Politicians & Agendas

Jüri Jaanson

47 agenda items
47/47 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Jüri Jaanson
Email: jyri.jaanson@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 13 years
Total Speaking Time: 7h 24m

Agenda Items:

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)

2025-11-11 12:13
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote. Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.

2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-11-06 12:10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments. The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.

Second reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Deployment of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in another international military operation led by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization or its member state, the European Union, or the United Nations Organization upon first contribution thereto" (705 DR)

2025-11-05 19:29
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Resolution 705, submitted by the Government of the Republic, concerning the use of the Defense Forces in international military operations for the first time, contributing up to 100 servicemen. Leo Kunnas, Vice-Chairman of the National Defense Committee, announced that no amendments had been submitted to the draft, and the committee had consensually approved the text, proposing to conclude the second reading and put the draft to a final vote. During the debate, the question of the draft's constitutionality was repeatedly raised. MPs Rene Kokk and Varro Vooglaid argued against delegating the authorization to the Government of the Republic, emphasizing that Article 128 of the Constitution grants the right to decide on the use of the Defense Forces solely to the Riigikogu. They highlighted that the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act allows for convening extraordinary or supplementary sessions quickly enough (even by the next day), meaning there is no real need to give the government blank authorization. Additionally, granting decision-making power to a government with low public support was criticized. Leo Kunnas admitted that he lacked arguments to refute the possibility of quickly convening the Riigikogu. Alar Laneman defended the draft, citing the state's capability to act in unforeseen circumstances and the need for strategic depth. In the final vote, the draft was adopted as a resolution with 52 votes in favor, 6 against, and 1 abstention.

First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Cybersecurity Act and Other Acts (Transposition of the Cybersecurity 2 Directive) (Bill 739 SE)

2025-10-23 13:10
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, presented Bill 739, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Cybersecurity Act and other acts (transposition of the NIS2 directive), to the Riigikogu at its first reading. The Minister emphasized the necessity of the act due to the rapid growth of cyber threats, citing the successful international police operation SIMCARTEL and cyberattacks against Estonian hospitals as examples. The main goal of the bill is to raise the level of cybersecurity in the European Union and harmonize the rules. The bill extends the application of stricter cybersecurity requirements to approximately 3,000 new organizations, increasing the total number of affected entities in Estonia to around 6,500. Another significant change is that the entire organization will henceforth be responsible for cybersecurity, not just a specific vital service. The Minister confirmed that the goal was to avoid "gold-plating" European Union law and introduced a new "traffic light" table to help assess the accuracy of the transposition. During the discussions, questions were raised regarding the complex wording of the bill (referencing criticism from the Bar Association and ITL) and the lack of an economic impact analysis. The Minister responded that it is difficult to estimate the exact cost, but the state will offer the new entities a three-year transition period, support measures, and free online courses. Kalev Stoicescu, Chairman of the National Defence Committee, supported the general principles of the bill, noting the need to align the draft with other laws currently under deliberation. The Committee proposed concluding the first reading.

Debate on the nationally important issue "Why is food expensive?", initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction.

2025-10-16 13:01
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate on the topic "Why is food expensive?" took place at the initiative of the Estonian Centre Party faction. The purpose of the debate was to address the rise in the price of foodstuffs and potential ways to mitigate it, focusing on lowering the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate. The first speaker was Jana Guzanova, the initiator of the popular initiative to reduce the VAT rate on foodstuffs, whose petition gathered nearly 100,000 signatures. Guzanova highlighted the sharp increase in the cost of the food basket and emphasized that 25% of the Estonian population lives in poverty, making the high VAT rate (24%) unfair and particularly painful for low-income individuals. She pointed to restaurant closures and the rise in food thefts as signs of a deepening crisis. Economist Heido Vitsur confirmed that Estonian food prices are disproportionately high compared to incomes, placing Estonia among the wealthiest European countries. He explained that the price of food largely determines the wage level and thus the country's competitiveness. Vitsur agreed with the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) recommendation to make the tax system more flexible but found that, due to political rigidity, lowering the VAT rate is currently the only real lever for influencing prices. The third speaker, Lauri Laats, chairman of the Centre Party faction, sharply criticized the tax policy of the Reform Party-led government, which, according to him, has driven food prices 57% higher since 2019. Laats highlighted alternative revenue measures, such as a bank tax, and referred to the success of other EU countries (e.g., Spain and Latvia) in implementing VAT exceptions. During the discussions, the Social Democrats (Züleyxa Izmailova) and the Centre Party (Vadim Belobrovtsev) supported lowering the VAT, while Eesti 200 (Diana Ingerainen) considered it ineffective and unfair, preferring targeted subsidies. Isamaa (Riina Solman) emphasized the need for comprehensive tax reform. No decision was adopted at the conclusion of the debate, but the session was extended until the agenda item was exhausted.

... and 42 more agenda items

Aleksei Jevgrafov

106 agenda items
106/106 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Aleksei Jevgrafov
Email: aleksei.jevgrafov@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 14h 44m

Agenda Items:

Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Urgently Develop the Suspension of E-voting" (679 OE), First Reading

2025-11-06 14:56
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Riigikogu Resolution 679, "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to urgently develop the suspension of e-voting," submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction. The draft resolution was introduced by Vadim Belobrovtsev, who emphasized that e-voting should be suspended until deficiencies in the control systems are rectified. As the primary motivation, he cited the recent OSCE/ODIHR report, which pointed to serious shortcomings in the system's reliability, transparency, and the assurance of voter confidence, particularly concerning the secrecy of the vote and the prevention of undue influence (e.g., in nursing homes). Belobrovtsev noted that confidence in e-elections in Estonia has dropped significantly (42% do not trust them) and that Estonia belongs to the group of countries regularly using e-voting, alongside Russia and Venezuela. Ando Kiviberg, Chairman of the Constitutional Committee, provided an overview of the committee's discussion. He confirmed that the Electoral Service found no anomalies during the recount of local government elections and that the ODIHR report was a legal, not a technical, assessment. The committee has approached the Ministry of Justice to ensure the recommendations are addressed. During the debate, opposition politicians (the Centre Party and EKRE) emphasized the complexity of challenging e-election results and the system's lack of transparency. The adoption of the draft resolution requires a majority vote of the Riigikogu membership (51 votes). The debate was concluded before the final vote and will resume on Monday.

2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-11-06 12:10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments. The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.

First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)

2025-11-04 12:07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.

First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

2025-10-08 21:14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 658 OE, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, the aim of which was to oblige the Government of the Republic to develop a plan for increasing competition in the mobile communications market and accelerating number portability. The presenter of the draft resolution, Lauri Laats, emphasized that Estonian mobile communication services are 30–35% more expensive compared to other Baltic states, citing the operators' high profit margins (approximately 20% of turnover). The main problem is that the long number transfer time (up to 50% of transfers are left incomplete) allows operators to offer better prices only to those customers who threaten to leave, thereby creating a so-called convenience tax. The draft resolution proposed shortening the number transfer period to a maximum of one working day and establishing real-time portability in the future. During the debate, questions were raised regarding coverage issues in sparsely populated areas and the government's inaction. Mario Kadastik, representing the Economic Affairs Committee, announced that the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs is already working on accelerating number portability, planning to shorten the process to a matter of hours. Despite the government addressing the issue, the Centre Party did not withdraw the draft resolution. During discussions, Andres Metsoja stressed that the state had made a mistake by failing to mandate the provision of high-quality data communication in rural areas through frequency tenders. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, but the required majority of the Riigikogu membership was not achieved (17 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention), and the bill was dropped from the proceedings.

