By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The political position focuses on the specifics of policy implementation and strategic planning for the future. The speaker is requesting justification for the principle of the specific two-year deferral and stresses the necessity of understanding what occurs should the European Union discontinue the relevant requirements. The overall position is inquisitive and process-oriented, concentrating on the long-term effectiveness of the regulatory framework.

The political stance is fiercely anti-government, focusing on failures in the justice system and internal security, such as the importation of convicted murderers and the failure to investigate domestic crimes (e.g., the Pihlakodu rapes). The speaker vehemently opposes plans to bring in foreign labor and criticizes the high unemployment rate (exceeding 64,000). The position is framed around the government's actions (or inaction) and the core values of security.

The political position is highly critical of the previous government's tax policy, particularly regarding the introduction of the security tax. The speaker frames the imposition of the tax as a deception, a cover under which they sought to raise VAT and income tax, and questions whether the security situation has genuinely changed now that the tax has been abolished. The overall stance is strongly results-driven, focusing on the lack of transparency and dishonesty surrounding the government's actions.

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on holding the government accountable for legal infractions and breaches in data collection, and demanding responsibility. Intense criticism is leveled against the incompetence and political activism of the Minister of Health and Social Affairs, underscoring the deterioration of the system and the resulting lack of public confidence. The speaker frames the government's activities as mere "obfuscation" and the formalization of "screw-ups," which strongly indicates a performance-based critique.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s energy policy, particularly the system of compensation payments (easement fees), which is viewed as an unethical payoff. Significant emphasis is placed on environmental protection, demanding that compensation for nature be calculated due to deforestation and microplastic pollution. The funding schemes of political NGOs are also sharply criticized, demonstrating a commitment to a value-based and ethical framework.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, focusing on the unrelenting price hikes, the drop in purchasing power, and the raising of 26 taxes. The speaker emphasizes that the country's situation is "dire" and criticizes the government's failure to address the negative consequences resulting from these tax increases. The focus is results-oriented, highlighting the economic decline for 13 consecutive quarters.

The political position is one of strong opposition, focusing on criticizing the government's budget priorities (propaganda versus teachers' salaries) and e-elections. E-elections are considered a priori unconstitutional and undemocratic, which indicates a deeply principled and intense resistance. Furthermore, the influence of green ideology on state research and decisions is sharply criticized.