By Months: Anti Allas
Total Months: 18
Fully Profiled: 18
10.2025
34 Speeches
The main confrontation is with the Reform Party and the government, who are being criticized for abolishing the tax hump and providing an "unnecessary gift" aimed at high earners (4000+ euros), which accounts for two-thirds of the car tax revenue. Criticism is also leveled at procedural inefficiency and the disregard of the former Minister of Finance's proposals. Furthermore, the falsehood presented by Aivar Kokk from the podium is categorically refuted.
09.2025
51 Speeches
The main criticism is directed at the actions of the government (the coalition), particularly concerning fiscal decisions and regional policy. It contrasts itself with the Centre Party when addressing social democratic topics and criticizes the Reform Party's opposition to lowering the VAT on foodstuffs. The criticism is intense, focusing on political injustice and the government's inability to resolve critical sectoral concerns (pig farming, specialized care).
06.2025
64 Speeches
The speaker is highly critical of the government, accusing them of prioritizing high earners and driving the tax system into bankruptcy. He criticizes the Isamaa party for hypocrisy and populism regarding the raising of land tax in the municipalities they control. He also criticizes the Centre Party, stating that while in opposition, they focus solely on leveling accusations rather than engaging in constructive cooperation to implement necessary changes.
05.2025
33 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party-led government, specifically targeting their fiscal and climate policies. They are accused of allowing structural problems to pile up and implementing unjust taxation. The critic sharply attacks procedural errors (such as failing to notify landowners) and the resulting instability (in the energy sector). Furthermore, the Centre Party is criticized for earlier government decisions, specifically the promise to phase out oil shale.
04.2025
16 Speeches
The primary criticism is directed at the Reform Party and Isamaa, who are accused of living beyond their means for decades, making populist decisions (such as lowering income tax at the expense of road maintenance), and unfairly drafting the car tax. EKRE is criticized for making unrealistic promises (like paving gravel roads with asphalt). The criticism is mainly focused on policy and accountability, accusing opponents of having lost touch with reality.
03.2025
9 Speeches
Fierce opposition is directed at the government’s actions regarding the speed of national defense procurements and the concept of a simple car tax proposed by the former Minister of Finance (Võrklaev), which allows for no exceptions. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, calling into question the legality of the Ministry of Climate’s activities when altering the regime of protected areas, citing the Chancellor of Justice.
01.2025
6 Speeches
The opposition's stance is primarily aimed at the Isamaa party, who they accuse of irresponsible populism and policies that hurt poorer people. The criticism stems from a lack of political and fiscal responsibility, especially regarding the issues of abolishing the car tax and the tax hump.
12.2024
5 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at populist political approaches that simultaneously promise to cut taxes and increase benefits, as well as previous unsuccessful legislative solutions (e.g., the requirement for a demolition certificate during the period of mandatory insurance). Urmas Reinsalu is named directly, with a hint that he failed to sufficiently grasp the economic damage caused by alcohol policy. It also calls into question the narrative coming from the other side of the chamber regarding the obstruction of oil shale energy production.
11.2024
9 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the ministries for the failed implementation of the activity-based budget, which has created more confusion and proven more expensive. He/She also criticizes the opposition's inconsistency (simultaneously criticizing both cuts and spending). On a personal level, he/she criticizes colleagues who stubbornly question the findings of scientists, and those who resort to impolite behavior (such as pointing fingers).
10.2024
3 Speeches
There is no direct criticism of specific opponents or policies, but the politician calls into question the current arrangement for social welfare funding, which compels pensioners to make supplementary payments. Also disputed is the negative labeling associated with budgeting for regional needs—specifically, its designation as "ugly pork-barrel funding."
09.2024
4 Speeches
The criticism is primarily aimed at the state's political and procedural shortcomings, such as the lack of transparency in the Nursipalu studies and the absence of loan security for rural areas. The speaker criticizes previous governments who claimed that local municipalities are "rich and wasteful," and is strongly opposed to subjecting vehicles of historical value to the new car tax. The criticism is aimed at correcting systemic failures.
07.2024
5 Speeches
The current confrontation is aimed squarely at the opposition parties, who are being blamed for the long-term underfunding and "hollowing out" of the Estonian state—a situation that necessitated the introduction of the car tax. The criticism is intense, focusing heavily on the fiscal policy failures of previous administrations, failures that left teachers, police officers, and rescue workers struggling on poverty wages.
06.2024
2 Speeches
The criticism targets the demagoguery and populism evident in the discussion, particularly concerning the land tax issue. He/She also criticizes the state for failing to conduct the regular valuation of land for 21 years, noting that this is the primary root cause of the current situation. Furthermore, he/she warns the government against linking all additional municipal expenditures to the anticipated increase in land tax revenue.
05.2024
10 Speeches
The speaker criticized the Isamaa party for "genuine populism" concerning the land tax, specifically faulting them for ignoring the financial decline of more remote local governments. Furthermore, the speaker voiced strong skepticism regarding the lobbying efforts surrounding nuclear energy development, insisting that economic considerations must take precedence.
04.2024
9 Speeches
The criticism is directed against the government's actions, which have left entrepreneurs without support during the economic downturn and cut critical investments. It also expresses skepticism regarding the sincerity of the specific bill's stated goals, pointing to decades-old, unresolved issues concerning the funding of small schools. The criticism is policy-based and procedural.
03.2024
7 Speeches
The primary and most intense criticism is directed at the EKRE faction, who are being accused of introducing a populist bill that directly contradicts the spending habits of their own members (specifically referencing Martin Helme and Rain Epler). The speaker also criticizes the central government’s approach to education reform, arguing that it is destroying small regional areas. The criticism is both policy-based (explaining why the bill is flawed) and personal/procedural (highlighting the hypocrisy of the opponents).
02.2024
6 Speeches
Strong opposition is directed at the government's tax policy (the car registration fee) and the EKRE faction's bill to ban electoral alliances. The tax criticism is policy- and forecast-based, whereas the criticism against banning electoral alliances is intense and principled, labeling it an undemocratic attempt to eliminate opponents. The speaker questions the opponents' motives, asking whether the political parties are simply too weak to handle fair competition.
01.2024
9 Speeches
The speaker strongly opposes the draft legislation that repeatedly attempts to resolve issues that have already been settled (the relocation of the Bronze Soldier), arguing that this reopens old wounds and creates new tensions within society. The speaker also criticizes the "black-and-white approach" to school reform prevalent at the state level, which is devastating for rural life.