2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-10-08 18:42
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: Social Minister Karmen Joller presented a report to the Riigikogu on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Eesti 2035," focusing on the areas of health and welfare. The Minister emphasized the need for better integration of the healthcare and social systems. In the health sector, Joller highlighted the increase in women's life expectancy (83.4 years) but stressed concern over men’s lower life expectancy and health inequality, which is particularly acute regionally (there is a 12-year difference in healthy life years between Hiiumaa and Võrumaa). The biggest public health problems are increasing obesity (over half of adults), high alcohol consumption, and the spread of e-cigarettes among young people. The Minister confirmed that the Health Insurance Fund’s (Tervisekassa) budget deficit has decreased (from the planned 177.6 million to 104.9 million euros), but the system requires efficiency improvements through the reorganization of the hospital network and the expansion of e-consultations. In the welfare sector, the biggest concern is the birth rate, which fell to the lowest level of the century in 2024 (9,690 births). Joller rejected accusations of pressuring families and emphasized that family policy must be cross-sectoral. During the discussions, the opposition criticized the government for underfunding healthcare, long treatment waiting lists, and insufficient support for the social sector (e.g., special care). Sharp criticism was leveled at the squandering of the Health Insurance Fund’s administrative costs and the continued development of the SKAIS2 system.

... and 101 more agenda items

Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski

33 agenda items
33/33 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski
Email: maria.jufereva-skuratovski@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 3h 5m

Agenda Items:

Second reading of the draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

2025-09-24 18:36
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The agenda focused on the second reading of Draft Act 670 on supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act, initiated by Riigikogu members Peeter Tali, Ando Kiviberg, Anti Haugas, and Mati Raidma. Madis Timpson, Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee, presented a report, explaining that the purpose of the draft act is to create a clear legal basis for the license plate recognition camera system, as the previous practice of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) was, according to the assessments of the Chancellor of Justice and the Data Protection Inspectorate, in conflict with the constitution. The committee discussed one amendment proposal submitted by the Government of the Republic, which received approval from all involved institutions. Questions arose during the debate regarding the unlimited number of cameras, the identification of facial images, and access to the data (including by the Tax and Customs Board). The opposition (EKRE, Center Party) sharply criticized the draft act, considering it a step towards a surveillance society and emphasizing the PPA’s previous illegal activity in data collection. Varro Vooglaid shared his experience regarding the PPA’s refusal to release processed images. The Center Party faction proposed interrupting the second reading, but this motion did not find support (12 in favor, 50 against). The leading committee proposed concluding the second reading and holding the final vote on October 8, 2025.

Chair implementation

2025-09-04 12:58
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions. Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.

Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

2025-06-11 18:57
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the second reading of Draft Act 645, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning the amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the repeal of the Security Tax Act. The report of the Finance Committee was presented by Maris Lauri. The Committee had approached 18 interest groups for their opinions, three of which responded (the Chamber of Service Economy, the Merchants’ Association, and the Chamber of Commerce and Industry). The Chamber of Service Economy recommended a technical legal amendment regarding the repeal of the Security Tax Act, which the Committee accepted. The Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry viewed the abolition of the temporary corporate profit tax positively. The Isamaa parliamentary group submitted six amendments. One proposal, which concerned the initiation of a supplementary budget, was excluded from the committee proceedings as it should have been submitted as a separate draft resolution. The Finance Committee made one technical legal amendment (No. 2). Opposition politicians (Tanel Kiik, Lauri Läänemets, Urmas Reinsalu, and others) sharply criticized the government's tax policy, considering it regressive and inequality-increasing, and accused the government of breaking promises regarding tax stability and the temporary nature of tax increases. Maris Lauri emphasized in her replies that she represented the views of the Committee and that, according to the Ministry of Finance forecasts, the tax burden is actually decreasing. Three Isamaa amendments (Nos. 4, 5, 6) and four proposals to suspend proceedings (Centre Party, Isamaa, EKRE, SDE) were put to a vote. All proposals were rejected in the votes.

The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

2025-06-10 13:04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda included a presentation by the Supreme Court's Chief Justice, Villu Kõve, on the situation regarding court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws. Kõve pointed out that the court system operates independently and impartially, but efficiency continues to decline, and the lengthening of processing times and increasing workload are affecting the resolution of civil, administrative, and criminal cases. He emphasized the influence of funding, the arrival of the younger generation, and the experience of retiring judges, and raised the need for reforms including: merging courts, a unified workload distribution, the implementation of digital and artificial intelligence, and the responsibility and disciplinary mechanisms for judges. He also touched upon the implementation of the development plan and critical issues at the state level, including maintaining the credibility of courts and the rule of law, and involving the public in reforms. In addition, questions and discussions flowed from both court system practitioners and politicians, including observations on consumer credit, environmental law, and the volume of cases filed in court, and the ethical and practical risks of artificial intelligence were raised, along with the need for additional legislative and funding solutions. Overall, the agenda focused on the future possibilities for the court system and its funding, and their impact on society.

Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

2025-06-05 13:08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda addresses a nationally important issue: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy," and has been initiated by the economic affairs committee. The day is structured around a central theme, with three speakers: Marek Reinaas, as chairman of the economic affairs committee (presentation up to 15 minutes, questions and answers up to 15 minutes), Urmas Varblane, as a member of the competitiveness expert group and as professor of international entrepreneurship at the University of Tartu and as an academic (presentation up to 30 minutes, questions and answers up to 30 minutes), and Raivo Vasnu, as a board member of Viru Keemia Grupi (presentation up to 20 minutes, questions and answers up to 30 minutes). Each member of the Riigikogu can submit one question to each speaker. Following the presentations, discussions will begin, and the initiators desire that representatives of the parliamentary groups speak first. At the end of the agenda, a plan was raised to extend the session if necessary, and a decision on this was made later. Topics were represented that touched on the conclusions of the competitiveness report, the role of exports and the service sector, the use of data in the economy, the European Union's internal market, and a number of independent issues (including energy policy, investments, regional development, and reducing bureaucracy). This discussion reflects critical questions and potential risks associated with demographic trends and future investments.

... and 28 more agenda items

Toomas Järveoja

3 agenda items
3/3 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Toomas Järveoja
Email: toomas.jarveoja@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 1m

Agenda Items:

Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

2025-10-09 13:01
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on the key national issue, "The Future of the Estonian Economy," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Reform Party. The presentations provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic situation and future visions. Maris Lauri (Reform Party) analyzed the four pillars of Estonian competitiveness: natural resources, labor, capital, and the smart utilization of knowledge. She stressed the need for continuous innovation and adding value to natural resources, noting that the advantage of cheap labor has been lost. She also criticized the dismantling of the second pension pillar for reducing domestic capital. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo presented an optimistic forecast, predicting Estonia would be the fastest-growing economy in Europe in the coming years, underpinned by security (5% of GDP defense spending), export growth targets (43 billion euros by 2028), and R&D investments. He also highlighted major investments (400 million euros) and the necessity of accelerating planning processes. Allan Martinson (Estonian Founders Society) focused on the startup sector, which contributes 4.5% to GDP and is shifting from extensive to intensive growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and defense technology. He emphasized the requirement for a stable economic environment. Liina Vahtras (EIS) provided an overview of the success of e-residency, which has generated 370 million euros in revenue for the state treasury, and introduced a planned cardless solution designed to shorten the time required to establish a company to two weeks, thereby maintaining Estonia's competitive edge as a digital state. During the negotiations, faction representatives underscored the need for a stable economic environment, reduced bureaucracy, and reform of the education and healthcare systems, while Urmas Reinsalu sharply criticized the government's tax experiments and policies that undermine economic confidence.

Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (regulation of derivatives and repo transactions) - first reading

2025-05-20 13:07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The first item on the agenda concerns the draft law 633 for the first reading of amendments to the Securities Market Act initiated by the Government of the Republic, and related laws. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi delivered the presentation from the rostrum of the Riigikogu. The main objective was to improve the regulation of derivatives and repo transactions and to increase Estonia’s legal alignment with international standards, including matters of settlement and termination. This would mean better legal certainty for foreign investors and would increase the access of Estonian banks and other financial institutions to the international derivatives and repo transaction market, which in turn could enhance the competitiveness of our business environment. Several other amendments were also introduced, concerning the regulation of crisis measures, the criteria for the liquidation of small banks, the procedure for assessing collateral for housing loans, and the labeling and control conditions for green bonds. There was also discussion regarding the licensing procedures of the Financial Supervision Authority, to ensure the orderly process of voluntary termination. Initially, various members of the Riigikogu raised questions concerning the harmonization of valuations and the situation of small banks. Ultimately, the discussion moved forward and the committee will continue the thorough discussion and preparation for subsequent sessions.

The oath of office of Toomas Järveoja, Member of the Riigikogu

2025-03-25 12:01
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The presented agenda reflects the swearing-in ceremony of former colleague Toomas Järveoja into the XV composition of the Riigikogu. The first speech formally invites Toomas Järveoja to become a member of the Riigikogu and requests his presence. The second speech confirms his commitment to fulfilling his duties and taking an oath of loyalty to the Republic of Estonia and its constitutional order. The third speech explains that Järveoja is assuming the position of Riigikogu member in connection with the suspension of Karmen Joller’s powers, and that her substitute has been sworn in. In summary, the topic is a change in the composition of the Riigikogu and the symbolic confirmation of the oath.

Mario Kadastik

61 agenda items
61/61 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Mario Kadastik
Email: mario.kadastik@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 22h 12m

Agenda Items:

First Reading of the Draft Act amending the Protection of Ambient Air Act and other Acts (Transposition of Amendments to the Renewable Energy Directive) (697 SE)

2025-10-15 21:04
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Draft Bill 697, initiated by the Government of the Republic, regarding the amendment of the Atmospheric Air Protection Act and other acts (transposition of the Renewable Energy Directive RED III). Andres Sutt, the Minister of Energy and Environment, introduced the draft bill, emphasizing its goal to simplify permit procedures for renewable energy projects by establishing a single point of contact in the form of the Estonian Building Register and setting deadlines for obtaining permits. The draft bill also addresses the transport sector by abolishing the 6% greenhouse gas emission reduction obligation for fuel suppliers and creating a framework for the wider use of hydrogen and liquefied biomethane. A significant amendment involves extending biomass sustainability criteria to smaller production units (starting from 7.5 MW). During the debate, opposition politicians (Rain Epler, Kalle Grünthal) expressed concern. Epler criticized the strictest possible transposition of the directive, which, in his assessment, promotes market consolidation and imposes excessive obligations on small enterprises. Grünthal raised the question of the safety of wind turbine infrasound, casting doubt on the validity of existing studies. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur of the lead committee, provided an overview of the discussion in the Economic Affairs Committee, which also addressed the requirement for bidirectional charging of electric cars, which the ministry wishes to make voluntary.

First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

2025-10-14 13:10
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the first reading of Bill 725, initiated by the Government of the Republic, amending the Public Transport Act. The bill was introduced by the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, Hendrik Johannes Terras. The main objective of the bill is to streamline the organization of taxi services, bringing it into line with the principles of the digital state, and to end the duplication of data between two registers. Going forward, all data related to taxi services (operating license, vehicle card, service provider card) would be managed solely in the Register of Economic Activities (MTR), which allows for the closure of the outdated Transport Administration's Public Transport Register. This step should reduce administrative burden, IT costs, and cyber risks. Another significant change is the abolition of the photo requirement for the service provider card, as it no longer creates added value and generates data protection risks. During the debate, Riigikogu members (Rene Kokk, Mart Maastik, Priit Sibul) focused mainly on the abolition of the photo requirement, emphasizing that a picture is necessary to ensure the client's sense of security and for driver identification. The Minister acknowledged the aspect of security perception but stressed that the service provider card is not an identity document according to the law. Also raised was the proposal by the Association of Estonian Cities and Rural Municipalities to grant local governments the right to carry out control transactions (mystery shopping) regarding platform service providers, which the Minister postponed to a broader package of amendments to the Public Transport Act, citing the urgent technical nature of the current bill. The rapporteur of the Economic Affairs Committee, Mario Kadastik, confirmed that the committee wishes to retain the photo requirement, recommending the use of photos available in the Population Register for this purpose, and the Minister promised to analyze this possibility before the second reading. The lead committee proposed concluding the first reading.

Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

2025-10-09 13:01
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on the key national issue, "The Future of the Estonian Economy," initiated by the faction of the Estonian Reform Party. The presentations provided a comprehensive overview of the current economic situation and future visions. Maris Lauri (Reform Party) analyzed the four pillars of Estonian competitiveness: natural resources, labor, capital, and the smart utilization of knowledge. She stressed the need for continuous innovation and adding value to natural resources, noting that the advantage of cheap labor has been lost. She also criticized the dismantling of the second pension pillar for reducing domestic capital. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo presented an optimistic forecast, predicting Estonia would be the fastest-growing economy in Europe in the coming years, underpinned by security (5% of GDP defense spending), export growth targets (43 billion euros by 2028), and R&D investments. He also highlighted major investments (400 million euros) and the necessity of accelerating planning processes. Allan Martinson (Estonian Founders Society) focused on the startup sector, which contributes 4.5% to GDP and is shifting from extensive to intensive growth, particularly in the fields of artificial intelligence and defense technology. He emphasized the requirement for a stable economic environment. Liina Vahtras (EIS) provided an overview of the success of e-residency, which has generated 370 million euros in revenue for the state treasury, and introduced a planned cardless solution designed to shorten the time required to establish a company to two weeks, thereby maintaining Estonia's competitive edge as a digital state. During the negotiations, faction representatives underscored the need for a stable economic environment, reduced bureaucracy, and reform of the education and healthcare systems, while Urmas Reinsalu sharply criticized the government's tax experiments and policies that undermine economic confidence.

