By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The economic perspective is critical of regulations that favor developers (guaranteeing them profit) while simultaneously ignoring the financial detriment suffered by local residents. Emphasis is placed on negative consequences, such as the devaluation of property and the marginalization of the area, and the proposed monetary compensation (fees) for the loss of the living environment is deemed inadequate.

Economic perspectives are tied to the impact of regulations on businesses, especially concerning sustainability reporting requirements and obligations. Also highlighted is the economic and logistical organization of renewable energy waste management, which points to an interest in the regulatory burden and the circular economy.

Economic perspectives address corporate responsibility and sanctions, demanding that social welfare institutions be held accountable for acts of violence occurring within their jurisdiction. This suggests the position that social safety and accountability must take precedence over commercial interests.

Economic views focus on preventing the abuse of state subsidies and regulating developers' price speculation in the context of wind projects. Government accountability is demanded in situations where the development of wind farms proves to be economically unprofitable, supporting fiscal responsibility and the protection of public funds.

Skeptical about the economic sustainability of current wind energy, considering it expensive, resource-intensive, and prone to bankruptcy, especially given the low productivity (20%). [The text/speaker] emphasizes the need for fair land-use compensation that would motivate communities, and expresses concern over the decline and competitiveness of the Estonian economy. It is believed that developers should compensate for the disturbances caused.

There is not enough data.