By Months: Helle-Moonika Helme
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
28 Speeches
The main confrontation is with the government and the coalition, specifically targeting Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi and the Minister of Justice. The criticism is intense, accusing the ministers of deceiving and lying to the public, and questioning why a bill is being debated that lacks the support of the Swedish parliament. He/She also criticizes the government’s low approval rating (11%).
10.2025
27 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at government ministers (Ligi, Annely), accusing them of a lack of clarity and failing to provide answers, particularly Minister Ligi, who "doesn't know how to answer." The opposition is intense and centers on procedural transparency and the fulfillment of promises made to the public.
09.2025
45 Speeches
The confrontation is directed at the government and its ministers, who are being criticized both for their political decisions (tax hikes, the budget) and for personal incompetence and shirking responsibility. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, demanding the resignation of the politicians over the mismanagement and corruption within their respective jurisdictions. Furthermore, the government is accused of intimidating and labeling the public, as well as squandering public funds.
06.2025
28 Speeches
The main opponents are the government and specific ministers (the Prime Minister, Minister Joller, and the Minister of Finance), who are criticized both politically and personally. Minister Joller is accused of incompetence, arrogance, and engaging in political activism rather than fulfilling the ministerial role. The government is blamed for the economic decline, legal violations (data collection), and deliberately misleading the public ("calling black white"). The criticism is intense, and there is zero willingness to compromise, with demands for accountability.
05.2025
53 Speeches
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the liberals, who are accused of incompetent state governance, a yearning for dictatorship, and robbing the people blind. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax hikes, the green transition) and unethical behavior (Kert Kingo's "witch hunt," political trials). The opponents are reproached for haughty and arrogant rule that shows no regard for the people of Estonia.
04.2025
26 Speeches
The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the government it leads, which stands accused of corruption, incompetence, and funneling public funds to businessmen. The criticism is intense, leveling charges of "liberal terror" against the government, as well as minimizing cases of elder abuse and rape. Opponents are branded as individuals sitting in an "ivory tower" who are completely out of touch with the public's concerns.
03.2025
40 Speeches
The main opponents are the Reform Party, Eesti 200, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and President Alar Karis. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax hikes, the green transition) and procedural breaches (constitutional violations during the change of government). The attacks are intense, accusing the opponents of corruption, lobbying, and even actions bordering on treason (Stark Logistics, constitutional violations).
02.2025
31 Speeches
The main adversaries are the Reform Party and the ruling coalition (Social Democrats, Eesti 200), who are accused of systematic corruption, attempted misappropriation of state funds, and damaging the economy. The criticism is intense and personal, calling the government's legitimacy into question and labeling the opponents "enemies of the Estonian state." There is no sign of a willingness to compromise; instead, the resignation of ministers and accountability are being demanded.
01.2025
12 Speeches
The main opponent is the current Estonian government and the prime minister, who are accused of pigheadedness, pursuing immoral ideologies, and burdening the populace. The criticism is intense, ranging from political disagreements (the car tax, green subsidies) to accusations of corruption ("the profit cartel") and injustice (those fired due to vaccinations). The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, a complete reassessment of the government's actions is demanded.