By Agendas: Urmas Reinsalu

Total Agendas: 197

Fully Profiled: 197

2025-10-15
Discussion of the state issue of significant national importance initiated by the Committee on European Union Affairs: "Estonia's Choices and Opportunities in the European Union's 2028–2034 Long-Term Budget"

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opponents are the Estonian government, which is severely criticized for its fiscal policy incompetence, irresponsible deficit spending, and lack of clear policy positions. The second target of criticism is the European Commission, whose MFF proposal is deemed strategically weak due to the introduction of new taxes and insufficient ambition regarding defense. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, and intense.
2025-10-15
Finance

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main opponents are the government, especially the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, who are criticized for their mismanaged fiscal policy and avoidance of responsibility. Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at the Reform Party's project to implement the tax hump using borrowed funds at a time when the state's finances are strained.
2025-10-13
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Act on Simplified Taxation of Business Income and the Income Tax Act, and the Act on the Repeal of the Security Tax Act and the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (Bill 734 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponents are the governing coalition and the Reform Party, represented by Mr. Michal, Mr. Ligi, and Kaja Kallas. The criticism is intense and targets both political failures (tax chaos, messing up the budget) and the loss of trust, given that the government has radically altered the backbone of the basic tax system. The speaker emphasizes that there is an alternative to the current government and demands a fundamental correction of policy.
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main adversary is the coalition government led by the Reform Party, which is fiercely criticized for political bungling and shattering economic confidence. The criticism targets both specific political decisions (the tax experiment, fueling inflation) and the government's overall inaction and incompetence. The intensity of the attacks is high, accusing the government of causing long-term economic stagnation.
2025-10-08
Third reading of the Draft Act supplementing the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opponent is the government and the Minister of the Interior, who are criticized for systemic lack of integrity and a cowardly method in lawmaking, exemplified by sneaking bills through. The criticism targets both the procedure (the lack of a proper draft bill) and the content (the restriction of fundamental rights), highlighting the government's recurrent approach and the resulting loss of trust. The government is also accused of avoiding parliamentary scrutiny and failing to observe its duty of due diligence.
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at Minister Joller, who is suspected of initiating the controversial child benefits reform—a reform from which another politician (Ligi) has categorically distanced himself. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and its lack of transparency and unclear origins.
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opponent is the prime minister, who is being intensely criticized both for policy issues (the misrepresentation of government spending cuts) and for personal competence (either not knowing the budget or outright obfuscation). The criticism is direct and demands immediate answers, repeatedly asking where the cuts are actually visible.
2025-10-08
Budget

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main opponent is the prime minister and the Reform Party-led government, who are criticized for irresponsible fiscal policy and for fulfilling election promises using borrowed funds. The criticism is sharp, focusing on political failure and the alleged manipulation of facts concerning government expenditures. The opposition is grounded in policy and procedural matters, highlighting concrete examples of financial waste (e.g., the establishment of wetlands, the reallocation of ministry salary funds).
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opposition is directed at the government's fiscal policy and the Minister of Finance, who is accused of irresponsible budget management. The criticism is political, directly linking the deficit to the cost of the Reform Party's tax hump and the fulfillment of election promises using borrowed money.
2025-10-06
Interpellation concerning the transfer of Swedish criminals to Estonia (No. 803)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The main opposition is aimed at the government, represented by the Minister of the Interior and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, concerning the financial planning of the prison project. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, centering on the possibility of violating the basic budget law and the alleged influence of a foreign state (Sweden) in the preparation of Estonia's budget strategy.
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The opposing side is the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200), which is being accused of political failure and breaking promises regarding the car tax. Criticism is particularly intense toward the session chair, who is being called to order for inappropriate shouting/interjections and violating the Rules of Procedure Act. The criticism is political, procedural, and personal.
2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government, which is accused of taking systematic steps to accelerate price increases and lacking the capacity for political dialogue ("a complete desert"). The criticism is intense and policy-based, citing inaction, an inability to respond appropriately to crises (e.g., the African swine fever incident), and making false claims about the causes of inflation.
2025-09-25
Political statement by Prime Minister Kristen Michal regarding the transfer of the draft State Budget Act 2026

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary adversary is Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the Reform Party-led government, who stand accused of systematic deceit, tax chaos, and steering the country toward insolvency. The criticism is intense, focusing on political incompetence, the suspension of budgetary rules, and unconstitutional fiscal management. A compromise regarding the current budget is ruled out, as the Isamaa party intends to present an alternative budget.
2025-09-24
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and the Minister of Agriculture, who are being accused of indecisiveness and ignoring the concerns of people within the sector. The criticism is intense, labeling the government as an aggravator of existing problems and demanding the public identification of the person responsible for the obstruction—the so-called "crocodile." The critiques are both policy-based (tax increases) and procedural (stalling tactics, lack of clarity).
2025-09-24
The situation in the country

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for their policies (an unfunded budget, the postponement of defense spending) and for dishonesty (regarding the ETS2 tax). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of choosing the path of living on debt and burdening future governments.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are the government and the coalition, who are accused of ramming the law through by "lying" (regarding the alleged lack of requirements under EU law and the absence of problems for businesses) and ignoring constitutional warnings. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the government of creating a failed shambles and demanding its cancellation, while ruling out mere cosmetic fixes.
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The main opponent is the Reform Party government (Michal's government), which is accused of creating bureaucracy, dismantling freedoms, and infringing upon the constitution. The criticism is intense and covers both substantive issues (the super database, thought crimes) and a lack of accountability (violation of banking secrecy, the LHV claim). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, there is a promise to reverse the initiatives.
2025-09-10
Draft law (667 SE) for amending the Atmosphere Protection Act and other laws (partial transposition of amendments to the directive on greenhouse gas emission trading) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the committee presenting the draft bill and its representative (Tarmo), whose provided information (especially concerning the absence of protests from Tallink) is considered false and incomplete. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural deficiencies, the concealment of actual protests, and the threat of unconstitutionality. The speaker accuses them of "arrogant behavior" and legal voluntarism.
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The core criticism is directed at Minister of Social Affairs Karmen Joller and the government as a whole, accusing them of managerial incompetence, making decisions without prior analysis, and hypocrisy (e.g., the Wagenküll party). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of "performative leadership" and irrational behavior.
2025-09-10
State governance choices

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The criticism is directed at the inefficiency and delays in the government's activities, especially concerning the acquisition of the acoustic monitoring system and the resolution of competence distribution. The criticism is procedural and political, not personal, and calls into question the economic justifications for the stalling of vital procurements. The goal is to force the government to make quick and clear decisions.
2025-09-09
Draft law amending the Cooperative Savings and Loan Societies Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (671 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The criticism is directed at the actions taken by former Finance Minister Ligi in 2010 concerning the scaling back of oversight, linking that decision to the current problems. Furthermore, doubt is cast on the necessity of the liquidation route proposed in the draft bill, with a preference for less invasive solutions.
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main opponent is the incumbent Minister of Defense, who is criticized for systemic management confusion, ignoring the advice of the Commander of the Defense Forces, and financial mismanagement. The criticism is both procedural (failure to submit data to the National Audit Office) and outcome-based (due to delays in the acquisition of capabilities). The speaker's intense criticism concludes with a direct call for the minister to consider resigning.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary adversaries are the Reform Party and the ruling coalition overall, who stand accused of systematic legal violations and deceit. Criticism targets both political decisions (tax hikes, cuts to defense spending) and specific individuals (Kaja Kallas over the eastern transport scandal, Jürgen Ligi due to the absence of NATO clearance). The speaker does not exclude the possibility of compromise, offering the government a "helping hand" via responsible alternatives (such as postponing the tax bump).
2025-06-19
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary targets of criticism are the initiators of the draft bill (including Maris Lauri), the government (for procedural violations), and the authorities who will be granted expanded access to data. The criticism is intense, centering on procedural errors—such as the lack of necessary approvals and the "supersonic speed" of the process—and substantive threats posed to fundamental rights.
2025-06-19
Draft law amending the Accounting Act (600 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is with the government, which is criticized for its passivity and lack of a comprehensive approach concerning European Union initiatives. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of generating bureaucracy and disregarding national interests. Climate Minister Michal’s personal political initiative regarding the ban on parking trucks is highlighted separately.
2025-06-19
Draft Law on Annulment of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (647 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), who stand accused of lying, evading responsibility, and political blackmail. Criticism is intense and targets both the substance of the policy and the unethical methods used to push it through, such as pressuring organizations representing people with disabilities. The coalition is also accused of constantly shifting responsibility onto one another.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed against the government and the agencies that submitted a draft bill lacking substantive quality, attempting to retroactively legalize widespread surveillance. The speaker criticizes the parliament's passivity and accuses politicians of misleading the public. The criticism is procedural and political, demanding the rejection of the bill.
2025-06-18
Draft law (667 SE) for amending the Atmosphere Protection Act and other laws (partial transposition of amendments to the directive on greenhouse gas emissions trading system) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed against the government’s policy and its representative, criticizing the logic of the policy and its consequences for Estonian businesses. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of distorting competition and disregarding national economic interests. This resistance is policy- and strategy-based.
2025-06-18
Draft law (645 SE) for the third reading amending the Simplified Taxation Act for Entrepreneurial Income, the Income Tax Act, and declaring the Security Levy Act invalid.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the coalition, who are criticized on the basis of both policy (tax increases) and ethics (lying, lack of democratic legitimacy). The intensity of the attacks is high, calling the policy "flawed" and "fragile" and accusing the opponents of arrogance and assuming the public has a lack of memory. Compromise is ruled out, as Isamaa presented a comprehensive alternative "tax peace law."
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Aliens Act, the Code of Administrative Procedure, and the State Duty Act (challenging visa decisions) – third reading (603 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the previous speaker's viewpoint, which is deemed contradictory and underestimates the impact of the change. The criticism is rooted in political and security concerns, emphasizing that the draft bill fundamentally alters core logic and referencing warnings issued by the security authority.
2025-06-18
Consequences of Government Policy