First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

2025-10-08 21:14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated Draft Resolution 658 OE, submitted by the Estonian Centre Party faction, the aim of which was to oblige the Government of the Republic to develop a plan for increasing competition in the mobile communications market and accelerating number portability. The presenter of the draft resolution, Lauri Laats, emphasized that Estonian mobile communication services are 30–35% more expensive compared to other Baltic states, citing the operators' high profit margins (approximately 20% of turnover). The main problem is that the long number transfer time (up to 50% of transfers are left incomplete) allows operators to offer better prices only to those customers who threaten to leave, thereby creating a so-called convenience tax. The draft resolution proposed shortening the number transfer period to a maximum of one working day and establishing real-time portability in the future. During the debate, questions were raised regarding coverage issues in sparsely populated areas and the government's inaction. Mario Kadastik, representing the Economic Affairs Committee, announced that the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs is already working on accelerating number portability, planning to shorten the process to a matter of hours. Despite the government addressing the issue, the Centre Party did not withdraw the draft resolution. During discussions, Andres Metsoja stressed that the state had made a mistake by failing to mandate the provision of high-quality data communication in rural areas through frequency tenders. The draft resolution was put to a final vote, but the required majority of the Riigikogu membership was not achieved (17 in favor, 0 against, 1 abstention), and the bill was dropped from the proceedings.

Draft law amending the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (649 SE) – First Reading

2025-09-24 20:58
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 3m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu proceeded to the first reading of Draft Act 649 on the Amendment of the Traffic Insurance Act, initiated by the Isamaa faction. The bill aimed to reduce bureaucracy by abolishing the obligation to separately insure trailers with a maximum total mass exceeding 750 kg. Rapporteur Andres Metsoja (Isamaa) explained that a trailer does not operate independently, and its insurance should be automatically covered by the insurance of the towing motor vehicle, citing the practice of the Kingdom of Norway as an example. This would help avoid the application of mandatory insurance to trailers that are rarely used. Metsoja emphasized that this was a matter of user convenience and system simplification. Mario Kadastik, the rapporteur for the Economic Affairs Committee, presented the committee's position, which was critical of the bill. The Ministry of Finance and the Motor Insurance Fund opposed the bill, citing European Union directives that require all registered vehicles to be insured. They also highlighted international risks, particularly using the example of Germany, where damages are divided between the insurance policies of the trailer and the towing vehicle. The committee proposed rejecting the bill (7 in favor, 3 against). In the subsequent vote, 44 members of the Riigikogu supported the rejection of the bill, resulting in the bill being dropped from the proceedings.

... and 56 more agenda items

Raimond Kaljulaid

53 agenda items
53/53 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Raimond Kaljulaid
Email: raimond.kaljulaid@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 6 years
Total Speaking Time: 10h 48m

Agenda Items:

2025 Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

2025-11-06 12:10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item was the presentation by Erkki Keldo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry, regarding the implementation of the national long-term development strategy, "Eesti 2035," during 2025. Minister Keldo provided an optimistic overview of the Estonian economic recovery, highlighting improved confidence and growth in exports. The strategy centers on ensuring security (allocating at least 5% of GDP to defense spending), reducing bureaucracy (with the goal of moving toward a real-time economy, saving entrepreneurs 132 million euros over five years), and promoting investments, including the creation of a 100 million euro support measure for major investments. The ensuing discussion addressed several important topics, such as regional policy (directing business subsidies outside major growth centers), solving the problem of youth unemployment through educational reform and more flexible labor laws, and increasing investments in research and development (R&D). The energy sector generated criticism and questions, particularly concerning the speed of renewable energy development and the opposition of local communities to planning proposals. Also debated was the impact of abolishing the tax notch and cancelling the planned income tax hike on domestic consumption and the middle class. During faction negotiations, representatives debated the Minister’s optimism and the competitiveness of green energy, citing both the causes of the economic downturn and risks related to national defense.

Interpellation Concerning the Underfunding of Special Care Services (No. 826)

2025-11-03 22:08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu held an interpellation (No. 826) of Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller regarding the underfunding of special welfare services, initiated by the Social Democrats under the leadership of Helmen Kütt. The interpellation was prompted by the 2025 review from the National Audit Office, which brought to light serious deficiencies in the accessibility of special welfare services. Helmen Kütt stressed that waiting lists have nearly doubled between 2018 and 2024, now extending up to 53 months, and that court rulings concerning places in secure special welfare facilities have not been implemented. She pointed out that the Ministry of Social Affairs had requested €195 million from the government for special welfare over four years but was allocated only €4.2 million for the upcoming year. Minister Karmen Joller acknowledged the chronic underfunding of special welfare and the increasing demand, particularly for round-the-clock services. She noted, however, that the budget has grown (from €22.7 million in 2015 to €57.7 million in 2026). Joller outlined three steps to improve the situation: increasing the remuneration for service providers by €4.2 million annually to facilitate a 10% salary increase; establishing a 10-day decision deadline for accepting a service placement to reduce the number of vacant spots; and opening new service placements in high-demand regions (Tallinn, Harju County, Tartu). Joller conceded that a situation where people must take the state to court just to receive services is neither humane nor appropriate for a state governed by the rule of law. During the debate, the questioners (Tanel Kiik, Lauri Läänemets) focused on the government's priorities, contrasting the €4.2 million allocated for salary increases with the tax "gift" of over €100 million given to the wealthier segment of society by abolishing the progressive income tax system (the "tax hump"). Minister Joller defended the tax reform, arguing that it also benefits those earning an average salary and simplifies the tax system, while affirming that special welfare remains a continuing priority within her ministry.

First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (661 SE)

2025-10-09 01:15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 17m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of the draft Act on Amendments to the Value Added Tax Act (661 SE), initiated by the parliamentary group of the Social Democratic Party, the aim of which was to lower the VAT rate on basic foodstuffs from 24% to 9%. Rapporteur Lauri Läänemets emphasized that the rise in food prices in Estonia has been unprecedented (over 50%) and that implementing a lower VAT rate would help alleviate the burden of the regressive tax, support people with lower incomes, stimulate domestic consumption, and improve the competitiveness of the domestic agricultural sector. Läänemets highlighted that Estonia is one of the few EU countries where a reduced rate is not applied to food, and he criticized the government's plan to take out a loan to distribute income tax concessions to the wealthier population, offering the VAT reduction as a better alternative. Diana Ingerainen, the representative of the Finance Committee, presented the committee's position, according to which the rejection of the draft bill was supported primarily because the tax reduction would create a deficit of nearly 200 million euros in the state budget, and there was no certainty that this reduction would reach the final consumer. During the debate, the Social Democrats were accused of hypocrisy, as they had previously supported VAT increases while in government and had voted against similar draft bills proposed by the Centre Party. Despite the support of the opposition and several professional associations, the draft bill was voted down in the first reading.

Interpellation concerning the unspent budget funds of the Ministry of Education and Research (No. 805)

2025-10-07 00:41
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The agenda item concerned the inquiry by Riigikogu members Anti Allas, Tiit Maran, and Züleyxa Izmailova regarding the budget balances of the Ministry of Education and Research (HTM). Inquirer Züleyxa Izmailova highlighted that despite the lack of funding in the education sector and cuts resulting from reforms (e.g., in Vana-Vigala and Hiiumaa), the budget balance for the HTM administrative area stands at 107.9 million euros, a figure that has grown compared to the previous year. This situation is difficult to comprehend given the sector's financial shortages. Minister Kristina Kallas explained that most of the balances are funds covered by existing obligations that cannot be redirected elsewhere. The largest groups of balances are related to research and development (including 45 million euros for co-financing *twinning* projects, pending decisions from the European Commission) and funds allocated for the transition to Estonian-language instruction. The latter involved poorly planned sums that had to be reallocated to cover deficits in future years (especially 2027/2028). Kallas confirmed that the restructuring of vocational education in Vana-Vigala and Hiiumaa is not due to cuts, but rather stems from overproduction identified by the OSKA analysis, depreciated infrastructure, and the necessity of ensuring vocational training accessibility for basic school graduates in every county. Kallas also specified that the HTM returned approximately 18 million euros of unused transition funds for Estonian-language instruction to the State Treasury and implemented an additional cut of 5 million euros, on top of the already agreed-upon cut of 76 million euros. During the discussion, topics such as the salary fund for kindergarten teachers and the financing of hobby education (analysis of the Icelandic model) were also raised.

