By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The speaker is an expert on the Riigikogu Members' Status Act and the regulation governing expense compensation. They clearly differentiate between the substance of the legal provision and the authority of the Riigikogu Board when setting expense categories. They point to the specific necessity of travel expenses, research and expert analyses, and representation costs required to perform the work of the Riigikogu. They propose procedural solutions (amending the Board's internal rules) rather than changing the law itself.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the social and physical consequences of smartphone addiction, citing examples from schools (the silence during breaks, attention deficits) and homes. He/She enumerates specific health impacts, such as reduced physical activity, vision problems, and weight gain. The expertise is grounded in highlighting social observations and trends.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the electoral code, the legislative process, and the operation of local government (councils). They use specific terminology such as "electoral unions," "dissonance," "threshold," and "residents of voting age," emphasizing their familiarity with political structures and procedures.

The expertise is required in the field of public procurement and regulation, specifically inquiring about the timing of the announcement of the planned reverse auction and the factors dependent upon it. Technical aspects are emphasized, such as necessary supplementary information and preliminary decisions required to initiate the process.

The speaker demonstrates proficiency in the terminology of education network reform, clearly contrasting "quantitative management" with "qualitative and case-based" reform. Specific terms such as the "school closure instrument" are employed, and reference is made to bending development curves upwards, which suggests an awareness of regional development methodologies.