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being blamed for authoring the climate car tax and creating bureaucratic chaos. Criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policy (cost, inefficiency) and the Prime Minister's political philosophy ("state-centric mindset"). Compromise is ruled out, with demands for the complete repeal of the tax.
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the government and the coalition, sharply criticizing the pace and manner in which the draft bill was processed, as well as the violation of good law-making principles. The criticism is primarily procedural and conceptual, accusing the government of deliberately downplaying the bill's impact and hiding behind European Union law. They also criticize the fact that the Chancellor of Justice's position was not presented in the coordination table.
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The speaker is clearly in opposition to Infrastructure Minister Leis, challenging both his competence regarding waste management issues and the transparency surrounding the bill's financial impact. The criticism targets the substance and procedure of the policy, demanding precise financial accountability and the fixing of fees before the law enters into force.
2025-06-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakostale, submitted by 42 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary target is Minister of Justice Liisa-Ly Pakosta, who faces criticism for avoiding political accountability and making irrational policy decisions concerning the prison lease. The critique is dual—addressing both policy substance and procedure (specifically, the concealment of documents)—and culminates in a direct appeal to vote for the motion of no confidence. The resistance is intense, and there is no indication of a willingness to compromise.
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the coalition parties—the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200—who are accused of pursuing poor policy and losing public trust. The criticism is predominantly policy- and performance-based (tax hikes, deficit, economic recession), but it also includes procedural accusations (procedural tricks, withholding information). Compromise on the budget has been ruled out, with demands for its complete rejection.
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the Reform Party-led government and coalition, which stands accused of violating the law, lacking democratic legitimacy, and overriding parliamentary custom. The criticism is intense, encompassing both policy outcomes (inflation, tax burden) and procedural infringements (such as prohibiting a vote on the Isamaa amendment). The speaker alleges that the majority is imposing its will "in a manner that violates the law and humiliates opponents."
2025-06-11
Internal security

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.

The confrontation is aimed at the government, and specifically the Minister of Justice, who is being threatened with a motion of no confidence. The criticism is both procedural (rushing, lack of analysis) and political (disregard for internal security interests). The government’s policy is being called "shaky" and is compared to previous failures (the offshore wind farm saga).
2025-06-10
The Chairman of the Supreme Court’s overview of court orders, the administration of justice, and the uniform application of laws.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition and the parliamentary majority, who are accused of disregarding the rules of democracy, violating laws, and having a legitimacy deficit. The criticism is intense and addresses both procedural violations (the blocking of amendments) and substantive issues (tax volatility, the imposition of retroactive obligations). Compromise is ruled out, with promises to "rigidly reject" the majority's interpretation in the future.
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The primary opponent is the government, which is sharply criticized both for its policies (tax hikes, instability) and its management style. The government's approach is labeled "pessimistic" and a "loser's mentality," which acts as a drag on Estonia's competitiveness. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of failing to define national interests within the context of the green transition.
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party government and the Minister of Finance. The criticism is predominantly focused on policy and procedure, centering on the sheer number of tax hikes, the uncontrolled growth of administrative costs, and the poor quality of the budget's content. The intensity of the attack is high, demanding that the draft bill be rejected and a substantive alternative be presented.
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is the government coalition led by the Reform Party, which is fiercely criticized for tax hikes and the obsessive implementation of its election promises. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing the government of lying about lowering taxes and breaking its pledges to cut administrative costs.
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Liquid Fuels Act (622 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main confrontation is directed at the bill's presenter (Andres/the minister), who is accused of concealing the economic impact and being deliberately vague ("obfuscating the facts") regarding the costs associated with the ReFuelEU Aviation Act. The criticism targets both procedural errors (the wrong minister is presenting it) and the actual costs of the policy to consumers.
2025-05-21
The Minister of Energy and Environment's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary adversaries are the government coalition and the Ministry of Climate, who stand accused of a lack of competence and creating chaos. The criticism leveled against them is both political (focused on raising costs) and procedural, demanding the complete dismantling of the Climate Act and the Ministry of Climate.
2025-05-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Government of the Republic to initiate proceedings in the European Union to invalidate the obligation to prepare sustainability reports" (601 OE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of pushing an ideological agenda, failing to conduct substantive impact analyses, and stealthily introducing new obligations. The criticism is both procedural (ELAK protocols versus Estonian laws) and political, casting doubt on the existence of the government's political approach.
2025-05-21
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law amending the Income Tax Act for Entrepreneurs, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opposition is directed at the government, which is accused of deliberately sidestepping the required coordination process and public dialogue when making the tax increases permanent. Criticism is also aimed at the Riigikogu Board, which accepted the bill for deliberation despite violating the Rules of Procedure Act. The resistance is intense and focuses on procedural deficiencies.
2025-05-21
Burden on the economy

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.

The confrontation is aimed directly at the government and the prime minister, criticizing both their policies (tax hikes, regulatory burdens) and the government's ethics. The attacks are intense, accusing the government of lying, breaking promises, and creating a crisis of confidence. Criticism is also leveled at the government's claims regarding the reduction of administrative costs, pointing out that the costs have, in fact, increased.
2025-05-20
Draft law amending the Enterprise Income Tax Simplification Act, the Security Tax Act, and the Income Tax Act (645 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party, whose agenda is called empty/lacking substance and "quite a joke." The criticism is intense and directed both at the substance of the policy (high tax burden) and at procedural shortcomings. In particular, they are accused of cowardice and the failure to send the draft bill to stakeholders for coordination.
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia’s Government to submit a negative supplementary budget bill to reduce administrative expenses in 2025" (608 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is intense and aimed directly at the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party and Eesti 200, as well as the ministers (Ligi, Kallas). The criticism centers on the failure of the government's policies and the breaking of promises, publicly accusing them of lying about reducing administrative costs. Instead of seeking a compromise, the government is being demanded to adopt Isamaa’s solution (a negative supplementary budget).
2025-05-14
Taxes

