelf. Heiki Lindpere pointed out that the legal framework for the protection of the continental shelf, the seabed beneath it, and underwater infrastructure is lacking, and the relevance of the continental shelf law and the territorial sea law to the situation should be considered. The speeches also touched on the possibility of supplementing the state border law regarding damage caused by ship anchor dragging and the need to quickly implement adequate protective measures. The actions were approved, and the final outcome was a decision to complete the draft law’s second reading as quickly as possible, taking into account the continuing threat of damage to vital infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. Finally, language and normative technical clarifications were approved, along with a procedural decision to conclude the draft law’s second reading.

... and 12 more agenda items

Signe Kivi

33 agenda items
33/33 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Signe Kivi
Email: signe.kivi@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 1h 52m

Agenda Items:

First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

2025-10-07 13:15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The first reading of the draft State Budget Act for 2026 (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, took place in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the budget, which has a revenue volume of 18.6 billion euros and an expenditure volume of 19.6 billion euros. The general government deficit reaches 4.5% of GDP, which is mainly due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditure (over 5% of GDP), while still remaining within the limits of the European Union derogation. Ligi emphasized that the budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and income. The tax burden will decrease from 36.6% to 35.2% of GDP, primarily due to the increase in the income tax-free minimum to 700 euros and the abolition of the tax kink, which the minister considered an important economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the salary fund (up to 10%) for police officers, rescuers, teachers, and special welfare workers. The debate focused on the large budget deficit and the growing debt burden. The opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme, and others) criticized the government for fulfilling election promises with borrowed money and for the long-term deterioration of state finances. Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit was largely caused by an external factor (the import of defense procurements) and blamed previous governments for loosening budget rules. The minister also sharply criticized Peeter Raudsepp, the head of the Institute of Economic Research, accusing him of methodological errors and inciting negative sentiment. Discussions also covered plans to reduce the deficit of the Health Insurance Fund, the funding of research and development, and the revenue base of local governments.

Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

2025-09-17 17:25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 50s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the re-adoption of the Act amending the Churches and Congregations Act (570 UA), which the President of the Republic had declined to promulgate. The proceedings began with a report by Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, followed by a report from Andre Hanimägi, representative of the Legal Affairs Committee. Both committees had discussed the grounds for the presidential veto, which mainly concerned the ambiguity of the Act and the overly broad definition of the concept of "threat," especially regarding the doctrinal basis of religious associations. The committees heard the positions of both Hent-Raul Kalmo, the President's legal counsel, and Erik Salumäe, adviser to the Ministry of the Interior. The Ministry of the Interior and the majority of the committees found that the Act is in compliance with the Constitution and that its purpose is to sever dangerous administrative ties on security grounds, not to restrict religious freedom. The opposition (Centre Party, EKRE) criticized the parliament's decision to send the Act back in its unamended form, considering it a legal defect and a disregard for the President's competence. The coalition emphasized the necessity of the Act in ensuring national security and considered referring the matter to the Supreme Court a normal democratic process. In the final vote, the Act was re-adopted in its unamended form with 63 votes in favor.

Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

2025-06-18 17:34
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 653, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act and the Vocational Educational Institutions Act (Certification of Principals and Teacher Career Model). Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas introduced the draft, which aims to improve career opportunities for teachers and raise the quality of school management. According to the draft, a four-tier career model will be established (starting teacher, teacher, senior teacher, master teacher), and corresponding salary coefficients for the years 2026–2028 (1.0; 1.0; 1.1; 1.3) will be implemented. The duration of fixed-term employment contracts for teachers studying in teacher training programs will also be extended to three years. A significant change is the introduction of a certification system for school principals after every five years of employment; the certification committee will consist of representatives of the school maintainer and the Estonian Association of School Leaders. The additional financial need resulting from these changes is 9.8 million euros for general education and 3.7 million euros for vocational education in 2026. During the debate, several questions were raised, particularly concerning the status and salary guarantees of unqualified teachers, as the legislative amendment removes the school maintainer's direct obligation to pay them the national minimum rate. The Minister clarified that the funding system will not change, but the goal is to motivate teachers without professional qualifications to acquire them. The public disclosure of principals' certification decisions and the support for the education agreement among local governments were also discussed. Liina Kersna, Chairman of the Cultural Affairs Committee, proposed concluding the first reading, noting that the committee will continue discussions regarding support for unqualified teachers.

