By Agendas: Helir-Valdor Seeder

Total Agendas: 137

Fully Profiled: 137

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-15
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Law on the Election of the President of the Republic (684 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting

There is no direct criticism of opponents, but there is indirect criticism aimed at the political inability to resolve the issue of the proportional composition of the electoral college. The criticism targets the distortions in the original proportions caused by administrative reforms, which have resulted in the creation of a significant imbalance.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Law on the State Budget for 2026 (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary adversary is the governing coalition, particularly the tax policy being implemented under the leadership of the Reform Party. The criticism is intense and focuses on political dishonesty (the breaking of promises) and the legitimacy of the policy (a lack of mandate).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-08
Budget and Tax Policy

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour

The main opponents are the government (the prime minister) and the finance minister, who are being criticized for their policies (the budget, the car tax) and for their lack of preparation during the debate on the car tax bill. The criticism is fierce, accusing the government of demagoguery and damaging the economy, with promises to repeal the car tax if they come to power. Compromise is ruled out, especially concerning the car tax.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-10-06
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (694 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary opponents are the minister, who faces accusations of incompetence and unfamiliarity with the draft legislation, and the coalition partners, who are being criticized for breaking their pre-election promises. The attacks are intense, encompassing both substantive policy issues and procedural governance, with the board being accused of stifling the debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
State finances

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

The primary adversary is the government as a whole, which is being sharply criticized for financial incompetence and systemic mismanagement within the ministries. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting constitutional violations and Estonia's passivity on the international stage (ETS2). Minister of Education Kallas and Minister of Social Affairs Joller are specifically singled out.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-24
Estonian choices

15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing

The main opponents are the prime minister and the government, who are criticized for unconditionally supporting foolish and unanalyzed decisions within the European Union. The criticism is intense and accuses the government of damaging the Estonian economy and ignoring the proposals put forth by fellow member states (Latvia, Poland). The opposition is also being extended to the European Union Affairs Committee (ELAK), pointing to a broader problem.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

Criticism is aimed at the President of the Republic, who is escalating tensions by considering an appeal to the Supreme Court, despite the fact that this may not be the most sensible course of action. The government, and particularly the prime minister, are also facing criticism for their failures to act, given that issues concerning national security interests should have been agreed upon with the president in advance. Furthermore, the changes introduced by the Centre Party are criticized for their substantive ineffectiveness and the potential risk of a greater violation of religious freedom.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
Government decisions

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The criticism is aimed at the quality of the government's responses during the information hour, which indicates dissatisfaction with the executive branch's performance. Furthermore, a procedural complaint has been filed concerning the technical organization of work within the Riigikogu.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-17
The Estonian language

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The primary opposition is aimed at the statement made by Narva's key politician, Jaan Toots, who labeled the transition to Estonian-language education a failed experiment. The criticism is political in nature, demanding that the government clearly distance itself from the idea of reversing the policy and put pressure on local municipalities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Social Minister Karmen Joller, submitted by 21 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is primarily aimed at the former minister (Signe Riisalo) for poor policy and administrative decisions, and at the current minister (Karmen Joller) for controversial actions (such as voting in favor of bonuses). The criticism is policy-driven and results-oriented, intensifying with the question of the ministers' continued membership in the same political party.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Information session