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The main confrontation is aimed squarely at the Prime Minister and the government, particularly the Reform Party, who stand accused of raising the tax burden and pushing through failed policy experiments. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative impact of the tax hikes and the collapse of the proposed car tax. The adversary is called upon to admit their mistakes and scrap the failed draft legislation.
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the government coalition and representatives of the Reform Party (Mr. Kadastik), who stand accused of ideological fixation, poor quality legislation, and the avoidance of responsibility. Criticism is also aimed at the Chairman of the Economic Affairs Committee (Mr. Reinaas) for his absence and for evading questions. Compromise is ruled out because the draft bill is fundamentally unacceptable, and efforts are being made to halt its passage through the proceedings.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed at the government, the Ministry of Climate, and representatives of the Reform Party, who are accused of causing energy chaos and serving specific business interests (OÜ Utilitas Wind) through legislative action. The criticism is intense and addresses both the political vision (the lack of dispatchable capacity) and procedural transparency (the concealment of information within working documents).
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the bill's proponents, especially the Ministry of Climate, whose arguments regarding the constitutionality of the levy are dismissed as "patently irrelevant." Criticism is intense, focusing on the political substance (the unpredictable charge) and legal uncertainty, and compromise is ruled out (they will vote against it and appeal to the President).
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the incumbent government coalition and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is directly accused of lying and breaking promises. The criticism is both policy-based (the failure of state reform) and procedural (the minister leaving the chamber). The intensity of the attacks is high, essentially precluding confidence in the government.
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the ruling government coalition, which is being sharply criticized for its political incapacity and incompetence regarding energy issues. The criticism is leveled against both policy decisions (the introduction of new fees, indecisiveness concerning the Kiisa plant) and individuals, specifically accusing the Prime Minister (Michal) and the former Climate Minister (Alender) of making false forecasts and having a short memory. Compromise is ruled out entirely, as there is a proposal to discontinue the reading of the draft bill.
2025-04-23
The effects of government policy on society

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The primary opposition is the government and the prime minister, whose energy policy faces sharp criticism due to inadequate financial projections and decisions that place a heavy burden on consumers. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, specifically challenging the government's rationale for delaying the market launch of the Kiisa power plant and obscuring the true cost of the balancing reserve fee.
2025-04-16
Draft Land Tax Act (582 SE) - First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition and Kaja Kallas’s government, who stand accused of breaking their promises and fast-tracking legislation. The criticism is intense, centering on both political untrustworthiness and procedural errors, such as the lack of a mandate and overriding the views of key interest groups. The speaker demands that the government acknowledge and rectify the error committed.
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Aliens Act, the Code of Administrative Procedure, and the State Duty Act (challenging visa decisions) – first reading (603 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main opposition is aimed at the bill’s sponsor (the minister) and the European Commission, who are seen as exerting pressure to pass legislation detrimental to security interests. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, specifically accusing them of carelessly pushing the bill through. The speaker demands that relevant counterarguments, based on security considerations, be presented to the Commission.
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main adversary is the ruling coalition, which is intensely criticized for incompetence, inaction, and misleading the public. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the government of prioritizing party interests (a €2.6 billion offshore wind farm) over national energy security. The departure of the Social Democrats from the coalition in connection with this project is also mentioned, highlighting the government's internal contradictions.
2025-04-16
Considering the material from the Riigikogu budget control committee’s Monday discussion on price increases, Eurostat’s comparative data regarding price increases, the Institute for Economic Research’s latest barometer, the March Eurobarometer survey, and Isamaa’s recent proposals on how to mitigate inflation (reducing government spending with a negative supplementary budget and abolishing increases in indirect taxes – gas, petrol, electricity and diesel excise duties, and VAT – in the coming months), conclusions regarding government policy.

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main confrontation is directed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing their inflation policy as ineffective and inflationary. The criticism is policy- and substance-based, questioning the government's economic conclusions and their inability to explain why Estonia's inflation is the highest among the Baltic states. The speaker also expresses dissatisfaction with the laughter of the Chairman of the Riigikogu Board.
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is the government (naming the administrations of Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal), which is criticized for pursuing policies radically contrary to its declared goals. The criticism is intense and focuses on a political agenda that ignores the demographic crisis, raises taxes, and increases government spending, systematically producing a façade.
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding the energy sector (no. 724)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opponents are the Prime Minister and former leaders of the ruling parties, who face sharp criticism for rushing energy-related decisions, failing to provide an analytical basis, and misleading the public. The criticism targets the government's management philosophy and its avoidance of accountability. Furthermore, the firing of a Ministry of Climate official for speaking the truth is also condemned. The speaker supports their critique by referencing the views of business organizations, energy experts, and entrepreneurs.
2025-04-10
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Road Traffic Act with the Basic Law.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary targets of opposition are the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who stand accused of incompetence, lying, and lacking a democratic mandate for implementing the car tax. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of making poor policy choices and restricting the freedom of the populace. The opposition is absolute, promising the repeal of the law.
2025-04-09
Third reading of the draft law amending the Defence Organisation Act and the Economic Zone Act (Strengthening Maritime Security) (565 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the Government of the Republic, accusing it of acting too slowly and dragging its feet on crucial maritime security initiatives. The critique is rooted in policy and procedure, stressing that the government’s pace has been insufficient for the substantive resolution of these problems. The speaker regretfully notes that our economic waters have become an anchorage for the Russian shadow fleet, pointing to the direct consequences of the government's inaction.
2025-04-08
Draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (571 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government coalition, which is sharply criticized for policies that increase inflation and worsen people's livelihood. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of breaking promises (reducing administrative costs) and incurring non-critical expenditures (such as the procurement of servers). The intensity is high, demanding the complete elimination (one hundred percent liquidation) of the car tax, which they label a "chimera," and promising its cancellation no later than 2027.
2025-03-27
Board elections of the Riigikogu

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the incumbent Speaker of the Riigikogu, Lauri Hussar, who is facing intense criticism on both procedural and performance grounds. He is accused of stifling the parliament, selectively interpreting the rules of procedure, and exhibiting bias, all of which have led to an environment of conflict. The opposition is intense and demands fundamental change.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the government for its sluggishness and overly protracted action concerning the issue of severing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate. The critique is procedural and performance-based, emphasizing the state's inability to act decisively in a critical situation. Also criticized is the excessively universal wording of the draft law, which fails to provide sufficient clarity.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct opponents are not criticized, but the opposition is directed against the postponement or failure of the decision, which is deemed contrary to national interests. The speaker warns that postponing the decision means leaving it unmade forever. He calls for the avoidance of short-term political passion that hinders the making of a long-term decision.
2025-03-26
Politics

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The opposition's stance is aimed squarely at the prime minister and the coalition, criticizing their economic policy and internal disarray. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political arguments and allusions to previous unethical conduct (Annika Arras’s warning), while demanding accountability and transparency. The coalition is also criticized for attempting to deflect political responsibility onto the opposition (the Lehtme case).
2025-03-20
Draft law (583 SE) for the first reading regarding accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and approval of amendment to Article 20, paragraph 1, of the Convention.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Economic Affairs (Erkki) and the governing coalition (referring to Michal and the Social Democrats). The criticism is procedural and political, focusing on the improper allocation of ministerial responsibilities and the neglect of the economy. The intensity of the attack is moderately strong, accusing the minister of being distracted.
2025-03-20
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic to close the temporary control line between the Republic of Estonia and the Russian Federation" (562 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the Government of the Republic and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets. Criticism is aimed at the lack of decisiveness, procedural delays (such as ordering a threat assessment only for April), and the government's earlier political calculation, which prioritized avoiding the dissatisfaction of Narva residents over security concerns. The Centre Party and the Reform Party, which raised objections, are viewed as opponents relying on incompetent arguments.
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Administrative Cooperation Act, and the Water Act (531 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the ruling coalition, especially Mr. Taro and the chairwoman of Eesti 200, Kristina Kallas. The criticism is aimed both at specific policies (the growth of bureaucracy, increasing the powers of the Environmental Board) and ethical issues. He/She accuses the coalition of lying and breaking promises, labeling their previous decisions as "absurdities."
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Act on Foreign Relations and amending other acts in consequence (385 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed against the Government of the Republic, citing sluggishness and a pause in resolving the status of the Taiwan representation, as well as restrictions concerning its diplomatic status. Procedurally, the government's initiative to casually introduce a significant constitutional amendment into the draft bill without sufficient parliamentary debate is being criticized. It is demanded that the initiators of the amendment bear the burden of proof regarding its necessity.
2025-03-19
Politics

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are severely criticized for the lack of political leadership and for disregarding the advice of the Defence Forces. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and procedural failures, with the concealment of these omissions being labeled as "cowardice."
2025-03-12
Estonian politics

