By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The political stance involves strong opposition to the draft legislation aimed at accelerating the deployment of renewable energy, which is viewed as a hasty action taken at the expense of the rights of the Estonian people, nature, and common sense. This stance is value-based, stressing the necessity of protecting citizens' health and living environment against the interests of developers. The speaker accuses the government of undermining the trust between the state and its citizens.

The speaker focuses on the practical implementation of environmental regulations and their impact on business, highlighting sustainability reporting requirements. Also a crucial topic is the planning of renewable energy infrastructure (solar panels, wind turbines) and waste management. The political framework is distinctly policy-driven, emphasizing the identification of concrete plans and commitments.

The political focus is on the accountability of nursing homes and the abuse of the elderly (rape, beating). The speaker adopts a strong, results-oriented stance, challenging the minister's previous comparison and demanding sanctions against the company for the management's inaction. This position is strongly aimed at increasing the accountability of social welfare institutions.

The political position is firmly rooted in prioritizing national defense and security over the green transition. The speaker criticizes the government’s energy policy as a security risk, demanding that the development of wind farms be halted in areas that compromise defense capabilities. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on economic accountability (the misuse of subsidies) and social access (referrals to the Emergency Department).

There is strong opposition to the current model for developing wind energy, particularly concerning onshore wind turbines reaching heights of 250–300 meters. The political focus is centered on protecting citizens' constitutional rights, their living environment, and their health, while simultaneously accusing the state of implementing a green transition that is both unfair and lacks a scientific basis. This position is strongly value-driven, prioritizing justice and community engagement ahead of economic interests.

The politician strongly opposes the inaction taken by the Ministry of Justice and the Prosecutor's Office in the Pihlakodu case, highlighting a systemic and moral failure. He also sharply criticizes the fragmented and opaque regulatory framework governing wind energy development, calling for national scientific standards. His political framework is strongly value-based (human dignity) and critical of institutional activity.