By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The primary conflict centers on the EKRE faction, whose proposed bill has been branded as populist and hypocritical. The criticism is aimed directly at specific individuals, citing the high expense allowances claimed by EKRE members (Martin Helme and Rain Epler) and previous scandals (such as the notorious "bottomless car tanks" incident). The speaker accuses the opposition of deceiving the public and destroying the reputation of the Riigikogu.

Insufficient data.

The speaker is taking an oppositional stance, criticizing the legislative consistency of the presenter’s party regarding the draft bill banning electoral alliances. He/She warns that the opposition (in the local councils) could constantly exploit the low 10% initiative threshold to impose measures against those currently in power, thereby rendering the criticism politically motivated.

The criticism is aimed at previous inaction in a crucial sector, noting that the government has "finally" started making decisions. The current stance is more procedural and inquisitive, rather than directly confrontational.

The opposition is directed at the central government's education reform policy and methodology, which critics denounce as a "one-size-fits-all logic" and an excessive reliance on centralized Excel spreadsheets. The criticism is intense and strictly focused on policy and procedure, accusing the approach of destroying local regions.