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The confrontation is aimed at the government led by the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, which stands accused of political gridlock, chaotic leadership, and poor policy-making. The criticism is intense, focusing both on policy and performance, specifically citing a cascade of tax increases and inept decision-making in the realm of security. The speaker categorically refuses to join the government, aiming to avoid legitimizing their policies.
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, particularly Prime Minister Michal and the Reform Party, who stand accused of indecisiveness and exacerbating the nation's crisis of confidence. The criticism is intense, centering on political failures (tax hikes, security policy decisions, and the expansion of bureaucracy). Cooperation with the government is ruled out entirely, as it would amount to legitimizing a failed political agenda.
2025-02-27
A written request from 21 members of the Riigikogu expressing a vote of no confidence in Climate Minister Yoko Alender.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main adversaries are Minister of Climate Yoko Alender (who is viewed as a spokesperson, rather than the "mastermind" behind the responsibility) and the energy policy steered by the Reform Party, particularly the direction set by Mr. Michal. Criticism targets both procedural deficiencies (lack of transparency, exclusion of the minister) and substantive errors, accusing the government of fostering corruption risks and a crisis of confidence. The criticism leveled against the Ministry of Climate by government partners (Läänemets, Kallas) is also brought to the fore.
2025-02-26
Energetics

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government as a whole, as well as the Ministry of Climate, accusing them of incompetence and organizational chaos. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, focusing on the flaws and lack of transparency surrounding the "deal between the three party leaders." The intensity of the opposition is high, suggesting that the government's actions are leading to chaos.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is leveled against the coalition (the Reform Party, Eesti 200) and particularly the Social Democrats, who stand accused of turning national security into an object of partisan political compromise. The Social Democrats are directly attacked for engaging in blackmail aimed at retaining power in Narva (Stalnuhhin & Co) via the voting rights granted to stateless persons. The coalition representatives' desperate distinction drawn between Russian citizens and stateless persons is deemed inadequate from a security perspective.
2025-02-19
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets (for offering unconvincing arguments and failing to utilize existing tools) and the Social Democrats. The SocDems are accused of effectively holding the coalition hostage, thereby blocking the passage of the bill aimed at restricting voting rights. The criticism is severe, labeling this a "short-sighted political style."
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the government coalition, who are accused of both failed policies and personal dishonesty (lying about the Nordica matter, insulting a female member of parliament). The intensity of the criticism is high, asserting that the government has lost the confidence of both parliament and the majority of society. The speaker emphasizes that the government has alienated the majority of society and experts.
2025-02-12
Political responsibility

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed at the government led by the Prime Minister and the Reform Party. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the detrimental impact of tax increases and social reforms on the elderly. They especially criticize the Reform Party's search for funding sources for its tax bracket project through the additional taxation of pensions.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the Estonian government's/coalition's inaction and sluggishness in shaping the European Union's security policy. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the government's failure to present concrete initiatives for securing additional funding. The speaker notes that the coalition did not support the specific proposals he/she put forward regarding the financing of defense investments.
2025-02-10
Inquiry Regarding Cooperation Between the Baltic States in Ensuring Energy Security (No. 679)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the government (the Prime Minister) and concerns the factual basis of the final indicators relied upon by the government when planning energy solutions. The objection is data-driven and challenging, demanding explanations and precise figures.
2025-01-30
Draft law amending § 5 of the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (530 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.

Not enough data.
2025-01-29
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Electricity Market Act with the Constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed against the government, which is accused of ignoring the logic of strategic management documents and violating legal certainty. The criticism is both procedural and political, emphasizing that the government is making decisions worth billions without parliamentary approval and without a valid development plan. It is also highlighted that the government has failed to take into account the devastating assessment provided by entrepreneurs and stakeholders.
2025-01-22
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "In Support of the People of Georgia" (564 AE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main adversary is Russia, which is seen as the restorer of the empire, utilizing levers of both military, political, and economic intervention. Criticism is directed at the Georgian government for enabling Russia's influence and at the European community for its "sluggish collective reaction." The criticism targets political processes and the absence of values.
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main opponents are the governing coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of undermining tax stability, lying, and breaking election promises. Criticism is intense, specifically accusing Prime Minister Michal of taking hostile actions against car owners and the Reform Party of using the tax revenue to cover the costs of the income tax bulge. The government alliance is being accused of failing in every sector.
2025-01-22
Government activity

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The primary conflict is with the government and the prime minister, who face criticism for their indecisiveness, delays, and failure to heed the advice of the Commander of the Defense Forces. This criticism is policy-based and centers on procedural errors, such as the rejection of Isamaa’s ammunition proposal during the deliberation of the 2025 budget. The speaker also points to the resignation of the Chancellor of the Ministry of Defense as a protest against the government’s lack of resolve.
2025-01-21
Draft law amending the Act on the Implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union and the Feed Act (546 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary opponents are the Government and the Rural Affairs Committee, who face criticism for setting irrelevant priorities (such as the issue of battery chickens or horse racing) at a time when the economy is in a slump. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, focusing specifically on the trend of unacceptable growth in administrative red tape. The opposition is robust, manifesting as a refusal to support the draft legislation.
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party-led government coalition, accusing them of indecisiveness, evasion, and the wrong setting of priorities (the Reform Party’s tax curve prioritized over national defense). The criticism is intense, pointing to the chaos in the political leadership of the Ministry of Defense and the insincerity of the ministers (Kaja Kallas, Hanno Pevkur). He/She criticizes the government’s inability to follow military advice and its tendency to backtrack on decisions made before parliament.
2025-01-20
Inquiry regarding the promotion of family and large families (no. 667)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the current "trio coalition" government and the Minister of Social Affairs, who is accused of destroying the security and confidence of families. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political decisions (the abolition of benefits, the imposition of taxes) and procedural instability (only a few hours given for coordination, lack of an evidence base). Compromise is ruled out, as there is a promise to overturn the government's poor decisions in the future.
2025-01-15
Government action

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing

The main opponents are the government coalition and the Social Democrats, who are accused of blocking a decision that serves security interests and of holding the coalition hostage. The Reform Party and the Prime Minister are also criticized for their cowardice, as they are unable to pass a decision that they themselves deem necessary. The criticism is intense and focuses on political logic and indecisiveness.
2025-01-13
Inquiry regarding the stability and price of electricity production (no. 670)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for ideological and incompetent energy policy choices. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (wrong overall objectives, unclear calculations) and at regulatory steps that create uncertainty (the blocking of Auvere, the unconstitutional principle of time limits). The speaker rejects the opposing side's claim that the opposition supposedly desires higher electricity prices.
2025-01-13
Request for information regarding the restoration and resilience plan and the use of oil shale (no. 668)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main conflict is with the government, which is being criticized for its weak leadership, indecisiveness, and organizational issues (such as Kaja Kallas’s work plan and nepotism). The Social Democrats are specifically singled out and accused of blocking decisions regarding energy matters. The criticism is intense and systemic, alleging that the government is making decisions (such as tax increases) that are exacerbating the electricity crisis.
2024-12-18
Third reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the government coalition and the Ministry of Climate, criticizing their policies as anti-economic and dismissive of the principles of the rule of law. The critique is both substantive (the destabilization of the economy) and procedural (the deliberate adoption of an unconstitutional law and governing based on legislation that does not exist). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the government coalition is being warned against setting a dangerous precedent.
2024-12-17
Draft law on aligning the State Budget Act with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (525 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed against the government and the coalition, who stand accused of adopting an unconstitutional budget and misleading the public regarding cuts to administrative spending. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural deficiencies (lack of transparency) and management failures (loss of control over resources). The government's policy approach is characterized as tax hikes without corresponding spending cuts.
2024-12-11
Second reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the bill's spokesperson ("Mait") and government representatives, who are being criticized for contradictory positions and procedural errors. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unconstitutionality of the bill and the disregard shown toward the protests of entrepreneurs.
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200), who stand accused of breaking their promises and generating a widespread crisis of trust. The criticism is intense and targets both specific policies (tax increases, bureaucracy) and the government’s overall integrity, describing their actions as "optical information operations." Specifically, the opposition addresses Andres Sutt directly.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main confrontation is with the Reform Party-led government coalition, which is criticized for both substantive errors (tax hikes, calling the reduction of governing costs a bluff) and procedural errors. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of refusing to provide answers and abusing the "absolutist power" inherent in the Riigikogu's working procedures. The representative promises to reverse the policy of tax increases.
2024-12-11
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which stands accused of cynical political maneuvering and generating instability. The criticism is intense, centered on political volatility, rising taxes, and the failure to control government spending. The government's actions are being labeled as grounds for indictment, with promises that their tenure will be temporary, thus precluding any compromise on the proposed legislation.
2024-12-11
Coping

