By Agendas: Ants Frosch

Total Agendas: 68

Fully Profiled: 68

2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed more at the current or previous mentality, which is characterized as "mental stagnation" dating back to the period before 2021. This implies criticism of long-term political guidance or intellectual inertia. Specific opponents or policies are not criticized by name.
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Social Affairs, Karmen Joller, and her area of responsibility. The criticism focuses on the lack of political accountability and is procedural, centering on the standards that should compel the minister to resign.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

A very strong opposition stance, criticizing the coalition for failing to pass draft legislation and the Riigikogu Presidium for implementing unfair procedural rules. The criticism targets both policy issues (tax hikes, misuse of state subsidies) and procedural injustice (hindering the submission of questions, labeling [their actions] as obstruction/filibustering). The opposition vows to continue its activities "bit by bit" until its goals are achieved.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Police and Border Guard Act (670 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the drafters of the bill because the impact analysis lacks a crucial financial detail regarding the cost of replacing Chinese cameras in Estonia. The objection is procedural and policy-based, not personal, and focuses on the quality of the legislation.
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act and the International Sanctions Act (640 SE) - second reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

No direct political opponent is criticized, but strong procedural and political criticism is leveled against the structure of the bill. The criticism targets the government’s intention to centralize power in the hands of the Minister of Finance and create a potentially insecure super-database. The opposition is policy-based, focusing on deficiencies in risk management.
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is directed at the minister/government that introduced the bill, as they failed to provide an adequate impact assessment regarding the burden placed on local authorities. The criticism is both procedural and political, emphasizing that the obligations imposed on local governments are disproportionate to their available resources.
2025-06-09
Inquiry regarding a network of number plate recognition cameras and the associated database (no. 756)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Opposition is focused on the government’s inaction or sluggishness in addressing security threats associated with widely deployed Chinese cameras. The criticism is grounded in policy and procedure, demanding the isolation of the database and the immediate deactivation of the cameras.
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct confrontation is not expressed, as the matter involves simply requesting information from the minister. Implicitly, the focus is on the progress of the ministry's work, but the criticism is procedural rather than personal.
2025-04-16
Personnel policy in the security and defence sector

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

The main targets of criticism are the Government of the Republic (suspected of exerting pressure) and the State Chancellery’s committee for the selection of top executives. The committee is accused of disregarding its own established criteria, which is particularly reprehensible in the security sector. The criticism is intense and procedural, demanding a revision of the selection process and the restructuring of the committee.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

There is no objection, as the speaker is not criticizing the substance of the draft bill or the opposing party, but is instead making a procedural motion. The criticism is aimed at the speed of the process, not the political substance.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The statement contrasts sharply with the positions held by the Centre Party (Lauri Laats) and the Social Democrats (Lauri Läänemets), who voted against the compromise, criticizing their interpretation of the measure as a deprivation of rights. It also indirectly criticizes the previous government's passivity in the spring of 2023, which resulted in security-related issues being neglected. Furthermore, it deems the raising of the "fifth column" issue in the Riigikogu chamber to be extremely inappropriate and threatening.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the 30-year-old practice of allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections, labeling it a dilution of responsibility towards one's own state. Also criticized are the decisions made by the Constitutional Assembly at the time, which were made in good faith but have not justified themselves today. They oppose the idea that local government does not deal with issues of national life, pointing to unresolved conflicts in Tallinn.
2025-02-13
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (544 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting

