By Months: Helle-Moonika Helme

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing its criticism on the government’s activities and adherence to proper procedure. The main objections are directed at the car tax (which they argue will destroy the market) and the plan to lease out prisons (which they claim is deceiving the public and amounts to asking for a blank check). Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of increasing support payments for pensioners to guarantee them a dignified standard of living.

The politician is heavily focused on achieving financial justice for families, demanding clarity regarding the refund mechanisms associated with the proposed car tax reduction. He/She questions the practical implementation of the bill, particularly concerning the reimbursement of amounts already paid, stressing that promises must align with public expectations. His/Her focus is results-oriented and aimed at ensuring the transparency of government operations.

The political stance is strongly anti-government and critical, accusing the government of incompetence, corruption, and inciting fear for domestic political gain. Key issues include the imbalance of state finances, the inefficiency of defense spending, and the protection of traditional values and parental rights against mandatory vaccination and the consent law. The presentation is heavily focused on results and values, highlighting the historically low level of government support. The speaker firmly opposes tax hikes and the budget deficit.

The political stance is one of strong opposition to the government's fiscal and social policies, focusing on the recession, tax increases, and the misuse of state priorities (such as propaganda and e-voting). The criticism is strongly results-oriented, highlighting the poor state of the country and the government's incompetence or deliberate deception. The speaker forcefully rejects the government's narrative that tax hikes will somehow leave people with more money. Key issues also include matters of national security and internal order (such as the import of prisoners and data collection).

The political stance is one of strong opposition to the liberal government's bungling governance, focusing specifically on economic injustice (tax hikes) and the detrimental impact of ideological regulations (the green transition, gender quotas). The speaker frames the government's actions as a desire for dictatorship and totalitarianism, which will inevitably lead to the impoverishment of the populace and mass emigration. The most critical issues highlighted are the economic downturn, ensuring security through GDP, and the weakening of the nation's will to defend itself.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government’s lack of legitimacy and its breach of the constitution following the Social Democratic Party’s departure from the coalition. The most prominent issues highlighted are the ideological ruinousness of the green transition, high taxes, and the crisis in the social sector, while the government is accused of incompetence and cynical state management. The government’s actions are framed as illegitimate and therefore unacceptable.

The political position is strongly oppositional toward the government led by the Reform Party and Eesti 200, which is considered illegitimate and corrupt. The main issues are the government's lack of legitimacy due to the violation of constitutional procedure, the reversal of economically devastating tax hikes (more than ten taxes are listed), and the investigation of corruption (Nordica, Stark Logistics, the interests of Eesti 200 funders). The political framework is strongly value-based (defending the constitution) and results-based (economic recession).

The political position is strongly oppositional towards the Reform Party-led government, focusing on economic failure and widespread corruption (especially concerning the financing of the green transition). They support US President Donald Trump's new conditional and value-based policies regarding both energy and social issues. The main goal is to "turn the upside-down world back onto its feet" in order to restore the economy. The framing is strongly performance- and value-based, accusing the government of ideological suicide.

The political stance is strongly conservative and value-driven, emphasizing the need to align Estonian politics with the value framework of US President Donald Trump’s new administration. Key issues include opposition to green and gender ideologies, reducing the tax burden (car tax), and rectifying injustices (compensating those fired due to vaccine mandates). These positions are intensely oppositional, and the framework is primarily value- and results-oriented, rather than focusing on detailed policy analysis.