By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The main opponents are the minister, who is criticized for evading a response, and Kaja Kallas, who is attacked for her personal involvement in circumventing sanctions. The criticism is intense and personal, focusing on political failure and the violation of the principles of the rule of law. No willingness to compromise is evident.

The main targets of criticism are renewable energy developers and the state policies that offer them guaranteed revenue at the taxpayer's expense. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of violating the principles of the market economy and engaging in ideological activity.

The primary opponents are the government, which is accused of hypocrisy, as well as "globalists," "liberals," and "extremist thugs" who are pushing trans and LGBT ideologies. Social Democrats were personally criticized for making foolish and vile claims. The attacks are intense and ideological, demanding an end to "the charade of hypocritical and ideological caring."

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is criticized for corruption, fiscal puritanism, and hypocrisy in the distribution of funds. The criticism is intense and directed both at political decisions (the green transition, indexing) and the inaction of state institutions (KAPO, MTA) in investigating major legal violations.

The main opponents are the Prime Minister and the ruling coalition, specifically the Reform Party and Eesti 200. The criticism is intense and multi-faceted, encompassing both the government's procedural irregularities and widespread conflicts of interest tinged with corruption within the ranks of Eesti 200. There are demands to freeze government operations, citing the need to involve investigative authorities (Kapo, the Prosecutor's Office).

The main opponents are the ruling coalition, who stand accused of violating the constitution and lacking a popular mandate. Criticism is also aimed at the ERJK, which is widely viewed as politically biased and a source of political retribution. The adversaries are directly accused of lobbying and jeopardizing democracy.

The main opponents are the Reform Party-led government and specific ministers (Võrklaev, the Minister of Education), who are being criticized for both their policies (tax increases, the reorganization of special needs schools) and their procedures. The speaker accuses the ministry of individually co-opting or persuading directors—using bonuses as leverage—to prevent collective resistance. The opposition is intense and uncompromising, calling into question the government's motives and integrity.

The main targets are medical staff and doctors who promoted vaccination, who are criticized for their reckless disregard for patients, especially pregnant women (e.g., family doctor Rospu). Criticism is also aimed at those who profited immensely from the vaccines, accusing them of corruption and crimes against humanity. The intensity of these attacks is extremely high, suggesting criminal liability.

The primary opponents are the Government (which refused to provide an opinion) and the committee that rejected the draft legislation. Criticism is intense, accusing them of covering up corruption, conflicts of interest, and using childish/arrogant justifications. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; on the contrary, the motives of the opposing side are being directly attacked.

The main adversaries are the Reform Party, the Prime Minister, and Eesti 200, who are being blamed for the economic downturn and tax increases. The criticism is intense and spans from policy issues (tax hikes) to procedural violations (constitutional breaches during the change of government) and personal accusations (the President’s son’s connection to a money scandal). The government's actions are being labeled as a deliberate violation of the constitution, which could potentially fall under the statute for high treason.

The backlash is aimed at the individuals or management failures connected to the cessation of Nordica's operations—individuals who are suspected of corruption and causing financial damage. The criticism is intense, focusing on ethical and financial violations, and demands an investigation into these circumstances.