The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

2025-04-22 13:03
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Minister of Culture, Heidy Purga, presented a report to the Riigikogu regarding the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035," focusing on the Ministry of Culture's area of responsibility, particularly culture and sport. The Minister emphasized the central role of culture as a driver of national identity and economic development, highlighting the high rate of cultural participation among Estonians (79% of residents in 2023) and investments in cultural facilities and the film sector. Regarding sports policy, the discussion covered the support of the Team Estonia program, the positive economic impact of hosting international sporting events, and concern over the low levels of physical activity among children and young people. The Minister also highlighted the success of developing the creative industries and the plan to digitize cultural heritage. During a round of questions and discussions, issues were raised concerning the low salaries of cultural workers and coaches, regional inequalities in access to cultural life (especially in rural areas), the impact of artificial intelligence on culture and copyrights, and questions regarding the financing of nationally important cultural objects (such as the annex to the Estonia Theatre) and sports infrastructure. The Minister confirmed that salary increases are a priority but could not provide specific commitments due to the budget situation. The fragmented nature of language policy was also discussed, along with the need to find new models for financing the sports and cultural sectors, particularly through the involvement of the private sector.

First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

2025-04-21 18:17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The first agenda item concerned the Riigikogu draft resolution 576 submitted by the Centre Party faction, the purpose of which is to establish a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu’s e-election process. A representative presentation was made from colleague Lauri Laats at the Riigikogu speaker’s platform, his speech focusing on the deficiencies in the secrecy, transparency, and security of e-voting, and the need for an independent investigation and drawing conclusions. He highlighted international experiences and OSCE/ODIHR observation reports, which emphasize the need to strengthen verifiability and auditability. The second part of the discussion concerned specific tasks of the investigative committee and potential solutions: analyzing the findings of TalTech scientists to be confirmed or refuted by independent experts, determining mechanisms for detecting and preventing potential election manipulation, assessing the adequacy of election auditing procedures, and analyzing the risks of mobile voting and compliance with international standards. There was also a discussion about whether the e-election system meets democratic standards and when and how to consider a temporary transition to safer voting methods. Finally, the aim was established to submit a final report to the Riigikogu and the public no later than December 1, 2025, when the committee's powers expire.

... and 28 more agenda items

Ando Kiviberg

49 agenda items
49/49 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Ando Kiviberg
Email: ando.kiviberg@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 5h 44m

Agenda Items:

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)

2025-11-11 13:22
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)

2025-11-11 12:13
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote. Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.

Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"

2025-11-10 17:19
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
9 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 13m

AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.

Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading

2025-11-06 14:56
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 13m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.

Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia

2025-11-05 16:03
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.

... and 44 more agenda items

Toomas Kivimägi

12 agenda items
12/12 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Toomas Kivimägi
Email: toomas.kivimagi@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 1h 10m

Agenda Items:

