Politicians & Agendas
Track individual politicians and their participation in various agenda items. See their speeches, voting patterns, and legislative contributions.
41-50 / 101 politicians
Eerik-Niiles Kross
9 agenda items
9/9 with AI summaries (100.0%)
9/9 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Eerik-Niiles Kross
Email: eerik-niiles.kross@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: eerik-niiles.kross@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 5h 39m
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 5h 39m
Agenda Items:
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 30m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading
2025-03-26 16:1215th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The presentation is of Bill 536, the third reading of the Act Amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia. The task is to discuss a unified implementation consistent with the Constitution regarding the right to vote in local government council elections, and to assess the associated timelines and risks. The procedure has been long and productive, and efforts have been made between the governing coalition and the opposition to find broad consensus within a complex security context. The bill has been drafted and includes two possible amendment proposals, introducing different compromise options and demonstrating the extent to which the Riigikogu seeks to find a solution that takes into account the influence of power related to the citizens of Estonia, non-citizens, and allied countries. The core of the matter is that the right to vote in local government elections will be harmonized between Estonian citizens, stateless persons, European Union citizens, and citizens of NATO member states, and positions and timelines are clearly defined and, if necessary, changes will be expedited. The mentioning of a sunset clause and the formation of agreements have been highlighted as an important part of continuous progress, and this has generated a broad debate on the topics of national security and integration.
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
2025-02-11 12:0715th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 8m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on a significant national issue initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee – a discussion on foreign policy opened by Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna. The Minister emphasized that the world is feeling the scent of the late 1930s and that the rules-based world order is under attack. Estonian foreign policy must be based on a decisive alignment in defense of our values, which requires a Ukrainian victory, the long-term containment of Russia, and the strengthening of allied relationships. Tsahkna affirmed Estonia’s commitment to Ukraine (0.25% of GDP for military aid) and called on allies to raise NATO defense spending to a minimum of 3% of GDP. Significant attention was also paid to the utilization of frozen Russian assets and resistance to hybrid activities.
During the question-and-answer session and negotiations, a sharp debate arose regarding the direction of U.S. President-elect Trump's foreign policy and Europe’s response. Several members of parliament criticized the Foreign Minister's answers, considering them inadequate and politically motivated attacks, particularly concerning statements by coalition partners (Läänemetsa) and corruption allegations against the Centre Party. The Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Marko Mihkelson, affirmed in his presentation that Estonia’s security is guaranteed by a united allied space and stressed that the West has underestimated the threat from Russia and must rapidly increase defense spending. The discussion was at times tense, reflecting both geopolitical anxiety and domestic political uncertainty.
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "In Support of the People of Georgia" (564 AE)
2025-01-22 19:5015th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
12 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 47m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate on the first reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “In Support of the People of Georgia” (draft 564). The draft was submitted by Riigikogu members Eerik-Niiles Kross, Marko Mihkelson, Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski, Luisa Rõivas, Katrin Kuusemäe, Tarmo Tamme, Maris Lauri, Aivar Sõerdi, Alar Laneman, Tõnis Lukas, Kristina Šmigun-Vähi, Urve Tiidus, Priit Sibul, Andrus Seeme, Vilja Toomast, Kadri Tali, Kalev Stoicescu, Züleyxa Izmailova, Juku-Kalle Raidi, Reili Ranna, Ester Karuse, Jüri Jaanson, Igor Taro, Mait Klaassen, Mart Võrklaev, Karmen Jolle, Irja Lutsari, Kristo Enn Vaga, Marek Reinaasa, Mati Raidma, Õnne Pillaku, Mario Kadastik, Hanah Lahe, Peeter Tali, Toomas Kivimägi, Margit Sutrop, Annely Akkermann, Andres Suti, Toomas Uibo, Pipi-Liis Sieman, Kalle Laanet, Madis Timpson, Maido Ruusmann, Urmas Reinsalu, Urmas Kruuse, Mihkel Leesi, Meelis Kiili, Eero Merilinnu and Lauri Hussar, presented a statement in support of the people of Georgia. A presentation was made to the Riigikogu speaker's chair by Eerik-Niiles Kross; the debate took place between factions and committees to present one question to each presenter and to hear the committee's presentation. In the final vote, the resolution was adopted. Strong attention was given to the importance of human rights protection, the release of political prisoners, Georgia’s continued path towards the European Union and NATO, and the need to hold new elections.
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading
2024-11-20 17:1215th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
57 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 2h 13m
AI Summary: The present agenda item concerns draft law 536 for amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia and the associated debate regarding the extension and restriction of suffrage in local government elections. The discussion will focus on three main aspects: the procedure for the first and second readings (the specifics of the constitutional amendment procedure; timeframes and conditions for submitting amendments), plus the definition of the electorate (citizens of Estonia, the European Union, and NATO countries versus individuals of undefined nationality and holders of grey passports). The draft law proposes allowing citizens of the European Union and NATO countries, as well as holders of grey passports, to participate in local elections while maintaining permanent suffrage, but recommends restricting the right to vote for citizens of those countries who do not fall under the sphere of protecting Estonia’s security and democratic interests. The debate will encompass the historical background, the balancing of democratic principles and geopolitical risks, and emphasize the need for broad consensus and legal clarity.
The second section concerns the practical implementation: how the amendments and supplementary regulations will come into force on the third reading, which procedural restrictions and safeguards should be applied, and how to ensure adherence to the rule of law. The discussion will also address the positions and observations of various political parties and interest groups regarding integration, legality, and security, and how different international practices may influence Estonia’s constitutional amendment and its national identity.
... and 4 more agenda items
Urmas Kruuse
63 agenda items
63/63 with AI summaries (100.0%)
63/63 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Urmas Kruuse
Email: urmas.kruuse@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: urmas.kruuse@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 14h 24m
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 14h 24m
Agenda Items:
2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-11-06 12:10XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments.
The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.
Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector
2025-11-06 00:3315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation.
In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04 12:07The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"
2025-10-15 17:23The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu held a debate on a matter of national importance concerning the European Union’s 2028–2034 long-term budget (MFF), focusing on Estonia’s choices and opportunities in the negotiations. Meelis Meigas, a representative of the Ministry of Finance, provided an overview of the European Commission’s proposal, which has a total volume of 1.98 trillion euros (1.26% of EU GNI). The budget structure has been simplified into four headings, with an emphasis on security, competitiveness, and cohesion. The volume of Estonia's national plan would increase by approximately 1 billion euros, reaching 6.5 billion, with internal security funding growing tenfold. Estonia is generally satisfied with the proposal but is critical of the lack of funding for the socio-economic impacts on the eastern border. Estonia is also opposed to several new own resources (e.g., 30% of emissions trading revenue, a levy on large enterprises), considering them regressive and a redirection of member states' budgetary revenue.
