By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The political position focuses strongly on holding the coalition accountable for fulfilling its promises, particularly concerning the reduction of administrative burden and regulatory reform. The speaker challenges the government’s activities, demanding specific evidence regarding the implementation of the "one in, one out" principle. Furthermore, the speaker intensely addresses issues related to constitutional conduct and the use of political rhetoric (such as "Moscow talking points").

The central theme is the termination of renewable energy subsidies (especially for wind power), as these are burdensome for consumers and economically unjustifiable. The speaker adopts a position of strong opposition to the current subsidy scheme, emphasizing the priority of consumer protection and national security over the green transition. The framing is heavily value-based and results-oriented, focusing on injustice, lack of transparency, and corrupt schemes. The speaker argues that the state's priorities are misaligned, favoring the profits of large investors over the security and welfare of the nation.

The most striking themes are ensuring the vitality of the border region and the sharp criticism directed at the government's economic management and social policy (specifically, discrimination against women). The speaker demands that the government locate funds to support border areas and stimulate the economy. These positions are strongly antagonistic toward the government's actions, particularly those of the Reform Party, with the focus resting on the inefficiency and conduct of the administration.

The political position focuses strongly on indexing the pay and ensuring fair compensation for reservists, while criticizing the government's failure to implement this. It also highlights the necessity of updating and indexing fines imposed for the cross-border movement of sanctioned goods so that they accurately reflect inflation and the actual damages incurred. The political framework is strongly results-oriented and value-driven, emphasizing justice and highlighting the inefficiency of government operations.

The political discourse is heavily dominated by profound concern over the demographic crisis and the survival of the Estonian nation, which is viewed both as a constitutional mandate and an existential threat. Consistent national security policy is also stressed, particularly concerning the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens and the influence of media. Criticism is leveled against the government's inaction and lack of clear priorities in managing population policy, with demands that this issue be elevated to the same level of importance as national security and the economy.

The political focus is directed at the question of COVID-19 vaccine safety, expressing strong skepticism regarding the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines (myocarditis, pericarditis). The speaker questions the activities of state institutions (the Health Board) and presents data suggesting a possible link between vaccination and excess mortality. This position is strongly opposed to established health policy and is framed as results-based criticism of the state's actions.

The political focus is on the supply security and assurance of strategic minerals through international cooperation, especially in connection with the USA-initiated Minerals Security Partnership (MSP). Domestically, criticism is directed at the government's plans regarding phosphorite mining, demanding strict accountability concerning environmental risks and the assurance of groundwater quality. The political framework is strongly policy- and results-based, requiring explanations regarding the fulfillment of both foreign and domestic political promises.

The political focus is centered on investigating the bankruptcy of Nordica and the management failures of state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the need for political and legal accountability. The speaker strongly supports the creation of an investigative commission to clarify the illogical decline and the disappearance of taxpayer money that occurred during the Reform Party’s time in power. The position is strongly critical of the government's actions, stressing the lack of responsibility and the necessity of changing the "rehepapp-like attitude" (opportunistic self-interest) within the political culture.