First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

2025-10-07 13:15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The first reading of the draft State Budget Act for 2026 (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, took place in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the budget, which has a revenue volume of 18.6 billion euros and an expenditure volume of 19.6 billion euros. The general government deficit reaches 4.5% of GDP, which is mainly due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditure (over 5% of GDP), while still remaining within the limits of the European Union derogation. Ligi emphasized that the budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and income. The tax burden will decrease from 36.6% to 35.2% of GDP, primarily due to the increase in the income tax-free minimum to 700 euros and the abolition of the tax kink, which the minister considered an important economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the salary fund (up to 10%) for police officers, rescuers, teachers, and special welfare workers. The debate focused on the large budget deficit and the growing debt burden. The opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme, and others) criticized the government for fulfilling election promises with borrowed money and for the long-term deterioration of state finances. Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit was largely caused by an external factor (the import of defense procurements) and blamed previous governments for loosening budget rules. The minister also sharply criticized Peeter Raudsepp, the head of the Institute of Economic Research, accusing him of methodological errors and inciting negative sentiment. Discussions also covered plans to reduce the deficit of the Health Insurance Fund, the funding of research and development, and the revenue base of local governments.

Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

2025-09-24 18:36
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The agenda focused on the second reading of Draft Act 670 on supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act, initiated by Riigikogu members Peeter Tali, Ando Kiviberg, Anti Haugas, and Mati Raidma. Madis Timpson, Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee, presented a report, explaining that the purpose of the draft act is to create a clear legal basis for the license plate recognition camera system, as the previous practice of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) was, according to the assessments of the Chancellor of Justice and the Data Protection Inspectorate, in conflict with the constitution. The committee discussed one amendment proposal submitted by the Government of the Republic, which received approval from all involved institutions. Questions arose during the debate regarding the unlimited number of cameras, the identification of facial images, and access to the data (including by the Tax and Customs Board). The opposition (EKRE, Center Party) sharply criticized the draft act, considering it a step towards a surveillance society and emphasizing the PPA’s previous illegal activity in data collection. Varro Vooglaid shared his experience regarding the PPA’s refusal to release processed images. The Center Party faction proposed interrupting the second reading, but this motion did not find support (12 in favor, 50 against). The leading committee proposed concluding the second reading and holding the final vote on October 8, 2025.

The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

2025-09-16 13:05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with an overview by Chancellor of Justice Ülle Madise regarding the compliance of legislative acts with the Constitution and the fulfillment of her duties during the period from September 1, 2024, to August 31, 2025. The Chancellor of Justice thanked the Riigikogu and officials for their good cooperation, noting that her office received over 5,500 submissions, of which more than 2,500 required substantive resolution. Madise highlighted several deepening problems: disregard for the implementation of laws, the application of flawed management methodologies of great powers in Estonia, and excessive reliance on machines and artificial intelligence, which must not replace human discretion. She criticized the acquisition of technological means restricting fundamental rights without the legal authorization of the Riigikogu and emphasized the importance of the principle of data collection decentralization, warning against the creation of "super databases." In the field of education, she criticized contradictory laws and the competition for school places that harms children's mental health. Madise stressed that Estonia is founded on freedom and responsibility, not on the total control of a preventative state. The questions and answers round addressed the criminal case concerning residence registration (propiska), developments in accessibility, the protection of banking secrecy, the status of the Estonian language, restrictions on the use of medical data, the limitation of property rights in nature conservation areas, and the insufficient resources of the Chancellor of Justice's office. Representatives of the factions (SDE, Reform Party, Isamaa, Centre Party) praised the Chancellor of Justice's work but used the podium to criticize the government's legislative work (including tax increases, the state budget base law, and data collection drafts) and bureaucracy.

Information session

2025-09-10 14:58
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: This report covers the opening remarks of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) Question Times held between January and September 2024. The Question Times strictly followed the prescribed procedure: attendance was checked at every sitting, participating government members were introduced (usually the Prime Minister or the minister acting as Prime Minister, and two or three ministers), and the rules of procedure were reiterated. Attendance at the sittings was generally low, mostly remaining between 10 and 25 Riigikogu members. Two minutes were allocated for asking questions and three minutes for answering, with provisions also made for a clarifying question and a supplementary question. Notable was the start of the Question Time on November 6, which took place in the Võro language. Procedural questions were raised on several occasions, including the Speaker's error in fixing the number of attendees on March 6 (corrected to 92 absentees) and the Speaker's request on April 9 that Riigikogu members specify the topics of their questions to avoid overly general categories such as "Varia" (Miscellaneous) or "Politics." The latter point was disputed by Helir-Valdor Seeder. Furthermore, Prime Minister Kristen Michal's technical pause was announced on February 12 in connection with the preparation for a vote of no confidence. Aleksandr Tšaplõgin also repeatedly raised procedural questions, inquiring about both the size of the Riigikogu composition and the issue of the Prime Minister apologizing.