Interpellation concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality (No. 797)

2025-10-06 22:56
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
3 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 53s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated an interpellation submitted by the Social Democrats concerning the insufficient state funding of school meals and the resulting inequality. Reili Rand, the representative of those submitting the interpellation, highlighted that the rapid rise in food prices has rendered the state support for school meals (which has remained unchanged for years) insufficient, forcing local governments (LG) either to make cuts in other sectors or to demand co-payments from parents, which deepens social inequality. Rand emphasized that school meals are an important form of social support, a guarantor of health, and a supporter of food security and the local economy. Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas responded, stressing the clear division of responsibility between the state and local governments. She explained that the school maintainer (usually the local government) is the primary bearer of school meal costs, and the state only provides support. The Minister rejected the proposal to link school meal support to inflation, citing the autonomy of local governments in organizing procurements. Kallas affirmed that, according to the assessment of the Ministry of Social Affairs, the new health requirements will not lead to a price increase. She noted that her priority during state budget negotiations was raising teachers' salaries. The Minister reiterated her preference to transfer school meal support to the revenue base of local governments to increase their autonomy. Several Riigikogu members (including Tanel Kiik, Vladimir Arhipov, Lauri Läänemets) criticized the Minister's rigid stance, arguing that the state's minimal contribution leads to a decline in the quality of school meals and a deepening of inequality across Estonia.

... and 48 more agenda items

Madis Kallas

77 agenda items
77/77 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Madis Kallas
Email: madis.kallas@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 1 years
Total Speaking Time: 10h 5m

Agenda Items:

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court" (744 OE)

2025-11-11 12:13
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The session commenced with a discussion of Draft Resolution 744 of the Riigikogu, "Appointment of Martin Triipan as a Member of the Supreme Court," presented by Villu Kõve, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Timo Suslov, representing the Constitutional Committee, introduced the committee's debate, noting that Martin Triipan's candidacy was supported by a majority in both the Council for the Administration of Courts and the Supreme Court's General Assembly. The committee unanimously decided to include the draft resolution on the plenary session agenda and proceed with the final vote. Martin Triipan, the candidate for Supreme Court Justice, delivered a brief but substantial presentation, highlighting his 25 years of work as an attorney and the three principles that would guide him as a judge: thoroughness, speed, and cooperation. In the subsequent question-and-answer session, Triipan was posed a wide array of questions covering both ideological topics (e.g., the Istanbul Convention, the relationship between European Union law and the Constitution, the green transition) and practical issues within the legal system (judicial reform, procedural efficiency, access to legal aid). Triipan stressed the necessity of adhering to the Constitution and existing laws and confirmed that he would recuse himself from the deliberation of cases where he had previously been involved as a party to the proceedings (e.g., the Nursipalu case). Following the closure of debate, a secret final vote was conducted, resulting in the adoption of the draft resolution. At the close of the session, a technical failure occurred, preventing the vote on extending the session before the introduction of a new agenda item, necessitating the announcement of a short recess.

Review of the Use and Preservation of State Assets in 2024–2025. Objectives and Reality in the Transport and Mobility Sector

2025-11-06 00:33
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m

View

AI Summary: Auditor General Janar Holm presented an overview to the Riigikogu regarding the use and preservation of state assets in 2024–2025, focusing on the transport and mobility sector and systemic problems within the state budget. Holm sharply criticized the failure of the performance-based state budget reform, noting that the proposed amendments to the State Budget Basic Act are substantively empty and do not increase parliamentary control over the use of funds. He emphasized that budget goals are often unrealistic and disconnected from actual possibilities, thereby creating disappointment and alienation. In the transport sector, Holm highlighted a massive funding shortfall (at least 1.35 billion euros in the period 2026–2030) required to meet existing obligations and goals, such as maintaining the condition of roads and financing Rail Baltic. He also provided examples from other sectors (social welfare, education) where the state is unable to fulfill statutory obligations due to a lack of funds. Furthermore, the Auditor General addressed serious systemic problems identified in the administrative area of the Ministry of Defence concerning accounting and work organization, including a stalled prepayment of 9.6 million euros, which has functioned as an interest-free loan at the taxpayer's expense. Holm stressed that although the accounting of the ministries is generally in order, the Ministry of Finance is responsible for the functioning of the system and adherence to rules, and cannot simply shift the responsibility to the ministries. The next annual report will focus on trends in healthcare.

First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Approval of the State's 2024 Financial Year Consolidated Report" (Bill 720 OE)

2025-11-06 00:09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the draft resolution on the approval of the State's 2024 consolidated annual economic report, submitted by the Government of the Republic, during its first reading. Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the report, noting that 2024 was a difficult year for the economy, particularly concerning consumer confidence, although fundamental indicators were improving. The statistical deficit of the general government sector reached 601 million euros (1.5% of GDP), which was smaller than expected thanks to good tax revenue collection and cost savings. During the year, a negative supplementary budget was adopted, and a security tax was introduced, and the VAT rate was raised, the main impact of which will manifest in the coming years. The National Audit Office audited the report and found that it fairly reflected the state's financial position, but made remarks regarding the accounting of Ministry of Defence inventories and deficiencies in the internal control systems of the Centre for Defence Investments and the Defence Forces, noting that this is a recurring problem. Annely Akkermann, Chair of the leading committee, the Finance Committee, provided an overview of the debate, which focused primarily on the lack of connection between performance indicators (metrics) and funding. The Committee proposed concluding the first reading.

Interpellation Concerning the Underfunding of Special Care Services (No. 826)

2025-11-03 22:08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu held an interpellation (No. 826) of Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller regarding the underfunding of special welfare services, initiated by the Social Democrats under the leadership of Helmen Kütt. The interpellation was prompted by the 2025 review from the National Audit Office, which brought to light serious deficiencies in the accessibility of special welfare services. Helmen Kütt stressed that waiting lists have nearly doubled between 2018 and 2024, now extending up to 53 months, and that court rulings concerning places in secure special welfare facilities have not been implemented. She pointed out that the Ministry of Social Affairs had requested €195 million from the government for special welfare over four years but was allocated only €4.2 million for the upcoming year. Minister Karmen Joller acknowledged the chronic underfunding of special welfare and the increasing demand, particularly for round-the-clock services. She noted, however, that the budget has grown (from €22.7 million in 2015 to €57.7 million in 2026). Joller outlined three steps to improve the situation: increasing the remuneration for service providers by €4.2 million annually to facilitate a 10% salary increase; establishing a 10-day decision deadline for accepting a service placement to reduce the number of vacant spots; and opening new service placements in high-demand regions (Tallinn, Harju County, Tartu). Joller conceded that a situation where people must take the state to court just to receive services is neither humane nor appropriate for a state governed by the rule of law. During the debate, the questioners (Tanel Kiik, Lauri Läänemets) focused on the government's priorities, contrasting the €4.2 million allocated for salary increases with the tax "gift" of over €100 million given to the wealthier segment of society by abolishing the progressive income tax system (the "tax hump"). Minister Joller defended the tax reform, arguing that it also benefits those earning an average salary and simplifies the tax system, while affirming that special welfare remains a continuing priority within her ministry.

