By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme
Total Sessions: 132
Fully Profiled: 132
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
No data available
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Lack of Data. (The discourse is purely confrontational and contains no references to cooperation or willingness to compromise.)
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker emphasizes cooperation in defending the legacy and highlighting the achievements of the former EKRE, Center Party, and Isamaa government. There are no indications of openness to finding compromises with the current coalition or engaging in cross-party cooperation. Instead, cooperation is manifested in maintaining a united opposition front.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is not enough data. The speaker is operating in this specific context as an interrogator and a critic, not as a collaborator.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
There is insufficient data. The speaker is operating in the role of an interrogator, which in this context is rather confrontational and does not suggest cooperation with other political parties.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
No data available.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation is lacking. The speaker adopts a purely oppositional and adversarial stance, focusing on sharp criticism of the government and ministers.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation occurs exclusively within its own parliamentary group (EKRE), submitting interpellations and draft laws on behalf of the group or its members. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cooperate with other political parties, with the exception of calls made to the opposition and the "new old" government to support the VAT Act bill initiated by EKRE.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient Data
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Cooperation is absent; the speaker’s style is purely confrontational, presenting sharp questions and doubts to the minister. There are no references to cooperation with colleagues, willingness to compromise, or cross-party action.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data is available. (All public statements are purely oppositional and critical, lacking any indication of cooperation or a willingness to compromise.)
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The individual relies on the arguments put forth by fellow faction members (Rain Epler, Martin Helme) and other conservatives (Priit Sibul), citing them approvingly. There is no cooperation with other parties or willingness to compromise; the focus remains squarely on exposing the ideologies of opponents and criticizing their activities.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The data is insufficient.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to the questions raised by other Riigikogu members (Hanah, Evelin Poolamets), showing a readiness to rely on the topics brought up by colleagues. Direct cooperation with the Minister is lacking; the interaction is rather confrontational and demands accountability.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data. The speaker primarily engages in oppositional criticism and rhetorical questioning; there are no indications of a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise, as the speaker focuses exclusively on challenging and criticizing the actions of the government and the presiding officer.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The information is insufficient. The speaker references Lauri Läänemets's statement and possible insider information, but direct cooperation is not described.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Information regarding willingness to cooperate is lacking; the speaker focuses entirely on criticizing the government and the ruling elite. There is no mention of bilateral cooperation or seeking compromises.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
When discussing cooperation, emphasis is placed on their party's (EKRE) historical opposition and their right to hold that position, given that in 2022 they were the only party 100% against the renewable energy target. Isamaa's potential change of heart is acknowledged, but it is treated skeptically, with questions being asked about whether this constitutes a sincere awakening.
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Data is lacking regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise. All statements presented are aimed at attacking the government and its associated business interests.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is engaged in a direct dialogue with a colleague ("Dear Kalle") regarding the Public Transport Act, suggesting a readiness to discuss specific legislative points. Although critical of the ruling coalition, the speaker remains open to legislative cooperation with other members of parliament who share his concern about unfair competition.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The data shows cooperation with opposition colleagues, referencing "previous speakers" and quoting Jüri Adams, one of the framers of the constitution. There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cooperation with the governing coalition.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
There is no data regarding cooperation, compromises, or cross-party activity, as the speeches primarily consist of critical statements and responses directed at colleagues.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker referenced a private discussion with a colleague ("Dear Kalle!"), which indicates internal collaboration in supporting the specific draft legislation. There is no evidence, however, of any openness to a broader compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
There is a total lack of willingness to cooperate, as they are demanding the freezing of government activities and resignation. Instead of seeking compromise with coalition partners, they are referencing critical public figures and experts who share concerns regarding the government's legitimacy.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The speaker supportively references the stance taken by fellow opposition member "Kert" regarding the dismantling of the ERJK, indicating ideological alignment. However, there is no evidence of formal cooperation or a willingness to compromise with the government.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speeches lack references to cooperation with other political parties; the focus is on sharp criticism of the government's activities and the submission of interpellations. The speaker acknowledges the minister and colleagues who attended, but does not refer to bilateral or cross-party cooperation in policy formation.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is cooperating with their dialogue partner ("Varro"), sharing a concern and seeking confirmation regarding the prospect of applying the principle of responsibility. This cooperation is aimed at achieving a shared goal: truth and accountability. There is no data available concerning cross-party cooperation.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The style of cooperation demonstrates strong support for the bill introduced by the colleague (Kert Kingo) and the specific cases she highlighted, using these as the foundation for their own arguments. There is no information available regarding a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation to save the bill.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
No data available. (The speaker is only expressing strong opposition and accusations; there is no willingness to cooperate.)