Peeter Tali, Chairman of the Committee on European Union Affairs, emphasized the importance of the debate and the need to set political priorities early. Estonia's main priorities should be enhancing defense capabilities, securing Rail Baltic and energy connections, and increasing competitiveness. Representatives of the parliamentary groups highlighted concerns regarding the potential reduction of agricultural subsidies and regional development funding in the new budget, and also criticized the growth of the EU's debt burden and interference in the taxation competence of member states. The debate confirmed that negotiations are still in the initial stages and require active and strategic action on Estonia's part.
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'
2025-10-09 13:0115th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on the key national issue, "The Future of the Estonian Economy," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Reform Party. The presentations provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic situation and future visions. Maris Lauri (Reform Party) analyzed the four pillars of Estonian competitiveness: natural resources, labor, capital, and the smart utilization of knowledge. She stressed the need for continuous innovation and adding value to natural resources, noting that the advantage of cheap labor has been lost. She also criticized the dismantling of the second pension pillar for reducing domestic capital. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo presented an optimistic forecast, predicting Estonia would be the fastest-growing economy in Europe in the coming years, underpinned by security (5% of GDP defense spending), export growth targets (43 billion euros by 2028), and R&D investments. He also highlighted major investments (400 million euros) and the necessity of accelerating planning processes. Allan Martinson (Estonian Founders Society) focused on the startup sector, which contributes 4.5% to GDP and is shifting from extensive to intensive growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and defense technology. He emphasized the requirement for a stable economic environment. Liina Vahtras (EIS) provided an overview of the success of e-residency, which has generated 370 million euros in revenue for the state treasury, and introduced a planned cardless solution designed to shorten the time required to establish a company to two weeks, thereby maintaining Estonia's competitive edge as a digital state. During the negotiations, faction representatives underscored the need for a stable economic environment, reduced bureaucracy, and reform of the education and healthcare systems, while Urmas Reinsalu sharply criticized the government's tax experiments and policies that undermine economic confidence.
... and 58 more agenda items
Leo Kunnas
69 agenda items
69/69 with AI summaries (100.0%)
69/69 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Leo Kunnas
Email: leo.kunnas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: leo.kunnas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 7h 41m
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 7h 41m
Agenda Items:
Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Deployment of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in another international military operation led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or its member state, the European Union, or the United Nations Organization upon first contribution thereto" (705 DR)
2025-11-05 19:2915th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 8m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Resolution 705, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the use of the Defense Forces in international military operations for the first time, contributing up to 100 servicemen. Leo Kunnas, Vice-Chairman of the National Defense Committee, announced that no amendments had been submitted to the draft, and the committee had consensually approved the text, proposing to conclude the second reading and put the draft to a final vote.
During the debate, the question of the draft's constitutionality was repeatedly raised. MPs Rene Kokk and Varro Vooglaid argued against delegating the authorization to the Government of the Republic, emphasizing that Article 128 of the Constitution grants the right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces solely to the Riigikogu. They highlighted that the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act allows for convening extraordinary or supplementary sessions quickly enough (even by the next day), meaning there is no real need to give the government blank authorization. Additionally, granting decision-making power to a government with low public support was criticized. Leo Kunnas admitted that he lacked arguments to refute the possibility of quickly convening the Riigikogu. Alar Laneman defended the draft, citing the state's capability to act in unforeseen circumstances and the need for strategic depth. In the final vote, the draft was adopted as a resolution with 52 votes in favor, 6 against, and 1 abstention.
First reading of the Draft Act (728 SE) on the Gambling Act, the Gambling Tax Act, the Act amending the Gambling Tax Act, and the Act amending the Cultural Endowment Act.
2025-10-21 13:0415th Riigikogu, Sixth Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Bill 728, the draft act amending the Gambling Act, the Gambling Tax Act, and the Cultural Endowment Act, which was initiated by 16 members of the Riigikogu, led by Tanel Tein. The main objective of the bill is to create a new, stable model for financing culture and sports by involving international tax revenue from the remote gambling sector. To achieve this, a gradual reduction of the gambling tax from 6% to 4% is planned by 2029, in order to make Estonia more attractive to international operators. The projected additional revenue would be directed into target funds established under the Cultural Endowment: the Private Funding Attraction Fund and the Sports Facilities Fund. The bill's presenter, Tanel Tein, emphasized that this would bring new licenses and taxable activity to Estonia, projecting revenue growth up to 100 million euros per year. Criticism (primarily from Isamaa and Varro Vooglaid) focused on the moral aspect of the bill (whether favoring gambling is fair), money laundering risks, and the fact that the government refused to submit the bill itself. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, confirmed that the committee supported the completion of the first reading of the bill, even though the government's opinion had not yet arrived. The Isamaa faction proposed rejecting the bill, but this did not find support.
First reading of the draft resolution (705 OE) of the Riigikogu, "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the initial contribution thereto."
2025-09-24 20:12Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Riigikogu Draft Resolution 705, which addresses the use of the Defence Forces in international military operations when contributing to them for the first time. Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur explained that the purpose of the draft resolution is to grant the government a flexible mandate to send up to 100 members of the Defence Forces, if necessary, to new, unforeseen operations conducted under the leadership of NATO, the EU, or the UN. Pevkur emphasized that the mandate is necessary for rapid response and cited examples of previous urgent needs (e.g., EUNAVFOR Med/Irini, Mozambique, Red Sea operations). Deputy Chairman of the National Defence Committee Leo Kunnas supported the draft, noting that the current practice has proven justified and that despite the existence of the mandate, Estonia's contribution to operations next year is planned to be historically small. Varro Vooglaid (EKRE faction) presented sharp opposition, arguing that the draft resolution contradicts Article 128 (1) of the Constitution because Parliament is delegating its decision-making power to the government, essentially granting a "blanket authorization" for missions whose details (including potential participation in Ukraine) are unknown. He stressed that the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act allows sessions to be convened even in urgent cases. Vladimir Arhipov (Centre Party) emphasized the importance of flexibility and strengthening allied relations. Following the debates, it was decided to conclude the first reading.