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The primary opponent is the ruling coalition, represented by Interior Minister Läänemets. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government both of pitting wealthier individuals against those with lower incomes and of reducing the budget allocated for the procurement of national defense supplies. The attacks are aimed at the consequences of the policies, rather than at the individuals themselves.
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the ruling coalition and Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev, who are accused of failing to consider the Estonian people and drafting an unconstitutional provision. The criticism is sharply political and procedural, focusing on the substantive flaws of the law and the disregard for the opposition's rights concerning the table of amendments. Compromise has been ruled out; they are demanding the complete withdrawal of the law.
2024-12-05
Draft law amending the Citizenship Act (522 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The main adversary is the government and the coalition, who are being criticized for their political style and their stance on the issue of citizenship. The criticism is aimed at a specific political line articulated by Mr. Läänemets, and it is both intense and principled.
2024-12-05
Draft law (534 SE) on Estonia’s accession to the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child concerning procedures for complaints

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The main adversary is the ruling coalition, particularly the Reform Party, whose tax policy is viewed as the primary cause of the erosion of financial stability for families with children. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of ignoring the demographic crisis and implementing measures that actively counteract the birth rate.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the governing coalition and the Reform Party, who are criticized for both substantive (tax hikes, sluggishness on security) and procedural violations. Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at the Finance Committee and the session chair, accusing them of arbitrarily restricting the rights of members of parliament and blocking Isamaa's alternative proposals.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Government, which is being accused of incompetence and irresponsibility for attempting to tax its way out of the economic downturn. The criticism is focused on policy and results, highlighting the negative consequences of the tax hikes and the failure to cut governing costs. Instead of showing a willingness to compromise, the Government is being demanded to abandon its agenda of further tax increases.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the Republic of Estonia's international obligations as part of the United Kingdom's joint expeditionary force" (483 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government's political leadership in the defense sector, which is characterized as "management chaos at the political level." The opposition targets coalition politicians (Kristo Enn), demanding explanations regarding budget cuts and the delayed procurement of ammunition. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal, but hints at internal problems within the Reform Party.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union's international military operation EUNAVFOR Aspides" (482 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition maintains a strong stance against the government and the ruling coalition, accusing them of inaction, hypocrisy, and manipulating budget figures. The criticism targets both the political will and specific budgetary decisions, particularly the delay in procuring provisions and the attempt to mask cuts to defense spending as mere administrative savings. The government's actions have been labeled "two lies at once."
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu (481 OE) "Extension of the period of use of the Defence Forces in the performance of the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in the European Union military operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is aimed at the government's fiscal policy, specifically regarding the 96 million euro cut targeting special defense equipment. The opposition is policy-driven, demanding clarification of the motivation behind the cut and a clear presentation of the budget entries.
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft resolution "Approval of the Consolidated Financial Report of the State for the 2023 Financial Year" (503 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of Finance, which are being sharply criticized for the poor quality of their financial management and lack of transparency. The criticism is both procedural (arbitrary distribution of funds based on executive orders) and political (claiming that tax hikes are unwarranted in a situation where funds remain unused). The opposition is intense and uncompromising, culminating in a proposal to reject the annual financial report.
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government, particularly Finance Minister Akkermann and the Reform Party, who are being accused of a lack of political will and failed fiscal policy. The criticism is intense, alleging that the government is responsible for budgetary mismanagement and is using funds designated for the education sector to politically influence and buy off local municipalities. The speaker rules out supporting the budget and tax legislation proposed by the government.
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the State Duty Act and the Act on Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances and their Precursor Substances (502 SE), third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the coalition and the government, which are criticized both for their policies (tax hikes) and their procedural style (a lack of substantive dialogue and an arrogant attitude). The government is accused of having "failed to clear the bar" when it comes to reducing administrative costs and prioritizing security. Compromise is ruled out, as Isamaa is voting against the draft bill and calling on others to do the same.
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the government and former climate minister Kristen Michal, whose initiated draft laws are considered utterly substandard. The criticism is both procedural (lack of impact assessments, post-factum analysis) and political (the subordination of ideology to reality). The opposition is intense, demanding a moratorium be placed on the law.
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the governing coalition, who are accused of pursuing obsessive and reckless policies and driving the state’s finances into a difficult situation. The criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (the tax hump) and at procedural irregularities (the violation of the six-month principle for enforcing taxes). They also criticize the Social Democrats for supporting high indirect taxes, which harms people in rural areas and those with lower incomes.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government coalition and the Kallas government, which are sharply criticized for poor governance, the diffusion of responsibility, and tailoring laws "to fit one person." The criticism is both procedural (concerning administrative culture) and political (related to creating management stress). The opposition is intense and uncompromising, demanding the withdrawal of the bill, rather than its amendment.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary adversary is the Social Democratic Party, which stands accused of holding both the parliament and the coalition hostage and imposing a logic of retreat. The criticism targets the SDE's political demand to preserve the voting rights of stateless persons at the constitutional level—a stance they have designated as their "new red line." The speaker also criticizes the coalition parties for being forced to yield under pressure from the Social Democrats, as well as the Mayor of Tallinn for being overly preoccupied with the issue of voting rights for Russian citizens.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding the governing coalition hostage and undermining the substantive quality of the draft legislation. Criticism is also leveled at the governing coalition parties, who have adhered to an agreement forged under pressure from the Social Democrats, effectively treading water for two years. The criticism is intense and addresses both the procedure and the substance of the policy.
2024-11-20
The situation in the country

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The primary opposition is directed at the Prime Minister, whose budget decisions concerning defense spending are being sharply criticized. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, demanding an explanation for the 96 million euro reduction in the defense equipment budget. The speaker is using the Prime Minister’s previous explanations against him/her to highlight the inconsistency.
2024-11-20
The content of politics

