By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

Total Sessions: 4

Fully Profiled: 4

2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The political position centers on ensuring food supply security, supporting the Government of the Republic’s stance that this issue should be resolved comprehensively through the draft Civil Crisis and National Defence Act. It opposes the narrow draft bill 124, arguing that it would only partially address the problem and would unreasonably divide responsibilities among ministries. The position is strongly policy- and procedure-driven, emphasizing the necessity of a holistic solution to a matter critically important for the functioning of the state. It expresses confidence that a resolution will be reached within half a year at the latest.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
This political position centers on strong opposition to the national "black and white" approach to school reform, an approach deemed destructive to rural life. The speaker is convinced of the viability of small rural schools and is actively seeking solutions for the survival of these communities. This stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing the critical importance of preserving rural life.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker strongly opposes the draft bill concerning the renewed relocation of the war monument, viewing it as an unnecessary reopening of old wounds and a source of new tensions. The political stance is value-based, emphasizing the need for social cohesion and the importance of clearly communicating the message of the Second World War (occupation, loss of freedom). He/She believes that resources should be directed toward strengthening the country's overall defense capability.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The political position focuses on the necessity of solving a specific "real problem" and the correctness of its processing within the Riigikogu. The speaker moderately supports the committee's understanding of the problem's existence but immediately emphasizes the procedural question concerning its referral to the Social Affairs Committee. The position is clearly framed procedurally and policy-wise.