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)
2025-09-15 18:1115th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 35m
AI Summary: The meeting focused on the interpellation by Riigikogu members concerning the obstruction of the defense industry's development, submitted by Raimond Kaljulaid and others. Raimond Kaljulaid (SDE), the representative of the questioners, sharply criticized the Ministry of Defence's delays, noting that the discussion of the interpellation took place four months after its submission. The main objects of criticism were the five-month delay in the implementing acts of the Weapons Act and the slowness of planning the defense industry park, due to which the Estonian Defence Industry Association estimates investments have been lost. Kaljulaid also highlighted the National Audit Office's remarks regarding deficiencies in financial management and the court dispute over the expansion of the Nursipalu training area, asking who was responsible for the problems that had arisen. Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur defended the ministry's actions, explaining that the drafting of the implementing acts was specific and required the extensive involvement of experts. He emphasized that the special planning procedure for the defense industry park (1.5 years) was the fastest possible way within the current legal framework, also considering the need for an environmental impact assessment. The Minister confirmed that an extraordinary inventory has been initiated to solve the problems identified by the National Audit Office, and several responsible individuals have left office, including the head of the Centre for Defence Investments. During the debate, questions were also raised about the lowering of language requirements for the RKIK director and Estonia's inability to offer purchase guarantees to major investors. In his closing statement, Leo Kunnas (EKRE) sharply criticized the strategic shortcomings in the development of the Estonian defense industry compared to Latvia and Lithuania, warning that without domestic production, the funding of national defense will become economically unsustainable in the long run.
First reading of the draft law on civil crisis and state defense
2025-09-10 23:4215th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur presented Bill 668, initiated by the Government of the Republic and concerning civil crisis and national defense, to the Riigikogu for its first reading. The bill aims to consolidate the existing National Defense Act, Emergency Situation Act, and Emergency Act into a unified framework to boost Estonia's crisis preparedness and ensure clarity in comprehensive national defense. The Minister stressed that although the bill is voluminous, along with the explanatory memorandum and implementing acts (1,600 pages were cited), the number of sections in the main text will significantly decrease (from 259 to 178). As key changes, Pevkur highlighted the introduction of the umbrella term "crisis situation," the clarification of the roles of local municipalities (KOV) (setting priorities during a crisis), and the establishment of population protection at the legal level for the first time, granting the Rescue Board a coordinating role. During the debate, the issues that generated the most questions among Riigikogu members were the sheer volume of the bill, the funding and readiness of local municipalities, and the government's decision to postpone the obligation to build shelters in new apartment buildings. The EKRE faction proposed rejecting the bill, citing fears of excessive government power when declaring a crisis situation. Mati Raidma, representative of the National Defense Committee, supported the bill's processing, emphasizing its time-critical nature and the necessity of strengthening comprehensive national defense.
... and 64 more agenda items
Katrin Kuusemäe
10 agenda items
10/10 with AI summaries (100.0%)
10/10 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Katrin Kuusemäe
Email: katrin.kuusemae@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: katrin.kuusemae@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 43m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 43m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)
2025-10-07 13:15The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The first reading of the draft State Budget Act for 2026 (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, took place in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the budget, which has a revenue volume of 18.6 billion euros and an expenditure volume of 19.6 billion euros. The general government deficit reaches 4.5% of GDP, which is mainly due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditure (over 5% of GDP), while still remaining within the limits of the European Union derogation. Ligi emphasized that the budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and income. The tax burden will decrease from 36.6% to 35.2% of GDP, primarily due to the increase in the income tax-free minimum to 700 euros and the abolition of the tax kink, which the minister considered an important economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the salary fund (up to 10%) for police officers, rescuers, teachers, and special welfare workers.
The debate focused on the large budget deficit and the growing debt burden. The opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme, and others) criticized the government for fulfilling election promises with borrowed money and for the long-term deterioration of state finances. Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit was largely caused by an external factor (the import of defense procurements) and blamed previous governments for loosening budget rules. The minister also sharply criticized Peeter Raudsepp, the head of the Institute of Economic Research, accusing him of methodological errors and inciting negative sentiment. Discussions also covered plans to reduce the deficit of the Health Insurance Fund, the funding of research and development, and the revenue base of local governments.
Draft law amending § 2 of the Public Holidays and Commemoration Days Act (637 SE) – First Reading
2025-09-11 01:3215th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
9 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 7m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Bill 637, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, concerning amendments to the Law on Holidays and Commemorative Days. The aim of the bill was to establish the second day of Easter (Monday) as a public holiday and a day off, citing the alignment of Estonia with the majority of European countries and the strengthening of family relationships as justification. The rapporteur, Vadim Belobrovtsev (Centre Party), emphasized that Estonia is in the minority in Europe (along with Malta and Portugal) where this day is not a rest day, which creates problems in international business cooperation, especially with the Baltic and Nordic countries. He noted that the bill has received approval from the Estonian Council of Churches.
During the debate, opposition from the Government of the Republic emerged, based primarily on the lack of a substantive impact analysis. Opposition MPs (Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Laats, Jevgrafov) criticized the government's position, deeming the demand for an impact analysis a hypocritical tactic, especially considering that the government itself fails to present sufficient analyses for significant bills (e.g., tax increases). Belobrovtsev confirmed that the economic impact is indeed difficult to assess unambiguously, as the positive and negative aspects (e.g., greater productivity after a holiday versus a lost workday) balance each other out. Katrin Kuusemäe, representative of the Constitutional Committee, gave an overview of the committee meeting, where the government justified its opposition by citing the need to proceed from internal socio-economic balance, rather than merely the desire for harmonization.
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (636 SE) – first reading
2025-09-11 01:0415th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 8m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of the Draft Act amending the Holidays and Commemoration Days Act [636], initiated by the Social Democratic Party faction and several members of the Riigikogu. The purpose of the draft act is to compensate for public holidays falling on a weekend (excluding the first day of Easter and Pentecost) with an additional day off on the following working day. Presenter Heljo Pikhof emphasized that Estonia has fewer public holidays than the European Union average, and Estonians lead the EU in terms of annual working hours. The additional days off would help improve work-life balance and mental well-being. Pikhof also referred to previous analyses which showed that the economic impact of additional days off is not necessarily negative; rather, it could stimulate the economy through tourism and consumption.
Katrin Kuusemäe, the presenter for the leading committee (the Constitutional Committee), conveyed the position of the Government of the Republic, which did not support the draft act. The government justified its opposition by citing the potential negative impact on employers, referring to a drop in production volume and additional administrative costs. During the debate, questions were repeatedly raised regarding the justification of the government's position, especially concerning the alleged negative impact on educational institutions and entrepreneurs, given that holidays often fall during the week anyway. The committee decided to conclude the first reading of the draft act.
