By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The main objects of criticism are the Supreme Court, which is accused of providing cover for political guidelines and dismantling the credibility of the rule of law. The government is indirectly criticized for failing to support an earlier border guard proposal and for its handling of the current migration crisis. The criticism is directed against institutions and political decisions.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the prime minister, accusing them of serving lobby groups and ignoring the public's tax burden. The criticism is intense, focusing on political and ethical shortcomings (such as 26 tax hikes and prioritizing online casinos). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the reversal of decisions is being demanded.

The primary opposition targets proponents of e-voting, particularly the chairman of the Constitutional Committee, who is being criticized for failing to uphold the duty to protect the constitution. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing opponents of ignoring repeated and potentially criminal vulnerabilities. There is no willingness to compromise, as they demand the complete abolition of e-elections.

The main opponents are the Reform Party, the Social Democrats (Socs), and Eesti 200, all of whom are being intensely criticized for their policies (the car tax, 26 tax hikes) and procedural decisions. The attacks are fierce, accusing the government of injustice, damaging the economy, and fleecing the public. Compromise is ruled out, with demands for the complete abolition of the taxes.

The main confrontation is directed at the government and the minister, who are accused of misleading Parliament and the public and pushing through a bill with non-existent support. The criticism is both procedural (improper work by the committee) and political (requesting a blank check). The speaker asks whether it will be possible to hold the minister accountable in the future for the words recorded in the transcript.

The main opponents are Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for undervaluing social assistance during the crisis. The opposition is intense, attacking the coalition over its low public support (11%) and suspecting that they will vote down support measures intended for pensioners. The criticism is aimed both at their policies and the legitimacy of the government itself.