By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The opposition is directed at the substance and timing of Draft Bill 124, as it fails to offer a comprehensive solution and duplicates the work of the government. The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing the unreasonableness of dividing responsibilities among ministries and questioning the role of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture in fulfilling a national defense mandate. The committee proposed rejecting the draft bill.

The resistance is aimed at the black-and-white narrative of school reform being disseminated at the state level, a narrative criticized for having a devastating impact on rural life. This criticism is policy- and value-based, standing in opposition to the idea of forced consolidation.

The speaker takes a stand against the bill's initiators, criticizing their actions as impractical and hazardous to society, as they risk generating new tensions. The critique is aimed at a political approach that lacks "common sense," and any compromise on supporting the draft legislation is entirely ruled out.

No data available