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Organizing a referendum on the question of electricity production from oil shale" (581 OE)
2025-05-13 15:0415th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 8m
AI Summary: The first reading of the draft resolution 581 of the Riigikogu, "Organizing a Referendum on the Cessation of Electricity Production from Oil Shale," presented by the Estonian Centre Party faction and delivered by Lauri Laats, took place during consideration of the third agenda item. The core issue addressed was whether a referendum should be held in Estonia on ending electricity production from oil shale by the year 2040. The discussion focused on energy security, dependence on raw materials, potential economic and social impacts, and the context of the European Union's green transition and the ENMAK development plans. Questions were also raised regarding public involvement, the conditions for organizing referendums, the legitimacy of a referendum, and possible alternative solutions, such as carbon capture technology and the modernization of oil shale power plants.
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines" (557 OE)
2025-03-13 12:0115th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The agenda concerns the review of the first reading of draft resolution 557, submitted by the Conservative People's Party fraction of the Riigikogu, which aims to establish a Riigikogu investigative committee to assess the risks associated with modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. VARRO VOOGLAIDI will present the draft, and the meeting will take place on March 13, 2025. The Riigikogu’s positions and security issues will be discussed in the context of a critical review of coronavirus restrictions and protective measures, and concerns are expressed regarding potential conflicts of interest and the constitutionality of drug safety oversight systems. According to reports, NORTH Group has contacted the committee, highlighting three main problems: the impact of vaccines on preventing the spread of the virus, the observed substantial side effects and party-specific dangers; and plasmid DNA contamination in lipid nanoparticles. The draft’s primary objective is to establish the investigative committee and to submit a final report by August 2025, if possible, with proposals for amending legislation to prevent future risks. At the end, the governing committee decided to reject the draft in the first reading, and it is removed from the procedure.
... and 5 more agenda items
Helmen Kütt
99 agenda items
99/99 with AI summaries (100.0%)
99/99 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Helmen Kütt
Email: helmen.kytt@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: helmen.kytt@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 13 years
Total Speaking Time: 11h 48m
Parliament Seniority: 13 years
Total Speaking Time: 11h 48m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Interpellation concerning the tax cut for online casinos (No. 806)
2025-11-10 17:56XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Interpellation No. 806, submitted to Prime Minister Kristen Michal by members of the Riigikogu (including Jaak Aab, Riina Sikkut, and Lauri Läänemets, among others), concerning the lowering of the gambling tax on online casinos. Jaak Aab, the proposer of the interpellation, emphasized that the government's plan to slash the tax rate on remote gambling by one-third is contradictory, especially considering that, at the same time, a VAT exemption for foodstuffs is not being supported. Aab highlighted the risks of increased gambling addiction, a rise in the number of debtors, and damage to the country's reputation. He referred to earlier positions held by Ministry of Finance analysts who doubted the growth of tax revenue, as well as the concerns of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) regarding the complexity of controlling money laundering when companies' legal entities are located in third countries.
Prime Minister Kristen Michal responded that the draft bill was initiated by members of the Riigikogu, not the government, and its goal is to bring the accounting and tax revenue of remote gambling companies operating in Europe to Estonia in order to increase funding for culture and sports. He confirmed that additional resources have been planned for the Tax and Customs Board and the FIU to mitigate risks and check the backgrounds of license applicants. During the debate, the opposition (Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits, Helle-Moonika Helme) sharply criticized the government's priorities, calling the policy an attempt to turn Estonia into "Europe's prison and casino hub" and pitting the concessions made to casino businessmen against the cost-of-living difficulties and tax hikes faced by ordinary people.
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)
2025-11-05 22:2415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.
Draft Act Amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (677 SE), second reading
2025-11-05 21:0415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 9m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 677, the act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, which was initiated by the Finance Committee. The main objective of the bill was to bring the tax law into compliance with the Constitution, taking into account the remarks made by the Chancellor of Justice. The amendments concern shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register (due to destruction, theft, or export from the country). The changes will be applied retroactively starting from January 1st of this year. Annely Akkermann (Reform Party), Chairman of the Finance Committee, stressed that this was a necessary correction of errors and that adapting tax legislation is routine work.
The debate was extremely critical. Opposition parties (EKRE, Isamaa, Center Party) accused the coalition of stubbornness, noting that the same flaws had been highlighted during the initial handling of the bill but were forcefully rejected. Critics argued that the amendments were only being made because the Chancellor of Justice intervened to prevent a constitutional crisis. The opposition repeatedly demanded the complete repeal of the motor vehicle tax, citing its unfairness, low revenue collection (half of what was forecast), and negative impact on rural life and the behavior of car buyers. Akkermann defended the tax as a fair way to collect money to cover the costs of roads and traffic management, noting that social benefits had already been increased using the tax revenue.
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05 16:0315th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu continued the first reading of Draft Act 682 on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the Enforcement of Prison Sentences, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which had begun at the previous sitting. Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta returned to the rostrum to answer numerous questions from Riigikogu members. The debate was extremely polarized and focused primarily on the economic viability of leasing out Tartu Prison, risks to internal security, and national dignity. The opposition parties (SDE, EKRE, Isamaa, Centre Party) sharply criticized the plan, calling it irresponsible, especially considering the government's low support and the opposition from the city of Tartu. They emphasized that the plan reduces security in Southern Estonia, burdens the healthcare system, and is fundamentally wrong. Minister Pakosta and the coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200) defended the draft act, stressing that the agreement is economically beneficial for Estonia (it covers the maintenance costs of the empty prison complex and generates revenue), creates new jobs in Southern Estonia, and strengthens internal security through Swedish-funded training. Valdo Randpere, the rapporteur for the lead committee (the Legal Affairs Committee), confirmed that the topic had been thoroughly discussed in the committee and proposed concluding the first reading. The opposition submitted a joint proposal to reject the draft act, which was voted down. The first reading was concluded.
... and 94 more agenda items
Kalle Laanet
11 agenda items
11/11 with AI summaries (100.0%)
11/11 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Kalle Laanet
Email: kalle.laanet@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: kalle.laanet@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 16 years
Total Speaking Time: 1h 11m
Parliament Seniority: 16 years
Total Speaking Time: 1h 11m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
The Ombudsman's proposal to grant permission to lift the immunity of Member of Parliament Kalle Laanet and to continue legal proceedings against him.
2025-05-22 13:0315th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 6m
AI Summary: The first item on the agenda concerns the Chancellery of Justice's proposal to grant permission to remove parliamentary immunity from Member of the Riigikogu Kalle Laanet and to continue criminal proceedings against him. The presenter is the Chancellery of Justice, Ülle Madise. The procedure is clearly defined: a presentation lasting up to 20 minutes, after which each Member of the Riigikogu may pose one oral question; this is followed by Kalle Laaneti’s statement, lasting up to five minutes, and the opportunity for questions concludes. Following that, deliberations will continue, and finally, a vote will take place. Please, Chancellery of Justice, Ülle Madise!
