By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

Total Sessions: 6

Fully Profiled: 6

2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker points to an earlier similar proposal by the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE) concerning the border issue, which demonstrates internal party alignment on security matters. Information is lacking regarding any openness to compromise or inter-party cooperation.
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker expresses support for an alternative model for funding culture (tax incentives for businesses), which they deem viable, but makes no reference to existing cooperation with other political parties. Information is lacking regarding cross-party collaboration or the pursuit of compromises concerning the current legislative drafts.
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
No data available
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The party’s approach to cooperation is evident in the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE) presenting a firm and unified stance on the complete abolition of the car tax. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation; instead, emphasis is placed on the government’s refusal to take earlier opposition amendments into account.
2025-11-04
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style of cooperation is rigid and uncompromising, demanding the withdrawal of the draft bill by the committee so that the proceedings can take place correctly. The speaker refuses to process the bill in good faith and criticizes the government's alleged agreement with the Swedish opposition.
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate in defining the substance of the policy, respectfully addressing their colleague (Helmen). They acknowledge the colleague’s background as a social worker and request a hypothetical expert opinion regarding the dignified minimum standard of living. This indicates a readiness to involve specialists and experts in the legislative debate.