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The main opponent is the prime minister and the government, who are sharply criticized for distorting budget data and misleading the public. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, accusing the government of hypocrisy because the VAT increase is justified by national defense, while simultaneously cutting costs for defense-related special equipment by nearly 100 million euros. There is no readiness for compromise; they only demand that the facts be presented.
2024-11-18
Inquiry Regarding the Involvement of Interest Groups (no. 656)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are intensely criticized both for the substance of their economic policy and for procedural violations. The accusations focus on the government’s inability to involve stakeholders and its violation of the principles of good legislative practice. The criticism is sharp, accusing the government of squandering the success of the Estonian economy.
2024-11-14
Second reading of the draft law amending the Social Welfare Act (pensioner support) (508 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary opponent is the government coalition, which faces criticism both for policies detrimental to the interests of the elderly and for unethical conduct. The criticism is intense and accusatory, centering specifically on political retribution achieved by zeroing out the funding for the Estonian Association of Pensioners' Unions. The opponent's actions are being labeled as contemptible and unjust.
2024-11-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main confrontation is directed at the "government's blueprint" and its proposed measures, which will worsen family livelihoods. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative impact of the measures on the demographic situation and the sense of security among families.
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary standoff is with the government coalition and the coalition majority on the Finance Committee, who are being criticized for their tax hike policies and the deterioration of the economy. The criticism is intense, targeting both the substantive policy choices and the procedural hypocrisy involved in blocking the vote on the alternative budget. The speaker deems the government representative’s assertions misleading and politically unconvincing.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The standoff is aimed at the ruling coalition and the Finance Committee, who stand accused of violating the law and failing to bring Isamaa's substantive proposals up for a vote. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the procedure ("a very bad precedent") and the substance of the policy (misappropriation of funds, a bluff). The speaker accuses the coalition of attempting to "erase" Isamaa's political alternative and escalating the political confrontation.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary adversary is the government and the ruling coalition, who are criticized for their inability to govern, lack of transparency, and the production of "illustrative noise." The criticism is both substantive (the quality of the budget) and procedural (the rejection of proposed amendments), accusing the government of creating an "optical jumble" and making misleading claims about reducing administrative costs at the expense of national defense. The speaker demands that the debate be suspended and a timeout be called to ensure the quality of the work.
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Weapons Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (468 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main confrontation is directed against the ruling coalition and the Riigikogu majority, who are accused of exacerbating the economic downturn, demonstrating a lack of leadership, and ignoring critical national defense needs. The criticism is intense and encompasses both political accusations (concerning spending priorities) and procedural charges (the blocking of Isamaa’s bills by the Parliament’s board).
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Land Register Act (467 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary opponents are the ruling coalition—the Reform Party and the Social Democrats—who stand accused of pursuing economy-hostile policies and limiting parliamentary rights. The criticism is intense, focusing both on procedural unfairness (specifically, failing to bring proposals to a vote) and on irrational tax hikes. Furthermore, the government is accused of fostering an atmosphere of anxiety and displaying a rise in arrogance, which is considered a "red flag."
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act and the Tax Procedure Act (462 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main opponent is the government coalition and the parliamentary majority, who are intensely criticized both for their economic policy choices and for the abuse of procedural power. The opponents are accused of blocking Isamaa’s political alternative, avoiding votes, and enforcing an arrogant political approach. The criticism is directed at both the policies themselves and the culture of parliamentary work.
2024-11-11
Draft law on the partial repeal of the Value Added Tax Act Amendment Act (489 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition (Reform Party, Social Democrats, Estonia 200). Criticism is directed both at the political substance (tax hikes) and at procedure and ethics (breaking promises, ignoring interest groups, lack of political mandate). The attacks are intense, accusing the government of worsening the economy and forcing people into difficult choices.
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government and its fiscal policy, which is accused of losing control and engaging in superficial governance. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, labeling the government's measures (zero budget, reduction of administrative costs) as "deception" or "incompetence." The speaker directly addresses Mr. Reinaasa, criticizing his political platform and demanding a response.
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is criticized for enforcing policy from the top down and for using rhetoric instead of protecting the economy. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the government of turning Estonia into a champion of indirect taxes, recession, and inflation. The government and the car tax are referred to as temporary.
2024-11-05
Draft law invalidating the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the coalition government as a whole (the Reform Party, Eesti 200, the Social Democrats), sharply criticizing the undemocratic enforcement of policy, the lack of dialogue with the public, and economic incompetence. The Reform Party is particularly criticized for breaking its promises regarding a low tax burden, and Eesti 200 for violating its promise on the car tax. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of destroying trust and losing the capacity to manage the country’s fiscal policy.
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the government coalition and the prime minister, who face criticism for political irrationality (PRC subsidies versus EU tariffs) and a lack of ambition regarding security and the economy. The criticism is intense, focusing on political inaction, particularly the disregard for advice given by Defense Forces leaders concerning ammunition procurement. Furthermore, the government's position regarding Kaja Kallas's hearing in the Riigikogu is criticized, with opponents viewing it as a failure to comply with legal requirements.
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi and the government, who are being criticized for their anti-economic policies and for denying the parliament's budgetary authority. The criticism is intense, including accusations of hypocrisy, lying, and irresponsibility in implementing policies that the minister himself deems incorrect. A compromise regarding the government's economic policy is ruled out, demanding its fundamental correction.
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets and his party (the Social Democrats), who are accused of blocking the resolution of crucial security issues. The criticism is intense and substantive, focusing on the Minister of the Interior's inaction over two years regarding the MP issue and the failure to resolve voting rights for party political reasons. The speaker accuses the Minister of the Interior of putting the parliament and the government into a "hostage crisis" and demands that party interests be subordinated to national interests.
2024-10-23
Wordplay

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main adversary is the government, particularly the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are accused of systematically and deliberately breaking promises. The criticism is intense and targets both the anti-economic nature of the policy and the untrustworthiness of the government’s conduct. Instead of a willingness to compromise, the focus is on protest (referencing the protest by 40 business organizations), and accountability is demanded.
2024-10-22
Draft law amending the Accounting Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (516 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponent is the governing coalition and the Minister of Finance (Mr. Ligi), who is being criticized for both policy issues (the growth of administrative burden) and ethical aspects (violation of the coalition agreement, dishonesty). The opposition is intense, and compromise is ruled out, as there is a proposal to reject the draft bill as "unfit."
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main target of opposition is Finance Minister Ligi and the bill presented by the government. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the initiative of being mere substitute activity and lacking strategic thought. The opposition is also aimed at the minister's attitude regarding the findings of constitutional institutions (the Chancellor of Justice and the Auditor General).
2024-10-16
First reading of the bill (521 AE) on the declaration of the 1944 mass deportation of the Crimean Tatars as an act of genocide

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at totalitarian regimes, primarily the Stalin-era communist regime and the contemporary Putin regime, who are described as perpetrators of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Domestic political opponents are not mentioned.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the Prison Law (506 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism targets the policies of the government and the Ministry of Justice, specifically attributing responsibility to Kristen Michal’s management style. The criticism is intense, focusing on political contradictions (a deficit of prisoners versus the hiring of new guards) and a lack of budget transparency. Regarding the budget, a clear answer is demanded concerning what "other things" will receive the funds freed up from the Ministry of the Interior.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Kallas-Michal governments and representatives of the Ministry of Finance (including Ligi and Akkermann), who are criticized on the level of both policy and procedure. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of indecisiveness, bluffing about cuts to administrative costs, and utilizing the method of transferring funds. The speaker demands the rejection of the draft bill, ruling out support for it in its current form.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the government coalition (the Minister of Justice, the minister responsible for telecommunications, Prime Minister Michal) and the Riigikogu Board. The criticism is intense and focuses on political unethicality, specifically suspecting that the law was tailored for one individual (Keit Kasemets) and that business circles influenced the legislation. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, a direct refutation of the claims presented in the press is demanded.
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the minister, both of whom are accused of undermining the confidence of families and providing false information. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the policy (its demographic impact) and on procedural incompetence (the minister failed to provide an explanatory note). The speaker characterizes the government's actions as a political agenda that runs counter to the interests of families.
2024-10-09
Management Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main opponents are the prime minister and former climate minister Michal, who are criticized for the lack of substantive quality and transparency in their management decisions. The criticism is intense and procedural, particularly regarding the refusal to appear before the Riigikogu Special Committee on Anti-Corruption, which constitutes a violation of parliamentary rules.
2024-09-26
Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's political statement regarding the submission of the draft law on the 2025 state budget.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary targets of the opposition are Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the Kallas/Michal government, who stand accused of implementing economic austerity measures and misleading the public regarding savings on both defense spending and administrative costs. The criticism is intense, focusing on political dishonesty, the erosion of trust, and the clear divergence between their words and their actions. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise on the budget proposed by the government, as the Isamaa party is presenting a comprehensive alternative.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and, as a consequence, amending other laws (426 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed at Kristen Michal's government and coalition, who are accused of hypocrisy, breaking promises, and the irrational increase of administrative costs. The criticism is both substantive (concerning bureaucracy) and procedural (the quality of the State Defence Committee's discussion was insufficient, and 110 pages of proposals were ignored). The government's actions are described as "optical maneuvers" and "substitute activity legislation."
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act (359 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary opponent is the government and the Ministry of Climate, who are being criticized for a lack of analytical rigor and rushing the process. The criticism is intense and substantive, addressing both irrational subsidies (offshore wind farms) and rule-of-law arguments (the imposition of Competition Authority fees without a legal basis). The government's approach is considered irresponsible.
2024-09-25
Economy

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary opposition target is the government (the Kallas-Michal cabinet) and the Reform Party, which face criticism both for their economic policy (specifically, tax hikes) and for irresponsible fiscal management. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of employing a false economic narrative and being stuck in the past. Furthermore, the Riigikogu Board is criticized for entering into an agreement with the Prime Minister that restricts the right of parliament members to submit questions.
2024-09-18
Economic policy

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is Prime Minister Michal and the governing coalition, whose political narrative is considered false. Criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (tax hikes, the dismantling of the corporate income tax system) and the procedure (lack of dialogue, incompetence in coalition negotiations). The attacks are intense, criticizing the Prime Minister for living in the past ("to abandon the Kaja Kallas complex").
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the incumbent government and the Minister of Defence, who are being directly criticized for cutting national defence funding and disregarding the advice of the Commander of the Defence Forces. Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas for her dismissive attitude toward the critical need for ammunition and the diagnosis of political chaos within the Ministry of Defence's purview. The criticism is primarily policy- and leadership-based.
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The main targets are Minister Vladimir Svet (due to ideological incompatibility) and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who is criticized for an inadequate response and a lack of ethical responsibility regarding personnel choices. The criticism is intense and focuses on the underlying value logic of the minister's previous stances, rather than technical policy issues. The opposition argues that the ruling coalition has chosen an unwise path by refusing to take time for reconsideration.
2024-07-29
Third Reading of the Draft Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA)

The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.