The backlash against the government coalition is strong; they are accused of ignoring the work of the Riigikogu and showing contempt for democracy. Specific political criticism is aimed at the coalition's constitutional amendment concerning the voting rights of stateless persons. Furthermore, he/she criticizes his/her colleagues in the Social Democratic Party, accusing them of putting words into his/her mouth.
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government, centering on the seemingly dishonest procedure used to replace high-ranking state officials (the State Secretary and chancellors). The attacks are intense and procedural, suggesting political manipulation ("executing a personnel game") and anticipating that the dismissals will continue.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed at the minister and his speechwriter, criticizing the inaccuracy of the facts presented by the government. The criticism is procedural and evidence-based, calling into question the reliability of the official information by citing contradictions with the NATO website and an expert's opinion.
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Aliens Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (to enhance migration procedures) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Insufficient information.
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The main criticism is focused on the government and its agencies, highlighting the internal disarray within the coalition and the inability of the departments (MTA and the Transport Agency) to present a unified picture. The opposition is intense and procedural, as it is argued that the entire structure of the tax is so fundamentally flawed that the only solution is its complete repeal.
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is leveled against the government and the prime minister, particularly concerning the handling of personnel policy within the defense sector. The criticism is intense and accusatory, centering on ethical and procedural deficiencies, which have been labeled "nepotism." The opposition is aimed at the government's handling of the appointments and departures of senior officials, rather than being focused on a specific piece of legislation.
2025-01-20
Inquiry regarding the promotion of family and large families (no. 667)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct opposition is not voiced; instead, the context of Prime Minister Michal's government is utilized (by referencing the title "the most empathetic minister of Michal's government") to frame the issue. The criticism remains indirect, centered on the necessity of a clear campaign and setting an example.
2024-12-09
Inquiry regarding phosphate mining plans (no. 664)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at Estonian government agencies, which have reportedly discussed the possibility of processing phosphorite using sulfuric acid in Estonia. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, calling into question the officials' deliberations regarding the adoption of dangerous technology.
2024-12-09
Inquiries Regarding Estonia's Conduct at the United Nations General Assembly (no. 663)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the government's foreign policy approach, specifically its limitation to consultations only with immediate neighbors. The opposition is policy-based, arguing that this approach diminishes Estonia's international standing and leads to its marginalization.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is aimed squarely at the Centre Party, criticizing their stance on the Security Police Board (KAPO) and the former Director General's public voicing of an opinion on a sensitive matter. The criticism targets ethical and political conflicts, rather than being focused on a personal level.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct criticism of opponents, but sharp questions are being raised regarding the legal basis of the draft bill. The criticism is aimed at the justification of the constructs presented by the bill's drafters (e.g., the expectations of 'grey passport holders') and the failure to ensure reciprocity regarding the voting rights of NATO citizens.
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Holiday and Commemoration Day Act (453 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

There is too little data.
2024-10-21
Inquiry regarding the provision of international protection to Ukrainian male citizens who are mobilization-eligible.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government's policy regarding asylum for Ukrainian men of mobilization age, with suspicions that economic interests may outweigh support for Ukraine's defense capabilities. The criticism is policy- and value-based, demanding a clear choice from the minister.
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Confiscation of the Estonian Soldier Memorial (no 642)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic and the Ministry of the Interior, who are criticized for the lack of institutional oversight and for avoiding responsibility. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the government of allowing security agencies to spin out of control and thereby damaging the procedures for ensuring national security.
2024-10-07
Inquiry regarding road construction and four-lane roads (no 408)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is focused on the government's inactivity or sluggishness in delivering infrastructure projects, citing past failures. The criticism specifically targets the timeline for fulfilling the minister's recent promise (the cross-party funding proposal), demanding a concrete response.
2024-10-07
Inquiry Regarding Via Baltica (No. 234)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed at the inaction of the minister and the government, criticizing the vague responses (the 2030 deadline) and the lack of ambition in developing Via Baltica. The criticism is policy- and results-based, emphasizing that Estonia is falling behind its neighbors.
2024-09-23
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Annul the Decision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Regarding the Closure of the Consulate General of the Republic of Estonia in New York" (328 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed against the decision by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Foreign Minister to close the Consulate General. The criticism is intense and characterizes the opponents' motives as short-sighted and failing to grasp the significance of symbols, referencing "the era of penny-pinching shopkeepers." The criticism is based on both policy concerns and underlying values.
2024-09-23
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Move the Embassy of the Republic of Estonia in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem" (325 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The objection is directed at the inaccuracies or untruth heard from the podium, not at a specific political group. The criticism is intense because an immediate correction of the factual error is demanded via the presiding officer of the session. The objection is strictly fact-based and procedural.
2024-09-19
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (491 OE) on the amendment of the Riigikogu Resolution "Formation of the Estonian Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe"

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The objection is aimed at the inaccurate information presented by the rapporteur concerning the speaker's departure from the delegation. The criticism is fact-based and focuses on procedural incorrectness, rather than the political substance.
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is directed at the activities of the Ministry of the Interior, alleging unequal resource distribution and political bias. It is suspected that the exclusion of the Valga and Otepää municipalities from the exercise is related to the Isamaa membership of their rural municipality heads, which transforms the criticism from procedural to political.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the prime ministerial candidate and his proposed government, strongly criticizing the content of the coalition agreement, particularly the inadequacy of the chapter on state reform. The criticism is both procedural and political, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the proposed solutions (optimization) as well as the adequacy of the selection system for senior state officials.
2024-05-13
Inquiry Regarding the Alleged Vandalism of Andrei Shumakov's Car (No. 630)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the Minister of the Interior and, more broadly, at the opacity of security institutions, particularly concerning the investigation's timeline and the accessibility of evidence. The criticism is procedural and seeks to achieve greater clarity, pointing out the limited capacity of the supervisory committee to reveal the truth.
2024-05-09
Debate on the matter of significant national importance: "E-elections – a threat to democracy."

