By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The political focus is on the activities of local authorities (LAs), emphasizing the necessity of aligning development plans and comprehensive spatial plans, alongside ensuring procedural clarity. A moderately critical stance is also expressed regarding the funding and expediency of new tasks (such as public order units) imposed by the state on LAs. The approach remains pragmatic, budget-driven, and aimed at improving the substance of policy.

The political position is strongly opposed to the pending advertising regulation bill, which is deemed poor and excessively bureaucratic. Criticism targets the practical workability of the legislation and how it creates unnecessary hurdles, such as through the requirements for ad placement. The focus is outcome-based, highlighting the negative impact of the law at the local level. Confusion is also expressed regarding the purpose of the Riigikogu (Parliamentary) procedural process if the law is already seemingly in force.

The most important topic is the demographic crisis and the ineffectiveness of family policy. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's actions, emphasizing that despite the distribution of subsidies, there are no results, and the birth rate is declining. The political framework is clearly results-based and critical of the government's activities. Family policy is also treated as a factor influencing security.

The political stance centers on the minister's conduct and maintaining parliamentary order during the Riigikogu session. The speaker adopts a sharply critical position regarding the minister's improper conduct (insulting remarks) and demands strict adherence to procedural boundaries. The position is highly procedural and performance-driven, demanding accountability for the inappropriate behavior.