The primary opposition is the ruling coalition, specifically the government led by Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal, and the Reform Party. They face criticism both for their policies (tax hikes, undermining the economy) and for procedural violations. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, accusing the majority of lacking both legitimacy and public support, and including a promise by Isamaa to abolish the car tax.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition (Kristen Michal's government, the Reform Party, and the Social Democrats), criticizing them for both their economic policies and issues of values. The criticism is intense and covers both the political level (tax hikes) and the procedural level (unconstitutional procedure). The speaker promises to repeal the car tax, thereby ruling out any compromise regarding the levy.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The primary opponent is Kristen Michal and his plans for forming the government, particularly the ministerial candidate, Mr. Svet. The criticism targets both security risks (Svet’s stated positions on Crimea) and the disproportionate nature and inefficiency of the government’s fiscal policy. The attacks are intense and cast doubt on the opponent’s credibility regarding budget management.
2024-07-15
Extraordinary Election of the Riigikogu Vice-Speakers

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

There is not enough data.
2024-07-15
Reconsideration of the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA) left unpromulgated by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The opposition is directed against those advocating for the rapid implementation of the bill, strictly criticizing procedural irregularities and violations of the law. The criticism is legal in nature, highlighting the breach of legitimate expectation, rather than the substance of the tax policy itself.
2024-06-19
Third Reading of the Draft Law on the State Supplementary Budget for 2024 (Bill 456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting

The main opponent is the Reform Party government, which is sharply criticized for its political choices (the tax hump vs. defense spending) and financial management (double bookkeeping, lack of certainty). The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the government of irresponsible policies and leading the country into a "hostage crisis." A direct question regarding a financial error is being posed to the former Minister of Finance (Akkermann).
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

The primary confrontation is with the ruling coalition, and specifically the Reform Party, which is being accused of pursuing policies detrimental to Estonian interests and of incompetent financial management. The criticism is intense, targeting both substantive policy decisions (like the tax hump/curve and covering fixed costs with loans) and procedural maneuvers designed to avoid voting on amendments. The ruling alliance is being described as fear-driven and living out its final days.
2024-06-10
First Reading of the Draft Act on the 2024 Supplementary Budget (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are Kaja Kallas’s government, the coalition, and the Minister of Finance, who are accused of ignoring political will (adopting the attitude of "let the dogs bark, the caravan moves on") and facing a leadership crisis. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the budget's "smoke and mirrors" and financial incompetence. The speaker deems the government's policy choices, particularly the cutting of support for Ukraine, to be "unacceptable."
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is with the government coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200, Social Democrats), who are accused of lying before the elections and ignoring the opinion of the people (80,000 petitioners). The criticism is intense and covers both political aspects (funding the tax hump) and procedural aspects (violating parliamentary procedures). The speaker calls on the public to vote against those parties that are pushing through the car tax.
2024-06-05
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Crypto-Asset Market (Bill 398 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed against the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200, Social Democrats), who are accused of lying, violating parliamentary procedure, and ignoring the will of the people. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of assuming the role of an "oppressive overseer" who restricts people's freedoms. Compromise is ruled out, with promises to seek the annulment of the law in court even if it is adopted.
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (395 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic not to Recognize the Results of the Presidential Elections of the Russian Federation"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the coalition, reproaching them for delaying the procedure on "incomprehensible motives" and showing internal hesitation regarding the interpretation of Putin's status. The criticism targets political indecision and procedure, not the personal level. The speaker also warns other politicians against drawing hyperbolic and inappropriate parallels between the Estonian and Russian regimes.
2024-06-03
Inquiry regarding the Directive on Platform Work (No. 629)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are the government, the Reform Party, and the Minister of Economic Affairs, who are being criticized for abandoning core principles and for incompetent handling of matters. The criticism targets both the political substance (the failure to protect business interests) and the procedures (the decision-making mechanism and the ethical questions surrounding lobbying). The Prime Minister's personal pressure on the minister is receiving particularly sharp criticism.
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are Kaja Kallas's government as a whole and the policies led by the Reform Party. Criticism is directed both at the policies themselves (tax increases, regulations) and at procedural incompetence (the sluggish utilization of foreign funds, and the disregard for the minister's plans). The intensity of the attacks is high, demanding that the minister obstruct the government's activities.
2024-05-30
Discussion of the nationally important issue: "How can the state avoid living in debt?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the government coalition and the Reform Party, accusing them of loosening budget rules and lacking predictability in economic policy. The attacks are intense and focus on political immaturity, the shaky management of fiscal policy, and the government’s inability to make decisions. Separately, the government is criticized for attempting to present the European Commission with a program that knowingly misrepresented reality.
2024-05-30
First reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the European Parliament Election Act (lowering the voting and candidacy age) (414 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, accusing them of a lack of consensus, political manipulation, and gaming the electoral rules. The coalition is also criticized for implementing a "nanny-state" culture regarding young people, which contradicts their supposed trust in the decision-making capacity of youth. Furthermore, there is criticism of politicians' failure to prevent strikes and uphold their promises.
2024-05-29
Third Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is the government and the coalition, which are intensely criticized for both procedural errors (such as dragging out legislation and fast-tracking its adoption) and substantive flaws (wasteful expenditures, inadequate pay raises). Specific expenditures are criticized particularly strongly, such as the 55 million euro wooden building and half a million euros allocated for top officials' "radical innovation."
2024-05-29
First reading of the Riigikogu Draft Resolution "Supporting the Introduction of Nuclear Energy in Estonia" (431 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversaries are Kaja Kallas’s governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party and the Social Democratic Party. The criticism is intense, focusing on both procedural errors (such as the incorrect legal form of the draft bill, or the government 'hiding in the bushes' to avoid scrutiny) and political deficiencies (subsidizing offshore wind farms, and partisan horse-trading). He/She accuses the Reform Party of making concessions to the Social Democrats regarding the offshore wind farm project, and the Social Democrats of blocking nuclear energy topics.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is the coalition and the minister, who stand accused of breaking promises and presenting inaccurate data regarding the bill's impact. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the draft legislation and the arrogant and insufficient manner in which it was handled. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, concrete and honest answers are being demanded.
2024-05-29
Government Spending Policy

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The confrontation is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are being sharply criticized both on policy grounds (wasteful spending, bureaucracy) and ethical grounds (lying, bluffing). The intensity of the attacks is high, calling into question the credibility of the ruling party candidates in the context of the European Parliament elections. Criticism is also aimed at the government's inability to say "no" to non-essential projects.
2024-05-29
Broken promises

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing

The main opponents are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Economic Affairs (Tiit Riisalo), who are being criticized for providing misinformation and obstructing parliamentary work. The criticism is intense and centers on the breach of trust and procedural violations, rather than the actual substance of the policy.
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who stand accused of lying, placing undue burdens on the elderly, and breaching the coalition agreement. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political untrustworthiness and administrative disarray, with the government being accused of deliberately deciding to postpone tax hikes until the post-election period.
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The main opponent is the incumbent government, which is intensely criticized for failures in both policy and procedure, such as increasing bureaucracy and severing dialogue with the business community. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on tax increases, the absence of an energy policy, and the planned-economy approach to the green transition. Compromise with the government’s agenda is ruled out, demanding the immediate abandonment of anti-economic policies.
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the Reform Party-led government and Climate Minister Michal, who are accused of pursuing left-wing and economy-stifling policies. The criticism is both political (climate socialism) and procedural (lack of impact analysis, putting the cart before the horse), and the intensity is high. Instead of showing a willingness to compromise, the government is being demanded to make a radical change in direction and restore confidence.
2024-05-15
Third reading of the Bill (332 SE) on the Amendment of the International Sanctions Act and the Amendment of other related Acts.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The direct domestic counterpart is not criticized, but the protracted nature of the proceedings is mentioned. Criticism is aimed at European countries, which have failed to achieve unity on the issue of frozen assets, a failure attributed to either "economic interests or political impotence."
2024-05-15
ETO