Chair implementation

2025-09-04 12:58
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 1m

AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions. Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.

... and 7 more agenda items

Mait Klaassen

35 agenda items
35/35 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Mait Klaassen
Email: mait.klaassen@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 5 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 43m

Agenda Items:

Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Chemicals Act (701 SE)

2025-11-11 14:32
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The agenda item was the second reading of Draft Act 701 SE, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Chemicals Act. The objective of the draft act is to specify the provisions of the European Parliament and Council Seveso III Directive, which have been transposed into Estonian law, concerning the notification of the public, including neighboring undertakings, in the event of major accidents, and the cooperation between official authorities (the Rescue Board, TTJA). The draft act does not introduce new substantive requirements but makes the law legally clearer and reduces the administrative burden by requiring documents to be submitted electronically only in the future. The Environment Committee discussed the second reading of the draft act and the sole amendment proposal submitted by Rain Epler. The proposal clarified that the undertaking shall carry out notification outside its territory through the Rescue Board, and is not obligated to notify persons directly. The Committee found the proposal entirely reasonable and that it brings the provision into compliance with the Directive, and decided unanimously to fully take it into account. The lead committee proposed concluding the second reading and holding the final vote on November 18.

Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector

2025-11-06 00:33
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation. In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.

Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

2025-10-09 13:01
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on the key national issue, "The Future of the Estonian Economy," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Reform Party. The presentations provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic situation and future visions. Maris Lauri (Reform Party) analyzed the four pillars of Estonian competitiveness: natural resources, labor, capital, and the smart utilization of knowledge. She stressed the need for continuous innovation and adding value to natural resources, noting that the advantage of cheap labor has been lost. She also criticized the dismantling of the second pension pillar for reducing domestic capital. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo presented an optimistic forecast, predicting Estonia would be the fastest-growing economy in Europe in the coming years, underpinned by security (5% of GDP defense spending), export growth targets (43 billion euros by 2028), and R&D investments. He also highlighted major investments (400 million euros) and the necessity of accelerating planning processes. Allan Martinson (Estonian Founders Society) focused on the startup sector, which contributes 4.5% to GDP and is shifting from extensive to intensive growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and defense technology. He emphasized the requirement for a stable economic environment. Liina Vahtras (EIS) provided an overview of the success of e-residency, which has generated 370 million euros in revenue for the state treasury, and introduced a planned cardless solution designed to shorten the time required to establish a company to two weeks, thereby maintaining Estonia's competitive edge as a digital state. During the negotiations, faction representatives underscored the need for a stable economic environment, reduced bureaucracy, and reform of the education and healthcare systems, while Urmas Reinsalu sharply criticized the government's tax experiments and policies that undermine economic confidence.

First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Chemical Act (701 SE)