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing

The opposition is directed at the procedural stance, which emphasizes the importance of the precise wording of the question to the quality of the answer. The criticism is direct and intense ("Absolutely not"), but focuses on the procedural side.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
Draft law amending the Cooperative Savings and Loan Societies Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (671 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main confrontation is against the government-initiated bill and the policy aimed at its abolition, demanding the rejection of the bill. Criticism is also directed at the inflexibility of the session chairman and the disrespect shown towards the parliament by the ministers (Defense Minister Pevkur and the Finance Minister), as they left the chamber during the debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary targets of criticism are the Riigikogu Board (specifically the Speaker) and the governing coalition. The criticism is largely procedural and legal, accusing the Board of selective citation, disregard, and abuse of power concerning the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. The government is also criticized for avoiding crucial security and economic issues (such as tax hikes and voting rights), while demanding an open debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (657 SE) – first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The main confrontation is directed at the minister and the government's waste management policy, which is considered archaic and ineffective. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the environmental sustainability and economic viability of the government’s plans. Furthermore, the Speaker of Parliament is being criticized for adhering to bureaucratic traditions (written slips).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-12
Second reading of the draft law amending the Aliens Act, the Code of Administrative Procedure Act, and the State Duty Act (challenging visa decisions) (603 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at "campaign-driven trends" and experiments originating from the European Union, which have historically resulted in losses and suffering. The Chairman of the Constitutional Committee (who speaks on behalf of Eesti 200) is directly called upon to reassess his long-term plan, citing the folly of the decision from a security policy standpoint.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the Church and Religious Communities Act (570 UA) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at those who create the impression that parliament is a "wicked society of conspirators" that knowingly violates the constitution. It also sharply criticizes the call to leave the law unchanged and to instruct law enforcement agencies (KAPO) to act more forcefully, labeling this a serious threat to the Estonian rule of law.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Second reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is directed at the ruling coalition, specifically the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are sharply criticized for hypocrisy at both the national and local levels. The criticism is intense and focuses on both political untrustworthiness and the lack of transparency in budget procedures.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Draft law amending the simplified taxation act for entrepreneurs and the income tax act, and repealing the security tax act – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is clearly a representative of the opposition (Isamaa), criticizing the procedural practices of the Finance Committee and, indirectly, the coalition. The criticism is procedural because the committee’s interpretation of the Rules of Procedure prevents the opposition’s amendments from reaching a vote. The speaker warns that such an interpretation could exclude the majority of the opposition’s amendments in the future.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft Law on Annulment of Excise Tax Increases on Energy Carriers (627 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the decisions of the public authority, namely the Riigikogu (Parliament), which sharply changed the land tax hike, completely overturning earlier predictable plans. The criticism is political and procedural, accusing the authorities of creating unpredictability and expense for entrepreneurs and homeowners.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed against the ERJK, whose activities are deemed unsystematic, unfair, and essentially a form of self-control, where politicians police themselves. The criticism is procedural and politically charged, as the ERJK is accused of cherry-picking individual cases and engaging in political score-settling. He/She also notes the State Audit Office’s reluctance to accept the new task.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at colleagues Sikkut and Tali, as well as previous governments and parliaments (2004, 2023, 2024) who failed to take the necessary step. Opponents are accused of lacking political will, short-sightedness, and pursuing a naive national defense policy, especially concerning the persistent threat posed by the eastern neighbor.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
First reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Finance and the inaccuracy of its budget planning, which necessitated a supplementary budget. The criticism is procedural, suggesting that the Ministry budgeted expenses with too large a reserve, anticipating high electricity prices that ultimately did not materialize. The intensity of the criticism is moderate but sharp, raising direct questions about the different accounting methodologies used by the ministries.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law on establishing tax peace (607 SE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Strong opposition is aimed at the governing coalition's tax policy. The Social Democrats are singled out for specific criticism, accused of laying the groundwork for the high tax burden. The criticism is both political and economic in nature, accusing the government of experimental and ineffective crisis management.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law (642 SE) for withdrawing from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The opposition is aimed at the 2004 decision-makers (politicians and diplomats who championed mainstream ideas), who are criticized for their short-sightedness regarding security issues. The claim by the commission representative that joining the convention happened "reluctantly" is also being challenged, with emphasis placed on the fact that support at the time was relatively unanimous. The criticism is policy-driven and focuses on the quality of the decisions made.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry Regarding the Future of Estonian Agriculture (No. 730)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the Prime Minister and the government, accusing them of failed agricultural policy and a lack of substantive responses. The government’s practice of renaming ministries is considered regrettable, destabilizing, and costly. Furthermore, the Prime Minister is criticized for a tendency to justify the absence of policy by citing climate change or making propagandistic references to tax policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Proposal to the Republic of Estonia’s Government to submit a negative supplementary budget bill to reduce administrative expenses in 2025" (608 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition, which is not expected to support any reasonable draft bill. The criticism focuses on the lack of clarity regarding the 20% cuts policy and the prime minister’s evasion of answers; he merely listed the sectors that would be spared from cuts. The criticism is both intense and policy-driven.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Reconsideration of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA), Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at colleagues who support the president's stance. These colleagues are criticized for having quickly developed trust in the president's integrity, despite having previously been critical of him. The speaker sharply rejects the accusations that he/she acted knowingly and maliciously in violation of the constitution.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-14
Close and sheep