First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic" (713 OE)

2025-11-03 18:33
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate focused on Draft Resolution 713, submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, which proposed raising the subsistence level for the Government of the Republic to at least 300 euros per month. Rapporteur Helmen Kütt emphasized that the current limit of 200 euros (which is set to rise to 220 euros starting in 2026) is insufficient and falls far below the absolute poverty line (345.80 euros). The goal of the draft resolution was to offer faster, needs-based support to single parents, the elderly, and low-income individuals, especially during the cold heating periods. The Social Democrats had also submitted a state budget amendment proposal to make the increase to 300 euros possible. During the debate, it was pointed out that raising the subsistence level to 300 euros would entail an additional cost to the state budget of approximately 12–13 million euros per year, but this money would immediately return to the Estonian economy through consumption. Eero Merilind, representative of the Social Affairs Committee, confirmed that although the objective of the draft resolution is sound, the state budget's resources are limited. Opposition parties (Centre Party, EKRE) supported the proposal, but EKRE representative Rain Epler criticized the Social Democrats and the Reform Party for earlier tax increases that disproportionately affected poorer residents. In the final vote, the draft resolution failed to gain support, as only 28 Riigikogu members voted in favor, which was insufficient to achieve the required majority of the Riigikogu composition (51 votes).

... and 72 more agenda items

Jaanus Karilaid

53 agenda items
53/53 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Jaanus Karilaid
Email: jaanus.karilaid@riigikogu.ee
Gender: MALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 10 years
Total Speaking Time: 7h 48m

Agenda Items:

First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Close the Temporary Control Line Between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (722 OE)

2025-11-11 13:22
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
4 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 4m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with a vote on extending the sitting, which the Estonian Reform Party faction had proposed to extend until the agenda was exhausted, but no later than 2 p.m. The proposal found support (60 in favor, 4 against, 2 abstentions). Discussion then moved to Riigikogu draft decision 722 OE, submitted by the Isamaa faction, which proposed that the Government of the Republic close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation. The rapporteur, Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa), emphasized that the main motives for the draft decision were ensuring security, conveying a political message, and better implementation of sanctions. He admitted that closing the border would cause inconvenience for residents near the border (e.g., in Setomaa), but argued that national security outweighed these problems. During the debate, the Centre Party and the Reform Party criticized the draft decision for being ill-considered and ignoring local residents. EKRE supported the draft decision but criticized Isamaa for offering half-measures, while simultaneously stressing the growing threat of Russification. The leading committee (the Legal Affairs Committee) sent the draft decision to the final vote, where it failed to gain support (20 in favor, 47 against).

National Audit Office Report

2025-11-05 14:49
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 4m

View

AI Summary: The fourth item on the agenda addressed the National Audit Office report regarding the infrastructure deficit in the transport and mobility sector, which amounts to 1.35 billion euros. Riigikogu member Jaanus Karilaid (Isamaa) asked Prime Minister Kristen Michal what the government's work plan was for covering this deficit and maintaining Estonia's competitiveness. Prime Minister Michal first corrected the budget deficit figure presented by the questioner and explained that the government would allocate the revenue collected from the annual car tax (approx. 280 million euros in the coming years) entirely to roads, pledging major investments in the construction of 2+2 roads in the direction of Pärnu and Tartu, and ensuring Rail Baltic stays on schedule. Karilaid presented a clarifying question regarding the construction project of the Turba–Rohuküla railway section, to which the Prime Minister responded that this would be left for future coalitions to decide as a priority. The discussion took an unexpected turn when Mart Maastik (Isamaa) presented an additional question concerning Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna's visit to China and Estonian-Chinese relations. The Chairman of the session reprimanded Maastik for deviating from the topic, which then triggered a long and passionate procedural dispute between Helir-Valdor Seeder (Isamaa) and the Chairman of the session. Seeder challenged the Chairman's right to regulate the content of additional questions, citing shortcomings in the Rules of Procedure Act regarding this matter. The Chairman defended his position, emphasizing that one must stay within the topic of the registered questions to ensure that other registered questions are addressed.

Chaos in Governance

2025-10-22 16:08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 7m

View

AI Summary: Riigikogu member Jaanus Karilaid submitted an interpellation to the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas, who was fulfilling the duties of the Prime Minister, on the topic "Confusion in State Management." Karilaid began with sharp criticism regarding the government's low support (referencing 2%) and the position of the minister acting as Prime Minister, accusing the coalition of being unable to solve problems in healthcare, finance, energy, and economic recovery. He asked directly whether the government had discussed resignation or a serious cabinet reshuffle. Minister Kallas rejected the criticism, emphasizing that the democratic mandate must be fulfilled until March 2027. Regarding energy, she stressed that the confusion was a legacy from previous governments, and the current coalition has taken decisive steps to break free from dependence on Russia. On economic matters, Kallas corrected Karilaid’s claims about investments, noting that Estonia is the largest investor in the European Union as a proportion of its budget. She cited the downturn in the manufacturing industry (especially the wood industry) as the reason for the economic recession, which is caused by problems in the Nordic real estate market and issues with the availability of raw materials. In a supplementary question, Riina Solman addressed the demographic challenges in the field of education. Kallas explained that although the decrease in the number of students and educational migration affect rural schools, the government has created a support measure for small six-grade schools to ensure their sustainability.

Inquiry regarding jobs and well-being outside of Harjumaa - the development of industry and production versus energy deficit (no. 768)

2025-09-08 21:25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 12m

View

AI Summary: During the Riigikogu session, the fourth item on the agenda was the discussion of Inquiry No. 768, submitted on May 7, 2025, by Riigikogu members Jaanus Karilaid, Andres Metsoja, Priit Sibul, Tõnis Lukas, Enn Eesmaa, and Ants Frosch. This inquiry addressed jobs and welfare outside Harju County, focusing on the development of industry and manufacturing in the context of energy shortages. Speaking on behalf of the questioners, Jaanus Karilaid emphasized that regional inequality and the lack of jobs outside Tallinn's "golden circle" is a long-standing problem that remains unresolved despite election promises. Karilaid highlighted the practical concerns of businesses in Lääne County, where expansion is hindered by a deficit in energy capacity or connection costs reaching millions, and stressed that improving the economic environment requires not only energy but also the maintenance of the road network. Minister of Economic Affairs and Industry Erkki Keldo responded to the inquiry, noting that while energy infrastructure falls under the responsibility of the Ministry of Climate, energy remains a critical input for industry. The Minister presented measures aimed at supporting regional development, including supply security support for businesses, extending the length of direct lines to 15 kilometers for large consumers, and additional investments in the electricity grids of Ida-Viru County. He also highlighted support for large-scale investments, where the grant rate is higher outside Harju County (15% vs 10%), and amendments to the Planning Act for the accelerated processing of strategic industrial areas in the regions. Minister Keldo confirmed that specific complaints regarding the stalled expansion of Lääne County businesses had not reached the ministry, but expressed readiness to assist entrepreneurs. At the end of the discussion, Jaanus Karilaid proposed organizing a ministerial visit to Lääne County in the coming months, to which Minister Erkki Keldo immediately agreed.