2025-10-08 22:42
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 701, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Chemicals Act. The draft act was introduced by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, Erkki Keldo. The main objective of the amendments is to resolve the infringement procedure initiated by the European Commission regarding the deficient transposition of the EU Directive (Seveso III), and to prevent major accidents involving hazardous chemicals. There are 133 such establishments in Estonia (e.g., fuel terminals, fertilizer storage facilities). The amendments focus on three topics: specifying the tasks of the authorities (the Rescue Board, TTJA) following an accident, clarifying the obligations of operators (including cooperation in the event of a domino effect risk and informing neighbors), and reducing the administrative burden. To reduce the administrative burden, all required documents will be submitted electronically via the TTJA information system. Furthermore, the state will assume responsibility for hazard notification (sirens and e-alarms/SMS notifications) so that operators do not have to create expensive systems themselves. During the debate, Rain Epler (Cjw223MbyUk) raised questions regarding unlimited liability for remedial measures and the operator's liability if state notification systems (e-alarms) fail during an accident. Minister Keldo confirmed that limits on liability are not considered reasonable and that disputes will be resolved in court in a state governed by the rule of law. Regarding notification liability, the minister promised to clarify whether the operator's obligation is considered fulfilled upon the transmission of information to the Emergency Response Centre. Mait Klaassen (RqbcXTim2Pc), representative of the Environment Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion, confirming that the draft act resolves the infringement procedure and reduces the administrative burden. The committee made a consensus proposal to conclude the first reading.

The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-09-24 21:17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

AI Summary: The Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, Hendrik Johannes Terras, presented the 2025 report to the Riigikogu on the implementation of the country's long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," focusing on viable regional development and robust food security. The Minister emphasized that Estonia faces geopolitical instability, climate change, and an economic slowdown, which necessitates smart and often painful structural reforms. He highlighted a demographic tipping point where 60% of the population is concentrated in Harju and Tartu counties, creating a "golden circle" and an emptying periphery. To reverse this trend, the government aims to direct at least 40% of business support outside major cities and increase the financial autonomy of local governments. A key reform introduced was the smart and accessible mobility reform, designed to ensure flexible public transport (a unified ticketing system, fixed-interval timetables, and on-demand transport). Regarding agriculture, the Minister stressed the need to increase added value and reduce dangerous dependence on imported production inputs (fertilizers, feed). The goal was set at an 80% self-sufficiency level in key food groups, viewing this as part of comprehensive national defense. The crisis involving African Swine Fever (ASF) was addressed separately; it struck Estonia's largest pig farming complexes in August 2025, leading to restrictions and culling/layoffs affecting over 50,000 pigs. The Minister announced preparations for creating a national guarantee scheme for the agricultural sector to mitigate market risks against which private insurance offers no protection, alongside the necessity of a long-term wild boar population control plan. During the debate, the opposition criticized the government's slow response to the ASF crisis and the negative impact of tax increases on rural areas.

... and 30 more agenda items

Aivar Kokk

155 agenda items
155/155 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Aivar Kokk
Email: aivar.kokk@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 14 years
Total Speaking Time: 53h 41m

Agenda Items:

Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector

2025-11-06 00:33
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation. In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.

Second reading of the Draft Act on the State Supplementary Budget for 2025 (733 SE)

2025-11-06 00:02
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Act 733 on the state's 2025 supplementary budget, initiated by the Government of the Republic. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, provided an overview of the committee's work, which took place on October 23 and November 3. According to the draft bill, expenditures will be reduced by 19.9 million and investments by 12 million, while financing transactions will be increased by 72.3 million euros. The reduction in expenditures is primarily due to the refinement of project timelines and the reallocation of funds to subsequent years. In addition, the budget of the Ministry of Defence will be increased by 39 million for assisting Ukraine and for defense procurements. The committee discussed the amendment proposal submitted by Isamaa, which aimed to further reduce central government expenditures by 200 million (excluding national defense and the salaries of teachers, police officers, and rescue workers). The Finance Committee decided not to consider the proposal, as it did not comply with the requirements of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, lacking a precise numerical formulation within the budget framework. Aivar Kokk raised a question regarding the revenue forecasts for the motor vehicle tax registration fee, to which Akkermann replied that the Ministry of Finance would submit an amendment proposal concerning the reduction in revenues for the third reading. The leading committee proposed concluding the second reading and shortening the deadline for submitting amendments due to the need for a faster procedure.

Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)

2025-11-05 22:24
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 38m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.