Draft law amending the Identity Documents Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (572 SE) – second reading
2025-05-21 19:05Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The present agenda item concerns the second reading of the draft law amending the Identity Document Act and, in connection therewith, amending other acts 572. The rapporteur is Kalle Laanet, a member of the Constitutional Committee. The first reading took place on April 29th and concluded. In preparing for the second reading, the Constitutional Committee held a session on May 12th, decided to submit four amendments, and also reviewed the linguistic clarifications made to the draft law.
The amendments formed a significant part of the discussion: No. 1 replaces the reference to the name of a specific foundation in the Identity Document Act with a reference to a sectoral foundation, so that it is not sensible to highlight a specific name in the law, as the foundation may change over time; No. 2 stipulates that some provisions that have already been repealed by the act amending the Aliens Act and, in connection therewith, amending other acts, adopted on March 15, 2025, are excluded from the draft law; No. 1 is derived from a proposal by the Data Protection Inspectorate and specifies the authority provisions relating to datasets, so that the issuing authority is obliged to provide precise retention deadlines; No. 1 is based on the amendments coming into force on December 19, 2025, by which return certificates and permits will disappear from the Identity Document Act and be replaced by an EU return certificate; therefore, these changes to the provisions must be removed and the number of the added paragraph corrected.
The guiding committee's procedural decisions were as follows: the second reading of the draft law shall be placed on the Riigikogu’s agenda on May 19th; to conclude the second reading of the draft law and, if concluded, to propose placing the draft law on the Riigikogu’s agenda for the third reading on June 19, 2025, and to carry out the final vote.
Draft law amending the Act on Documents Establishing Identity and amending other acts in consequence (572 SE) – first reading
2025-04-09 22:4015th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The eighth item on the agenda was the first reading of draft law 572, amending the Identity Documents Act, and amending other acts related to it, initiated by the Republic's Government. The draft’s focus is to enhance the security of identities, mitigate security risks, and reduce bureaucracy, while taking into account rapid technological development and international standards. Significant changes include the possibility of identity verification via mobile phone through a data gateway, establishing a list of restrictions for e-residency, harmonizing the processing of data and registers with the General Data Protection Regulation, and ending the suspension and restoration of certificates, which will lead to individuals having to apply for an ID card with new certificates.
Another important part concerned restrictions on e-residency, under which a regulation will be created to form a list of countries where there is a higher risk of money laundering or terrorism financing, or with which Estonia lacks law enforcement cooperation. The list will take effect with regulations, and the issuance of e-resident digital IDs/processing of data will follow common standards. In addition, several technical and legal changes, carried out in cooperation between the Riigikogu members and ministries, were discussed, such as the introduction of DNA expertise when applying for a document for the first time, specifying the maximum retention periods for datasets, and ending the suspension of certificates for security considerations. Overall, the draft is aimed at higher security, better risk management, and user convenience, but it also involves a significant impact on the handling of personal data and the level of international cooperation.
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the circumstances related to the termination of Nordica’s activities” (543 OE)
2025-03-10 17:1015th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The main item on the agenda was the first reading of draft resolution 543 of the Riigikogu, aimed at establishing a Riigikogu investigative commission to examine the circumstances surrounding the termination of Nordica. The proposal is submitted by the fraction of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), and the commission's tasks include clarifying shortcomings in state oversight, identifying management errors and accountability, and assessing the ministry's actions during the period when Nordica's problems emerged. Nordica’s financing and termination (the November 2024 announcement and bankruptcy filing) highlighted the need to gather an impartial and broad-based overview, the results of which could form a reasoned basis for the Riigikogu’s future decisions and to improve political culture. In addition, consideration was given to how and whether Nordica and related companies should be terminated in the future in a way that would be most beneficial to Estonia's interests. The first reading also discussed deadlines and procedures, as the draft resolution has been submitted previously, and an extension of deadlines is likely.
... and 6 more agenda items
Lauri Laats
291 agenda items
291/291 with AI summaries (100.0%)
291/291 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Lauri Laats
Email: lauri.laats@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: lauri.laats@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 141h 32m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 141h 32m
Agenda Items:
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act (694 SE)
2025-11-05 22:2415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Bill 694, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and amendments to the Traffic Act. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the Finance Committee, presented the content of the draft legislation, which stipulates an annual tax reduction of 100 euros for families with children for every child under the age of 18, applied retroactively starting in 2025. Furthermore, the tax rate for M-category minibuses with more than seven seats will be significantly reduced by applying the N-category tax rate, which supports large families and people with disabilities. Akkermann explained that the amendment affects 150,000 taxpayers and provides families with a total of over 16 million euros. The opposition sharply criticized the bill, calling it a cosmetic fix that does not compensate for earlier cuts to family benefits, and demanded the complete abolition of the car tax. The lack of specific provisions for people with disabilities was particularly highlighted. Amendment Proposal No. 3 by the Social Democratic Party faction, which provided for tax exemption for individuals with severe or profound disabilities, was rejected in the vote. The lead committee made six consensual amendments to the bill, and the second reading was concluded.
The State of Dental Care in Estonia
2025-11-05 14:3415th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 5m
AI Summary: The third item on the agenda addressed the state of dental care in Estonia, a topic raised by Riigikogu member Lauri Laats to Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller. Laats stressed the direct connection between oral health and overall well-being and presented alarming statistics: out of 1.3 million residents, only 327,000 people annually utilize the Health Insurance Fund’s 60-euro dental care reimbursement. Laats argued that the primary barrier to visiting the dentist is financial hardship, citing studies showing that people are forced to take out quick loans to cover dental treatment costs, especially among young people. Minister Joller acknowledged the importance of oral health but emphasized the critical role of prevention, hygiene habits, and healthy eating. She noted that the state has increased benefits, treatment is free for children (though the attendance rate is only 60%), and future plans include better targeting of services toward lower-income individuals and sending reminders to parents. The discussion grew heated when Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart posed a supplementary question regarding the Ministry of Social Affairs’ alleged inefficient use of European Social Fund money (project managers’ salaries, seminars, trips) instead of developing services for children with special needs. Minister Joller rejected the accusations, defending the necessity of inclusion during reforms and accusing the questioner of unethical behavior and presenting factual inaccuracies. The session chair requested that participants refrain from personal attacks.
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04 12:07The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1m
AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.
