By Months: Evelin Poolamets
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
2 Speeches
The speaker’s focus rests on parliamentary procedural correctness and the behavioral norms of ministers, which indicates a rather performance-driven approach. This stance is a strong demand for accountability, stressing that in cases of improper conduct (insulting others), the minister should immediately relinquish the floor.
09.2025
39 Speeches
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's policies, particularly concerning directives imported from the European Union (such as the CO2 tax and Rail Baltic) and the reduction of rural support funding. The political framework is value-based, stressing Estonian sovereignty, the preservation of rural areas, and the production of clean food, while labeling the opposing side's actions as "ideological experiments." The strong resistance to the Rail Baltic project is driven by financial uncertainty and associated budget cuts.
06.2025
35 Speeches
The political stance is firmly opposed to the government's green transition (especially the development of wind energy), highlighting its negative impact on local communities, public health, and national defense. Another core issue is the fierce criticism directed at the systemic failures and lack of accountability surrounding abuse cases in care homes. Their rhetoric is value-driven, focusing on safeguarding the rule of law and fundamental human rights. They also sharply criticize the decline of the Estonian economy and the erosion of its competitiveness.
05.2025
46 Speeches
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's green policies and tax increases, emphasizing that these measures are detrimental to the Estonian economy, rural areas, and national security. The speaker prioritizes the interests of the nation-state, energy security (oil shale), and the protection of the traditional social order against ideological pressure. The framing is heavily value-based and critical of the government’s actions, accusing it of serving ideology rather than the interests of the people. The main topics are opposition to the renewable energy bill and the harmfulness of tax hikes during an economic recession.
04.2025
30 Speeches
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the ideological agenda of the Reform Party-led government, focusing on the need to revitalize the economy and alleviate the tax burden. Key themes include ensuring energy security through dispatchable capacity (oil shale, nuclear power plant), opposing gender quotas and gender ideology, and protecting people from cybercrime and the health risks associated with wind farms. The political framework is highly critical, accusing the government of ideological experimentation and driving the Estonian economy into the "European bottom league."
03.2025
49 Speeches
The political focus is currently centered on demanding accountability for the state's administrative failures (Nordica) and opaque subsidy schemes (renewable energy). Furthermore, there is a strong emphasis on the urgent necessity of tackling the demographic crisis, which is framed as a constitutional duty. The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional and value-driven stance, criticizing the government's activities as unjust and detrimental to the nation, and demanding political responsibility and resignations. The critique is primarily aimed at the incompetence and pattern of corrupt behavior demonstrated by the governments led by the Reform Party.
02.2025
13 Speeches
The political platform is strongly anti-government, focusing on the administration's inefficiency in economic management and its perceived moral decay. The most contentious issues are the defense of national self-determination (restricting voting rights exclusively to citizens) and criticism of the green transition, especially concerning the regulatory burden placed on wind energy developers and local municipalities. The critique is both policy-driven and value-based, emphasizing the decline in economic competitiveness and the government’s failure to act.
01.2025
19 Speeches
The politician is strongly opposed to the government's energy policy, particularly the subsidization of intermittent renewable energy (wind power), stressing its inherent instability and environmental costs. He urgently demands full transparency and substantiation regarding the representation expenses of high state officials (the Chancellor of Justice and the Prosecutor General), viewing the current system as undemocratic and an unfair use of taxpayer money. These positions are deeply rooted in policy and values, focusing on security of supply and honest governance.
12.2024
23 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the survival of the nation (demographics, birth rate) and state security (voting rights for stateless persons). The speaker forcefully opposes government initiatives that lead to increased bureaucracy, damage to the economy, or the imposition of ideological values. Criticism is directed at the government's priorities and its inaction, particularly regarding the resolution of the demographic crisis. The political framework is strongly value-based, emphasizing the protection of children and the traditional family.
11.2024
20 Speeches
The political focus is heavily directed towards criticizing the government's actions and the trustworthiness of its coalition partners, particularly concerning drug policy and the management of state resources (phosphorite). Simultaneously, a strong value-based bill has been introduced aimed at increasing employee well-being and recognizing Christian traditions. The speaker demands transparency from the government and the prioritization of national competence, placing the life philosophy "work to live" first.
10.2024
36 Speeches
The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the government's actions and core values. The most prominent issues are the demographic crisis and economic regulation. These positions are deeply value-based, emphasizing the preservation of the Estonian nation and culture. The government faces fierce criticism both for underfunding infrastructure and for cutting family policy, measures which are deemed cruel and unjust.
09.2024
25 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's actions from the perspective of national values and state sustainability. The main issues are the demographic crisis, the quality of the transition to Estonian-language instruction, and the negative impact of green transition projects (bog restoration, wind farms). The criticism is intense and value-based, accusing the government of being anti-family and lacking in ideas. The arbitrary action of state authorities in confiscating the copy of the Lihula monument is also criticized.
07.2024
8 Speeches
The political stance is sharply critical of the government's tax policy and overall economic management. The speaker opposes drastic tax increases, particularly the proposed car tax, and highlights the government's failure to stimulate economic growth, pointing specifically to ten consecutive quarters of decline. The criticism is primarily aimed at the inefficiency of the government's operations and its fundamental lack of economic understanding.
06.2024
4 Speeches
The political focus is heavily centered on the motion of no confidence against a government minister, highlighting issues of corruption, conflicts of interest, and unethical lobbying (Bolt, Ossinovski). Furthermore, the government is being pressed for clear next steps regarding the non-recognition of the results of the presidential elections in the Russian Federation. The overall political framework is primarily aimed at criticizing the government’s actions and ethical conduct.
05.2024
11 Speeches
The political position is strongly nationalistic and value-based, emphasizing the protection of the Estonian language and culture and the upholding of the Preamble of the Constitution. The speaker scathingly criticizes the government's actions, particularly the Minister of Education's failure to avert the teachers' strike and the Prime Minister's conduct. These standpoints are heavily focused on ensuring security and combating illegal immigration. The political framework is predominantly results-oriented and value-driven, demanding that the state enforce the use of the Estonian language.
04.2024
32 Speeches
The political position is firmly in opposition to the government's policies, especially regarding family support (opposition to the car tax, criticism of cuts to family benefits) and the economy (questioning the economic viability of the green transition amid a deep recession). Policy formation emphasizes value-based themes, such as the demographic crisis, national security, and electoral transparency.
03.2024
31 Speeches
The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on the government's economic failures—specifically low GDP growth and the introduction of new taxes—as well as the defense of core national values, such as the preservation of the Estonian nation and the trustworthiness of e-voting systems. Criticism is also leveled at the funding sources of the coalition parties and the Prime Minister’s failure to halt trade involving sanctioned goods or entities. The speaker frames their position as value-based, stressing deep concern for the future of the Estonian people.
02.2024
13 Speeches
The political focus is heavily concentrated on national security and restricting the influence of Russian Federation citizens, particularly concerning real estate transactions, demanding swift action from the government. Furthermore, it supports economic relief measures, specifically by lowering the VAT on food products and increasing subsidies for school lunches. The text is critical of the government's inaction regarding security matters and emphasizes political ethics (citing the prime minister's scandal and corruption).
01.2024
23 Speeches
The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on value-based issues (opposition to same-sex marriage, opposition to mandatory renovation) and fiscal criticism (the scale of aid to Ukraine, support for tax relief). The criticism targets the government's procedural deficiencies (the absence of a drafting intent for the Water Act) and hidden agendas (a reference to the government regarding Stark Logistics). The speaker emphasizes that the government is pushing legislation through using strong-arm tactics, thereby dividing society.