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The main adversary is the prime minister and the government, who are being criticized for the lack of transparency in managing state funds and for concealing information. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, expressing serious concern regarding the government's fulfillment of its duty of care. The speaker accuses the prime minister of breaching an agreement concerning the preparation of a response.
2024-05-15
Execution of the 2023 State Budget

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The main adversary is the government, specifically the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are sharply criticized for refusing to provide information and for remaining silent. The criticism is both procedural and robust, accusing the government of pursuing a policy of non-response, which is characteristic of their administration.
2024-05-13
Interpellation regarding the suffrage of Russian citizens in Estonian local government elections during Russia's war against Ukraine (No. 624)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Minister of the Interior, who stands accused of manipulating the public and misrepresenting the contents of a security agency report. The criticism is intense and focuses on ethical and procedural misconduct, demanding concrete action from the government, provided the political will exists.
2024-05-08
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Third Party Liability Insurance Act and Consequential Amendments to Other Acts (400 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the government (the Minister of Finance and the Prime Minister), primarily criticizing the lack of transparency and the inability to address key budget figures. The criticism focuses on evaluating the government's performance, demanding answers regarding unrealized expenditures, which are considered a crucial indicator.
2024-05-08
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Finance on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Eesti 2035" (including an overview of public service development trends in 2022 and 2023)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main opponents are the Minister of Finance and the government coalition, who are criticized for their inability to govern, indecisiveness, and disregard for financial indicators. The criticism is intense and politically pointed, accusing the coalition of voting down specific proposals put forward by Isamaa. The speaker demands the Prime Minister's resignation due to the political deadlock.
2024-05-08
Second reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the International Sanctions Act and the Amendment of Other Acts Related Thereto (332 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The criticism targets the government’s inaction and lack of initiative when implementing national sanctions, as well as the lack of cooperation with neighboring countries. The speaker implicitly criticizes the prime minister and her family business, along with the Ossinovski family’s donations to Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats, citing this as a factor that shapes the political environment and suggests a conflict of interest concerning Russian business.
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The strong opposition is directed at the Legal Affairs Committee, its chairman, and the rapporteur (Mr. Odinets), as well as the Riigikogu Board (Mr. Kivimägi), which was chairing the sitting. The criticism is primarily procedural, accusing them of violating the law and restricting the rights of Members of Parliament. Opponents are accused of implementing "voluntarism" and "caterpillar democracy," and of evading responsibility.
2024-05-08
Estonia-Ukraine Security Agreement

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed at the actions of the government and the prime minister, accusing them of evading answers to specific fiscal questions. Criticism has also been leveled at the legitimacy of the government’s activities concerning financing transactions for aid to Ukraine, demanding that the State Auditor General’s observations be addressed.
2024-05-08
The political situation

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary targets are the Prime Minister and the ruling coalition (the Reform Party), who face sharp criticism regarding their policies (tax hikes, economic recession) and their governing competence (a crisis of indecisiveness). The opposition is intense, including a direct call for the Prime Minister to resign and accusations that parliamentary rules of procedure have been violated. Criticism is also aimed at the Reform Party's decision to implement its costliest election promises during a time of crisis.
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main opponents are Kaja Kallas’s government, the Reform Party (Reformierakond), and Estonia 200 (Eesti 200), especially Minister of Education Kristina Kallas. The criticism is intense and systemic, focusing on the breaking of political promises, incompetence in leadership, and the failure to manage the state budget. The opposition is principled, demanding the prime minister’s resignation and the dissolution of the government, ruling out any compromise with the current leadership.
2024-05-06
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Statement of the Riigikogu "On declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an institution supporting the military aggression of the Russian Federation" (Bill 420 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed at the government and the Interior Minister, who are accused of having an unclear approach to the legal implementation of Parliament's position. The speaker criticizes the government for failing to provide answers to questions concerning the application of national sanctions and threat prevention measures against the Moscow Patriarchate. The coalition is also urged to show the same decisiveness regarding the issue of voting rights for citizens of the aggressor state.
2024-04-04
Elections of the Riigikogu Board

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Direct opponents are neither named nor criticized, but there is an indirect reference to the "critical conflict situations" that arose in parliament over the past year. This suggests a need to find leadership capable of resolving the existing tensions.
2024-03-13
Rule of Law

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The primary adversary is the Minister of Justice, who is being sharply criticized for systematic lying, pressuring the prosecutor's office, and involving third parties (Erki Aavik) in the discussion of official business. The criticism is both procedural (interference in legal proceedings) and personal (lack of integrity). The confrontation is intense and uncompromising, effectively calling the minister's trustworthiness into question.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning business activities originating in Estonia and related to Russia during the War in Ukraine (No. 598)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government, who are being criticized for the lack of substantive decisions and the ongoing political crisis. The criticism targets both political inaction (regarding sanctions and support measures) and ethical inconsistency, specifically pointing to the Prime Minister’s family business and Oleg Ossinovski’s financial support for coalition partners (Eesti 200, SDE), which creates a conflict of interest.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning Estonia's critical demographic situation (No. 597)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the government and the prime minister, who are fiercely criticized both for their political choices (tax hikes, family policy) and for the functioning of the rule of law (the Prosecutor General's case). The criticism is intense and uncompromising, accusing the government of an inability to make substantive decisions and relying solely on the force of negative policy choices. The speaker demands the immediate cessation of the government's political agenda, not compromise.
2024-02-20
First reading of the draft statement of the Riigikogu "On the Return to Ukraine of Children Deported by Russia" (375 AE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main adversary is the Russian Federation, which is being criticized for genocide and war crimes, with demands for its removal from the UN Security Council. Criticism is also aimed at the international community and major Western nations for insufficient military aid and the failure to legally classify the war. Separately, the internal political standoff in the US is criticized for blocking the provision of $60 billion in aid.
2024-02-15
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Isamaa faction, titled "Estonia in Economic Recession. What is to be done?"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is accused of untrustworthiness, lacking economic vision, and wasting time. The criticism is predominantly policy- and procedure-based (tax hikes, bureaucracy, steamrolling tactics), but also includes sharp accusations directed at the Prime Minister (e.g., labeling families as "whiners"). The government's capacity to lead is considered inadequate, and calls for their resignation are being made.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the Minister of Finance and the government, who are being sharply criticized for failed fiscal policy and massive tax increases. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, arguing that the government has only managed to deliver tax hikes and has caused significant chaos in state finances.
2024-02-14
Government policy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

Strong opposition to the government and the prime minister, criticizing both the substance of the policy (raising taxes during an economic downturn) and procedural deficiencies (lack of impact assessment, fast-tracking the bill). The government's political agenda is deemed a failure, and they are accused of passivity in European politics. Criticism is also aimed at ignoring the appeals of interest groups.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at Western nations as a whole, who are accused of insufficient political effort and an inability to make vitally necessary decisions, which has led to a "paradigmatic crisis" in support for Ukraine. Separately, the domestic political standoff in the US is criticized, which is preventing the allocation of a $60 billion aid package. Russia is viewed as an adversary whose economy has managed to adapt to the current sanctions regime.
2024-02-07
Motor Vehicle Tax

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main confrontation is directed against the economic policy of the prime minister and the government, which is seen as deepening the economic downturn. The criticism is intense and focuses on political errors (tax hikes) and inaccurate factual claims presented by the head of government. A compromise regarding the car tax is ruled out, and its immediate withdrawal is demanded.
2024-01-10
The economic situation

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the Reform Party-led government, which is accused of anti-business policies and passivity in resolving the crisis. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, highlighting the government's inability to formulate a financial plan and make swift decisions. Particular criticism is leveled at the infighting among government ministers and their lack of clarity regarding future taxes.