Draft Act Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (677 SE), second reading

2025-11-05 21:04
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 52m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 677, the act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, which was initiated by the Finance Committee. The main objective of the bill was to bring the tax law into compliance with the Constitution, taking into account the remarks made by the Chancellor of Justice. The amendments concern shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register (due to destruction, theft, or export from the country). The changes will be applied retroactively starting from January 1st of this year. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, stressed that this was a necessary correction of errors and that adapting tax legislation is routine work. The debate was extremely critical. Opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Center Party) accused the coalition of stubbornness, noting that the same flaws had been highlighted during the initial handling of the bill but were forcefully rejected. Critics argued that the amendments were only being made because the Chancellor of Justice intervened to prevent a constitutional crisis. The opposition repeatedly demanded the complete repeal of the motor vehicle tax, citing its unfairness, low revenue collection (half of what was forecast), and negative impact on rural life and the behavior of car buyers. Akkermann defended the tax as a fair way to collect money to cover the costs of roads and traffic management, noting that social benefits had already been increased using the tax revenue.

Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Competition Act (654 SE)

2025-11-05 20:54
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The item on the agenda was the second reading of Draft Law 654, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Competition Act. The report was presented by Marek Reinaasa, Chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee. The committee had reviewed the draft law on October 23rd, and two amendment proposals (both submitted by the lead committee) were presented, which received consensus support and were fully incorporated. The substantive amendment involved taking foreign subsidies into account when assessing mergers if those subsidies distort the European Union's internal market. Reinaasa explained that upon the adoption of the law, the Consumer Protection and Technical Regulatory Authority would become the contact point for the European Commission in Estonia. During the debate, questions were raised regarding the practical impact of the amendment (Aivar Kokk), and the definition of concentration was clarified in the meaning of Article 20 and Article 21, paragraph 5 of the regulation (Peeter Ernits). The effectiveness of the directive against subsidies from major powers and the possibility of retaliation were also discussed (Rain Epler). Reinaasa confirmed that the fines amount to 5–10% of global turnover, which is sufficiently deterrent. The lead committee proposed concluding the second reading of the draft law, which was done, and the third reading was scheduled for November 12th.

... and 150 more agenda items

Rene Kokk

171 agenda items
171/171 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Rene Kokk
Email: rene.kokk@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 5 years
Total Speaking Time: 38h 44m

Agenda Items:

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)

2025-11-11 12:13
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote. Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.

Inquiry Regarding the Explosion of an Attack Drone on the Territory of Estonia (No. 810)

2025-11-10 18:37
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The item on the agenda addressed the interpellation submitted by members of the Riigikogu to Prime Minister Kristen Michal concerning the attack drone explosion in Koruste village, Elva municipality, Tartumaa County, in August 2025. The interpellation was introduced by Mart Helme, who emphasized the inadequacy of the explanations provided to the public and raised questions regarding Estonia's air surveillance capability and the incident's connection to the war in Ukraine. Helme highlighted the suspicion that the drone was Ukrainian, targeting Russian strategic objects, but ended up in Estonia due to jamming. Prime Minister Michal responded to 11 questions, confirming that the drone did not launch from Estonian territory and that Ukraine has not been granted permission to use Estonian airspace for offensive operations. Michal blamed Russia for the incident and, regarding the shortcomings in drone detection, referred to the 2019 decisions to cut the border construction budget, indirectly blaming former Finance Minister Martin Helme. In the subsequent debate, EKRE members (Martin Helme, Mart Helme, Rain Epler, and others) accused the government and the Reform Party of incompetence in developing national defense, particularly air and drone defense, despite the increased defense budget. Mart Helme and Peeter Ernits speculated that Estonia might have been aware of Ukrainian drones flying toward Russian targets, referencing the simultaneous closure of Tallinn Airport. The Prime Minister defended the government's actions, emphasizing historically large defense investments and rejecting accusations of avoiding responsibility.

Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading

2025-11-06 14:56
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.

2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-11-06 12:10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments. The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.

Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector

2025-11-06 00:33
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation. In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.

... and 166 more agenda items

Andrei Korobeinik

86 agenda items
86/86 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Andrei Korobeinik
Email: andrei.korobeinik@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 8 years
Total Speaking Time: 46h 19m

Agenda Items:

Chair implementation

2025-09-04 12:58
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
81 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 16h 19m

AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions. Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.

Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

2025-06-18 20:15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m

AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the third reading of the draft 2025 supplementary budget act (651), initiated by the Government of the Republic. Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, presented a report explaining that the content of the bill had changed during the proceedings, increasing revenues by 26.3 million, expenditures by 36.9 million, and investments by 41.9 million euros. A significant portion (44.2 million) is directed towards comprehensive national defense, of which 30 million will go to the administrative area of the Ministry of the Interior, and 12 million to road construction. The parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party submitted two amendments: raising the subsistence level (6 million euros) and offering free kindergarten places in all local governments (22 million euros). Both proposals were rejected by the Finance Committee, citing the government's position that the supplementary budget should not create additional permanent expenditures, and emphasizing the autonomy of local governments. The debate was heated, focusing on the Reform Party's contradictory stance regarding kindergarten fees (supporting them in Tallinn but not at the national level) and the postponement of raising the subsistence level. The opposition (Centre Party, SDE, Isamaa) criticized the government's economic policy, the opacity of the budget, and the expansion of the public sector. The bill was put to a final vote and adopted.

Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

2025-06-18 19:40
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the third reading of Bill 645, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the simplified taxation of business income, amendments to the Income Tax Act, and the repeal of the Security Tax Act, as the fifth item on the agenda. The debate centered on making the government's tax policy permanent and its impact on society. Opposition parties sharply criticized the government for breaking its promises, noting that the increases originally dubbed a temporary security tax (VAT to 24%, income tax to 22%) are being made permanent, while the planned 2% corporate income tax hike is being cancelled. Lauri Laats, representing the Centre Party, accused the government of lacking solidarity, arguing that the tax burden falls disproportionately on the most vulnerable through consumption taxes. The Isamaa faction (Urmas Reinsalu) voted against the bill, citing the deterioration of economic competitiveness and the shrinking of real incomes. Social Democrat Lauri Läänemets stressed that the bill perpetuates a regressive tax system that favors the wealthy and stifles economic growth, and called for the implementation of a progressive income tax. Reform Party representative Annely Akkermann defended the bill, explaining that it leaves more money in the hands of low-income individuals and pensioners through a 2% income tax exemption, and that the overall tax burden will decrease next year due to the abolition of the ‘tax hump’. Following the negotiations, the final vote was conducted.

Draft law amending the Churches and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) - Third Reading

2025-06-18 18:43
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the draft act on amending the Churches and Congregations Act (570 UA), initiated by the Government of the Republic, during its third reading. The debate centered on the constitutionality of the bill and its impact on religious freedom and security, particularly concerning religious associations affiliated with the Moscow Patriarchate. The opposition (Centre Party, EKRE) argued that the bill remains unconstitutional despite cosmetic changes, and illegally pressures the Estonian Orthodox Church and Pühtitsa Convent to sever canonical ties with Moscow. Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party) expressed hope that the President would refuse to promulgate the law for a second time. Varro Vooglaid (EKRE) stressed that the real issue is ensuring the rule of law, not ‘Estonian-mindedness,’ and warned that the threat of forced termination increases societal division and security risks. Representatives of the coalition and supporting factions (Isamaa, Eesti 200, SDE) defended the bill, emphasizing that it complies with the constitution (referencing the Ministry of the Interior's analysis) and aims to restrict hostile influence activities, not religious freedom. Jaanus Karilaid (Isamaa) and Peeter Tali (Eesti 200) directly linked the Moscow Patriarchate to the Kremlin and the FSB, labeling it ideological support for the Putin regime. Andre Hanimägi (SDE) highlighted that the bill targets an institution that justifies the ideology of violence, not faith itself. Following the discussions, the final vote was conducted.

Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

2025-06-17 13:49
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 10m

AI Summary: The third agenda item concerned the second reading of draft law 640, amending the Law on Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing initiated by the Government of the Republic, and the Law on International Sanctions. This was primarily a matter of clarifying the technical and legal framework of the draft and involving various stakeholder groups. Negotiations took place in the Finance Committee on June 5th, 10th and 12th and focused on the clarity of the draft's impact assessment provisions: what data the State collects within the limits and scope of data protection, how data is pseudonymised and de-pseudonymised, and how the rights of individuals and oversight are ensured. There was also discussion regarding the role and conditions under which the Bureau for the Prevention of Money Laundering (RAB) could be involved in transaction monitoring and case analysis, and how to maintain a balance between security and the protection of privacy and personal data. The Committee kept in mind the protection of human rights and democratic transparency, emphasizing that data collection must be needs-based and under control, and referred to national oversight and reporting obligations. The result was an agreement and a decision to officially keep the second reading of the draft on the agenda, but it also created a situation where any further proceedings regarding additions or amendments would depend on upcoming plenary sessions and voting results. The general conclusion was that, although the discussion was thorough and multifaceted, the Committee considered it important to limit the scope of data collection and strengthen oversight to maintain proportionality and the needs for the protection of personal data.

... and 81 more agenda items

Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

298 agenda items
298/298 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Email: anastassia.kovalenko-kolvart@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 3 years
Total Speaking Time: 83h 39m

Agenda Items:

Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)

2025-11-10 17:56
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries. Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.

Continuation of the first reading of the draft resolution (679 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting"

2025-11-10 17:19
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The sitting continued the first reading of Riigikogu draft resolution 679, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which concerned a proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, answered questions from Riigikogu members, emphasizing that the committee had forwarded the recommendations contained in the ODIHR report to the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs for the initiation of necessary amendments. The discussion focused on the crisis of confidence in e-voting and the security of the system. Opposition politicians (including Rain Epler, Arvo Aller, Evelin Poolamets, Mart Helme, and Martin Helme) sharply criticized the system's lack of transparency, the violation of security measures, and the fact that nearly half the population does not trust e-elections, which undermines the legitimacy of democracy. Kiviberg conveyed the position of Arne Koitmäe, head of the Electoral Service, that e-voting is verifiable and complies with legal requirements, and that ODIHR has not deemed the system untrustworthy. During the debates, the Centre Party, EKRE, and Isamaa supported the suspension of e-voting in order to restore the trustworthiness of elections. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, where it required an absolute majority of the Riigikogu membership.

Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading

2025-11-06 14:56
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.

Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)

2025-11-05 22:24
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 36m

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.

Draft Act Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (677 SE), second reading

2025-11-05 21:04
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 677, the act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, which was initiated by the Finance Committee. The main objective of the bill was to bring the tax law into compliance with the Constitution, taking into account the remarks made by the Chancellor of Justice. The amendments concern shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register (due to destruction, theft, or export from the country). The changes will be applied retroactively starting from January 1st of this year. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, stressed that this was a necessary correction of errors and that adapting tax legislation is routine work. The debate was extremely critical. Opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Center Party) accused the coalition of stubbornness, noting that the same flaws had been highlighted during the initial handling of the bill but were forcefully rejected. Critics argued that the amendments were only being made because the Chancellor of Justice intervened to prevent a constitutional crisis. The opposition repeatedly demanded the complete repeal of the motor vehicle tax, citing its unfairness, low revenue collection (half of what was forecast), and negative impact on rural life and the behavior of car buyers. Akkermann defended the tax as a fair way to collect money to cover the costs of roads and traffic management, noting that social benefits had already been increased using the tax revenue.

... and 293 more agenda items

Previous
2
3
4
5
6
Next