By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The primary criticism is aimed at the elected representatives who stubbornly cast doubt on the statements made by scientists, labeling this a futile and dangerous endeavor. The criticism specifically targets the lack of intellectual integrity and the disregard for scientific consensus.

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. The questions are focused on clarifying the implementation of the policy and addressing data deficiencies, rather than engaging in personal attacks.

The opposition's stance is mentioned for context, referencing their contradictory criticism regarding both spending and cuts. The speaker himself does not launch direct attacks, but rather uses the opposition's criticism as an introduction to his question.

The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the ministries concerning the unsuccessful implementation of activity-based budgeting and the lack of efficiency in public spending. The criticism is substantive and substantiated by the State Audit Office's audit, but at the same time, a warning was issued against rushing headlong back to the old system. Furthermore, one person present in the hall was criticized for impolite behavior (finger-pointing).