Inquiry concerning the safe use of mini-mopeds (No. 828)
2025-11-03 19:50The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 19m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation submitted to Infrastructure Minister Kuldar Leis concerning the safety and regulation of minimopeds and light personal transporters (LPTs), which was presented by Lauri Laats and other members of the Riigikogu. The submitter of the interpellation, Lauri Laats (pid: q-NH4yPMXTY), stressed that the sector is plagued by "disorder" regarding both technical and legal regulation, citing tragic accidents (including a recent fatal accident in Tartu). Minister Kuldar Leis thanked the members for raising the topic and presented statistics, noting that the number of accidents involving light personal transporters has decreased by 26% over the last nine months, but stressed that the focus has shifted from rental vehicles to privately owned LPTs, especially among 7–14-year-olds. Leis confirmed that vehicle types are precisely defined by law in Estonia. He outlined the ministry's plans: consideration is being given to raising the minimum age limit for LPT drivers and extending the requirement for driving rights to minors (bicycle licenses). Work is also underway to establish an obligation for rental companies to implement reliable age and identity verification measures. The Minister promised that legislative amendments would be drafted under the leadership of the Ministry of Climate and attempts would be made to bring them before the Riigikogu before the next season (spring). In the subsequent debate, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart (pid: pRsZT2E8hTk) sharply criticized the coalition, accusing them of voting down previous Center Party drafts (e.g., establishing a limit on the number of rental vehicles, helmet rental, mandatory traffic insurance) and accusing the government of prioritizing the interests of entrepreneurs over public health.
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop the Procedure for Paying an Additional Annual Lump-Sum Pension Supplement to Pensioners" (678 OE)
2025-11-03 17:32The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
12 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 41m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 678, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic develop a procedure for paying pensioners an additional annual one-off pension supplement (€100). Rapporteur Lauri Laats emphasized that this was a deeply moral issue, as over 327,000 pensioners live in a situation where the cost of living has grown significantly faster than pensions in recent years, especially the prices of food and essential goods (a rise of over 40%). He highlighted that Estonia's pension replacement rate (around 34%) is the lowest in the European Union, and nearly 40% of the elderly are at risk of poverty. Laats argued that the support, costing 33 million euros, is affordable for the state and would help alleviate the financial difficulties faced by the elderly while simultaneously stimulating domestic consumption. As funding sources, the faction proposed introducing a bank tax and a progressive income tax, as well as savings from bureaucracy and green transition costs.
During the debate, questions were raised about the universality of the support, to which Laats replied that the draft resolution stipulated payment to all pensioners, but making exceptions was negotiable. Signe Riisalo, Chairman of the Social Affairs Committee, provided an overview of the committee's brief discussion, noting that the committee does not develop solutions but pointed to the need for an extraordinary increase in the national pension to reduce poverty among the elderly. During negotiations, Aleksandr Tšaplõgin and Mart Helme criticized the government, accusing it of neglecting the elderly and breaking election promises. Social Democrat Andre Hanimägi supported steps to assist the elderly but emphasized the need for systemic solutions. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, which required a majority of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes) for adoption. The draft resolution was rejected, receiving only 22 votes in favor.
... and 286 more agenda items
Hanah Lahe
29 agenda items
29/29 with AI summaries (100.0%)
29/29 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Hanah Lahe
Email: hanah.lahe@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: hanah.lahe@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 6h 44m
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 6h 44m
Agenda Items:
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)
2025-11-11 12:13XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote.
Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 1h 0m
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading
2025-06-19 01:0315th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: During the Riigikogu session, Bill 647, initiated by the Isamaa faction, was debated. The bill’s objective was to repeal the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, effective January 1, 2026. Presenter Aivar Kokk (Isamaa) sharply criticized the tax, labeling it voter deception and socially unjust, particularly toward large families and people with disabilities, citing examples of shockingly high tax bills. He stressed that the governing coalition ignored pre-election promises and is essentially double-taxing car owners, given that the fuel excise duty is already established.
The debate was tense, focusing on the coalition’s responsibility and the "festival of tax hikes." Coalition politicians referred to planned relief measures for families with children and investments in roads, which Kokk deemed insufficient. The lead committee (the Finance Committee), represented by Annely Akkermann, proposed rejecting the bill during its first reading. During faction negotiations, Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa) promised the tax would be abolished by 2027 at the latest, accusing the government of dishonest politics and succumbing to pressure from interest groups. Anti Allas (SDE) confirmed that he would vote in favor of the bill, although he felt that some form of environmentally oriented car tax was necessary for the state. Following the vote, the bill was rejected.
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading
2025-06-16 18:58XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 25m
AI Summary: The agenda item was the first reading of Bill 657 on the amendment of the Waste Act and related amendments to other acts, initiated by the Government of the Republic, which was introduced by Infrastructure Minister Kuldar Leis. The bill, also referred to as the waste reform, aims to bring Estonia's waste sector into the 21st century by increasing the recycling rate from 38% to 65% by 2035 and reducing landfilling to below 1%. The Minister emphasized that the reform will help avoid large fines to the EU (currently 16–20 million euros per year) and will create a new industry. The changes include a unified collection standard (four containers in densely populated areas), the separation of transport and handling procurements to increase competition, and the digitalization of waste management. The Minister confirmed that the average monthly cost for households that sort waste separately will remain within five euros, and the state will be 20 million euros in surplus due to the reform.
The opposition (Centre Party, EKRE, Isamaa) sharply criticized the bill, calling it a "tax festival" and claiming it increases consumer costs (Aivar Kokk estimated the additional cost at 75 million euros per year) and bureaucracy for local governments (LGs). Specific criticism targeted the raising of landfill and incineration fees, and the right granted to LGs to add up to 50% of transport costs to cover waste management expenses. Supporters (Eesti 200, Reform Party) stressed that the reform is necessary to end the monopoly and meet recycling targets. During the vote, the proposal by the Centre Party and Isamaa factions to reject the bill at the first reading was voted down.
Draft law amending the General Part of the Environmental Code Act and other laws (611 SE) – Second Reading
2025-06-12 02:4215th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The discussion covering agenda item 12 concerns the second reading of the draft law amending the General Part of the Environmental Code Act and other laws, initiated by the Republic of Estonia’s Government, number 611. Hanah Lahe, a member of the Environment Committee, presented the report, introducing the draft law and the proposed amendments. The first reading took place on May 14th, and the deadline for submitting amendments was May 28th. The committee submitted 11 amendments, which arose from three sittings: May 20th, June 2nd, and June 9th. These are technical and aimed at clarifying and improving the draft law. The amendments were reviewed and fully and consensually considered.
