By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The speaker's political position is strongly directed against the circumvention of sanctions, viewing it as a critical threat to European security. This stance is heavily value-based and results-oriented, focusing on demanding political accountability from high-ranking officials, particularly in the context of the Kaja Kallas and Stark Logistics case. It is emphasized that obtaining short-term gain by evading sanctions constitutes the substance of the matter, and this practice must be brought to an end.

The political position is strongly opposed to subsidies for the green transition and renewable energy, which are considered unscientific and ideological. The speaker advocates returning to oil shale energy in order to prevent high electricity bills for consumers and unnecessary grid investments. A crucial priority is directing state investments toward family policy, rather than guaranteeing profits for the business sector.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's economic policy (tax increases, termination of pension indexation) and social policy (ensuring women's rights and security). Emphasis is placed on the need to accelerate the construction of the temporary control line for security reasons. The standpoints are strongly value-based, opposing "globalists" and trans and LGBT ideologies, which are deemed to infringe upon women's rights.

The political position heavily focuses on national priorities, demanding that security and defense be prioritized over the costly green transition. It also highlights the lack of accountability and justice, criticizing major legal violations and corruption committed by Reform Party politicians. These stances are strongly opposed to the government's current direction and are framed both on a values basis (justice) and a performance basis (the inaction of state agencies).

The most crucial stance is strong opposition to the government's legitimacy, demanding the Prime Minister's resignation and adherence to constitutional procedure when forming a new government. It is stressed that the current government lacks a parliamentary mandate and public support is low (17.9% for the coalition partners). This position is primarily procedural and value-based, calling for a freeze on political activity.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government's actions due to the violation of constitutional procedure and the lack of a popular mandate. The speaker opposes legislative bills favoring specific economic interests (such as fast-tracking procedures for startups and film crews) and is against granting new powers to the ERJK, deeming it politically biased. He/She claims that Estonia is no longer a rule of law state, citing the ruling parties' violation of the constitution and the failure of supervisory bodies.

The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's tax policy, criticizing the implementation of new taxes (such as the car tax) and the government's claim that the tax burden will not increase. A second central theme is the Ministry of Education and Research's plan to merge seven schools for students with special educational needs (SEN), which the speaker views as bureaucratic and detrimental to the welfare of the children. The political framework is intensely critical and outcome-based, accusing the government of self-justification.

The political stance heavily focuses on criticizing the COVID-19 vaccination program, alleging a deliberate human experimentation program and corruption. The speaker demands the application of the principle of accountability and the establishment of truth regarding the lack of long-term studies on the vaccines. The position is value-based and intensely oppositional, accusing the opposing side of crimes against humanity.

The political stance is strongly focused on increasing government accountability and transparency, supporting a draft law that addresses corruption and conflicts of interest among government members. The speaker frames the issue as the unwillingness of government officials to cooperate with the investigation, thereby calling into question the motives of both the government and the commission. The position is highly supportive of the bill and critical of its rejection.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the government, focusing on the administration's failures stemming from the economic downturn and tax hikes. They also highlight constitutional breaches related to changes in the government's composition. The political framework employed is dual: it is both performance-based (citing the 11-quarter economic decline) and values-based, underscoring the necessity of adhering to the procedures of parliamentary democracy.

The political stance heavily emphasizes the need to investigate the circumstances surrounding the cessation of operations of the state-owned company Nordica, particularly suspected corruption and financial damage. This is a forceful position aimed at combating poor public sector management and a lack of accountability. The focus is on demanding performance-based accountability and rooting out corruption.