By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The most crucial issue is the regulation of food irradiation, which the speaker strongly opposes, citing potential health risks and the development of cancerous tumors. This position is strongly value-based and procedural, criticizing the lack of public debate before the dangerous legislation was adopted. The faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party does not support the draft bill.

The political focus centers on monitoring the government's activities and accountability, particularly regarding the functioning of a critical national system (the land cadastre). The approach is results-oriented, demanding explicit assurance from the minister that the system is operating without disruption. The speaker expresses skepticism about the system's flawless performance.

The political position is strongly nationalistic and value-driven, focusing on the protection of the Estonian language and the upholding of the Preamble to the Constitution. The speaker deems the current situation in the public sphere "lawless" and urgently demands the reinstatement of the B1-level language requirement for taxi drivers and platform workers. This stance is directly linked to the fight against illegal immigration and the reduction of security risks.

The political focus is directed toward the continuity of democratic principles and national security. The speaker questions the criteria used to restrict suffrage, drawing a comparison between the disenfranchisement of Russian citizens and the voting rights afforded to convicted felons. Significant emphasis is also placed on investigating hybrid threats and the potential targeted activities of Russian special services on Estonian territory. The political framework is value-based and security-centric.

The political position centers on the procedural aspect of the legislation, criticizing the government's or the majority's decision not to subject the bill to a confidence vote. The speaker believes this decision resulted in a predictable dispute and subsequent deadlock over the proposed amendments. The stance is procedural in nature and moderately critical.

The speaker focuses on the failure of the government's actions, particularly the inability of the Minister of Education to prevent the teachers' strike. The political position is strongly critical and performance-based, emphasizing the minister's complete failure in leading their sector.