In addition, it was planned that the draft law would be placed on the plenary’s agenda on June 11th, and the conclusion of the second reading would be carried out on June 18th. The EKRE faction opposed the consideration of the 11th amendment, but the committee’s proposal to conclude the second reading remained in contention. The final vote on the draft law and the closure of the agenda took place in accordance with the previous record and the voting result.
... and 24 more agenda items
Alar Laneman
25 agenda items
25/25 with AI summaries (100.0%)
25/25 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Alar Laneman
Email: alar.laneman@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Email: alar.laneman@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 2h 45m
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 2h 45m
Agenda Items:
Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Deployment of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in another international military operation led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or its member state, the European Union, or the United Nations Organization upon first contribution thereto" (705 DR)
2025-11-05 19:2915th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Resolution 705, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the use of the Defense Forces in international military operations for the first time, contributing up to 100 servicemen. Leo Kunnas, Vice-Chairman of the National Defense Committee, announced that no amendments had been submitted to the draft, and the committee had consensually approved the text, proposing to conclude the second reading and put the draft to a final vote.
During the debate, the question of the draft's constitutionality was repeatedly raised. MPs Rene Kokk and Varro Vooglaid argued against delegating the authorization to the Government of the Republic, emphasizing that Article 128 of the Constitution grants the right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces solely to the Riigikogu. They highlighted that the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act allows for convening extraordinary or supplementary sessions quickly enough (even by the next day), meaning there is no real need to give the government blank authorization. Additionally, granting decision-making power to a government with low public support was criticized. Leo Kunnas admitted that he lacked arguments to refute the possibility of quickly convening the Riigikogu. Alar Laneman defended the draft, citing the state's capability to act in unforeseen circumstances and the need for strategic depth. In the final vote, the draft was adopted as a resolution with 52 votes in favor, 6 against, and 1 abstention.
Second Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu titled "Extension of the Term for the Use of the Estonian Defence Forces in Fulfilling the International Obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union Military Operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini" (703 OE)
2025-11-05 19:1815th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The second reading of Draft Resolution 703 of the Riigikogu, submitted by the Government of the Republic, was on the agenda. It concerned the extension of the term for using the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Estonian state in the European Union military operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini. The rapporteur was Alar Laneman, a member of the National Defence Committee. He explained that the leading committee discussed the draft resolution at two sittings, and no amendments were submitted. The committee only made linguistic clarifications, harmonizing points 1 and 2 of the draft. According to the draft resolution, Estonia will continue contributing to the operation, increasing the maximum limit of Defence Forces personnel from three up to six servicemen. Since there was no desire for debate and no amendments were submitted, the leading committee proposed conducting the final vote on the draft resolution. In the final vote, 66 members of the Riigikogu supported the draft, 0 were against, and 1 abstained. The draft resolution was adopted.
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (Parliament) "Extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union military operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini" (703 OE)
2025-09-24 19:59Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Resolution 703, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the extension of the term of use of the Defence Forces in the European Union military operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini. Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur presented the draft resolution, providing an introductory overview of the general reduction in Estonia's participation in international military operations next year, focusing instead on raising the internal level of the Defence Forces and training instructors. The operation in Iraq has ended and contributions there are no longer being made. Regarding the EUNAVFOR Med/Irini operation, the Minister proposed increasing the contribution from one staff officer to two, while the total size of the mandate would be up to six servicemen. The objective of the operation is to ensure freedom of navigation and implement the UN arms embargo against Libya.
Alar Laneman, speaking on behalf of the National Defence Committee, confirmed the committee's support for the draft resolution, emphasizing the operation's importance in implementing the UN arms embargo, preventing illegal oil exports, and combating human trafficking. The committee had discussed the draft resolution at its session on September 15 and unanimously decided to propose to the Riigikogu that the first reading be concluded. Debates were not opened, and the first reading of the draft resolution was concluded.
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"
2025-09-09 13:0415th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur presented a report to the Riigikogu on the implementation of the national long-term development strategy "Eesti 2035" within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defence. The Minister emphasized the growth of Estonia's defense budget, pointing out that the 2025 budget will exceed 2 billion euros (over 5% of GDP), which is 250,000 times greater than in the early years following the restoration of independence. He affirmed that Estonia is now a strong, straight-backed nation capable of defending its own freedom. Pevkur provided an overview of military capability development, including the creation of a division structure, the mechanization of the 2nd Infantry Brigade, the establishment of an artillery regiment (HIMARS, K9, Caesar), and the development of multi-layered air defense (IRIS-T systems, creation of an air defense brigade). He called upon the Riigikogu to confirm the 5% defense spending level in the long-term fundamentals of security policy and announced plans to create a 10-year budgetary framework for defense planning.
The debate centered on a recent audit by the National Audit Office, which exposed systemic shortcomings in the Ministry of Defence and its subordinate institutions regarding the use of funds and inventory accounting (amounting to over 700 million euros). The opposition (specifically Varro Vooglaid, Urmas Reinsalu, and Martin Helme) demanded the Minister take responsibility and resign, accusing him of weak leadership and misleading the public. Minister Pevkur defended the Ministry, asserting that all acquired stocks are present and in use, but conceded the need to improve inventory and accounting processes, announcing the initiation of an extraordinary stocktake. The discussion also covered the Elva drone incident, the fast-track procedure for expanding the Nursipalu training area, and the topic of women's conscription.
Chair implementation
2025-09-04 12:5815th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s
AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions.
Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.
... and 20 more agenda items
Maris Lauri
36 agenda items
36/36 with AI summaries (100.0%)
36/36 with AI summaries (100.0%)
Politicians: Maris Lauri
Email: maris.lauri@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Email: maris.lauri@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE
Active:
Yes
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 12h 39m
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 12h 39m
Agenda Items:
First Reading of the Draft Legislation (736 SE) on the Amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act Amending the State Budget Act
2025-10-13 19:4715th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m
AI Summary: The agenda item was the first reading of Draft Bill 736, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the State Budget Act and the Act amending the State Budget Act. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi introduced the draft bill, the main objectives of which were the transposition of the European Union budgetary framework directive (including establishing a new ceiling for the structural deficit at 1.5% of GDP), increasing budget transparency (by integrating an activity-based and economic view into the 2026 budget), streamlining the granting of subsidies, and increasing the flexibility of local government financing. Ligi also explained the limitation of the government reserve to 3% of the volume of expenditure and the termination of carrying over unused balances.