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are the governing coalition and the Republic’s Electoral Committee (VVK). The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the government’s lack of will to solve problems and the VVK’s inability to ensure transparency and trustworthiness. The opposition is intense, suggesting that the situation is sliding "downhill like a children's slide."
2024-05-09
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Security Institutions Act (330 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic and Ministry of Defence officials, who are being criticized for failing to support the draft bill and for delaying analyses. The criticism is intense and politically charged, accusing the government of irresponsibility and Ministry of Defence officials of being at odds with the servicemen themselves.
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary opposition is directed at the Minister of Education and Research and the implementation of the policies under their leadership. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the lack of specialized support and its negative impact on the education of Estonian children. The intensity of the criticism is high because it concerns the future competitiveness of children and stunted educational development.
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the executive branch, especially Interior Minister Läänemets, whose competence is being questioned. Criticism is also leveled at the Riigikogu leadership and the committee for procedural errors and for ignoring the appeals of church leaders, while warning against the use of the "steamroller."
2024-04-30
First reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is directed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing the latter's alleged attitude toward the regions ("evil people"). The criticism is sharp, linking the negative impact of the tax law to the prime minister's personal opinion about the residents of Võru. The opposition is provocative on both political and personal levels.
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the coalition and the prime minister, who are accused of establishing autocratic rule and destroying parliamentarism. Criticism is also aimed at the chairman of the Constitutional Committee, Terras, who is being faulted for avoiding substantive debate and for the superficial nature of the discussion.
2024-04-17
The Sustainability of Estonia's Security Policy and the Transatlantic Relationship

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing

Criticism is directed at the government’s activities and strategic planning, particularly concerning the failure of the "million shells idea." There is also criticism regarding the lack of clarity in the long-term direction of Estonia's policy toward America, which points to deficiencies in strategic leadership. Concerning foreign partners, the speaker notes that neither Biden nor Trump has recently been a contributor to European security.
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the creators of the "Tartu 2024" program and, indirectly, the priorities of the Minister of Culture, who are accused of disregarding national values. The criticism is intense and focuses on a value-based selection process where national events have been omitted.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Amending the Basic Schools and Upper Secondary Schools Act" (279 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (274 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare and Restore a Militarized Border Guard as a Separate Agency"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the former decision-makers who established the unified Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) agency haphazardly, relying on unjustified hopes. The speaker demands accountability from those who permit the current structure to persist, given that it poses a threat to national security. The critique is both procedural and political, focusing specifically on the substandard quality of administrative decisions.
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Enhancing the Exercise of Administrative Oversight over the Prosecutor's Office" (280 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the leadership of the Prosecutor's Office (Parma is specifically mentioned) and other high-ranking state officials who are attempting to evade accountability or resign from office prematurely. There is also criticism regarding the sluggishness of the judicial system, which effectively turns the legal process itself into a form of punishment, thus highlighting the necessity for political intervention. The criticism is primarily procedural and outcome-based.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning men of mobilization age from Ukraine in Estonia (No. 619)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at the government (the minister), criticizing the absence or ambiguity of policy concerning the definition of boundaries for security threats and mass immigration. The criticism is focused on policy and preparedness, demanding a clear action plan from the responsible party.
2024-04-01
Interpellation Regarding Mass Immigration (No. 617)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the presenter, whose policy is being criticized for its excessively narrow focus, as they constantly speak only about the special status of Ukrainian refugees. The criticism is policy-based, stressing that the government should be dealing with the total cessation of all other immigration.
2024-04-01
Interpellation to the Government of the Republic concerning plans to increase immigration (No. 614)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the policy of the Government of the Republic concerning plans to increase immigration. The opposition is political and focuses on the negative impact of the government's actions on national security. The government's actions are described as a situation that has led to a "complex" state of affairs regarding mass migration.
2024-03-20
Sanctions

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.

