By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural arguments, and posing detailed questions to the presenter regarding the resolution of contradictions. Figurative and skeptical comparisons ("Wild West," "their own sheriff") are employed to cast doubt on the expediency of the new law enforcement unit. The tone is formal and concerned.

The rhetorical style is confrontational and direct, posing sharp questions regarding the purpose of the procedure and the credibility of the presenter. A specific, localized anecdote (the tearing down of the EKRE advertisement in Viru-Nigula municipality) is employed to illustrate the negative impact of bureaucracy. The tone is critical and demanding, culminating in a direct question concerning the presenter’s alleged dishonesty.

The rhetorical style adopted is critical and demanding, posing pointed questions to the government regarding its new goals and measures. Juxtaposition is employed (economic figures versus demographic indicators), along with the slightly ironic phrase "number magic." The focus is placed on logical failure and the absence of tangible results.

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and confrontational, focusing on condemning the opposing side's behavior. Hyperbole is employed (the example of taking the minister's trousers off) to underscore the necessity of defining the limits of inappropriate conduct. The speech is formal (an address to the chairman), yet it carries a strong emotional charge due to the insult.