By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The rhetorical style is informative, serious, and cautionary, focusing on logical arguments and the presentation of technical details. The speaker employs an evidence-based approach, referencing studies by German scientists and the legislation of other countries (Germany, Great Britain) to highlight the dangers of the draft bill. The tone is formal and focuses on facts, not emotional appeals.

The style is formal and direct, addressing the session chair and the minister respectfully. Repetitive and clarifying questioning is used ("everything has been eliminated, all system failures have been eliminated by today") to compel the minister to provide an unambiguous answer. The tone is analytical and demanding.

The rhetorical style is insistent and defensive, emphasizing the critical importance of the survival of the Estonian language and the nation-state. It employs both logical arguments (referencing laws and data from the Language Inspectorate) and emotional appeals, directly linking the language issue to a security risk and a lawless situation. The final message presents a stark choice: either enforce the use of Estonian or accept the decline of the nation-state.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct, employing the salutations "Esteemed Chairman/Minister of the Riigikogu." The speaker poses pointed, yet neutral questions, aimed at highlighting political contradictions and verifying the facts regarding the security situation. The tone is analytical and serious, focusing on logical argumentation.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing esteemed officials (the Director, the Chairman, the Vice-Chairman). Although the tone is courteous, the question is sharp in substance and procedurally critical, emphasizing the logical rationale for why a certain step was omitted.

The rhetorical style is confrontational and accusatory, using direct questions that point to the minister's failure. Although the address is formal ("respected"), the content is sharp and critical, accusing the prime minister of laughing at the teachers.