... and 48 more agenda items

Ester Karuse

32 agenda items
32/32 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Ester Karuse
Email: ester.karuse@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 2 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 19m

Agenda Items:

First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)

2025-11-04 12:07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: At the session, the first reading of Draft Law 682, initiated by the Government of the Republic concerning the ratification of the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden on the enforcement of prison sentences, was discussed. The Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs, Liisa-Ly Pakosta, introduced the bill, emphasizing Estonia's success story in maintaining low crime rates and a world-class prison system. The Minister affirmed that prison leasing is extremely beneficial for Estonia economically (Sweden covers all costs, including a risk margin, and creates new jobs in the field of internal security), and security is guaranteed: inmates are released to Sweden, not Estonia, and only individuals with carefully vetted backgrounds are accepted. The opposition sharply criticized the government's actions, accusing Estonia of turning into a "subcontractor state" and ignoring the opinion of the local community (Tartu). Particular indignation was caused by the fact that the threat assessment compiled by the Security Police (KAPO) had not been made available to Riigikogu members, which led to several procedural questions and demands for the discussion to be suspended. The Chairman of the session, Toomas Kivimägi, and later Arvo Aller, attempted to resolve the situation; the latter even called a 15-minute recess. The discussion continued but ended during the question-and-answer phase at 2:00 PM, without the first reading of the bill having been concluded.

Inquiry regarding the healthcare funding crisis (No. 811)

2025-11-03 20:26
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
1 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debate centered on an interpellation submitted to Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller concerning the healthcare funding crisis. The interpellation was presented by members of the Social Democratic Party and other opposition factions, led by Tanel Kiik. The interpellators highlighted the chronic deficit of the Health Insurance Fund (200–300 million euros) and the underfunding of Estonian healthcare compared to the OECD and EU averages, warning that government inaction would deepen waiting lists and inequality. Questions addressed ensuring sustainability, covering the 2026 deficit, involving private capital in primary care, and reducing patient co-payments. Minister Joller acknowledged the funding problem but stressed that the government's priority is first to streamline healthcare expenditures and optimize the hospital network to ensure funds are directed toward results-based objectives. She explained that the 2024 budget deficit was successfully reduced by 70 million euros due to better collection of social tax and efficiency measures. Joller criticized the opposition's focus solely on accessibility, emphasizing the importance of treatment quality. She confirmed that the government’s specific proposals for long-term funding would be presented in February, but conceded that finding a large volume of additional funds would necessitate new tax increases or the reallocation of resources from other priorities, such as national defense. The discussion also brought up concerns about two-tier medicine and the future of regional hospitals (e.g., Hiiumaa) within the context of optimizing the hospital network.

Interpellation regarding failure in Basic School final examinations (No. 800)

2025-10-06 23:43
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
8 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 36m

View

AI Summary: The agenda item concerned Interpellation No. 800, submitted on June 17, 2025, by Riigikogu members Ester Karuse, Lauri Läänemets, Reili Rand, Madis Kallas, Jaak Aab, Züleyxa Izmailova, and Andre Hanimäe, regarding failures in basic school final exams, focusing specifically on the poor results of the mathematics exam. Interpellator Ester Karuse highlighted in her presentation the extreme situation at Valga Basic School, where 50 out of 85 graduates failed to achieve a passing grade on the mathematics exam, emphasizing that this constitutes a widespread social and regional problem. Karuse asked how remedial teaching is supported for students with weak knowledge and how the problem of those avoiding compulsory schooling is addressed, especially in connection with the extension of compulsory education to the age of 18. She also criticized the unequal treatment of Valga compared to Ida-Viru County regarding support for state language proficiency. Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas responded that the national average result for the mathematics exam (64%) was similar to previous post-COVID years, but she admitted that results were very poor in certain schools with many children with special educational needs or from weaker socio-economic backgrounds (such as Valga Basic School). The Minister explained that due to the extension of compulsory education to the age of 18, the basic school final exam resit (school exam) will be abolished next year, as there is no longer a need to guide students out of the education system. Preparatory study curricula will be created in state schools, primarily vocational schools, for young people with learning gaps, with the obligation for financing resting with the state. The Minister confirmed that Valga Basic School requires special support. Riigikogu members additionally inquired about support measures (smaller study groups, temporary catch-up groups) and the impact of changes to the examination system on mental health. Ester Karuse concluded the debate by sharply criticizing the education management of Valga municipality, citing as examples the local government's court disputes with teachers and the large departure of teachers from Valga Basic School.

Inquiry regarding the accessibility of secondary education in Estonia (no. 799)

2025-09-15 23:26
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 28m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated, as the 11th item on the agenda, the interpellation submitted by Riigikogu members Ester Karuse et al. concerning the accessibility of gymnasium education in Estonia. Interpellator Ester Karuse highlighted the stressful situation that arose in the spring of 2025, where hundreds of basic school graduates were left uncertain about securing gymnasium places, especially in Tallinn, Tartu, and Pärnu, while schools in rural areas are being closed. Karuse emphasized that the state cannot demand compulsory education be fulfilled if it cannot offer a place to everyone, and demanded immediate solutions. Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas explained that although there are enough places nationwide (with some remaining by August), the stress that arose in the spring was due to a change in the admissions procedure, which prohibited schools from asking for students' preferences, thereby significantly prolonging the period of interviews and tests. The Minister announced that a legislative amendment will be presented to the Riigikogu in the autumn, allowing schools to ask for preferences in order to speed up admissions. Regionally, there are shortages in Tartu (approx. 240 places) and Pärnu (approx. 50 places) due to high student migration. In Tartu, there are plans to create additional places at Tamme State Gymnasium and the vocational school VOCO, utilizing the former National Archives building. New state gymnasiums in Tallinn (Tõnismäe and Lasnamäe) will only be completed in 2030. The Minister confirmed that the state is considering fully taking over responsibility for secondary education, but plans for establishing new schools in Harjumaa are uncertain due to the state budget situation.

Inquiry regarding the loss of essential banking services from county centers (no. 773)

2025-09-08 20:20
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
5 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 31m

View

AI Summary: On May 13, 2025, the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) debated Inquiry No. 773 concerning the disappearance of vital banking services in county centers, submitted by Ester Karuse, Tanel Kiik, Andre Hanimägi, Anti Allas, Reili Rand, Heljo Pikhof, and Jaak Aab. The initiator of the inquiry, Ester Karuse (SDE), highlighted the situation in Valga and Põlva counties, where physical bank branches have been closed (most recently SEB in Valga), leaving tens of thousands of residents, especially the elderly and those lacking digital skills, without necessary services and consultation. Karuse emphasized that banking is a socially essential service, not merely a business activity, and asked the minister for concrete steps to initiate dialogue with the banks and for the state's readiness to ensure physical banking services in county centers. Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture Hendrik Johannes Terras acknowledged the concern but pointed out that the number of bank branches in Estonia has decreased by nearly half over the last ten years (from 107 in 2015 to 58 by the end of 2024) due to changes in consumer behavior and digitalization. He specified that Coop Pank offers cashless office services in Valga and Põlva. The Minister stressed that the availability of services is more important than a physical branch and highlighted alternatives such as ATMs (interoperable and offering deposit capabilities), cash withdrawal at stores/gas stations, and payment services at Omniva post offices. Terras confirmed that he intends to meet with representatives of the banking sector, but currently, the ministry is focusing on the broader regional development problem: the concentration of the population in the capital region. During the debate, opposition politicians criticized the Minister's management style and the slackness of regional policy.