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker formally addresses the presiding officer and a specific colleague ("Dear Evelin"), but their objective is to convince the assembly of the validity of their position and the necessity of forming an investigative committee. There are no direct references to cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is evident in supporting the opposition's motion of no confidence and creating a unified critical narrative against the government. There is absolutely no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
There is a lack of willingness to cooperate; the speaker is operating from a purely adversarial opposition stance, demanding accountability and the minister's resignation, and alleging the "buying off" of government partners.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is purely oppositional and uncompromising. The speaker criticizes the internal discord within the government and the commission, as well as their inability to reach an agreement before submitting the bill. There is no mention of any readiness for cross-party cooperation.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Data unavailable.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data regarding the style of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or inter-party collaboration, as the rhetoric has been focused on stark opposition.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
No data available
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Insufficient data. The speech is purely oppositional and critical, focusing on demanding policy changes from the government.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is largely adversarial, as the speaker argues against the majority of colleagues who spoke previously. He/She commends a colleague (Annely) for raising an important topic and refers to cooperation with the civic movement "Eesti kool on eesti keele kodu."
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports the Isamaa faction’s amendment proposal to the draft Early Childhood Education Act, demonstrating collaboration with the opposition partner. They also refer to a discussion held with colleague Margit in the committee, although the general style is confrontational towards government coalition politicians and officials. The cooperation is focused on achieving common objectives within the opposition.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is no cooperation with other political actors. The speaker bases their arguments on an external professional association (the Estonian Doctors' Association) and media sources to support their criticism of the government.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is purely confrontational; the speaker presents ultimatums to the coalition and demands that they make a moral choice ("whether they stand with pedophiles or with children"). Reference is made only to the previous findings of their own faction (EKRE), and there are no signs of readiness for compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of engagement is purely oppositional and critical, focusing on exposing the motives and actions of the ruling coalition (Social Democrats, Reform Party). There is a complete absence of any indication of a willingness to compromise; instead, the unconstitutionality and danger of the opposing side's actions are emphasized.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
We have no data regarding their willingness to cooperate; the style is purely confrontational and focused on demanding answers from the government and exposing their actions.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Demonstrates cooperation with colleagues ("The wording of Raini and Martin's proposal") when submitting amendments, highlighting the superiority of their proposal compared to that of the committee. Overall, the style is rather confrontational towards the government, focusing on bringing their own proposals to a vote and seeking opposition rather than compromise.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity was not presented in the speeches. The speaker is acting more as a critical opponent, challenging the work of the committee and the substance of the draft legislation.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is manifested in asking questions to the presenters of the draft bill (Evelin, Varro) to clarify the legal background and public opinion. The speaker attempts to clarify the actual content of the draft bill in order to prevent colleagues from voting incorrectly. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker points to previous similar cooperation with the Centre Party regarding the submission of proposals to lower the VAT on food products. Although the overall tone is oppositional, coalition members are urged to find the courage to support the draft bill, citing the potential for unified action to improve the public's well-being.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to cooperation with EKRE, jointly supporting the abolition of the motor vehicle tax. He expresses strong opposition to the government's policy and shows no openness to compromise concerning the existing tax law, demanding its full repeal.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is virtually non-existent; although there is agreement on revoking the voting rights of citizens of aggressor states, this is immediately used to criticize the opposing side for having previously voted down similar bills. Emphasis is placed on preferring one's own "clean solution," and the minister is urged to take into account the opinions of local residents.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Information is lacking regarding cooperation or the willingness to compromise within the Riigikogu. However, the speaker demonstrates strong support for and defense of Hungary, viewing it as an EU partner that has dared to swim against the current.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is not mentioned, but the speaker characterizes the opposition's work as an obligation to dissect the laws and uncover hidden content, contrasting this with the coalition's tendency to vote blindly. There is no willingness to compromise; the party's position regarding the ratification of the convention is firmly opposed.