By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The style is analytical, yet sharply critical, utilizing strong expressions such as "populist froth" and "populist spectacle." The speaker employs rhetorical questions, Biblical phrases ("Which of you is without sin..."), and concrete examples (e.g., bottomless tanks) to discredit the motives of their opponents. He/She balances this emotional attack with a legal explanation detailing the differences between law and order.

The rhetorical style is concerned and urgent, employing a powerful metaphor ("pandemic") to underscore the seriousness of the issue. The speaker relies on observations and anecdotal evidence ("visiting schools") to justify the necessity of systemic national intervention. The tone is formal, yet emotionally charged.

The style is formal and analytical, employing direct and critical questions to draw attention to legislative inconsistencies and practical risks. The speaker relies on logical arguments, emphasizing the potential negative impact of a low initiative threshold on the functioning of the councils. The tone is moderately challenging and pragmatic.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, commencing with an acknowledgment directed towards the government ("Thank you! Acknowledgment"), followed by the presentation of detailed and logical questions. The tone is constructive and purposeful, focusing on facts and procedures.

The rhetorical style is critical and concerned, incorporating an emotional appeal that expresses sadness ("it is very sad to watch") regarding the destruction of small regions. The speech is formal and centers on the logical contrast between two management logics (quantitative vs. qualitative), demanding an approach based on the condition "if" (or "provided that").