... and 27 more agenda items

Liina Kersna

26 agenda items
26/26 with AI summaries (100.0%)

Politicians: Liina Kersna
Email: liina.kersna@riigikogu.ee
Gender: FEMALE

Active: Yes
Parliament Seniority: 9 years
Total Speaking Time: 4h 14m

Agenda Items:

First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

2025-10-07 13:15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The first reading of the draft State Budget Act for 2026 (737), initiated by the Government of the Republic, took place in the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). Minister of Finance Jürgen Ligi presented the budget, which has a revenue volume of 18.6 billion euros and an expenditure volume of 19.6 billion euros. The general government deficit reaches 4.5% of GDP, which is mainly due to the extraordinary increase in security expenditure (over 5% of GDP), while still remaining within the limits of the European Union derogation. Ligi emphasized that the budget priorities are security, supporting the economy, and income. The tax burden will decrease from 36.6% to 35.2% of GDP, primarily due to the increase in the income tax-free minimum to 700 euros and the abolition of the tax kink, which the minister considered an important economic stimulus. The budget also provides for an increase in the salary fund (up to 10%) for police officers, rescuers, teachers, and special welfare workers. The debate focused on the large budget deficit and the growing debt burden. The opposition (Urmas Reinsalu, Martin Helme, and others) criticized the government for fulfilling election promises with borrowed money and for the long-term deterioration of state finances. Ligi defended the budget, emphasizing that the deficit was largely caused by an external factor (the import of defense procurements) and blamed previous governments for loosening budget rules. The minister also sharply criticized Peeter Raudsepp, the head of the Institute of Economic Research, accusing him of methodological errors and inciting negative sentiment. Discussions also covered plans to reduce the deficit of the Health Insurance Fund, the funding of research and development, and the revenue base of local governments.

Draft law amending the Basic and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (620 SE) – First Reading

2025-09-17 22:50
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
18 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 22m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Bill 620, initiated by the Estonian Centre Party faction, concerning the amendment of the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act and the Vocational Educational Institutions Act. The aim of the bill was to raise the state minimum subsidy for school lunch from 1 euro to 2 euros per student per day, as the state's contribution has not increased since 2018, despite inflation. Presenter Vadim Belobrovtsev stressed that the rise in food prices (40% over the last two years) has led to a situation where the quality of the school meals offered has declined, resulting in children refusing to eat them. He criticized the government, which has refused to amend the law, arguing that a ministerial regulation would suffice, yet has failed to establish that regulation itself, leaving the situation unresolved. Liina Kersna, Chairman of the Cultural Affairs Committee, introduced the committee’s discussion and its non-supportive position. The government’s position was that amending the law is not the appropriate method for increasing the subsidy, as this can be done via a Regulation of the Government of the Republic. Kersna emphasized that school lunch funding has always been tripartite (state, local government, parents) and that the government's priority is raising teachers' salaries, not increasing the school lunch subsidy, which would cost 30 million euros. The debate also covered the issue of funding sources, with Belobrovtsev proposing the introduction of a bank tax and the postponement of the abolition of the tax hump as solutions. Following the debate, the leading committee's proposal to reject the bill was put to a vote.

The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

2025-09-16 13:05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 40s

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu session began with an overview by Chancellor of Justice Ülle Madise regarding the compliance of legislative acts with the Constitution and the fulfillment of her duties during the period from September 1, 2024, to August 31, 2025. The Chancellor of Justice thanked the Riigikogu and officials for their good cooperation, noting that her office received over 5,500 submissions, of which more than 2,500 required substantive resolution. Madise highlighted several deepening problems: disregard for the implementation of laws, the application of flawed management methodologies of great powers in Estonia, and excessive reliance on machines and artificial intelligence, which must not replace human discretion. She criticized the acquisition of technological means restricting fundamental rights without the legal authorization of the Riigikogu and emphasized the importance of the principle of data collection decentralization, warning against the creation of "super databases." In the field of education, she criticized contradictory laws and the competition for school places that harms children's mental health. Madise stressed that Estonia is founded on freedom and responsibility, not on the total control of a preventative state. The questions and answers round addressed the criminal case concerning residence registration (propiska), developments in accessibility, the protection of banking secrecy, the status of the Estonian language, restrictions on the use of medical data, the limitation of property rights in nature conservation areas, and the insufficient resources of the Chancellor of Justice's office. Representatives of the factions (SDE, Reform Party, Isamaa, Centre Party) praised the Chancellor of Justice's work but used the podium to criticize the government's legislative work (including tax increases, the state budget base law, and data collection drafts) and bureaucracy.

Chair implementation

2025-09-04 12:58
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 30m

View

AI Summary: The report on the sittings of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) covers the work of several sessions (III, IV, V, VI), which were characterized by sharp political confrontations and extensive obstruction, especially concerning the government's tax policy and the organization of parliamentary work. At the beginning of the sittings, greetings were exchanged for the new year, but a large portion of the time was spent confirming the agenda and discussing procedural matters. The opposition (primarily EKRE and the Centre Party) repeatedly challenged the board's decisions regarding the procedure for processing draft legislation, the bundling of amendments, and the majority required (51 votes) for adopting resolutions. Several motions of no confidence were filed against various ministers (including Kallas, Riisalo, Joller, Pakosta, Alender, Ligi, Svet), indicating a deep crisis of confidence in the executive branch. Due to the obstruction, the board was forced to temporarily halt the acceptance of draft legislation and interpellations on February 14th. Substantive topics were dominated by the motor vehicle tax (for the repeal of which bills were repeatedly submitted), the teachers' salary crisis and strike, national defense funding and security (border control, procurement of ammunition), and social sector issues (care reform, demographics). The security and transparency of e-voting were also discussed.

Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

2025-06-18 17:34
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
6 speeches by this politician
Agenda Duration: 44m

View

AI Summary: The Riigikogu debated the first reading of Draft Act 653, initiated by the Government of the Republic, concerning amendments to the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act and the Vocational Educational Institutions Act (Certification of Principals and Teacher Career Model). Minister of Education and Research Kristina Kallas introduced the draft, which aims to improve career opportunities for teachers and raise the quality of school management. According to the draft, a four-tier career model will be established (starting teacher, teacher, senior teacher, master teacher), and corresponding salary coefficients for the years 2026–2028 (1.0; 1.0; 1.1; 1.3) will be implemented. The duration of fixed-term employment contracts for teachers studying in teacher training programs will also be extended to three years. A significant change is the introduction of a certification system for school principals after every five years of employment; the certification committee will consist of representatives of the school maintainer and the Estonian Association of School Leaders. The additional financial need resulting from these changes is 9.8 million euros for general education and 3.7 million euros for vocational education in 2026. During the debate, several questions were raised, particularly concerning the status and salary guarantees of unqualified teachers, as the legislative amendment removes the school maintainer's direct obligation to pay them the national minimum rate. The Minister clarified that the funding system will not change, but the goal is to motivate teachers without professional qualifications to acquire them. The public disclosure of principals' certification decisions and the support for the education agreement among local governments were also discussed. Liina Kersna, Chairman of the Cultural Affairs Committee, proposed concluding the first reading, noting that the committee will continue discussions regarding support for unqualified teachers.

... and 21 more agenda items