During the debate, Members of the Riigikogu (Peeter Ernits, Rain Epler, Aivar Kokk) criticized the new rules, arguing that they increase bureaucracy and restrict the democratic decision-making process (especially in connection with the EU's four-year frameworks). Ligi defended the new rules, emphasizing the role of expertise and the European Commission in curbing political populism. A discussion also arose regarding the level of budget detail, where the opposition demanded a more precise breakdown of expenditures (labor, economic, social costs), to which Ligi replied that international recommendations and practical necessity require flexibility in reallocating expenditures. Maris Lauri, the rapporteur for the Finance Committee, confirmed that members of the Riigikogu have exceptionally good access to detailed budget data through the budget information system.
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'
2025-10-09 13:0115th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
10 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 26m
AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on the key national issue, "The Future of the Estonian Economy," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Reform Party. The presentations provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic situation and future visions. Maris Lauri (Reform Party) analyzed the four pillars of Estonian competitiveness: natural resources, labor, capital, and the smart utilization of knowledge. She stressed the need for continuous innovation and adding value to natural resources, noting that the advantage of cheap labor has been lost. She also criticized the dismantling of the second pension pillar for reducing domestic capital. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo presented an optimistic forecast, predicting Estonia would be the fastest-growing economy in Europe in the coming years, underpinned by security (5% of GDP defense spending), export growth targets (43 billion euros by 2028), and R&D investments. He also highlighted major investments (400 million euros) and the necessity of accelerating planning processes. Allan Martinson (Estonian Founders Society) focused on the startup sector, which contributes 4.5% to GDP and is shifting from extensive to intensive growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and defense technology. He emphasized the requirement for a stable economic environment. Liina Vahtras (EIS) provided an overview of the success of e-residency, which has generated 370 million euros in revenue for the state treasury, and introduced a planned cardless solution designed to shorten the time required to establish a company to two weeks, thereby maintaining Estonia's competitive edge as a digital state. During the negotiations, faction representatives underscored the need for a stable economic environment, reduced bureaucracy, and reform of the education and healthcare systems, while Urmas Reinsalu sharply criticized the government's tax experiments and policies that undermine economic confidence.
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic
2025-09-17 18:5715th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
20 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 18m
AI Summary: The third item on the Riigikogu agenda was the re-adoption of the Act amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 UA), which the President of the Republic had left unpromulgated. The President had refused to promulgate the Act, citing a conflict with Sections 26 and 44 of the Constitution, arguing that it unduly restricts citizens' right to informational self-determination.
Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, and Maris Lauri, member of the Finance Committee, provided an overview of the committees' discussions. Both committees reached a consensus decision that the Act should not be re-adopted in its unamended form, thereby agreeing with the President's position. Hent-Raul Kalmo, the President's legal advisor, and representatives of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU, or RAB in Estonian) who participated in the discussions, conceded that the basis for restricting data subject rights in the Act was too broad and needed clarification. Lauri also highlighted an unprecedented case in the Supreme Court, which has referred the matter to the European Court of Justice for clarification regarding the legal basis for the FIU's data processing.
During the negotiations, the opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Varro Vooglaid, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Peeter Ernits) sharply criticized the totalitarian nature of the Act, which would allow the creation of profiles of all citizens and companies using artificial intelligence, violating privacy and establishing a surveillance society. The opposition demanded the complete withdrawal of the Act, not just cosmetic amendments. Social Democrat Riina Sikkut emphasized the need for substantive discussion to find a balance between the secrecy of proceedings and trust in the e-state. In the vote, the adoption of the Act in its unamended form was rejected by 70 votes. The deadline for submitting amendments was set for October 1, 2025, at 5:15 PM.
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.
2025-09-16 13:05Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s
AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with an overview by Chancellor of Justice Ülle Madise regarding the compliance of legislative acts with the Constitution and the fulfillment of her duties during the period from September 1, 2024, to August 31, 2025. The Chancellor of Justice thanked the Riigikogu and officials for their good cooperation, noting that her office received over 5,500 submissions, of which more than 2,500 required substantive resolution. Madise highlighted several deepening problems: disregard for the implementation of laws, the application of flawed management methodologies of great powers in Estonia, and excessive reliance on machines and artificial intelligence, which must not replace human discretion. She criticized the acquisition of technological means restricting fundamental rights without the legal authorization of the Riigikogu and emphasized the importance of the principle of data collection decentralization, warning against the creation of "super databases." In the field of education, she criticized contradictory laws and the competition for school places that harms children's mental health. Madise stressed that Estonia is founded on freedom and responsibility, not on the total control of a preventative state. The questions and answers round addressed the criminal case concerning residence registration (propiska), developments in accessibility, the protection of banking secrecy, the status of the Estonian language, restrictions on the use of medical data, the limitation of property rights in nature conservation areas, and the insufficient resources of the Chancellor of Justice's office. Representatives of the factions (SDE, Reform Party, Isamaa, Centre Party) praised the Chancellor of Justice's work but used the podium to criticize the government's legislative work (including tax increases, the state budget base law, and data collection drafts) and bureaucracy.
The Financial Supervision Authority's 2024 Report
2025-09-11 13:0615th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m
AI Summary: The agenda for the Riigikogu session included the 2024 annual report of the Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA), presented by Kilvar Kessler, Chairman of the Management Board. Kessler provided a comprehensive overview of the authority’s 12 years of activity, emphasizing the FSA’s role as an apolitical, independent, and professional supervisory body that reports directly to the legislature. He highlighted four main topics: corporate mergers in the financial market (including the relocation of the SEB Baltic headquarters to Tallinn), over-regulation of the legal framework (over 700 legal acts), the launch of new supervisory areas (e.g., crypto assets, credit providers, crisis resolution), and successful risk mitigation during crises (the ID card crisis, COVID, the start of the war in Ukraine). Kessler stressed that the FSA is the smallest financial supervisory authority in the European Union (with 140 experts), supervising assets worth over 60 billion euros based on a risk-based approach. In his future forecasts, he noted the need to simplify EU rules, cope with deepening digitalization and technological risks, and utilize Tallinn’s potential as a banking center.
The Q&A session addressed the Enefit Green insider trading case, regarding which Kessler confirmed that a criminal report had been submitted, emphasizing the importance of ensuring market integrity. They also discussed the regulation of credit unions (recommending supervision for portfolios starting at 50 million euros) and issues in the non-bank credit market, where the FSA has revoked 20% of operating licenses due to irresponsible lending. Kessler reiterated his long-standing position on the necessity of creating a financial ombudsman to ensure quick and affordable dispute resolution for consumers. During the debate, Maris Lauri (Reform Party) and Andre Hanimäe (Social Democratic Party) supported the work of the Financial Supervisory Authority but also stressed the need to establish a financial ombudsman and improve the regulation of the non-bank credit market, including the creation of a positive credit register.
... and 31 more agenda items