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is clearly acting as a representative of the EKRE faction, taking procedural steps on its behalf. There is no evidence of cooperation with other factions or political parties.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding cooperation is absent; the speaker performs as an intense opposition questioner, focusing on holding ministers accountable. There are no references to cross-party cooperation or a readiness for compromise.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data regarding cooperation. The speaker maintains a strictly oppositional stance, leveling sharp criticism against the government and the minister.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is demonstrated through identifying with the regional concerns of a fellow colleague (Maido Ruusmann) and extending those concerns to one's own constituency. There are no indications of a broader, cross-party compromise or cooperation regarding draft legislation.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There are no signs of cooperation with the government; rather, he/she is in sharp opposition to the ministers and the proposals put forth by their administrative areas. He/She continues to reference the Varro Vooglaid issue, which demonstrates ideological alignment with certain colleagues.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker bases their arguments on points presented by their colleague, Kalle Grünthal, thereby indicating internal cooperation or an alignment of views. There is absolutely no mention of any willingness to compromise with the proponents of the draft bill.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker is acting on behalf of the parliamentary group, presenting a draft resolution. He is asking for support from all Riigikogu members for the demography bill, in order to "push the government onto the path of common sense." There are no references to cooperation with the governing coalition or willingness to compromise.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
His cooperative approach is evident when dealing with party colleagues, whom he supports and whose arguments (such as the issue of undermining the labor market) he elaborates on. While presenting draft legislation, he addresses his colleagues respectfully, but he adopts a demanding and confrontational stance toward the government and the rapporteurs.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
No data available.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data. The speaker refers to other questioners (Mart Helme) and a collective concern ("the concern of all private forest owners"), but there is no evidence of cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is no evidence of a willingness to cooperate or compromise; the speaker is adopting a purely oppositional and aggressive stance. Reference is made to EKRE's previous demand, while in the Ratas government, to distance itself from the United Russia agreement, which rather suggests a demanding partnership in the past.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker stresses solidarity with their parliamentary group (EKRE) and with nearly 80% of the Estonian people who do not support the car tax. Cooperation with other factions is not mentioned; rather, the emphasis is placed on opposing the coalition and the government, which are deemed incompetent and corrupt. He criticizes the use of European Union funds, which, he claims, has corrupted the Estonian state.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
There is a lack of willingness to cooperate; the speaker positions themselves in complete opposition to the government and demands accountability. A reference is made to an internal opposition dialogue (with Isamaa) concerning pensions, but this is primarily intended to refute the opponent's assertion.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Information regarding cooperation is lacking; instead, emphasis is placed on the EKRE party's unique and unrivaled opposition to the car tax, which suggests isolation on this issue. No willingness to compromise is expressed; rather, they demand the complete reversal of the draft bill.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The pronoun "we" is used, indicating cooperation with one's own faction or circle of supporters regarding shared content and voting strategy. There is no information regarding openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no data regarding their willingness to cooperate; the speaker represents the position of EKRE and is primarily focused on public opposition and obstructing the government's activities. Instead of cooperation, Estonian people are being urged not to elect representatives of the governing parties to the European Parliament.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Cooperation is lacking; the speaker challenges the impartiality of the session chair and requests that he issue a reprimand to his party colleague, the Foreign Minister. The focus is on holding the opposing side responsible and demanding accountability, rather than seeking compromises.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party collegiality.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The speaker collaborates with colleagues, participating in the proceedings concerning the motion of no confidence, and commending colleague Heljo for the objective overview presented to the committee. The speaker is seeking solid and proactive support for certain issues within the committee, indicating a desire to ensure the sustained handling of these matters.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Neither a desire for cooperation nor a readiness for compromise is evident. The speaker’s style is purely confrontational, posing sharp questions to the government and demanding the immediate halting of major projects (Rail Baltic).
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The cooperative style demonstrates internal cohesion within the opposition, as the speaker acknowledges their colleague Helir-Valdor Seeder for adding an additional point (state fees) from the floor. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or cooperate with the ruling coalition, which is referred to as "the party of liars."
