By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The political stance is fiercely anti-government, centering on the risks associated with the mandated biofuel additive for aviation fuel (safety, cost) and the recent tax hikes (VAT, potential property tax). The speaker stresses that legislation must be designed to benefit the people, accusing the government of imposing ideological components and pursuing personal ambitions at the cost of the nation’s suffering. The rhetoric is heavily value- and results-driven, continually posing the question of who is being served: their own people or someone else.

The speaker is in strong opposition to the government's actions, criticizing them as "bungling" and "inept" state administration. The primary points of contention are economic policy (tax hikes, inflation), security provision (the ineffectiveness of the 5% GDP slogan), and the decline in public defense morale, which is attributed to the state's negligence. The political framework is heavily performance-driven, emphasizing the government's failure regarding economic indicators and popular support.

The dominant themes are opposition to the green transition, especially concerning CO2 regulations, which are labeled a "racket" and a "big lie," and the protection of private property against state nationalization carried out under the guise of nature conservation. The political position is strongly value-driven and anti-regulation, emphasizing individual freedoms and economic common sense. Furthermore, a significant issue is the resistance to gender quotas and gender ideology, stressing the importance of selection based purely on expertise.

The political position focuses strongly on the failure of the care reform, arguing that it has increased costs for both individuals and local municipalities, contrary to the government's promises. This stance is intensely critical and results-oriented, highlighting the stark contradiction between the government's propaganda and the actual reality. The speaker accuses the government of maintaining an unfair system that favors businessmen affiliated with the ruling party.

The speaker focuses heavily on the direction of criminal policy and the threat of politicization within the prosecutor's office, thereby calling into question the selection of the Prosecutor General candidate. They adopt a critical and cautionary stance, stressing the necessity of protecting free speech from potential political processes. The political framework is value-driven, centered on accountability and civil liberties.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's (especially the Reform Party's) economic and energy policies, highlighting their complexity and the high cost they impose on consumers. The key issues are high energy prices, massive tax increases, and the resulting emigration. The political framework is outcome-driven, accusing the government of worsening the public's standard of living and making life unaffordable.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government and liberal ideology, emphasizing that liberalism is not mentioned in the constitution and that its promotion threatens the equal treatment of other worldviews. The criticism is directed at the government’s incompetence and "bungling state management," especially concerning the failed tax policy forecasts.

The political stance is firmly pro-consumer protection and tax relief, advocating for a reduction in VAT on essential goods. The attitude toward the Competition Authority is skeptical, with suspicions that the agency may be following directives from those in power rather than defending the interests of consumers. The speaker frames their views through criticism of political policies and government actions.