By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

Strong opposition to tax hikes (VAT, car tax, property tax), as these measures reduce people's purchasing power and damage business, ultimately driving the country into an economic recession. It supports the interests of businesses, rejecting the government's assertions that entrepreneurs are "crooks." Furthermore, it views biofuel mandates as economically detrimental ideological components.

The speaker is strongly opposed to tax hikes and new taxes, arguing that they will cool the economy, increase inflation, and cause unemployment. He advocates for economic growth that would ensure a higher GDP, and criticizes both European green policy and the Estonian government's ambitious climate goals, which are pushing the agricultural sector to the brink of disaster.

A strong anti-regulatory stance, particularly concerning gender quotas for listed companies and green transition regulations, which are viewed as bureaucratic and detrimental to national wealth. It fiercely defends private property, labeling any restrictions as nationalization and demanding fair, market-value compensation from the state. Furthermore, it criticizes the high state expenditure resulting from the payment of these compensations.

The economic perspective focuses on the funding of social services, where there is sharp criticism regarding the funneling of state and public funds to nursing home operators linked to the Reform Party. This indicates opposition to a system that permits unethical profits derived from essential services, even as the quality of those services deteriorates.

No data available

The speaker is vehemently opposed to tax hikes, arguing that they have pushed people past their breaking point and are fueling inflation and out-migration. They advocate for lowering taxes and excise duties to alleviate the burden on consumers and mitigate price increases, particularly concerning fuel costs. Furthermore, they are worried that the current tax policy is shrinking the GDP.

The economic views expressed are firmly opposed to these taxes (specifically the Car Tax), arguing that they are based on failed forecasts and foolish government decisions. Concern is voiced over the impoverishment of the populace, who can no longer afford to finance the government's failures, stressing the necessity for a more responsible fiscal policy.

Strongly advocates for assisting consumers through tax policy, demanding a reduction in VAT on essential goods so that people have more disposable income. They are critical of the government's position that merchants would simply pocket the tax cut, emphasizing the need for oversight by the Competition Authority.