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation is clearly intra-factional, as demonstrated by the proposal to suspend the second reading of the bill on behalf of the EKRE faction. Strategic cooperation is evident in the decision to take a recess for discussions with Mart Helme and the subsequent demand for a vote on the amendments proposed by other opposition colleagues (Arvo Aller, Rain Epler, Leo Kunnas). Cooperation with the coalition is not sought.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Not enough data.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of collaboration is formal and is directed toward the presiding officer of the session, who must be asked for permission to take procedural steps (such as a recess). There are no direct references to inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise in the speeches.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available. The speaker focuses on attacking the government and does not mention possibilities for cooperation with other parties.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes cooperation with the support group that initiated the bill, demonstrating a readiness to work with colleagues who share similar interests. However, his attitude toward the opposing side and the government is extremely critical and uncompromising, especially regarding funding priorities and the location of the project.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker refers to cooperation with other proponents of the no-confidence motion ("as our no-confidence initiators") and with colleagues (Martin Helme), demonstrating collaboration within the opposition faction during the submission of the motion. The style adopted towards the coalition parties (the Reform Party) is hostile, as the speaker refutes their arguments and accuses them of outright lying.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is acting in cooperation with their political group, requesting a recess "on behalf of our faction." This indicates strong internal factional coordination and the necessity of establishing a unified position prior to the vote.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation demonstrates reliance on and referencing other opposition colleagues ("Exactly as Anti Poolamets said"), suggesting a sharing of similar viewpoints within the faction or the broader opposition. Information regarding readiness for cross-party cooperation or compromise is lacking.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no sign of cooperation; the speaker is rather confrontational, defending the amendments proposed by their party (EKRE) that were ultimately ignored. Instead of seeking cooperation, the focus remains on disputing the decisions made by the committee and other political parties.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker acts on behalf of the faction when calling for procedural timeouts and refers to a similar question raised by a colleague (Kert Kingo). There is no information regarding cooperation with other factions or readiness to make compromises.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker referenced their fellow group member, noting they share a similar position on infrastructure matters, which demonstrates cooperation within the group. However, there is no indication of openness toward cross-party compromise or collaboration.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no information regarding cooperation, as the address is aimed at sharply criticizing opponents and exposing their activities.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data. The speaker refers to Isamaa's previous experience in government with the Reform Party, but does so in a critical context, not with the aim of cooperation.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation with colleagues or other political parties is absent, apart from a reference to the role of Isamaa in the previous appointment of the Prosecutor General. The speaker’s style in this context is purely confrontational and focuses on criticizing the opposing side.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The collaborative style demonstrates support for a colleague's (Mart Helme) procedural remark regarding staying on topic, which indicates cooperation within the opposition bloc. There is no evidence of seeking compromises with the government or of cross-party cooperation.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker claims that their side has supported the government's family initiatives, but sharply criticizes the government for never supporting bills introduced by the opposition. This indicates a willingness to back good initiatives, but reciprocal cooperation is clearly lacking on the government's part.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data. All the statements presented are directed toward criticism of the government and questions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speeches lack direct references to cooperation with other members of the Riigikogu. However, one minister is praised for their polite and dignified conduct, which suggests a willingness to recognize constructive engagement, even when political viewpoints diverge.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The data is insufficient.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no information regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise. Although the colleague’s (Evelin Poolamets) previous question is mentioned, it is only used to highlight a procedural deficiency and demand the suspension of the bill’s reading.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Information regarding the willingness to cooperate is unavailable. The coalition partner Eesti 200's concept of a personalized state is being used rhetorically in an ironic proposal to impose a car tax exclusively on supporters of the Reform Party, which signals a lack of cooperation and clear antagonism.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is insufficient. The speaker is primarily engaged in questioning and challenging the presenters and chairpersons, rather than seeking cooperation or compromise.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or communication with colleagues across party lines.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The cooperative style demonstrates support for the minister's position on the issue of cannabis legalization, noting satisfaction with the minister's continued opposition. This indicates a readiness to support the executive power when the political direction is consistent with the speaker's values.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaboration style is directive yet personal, addressing the presenter by name and encouraging them, as an environmentalist, to delve deeply into specific topics. They demonstrate a desire to guide their colleagues' activities and research focus.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Regarding the language issue, the speaker referred to the cross-party consensus on the necessity of protecting the Estonian language and supporting the work of the Language Board. Concerning the income tax bills, he demonstrated a pragmatic approach, immediately presenting a new, slightly lower compromise proposal (42 cents) after the rejection of the initial proposal (45 cents) in order to achieve legislative success.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Data is scarce.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to their colleagues (Martin Helme, Rene Kokk, Kert Kingo) and their previously stated positions, demonstrating cooperation within the faction. There is no evidence of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation, as the focus remains on sharply opposing the government's policies.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative style is appreciative and supportive of the presenter, thanking them on multiple occasions. The reference to the Culture Committee's thorough work demonstrates a willingness to engage in in-depth cooperation with colleagues and discuss shared topics broadly.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The cooperative approach is aimed at colleagues in the chamber, who are protected from the presiding officer's criticism and whose support is sought for the bills that have been introduced. This refers to a shared understanding of economic concepts within the opposition, in contrast to the government's policy.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is insufficient data. The speaker addresses colleagues and EKRE MPs, but there are no references to cooperation with other political parties, a willingness to compromise, or bilateral efforts.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker values the plurality of opinions and the substantive debate, thanking the previous presenters (including Martin Helme) for their balanced presentation. They show respect for differing views but express disappointment over the lack of cooperation at the committee level, which resulted in the draft bill being left unsupported.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data.