Strong criticism has been leveled against the governing party Eesti 200 concerning an ethical scandal, with demands that returning the donation would be a "very simple" step. Regarding legislative matters, it is highlighted that opposition MPs (including EKRE) have raised significant questions concerning legal and security risks, thereby indicating a wider opposition consensus on procedural issues.
2024-03-18
Inquiry concerning the justification of the activities of the Prosecutor's Office and the Security Police Board (KaPo) (No. 528)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism targets the actions of the investigative authorities (the Prosecutor’s Office and KaPo), specifically alleging the violation of constitutionally protected rights and the failure to observe the principle of proportionality. The criticism is intense, centering on procedural shortcomings and the tactical deployment of the judicial process.
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Government of the Republic Act (276 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the coalition partners (the Social Democrats, Eesti 200), who are accused of voting down the draft legislation and being tied to 'Eastern money.' The criticism is intense, ranging from procedural opposition to accusations of maintaining an undemocratic political system and ignoring security threats.
2024-03-12
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Organization Act (Bill 289 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting

The opposition targets the stance taken by the committee—which favors rejecting the draft bill—and the behavior observed in the chamber. The criticism is procedural and tied to democratic values, citing "the regrettable situation."
2024-03-11
Interpellation Concerning the Negative Impacts of the Motor Vehicle Tax on Families with Children (No. 602)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main confrontation is directed at the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for ignoring transport problems in rural areas. The criticism targets both the policy failure (the lack of public transport) and the Prime Minister's alleged avoidance of local residents.
2024-03-11
Interpellation concerning business activities originating in Estonia and related to Russia during the War in Ukraine (No. 598)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the Prime Minister and the government, whose policy regarding Russia is considered contradictory and illogical. The criticism is political, focusing on the inconsistency of the government’s narrative in the international media.
2024-02-21
Russian Agents in Universities

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the inability of the government or responsible agencies to control the number of border crossers, a failure which exacerbates the security threat. The opposition is policy- and results-driven, demanding immediate and substantial reductions in border crossings through the use of general preventative measures.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the government’s decision to cut Estonia’s network of foreign representations, especially in the US, which is considered damaging and inadequate. Criticism is also aimed at the US domestic political standoff, which has paralyzed aid to Ukraine and called NATO’s credibility into question. The opposition is policy-based and intense, employing strong language such as "emasculation."
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (177 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups. The criticism is aimed more at the procedural shortcomings in the handling of the draft bill (e.g., regarding the committee's work and the effective date), rather than at substantive opponents.
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Prosecutor's Office Act and the Courts Act (167 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The primary criticism is aimed at the institution of the Prosecutor's Office, which is accused of failing to uphold justice and lacking adequate leadership. Furthermore, there is criticism regarding the trend where high-ranking state officials (including the Prosecutor General) are unable to complete their terms, suggesting a systemic flaw in the process of appointing officials.
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (197 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Data is scarce.
2024-01-22
Inquiry Concerning the Imposition of the Motor Vehicle Tax (No. 310)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent being criticized is the Reform Party, which is accused of leading Estonia into an era of economic decline. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing on the negative socio-economic impact of the government’s actions on rural residents. The opposition is presented in the form of a direct accusation ("The Reform Party has started turning Estonia into a sputtering wreck").
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the underfunding of state infrastructure (No. 334)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition targets the government's infrastructure policy, emphasizing the necessity of learning from international success stories. The criticism is policy-driven, citing poor development momentum and the failure to achieve growth comparable to that of Poland.
2024-01-22
Interpellation concerning the environmental impact of mandatory building renovation and citizens' ability to pay (No. 123)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed against the government's activities, specifically concerning the inadequacy of the engagement procedure and the disregard for owners' ability to pay. The opposition is both procedural and political, emphasizing that the state may not have an overview of the real owner's opinion and capacity.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (242 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Customs Act (350 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the shortcomings of the bill presented by the ministry or the government, particularly the absence of oversight measures to ensure the inviolability of private life. The criticism is policy-focused and centers on demanding solutions, repeatedly inquiring about plans for implementing additional measures.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at the inaction of the Constitutional Committee, as they failed to request an assessment from security agencies regarding Russian propaganda narratives. There is also an ironic reference to the "fresh social democrats," hinting at their possible naivety concerning security matters.
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the necessity and construction of Rail Baltic (No. 262)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

Criticism is leveled against the government and the prime minister regarding infrastructure priorities and choices made previously (2007–2008). The objection is both political and procedural, alleging that a crucial decision was made in Brussels, not in Estonia, thereby disregarding local needs and the preferences of the public.
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the demographic crisis and its resolution (No. 232)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The confrontation is directed at the government, questioning their preparedness and the discussions surrounding the accelerated raising of the pension age. The criticism is political and procedural, alleging government inaction in speeding up the crucial reform.
2024-01-15
Inquiry on Immigration (No. 133)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the prime minister and the government, who face criticism for their lack of ethical and legal clarity concerning the issue of Ukrainian men. The criticism is intense, featuring accusations of "ethical relativism" and "legal nihilism," signaling strong dissatisfaction with the government's actions.