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The main adversaries are the ruling coalition (the Reform Party and Eesti 200) and, specifically, the Prime Minister herself. The criticism is both personal (demanding that the PM condemn the insults made by a fellow party member) and political/procedural (calling into question the actual implementation of the cuts and the quality of the legislative drafts/bills). There is no apparent willingness to compromise; the attitude is clearly confrontational.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the absence of the Minister of Finance and his attempt to participate electronically, as well as the actions of the session chair who allowed this format. The criticism is intense and strictly procedural, emphasizing the minister's lack of accountability before the Riigikogu.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-23
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Appointment of Members of the Bank of Estonia Supervisory Board from Members of the Riigikogu" (629 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at a political deal linked to the appointment of Mart Võrklaev to the Council of the Bank of Estonia. The criticism is both personal and procedural, focusing on the alleged political reward for implementing the car tax. The opposition is intense, demanding immediate accountability and explanation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Social Democrats, Eesti 200, and the Reform Party, all of whom repeatedly criticized Isamaa. The Social Democrats are specifically criticized based on their policy, as they failed to support the fixed universal service price solution proposed by Isamaa, which would have prevented the service price from increasing due to the market rate.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-14
Inquiry regarding energy supply reliability (no. 717)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker is in an opposition role relative to the government, criticizing the deficiencies in energy policy planning and the uncertainty regarding the security of supply. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and the procedural timeline for key legislative documents.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Government decisions

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is directed at the government and its internal discord, criticizing the contradictory nature and ambiguity of its policies. Specifically highlighted are the pension cut proposal from Eesti 200 (Kristina Kallas) and the regional minister’s (Terras) position regarding the VAT on foodstuffs, which serve to illustrate the coalition's fragmentation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-09
Varia

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the government and its members, who are being criticized for sending contradictory messages regarding budget and tax policy. The criticism is aimed at the chaos and inefficiency of the policies, specifically highlighting the differing views among ministers (Tsahkna, Taro, Kallas, Terras) concerning cuts and taxation. The government's policy is referred to as "misshapen" (or "crooked"), and correcting it is considered necessary.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-08
Draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (571 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The primary focus of the opposition is the government, which is being criticized for imposing the car tax and for its unreasonable conduct. Furthermore, the Riigikogu committee and the Board are facing criticism for violating established good parliamentary practice by processing the draft bill without the presence of the initiator. The criticism targets both the political substance and the procedural deficiencies.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-27
Board elections of the Riigikogu

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the coalition that took office in 2023, which misled the public by seeking solutions that did not require constitutional amendment but could not be implemented within the existing legal framework. Also criticized are those who attempted to complicate the amendment through ideological vetting or a mandatory registration requirement. The opponents' argument regarding the restriction of voting rights as "collective punishment" is rejected, citing the sovereign right of states to make such decisions.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Politics

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

A strong oppositional stance toward the Prime Minister and the governing coalition. The criticism is aimed both at the political substance (insufficient development of defense capabilities) and at the personal/procedural level (accusing the Prime Minister of megalomania and misrepresenting the positions of Isamaa). The speaker demands that the Prime Minister be called to order, given that thousands of people are watching the information session.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-12
Governing the state

The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the Social Democrats and their bureaucratic initiatives, alongside the tax policies of the previous administration. The current prime minister and a potential new partner (Keit Kasemets) are facing criticism due to their "glorious shared history" (Nordica, the energy sector), which naturally breeds skepticism. The criticism is intense, focusing on the political fallout and the squandering of public funds.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main adversary is the current government and the Reform Party, who stand accused of sowing chaos throughout Estonia. The criticism is intense, focusing on the outcomes of the government's actions and procedural irregularities. No opportunity for compromise is being offered; instead, they are demanding an end to the government's activities.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the unreasonable amendment proposal put forward by coalition MPs and the justifications accompanying it, which would create international problems by dividing allies (NATO vs. third countries). The criticism is particularly sharp towards members of the Centre Party, who are accused of spreading disinformation based on their disregard for the security agencies' report.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding the Impact of Elron Ticket Price Increases on Regional Policy (No. 708)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and its tax policy, specifically the car tax and the income tax reform. Separately, the Social Democrats (SDE) are being criticized for the tax compromise, with claims that they were "viciously tricked" in a deal that allocated only 60 million euros to local municipalities. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, casting doubt on the feasibility of the government's promises.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Regional Representatives (no 706)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the central government, particularly the Minister of Regional Affairs, who stands accused of engaging in partisan politics and neglecting regional policy. Intense criticism is specifically aimed at officials who, working behind closed doors, are drafting illogical administrative schemes designed to eliminate local municipalities as partners. The criticism targets both political decisions (the car tax) and procedures (the lack of consultation).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the government's narrow circle of decision-makers and procedural deficiencies, accusing them of a lack of transparency and disregarding the role of parliament. Separately, the contradiction between the statements of the Prime Minister and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi is highlighted, raising the question of which minister is lying. Criticism is also directed at the lack of national coordination in energy planning.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry regarding the merging of schools for children with special educational needs (no 684)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the activities of the Ministry of Education and Research, sharply criticizing the adoption of decisions before negotiations have taken place with local governments and other stakeholders. This procedural criticism is exacerbated by a comparison with the government’s handling of energy policy, where decisions are made prior to any discussion. The criticism is also aimed at alleged inefficiency and a lack of information.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-13
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (544 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting

Speaker 1 treats the Government’s comments primarily as technical issues that can be resolved and refuted without generating a sharp political conflict. Speaker 2 delivers a strong and substantive critique of the governing coalition’s energy policy, calling into question the professionalism and legitimacy of its foundations.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main targets of criticism are Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the governing coalition, who are accused of making decisions "troika-style," without consulting parliament or experts. The criticism is aimed both at policy (energy, taxes, pensions) and at procedures (the interpretation of the rules of procedure). Compromise has been ruled out, as the speaker is demanding the government's resignation and the formation of a new coalition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Government coalition policy

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main adversary is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized both for the manner in which decisions are made (by a narrow circle) and for the substance of its policies (specifically energy). The criticism is intense, citing a lack of transparency, the exclusion of the Minister of Finance, and suspicious ties to firms connected with the Reform Party and the Social Democrats.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-12
Damage to Allied Relations by Ministers

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the prime minister, who is being criticized for leveling extremely serious and unfounded accusations against the opposition. The criticism is intense and includes personal/ethical attacks, accusing the prime minister of megalomania and equating the state with himself ("the state – that is me"). No compromise is being sought; instead, an investigation into the seriousness of the prime minister's statement is demanded.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-29
Sideteenused

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is directed at the inaction of the government (the digital minister) and supervisory authorities, as well as the unethical behavior of the telecommunications company Telia toward consumers. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and consumer protection failures, labeling Telia's actions as "forcing happiness" and a hidden price increase.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-22
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (538 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.

The primary objection targets the presiding officer’s interpretation of the Rules of Procedure Act concerning the right to reply. The criticism is both procedural and legal, accusing the chair of implementing unfair and unlawful practices that violate the equal rights of Parliament members. The opposition is intense and manifests as a demand to revise the existing interpretation.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-20
Inquiry regarding the promotion of family and large families (no. 667)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the sitting government and coalition (referring to Kaja Kallas’s government), which is being sharply criticized for ignoring demographic issues and taking steps that harm family policy. The criticism is cross-political, accusing the government of undermining public confidence and committing the "biggest disservice." The opposition is intense and demands the reversal of specific policies.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Guardians of the Economy

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The primary opposition is directed against the government's regional policy and the responsible minister, who is being criticized both for political decisions (centralization) and for misrepresenting the facts. The criticism is intense and culminates in a proposal to replace the minister if the government fails to implement its political will.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-18
Tourism Strategy

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The opposition is directed against the Ministry of Culture's current sports funding policy, which left the 'Jõud' Sports Union and the school sports union without state support literally overnight. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, but is presented in a tone that is more informative and hopeful, rather than aggressive, expressing hope that the policy will be reconsidered.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-17
Draft law on aligning the State Budget Act with the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (525 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the government or the parliamentary majority, who are responsible for creating a state budget that is both unconstitutional and opaque. The criticism is procedural and institutional, emphasizing that even the Auditor General cannot extract the necessary information from the budget.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-12
Draft Law Amending the Act on the Government of the Republic (523 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

There is no direct opposition to a specific political group, but the lack of clarity in labeling the bill populist is being criticized. The criticism is directed rather at the vagueness of the debate and the fact that the content of the concept of populism remained unclear within the committee.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the Finance Committee and the session chairman, who are being criticized for violating procedural rules and ignoring the opposition. The criticism is intense, accusing the opposing side of "forcibly bundling" the amendments together and removing them from the voting schedule. Attention is drawn to the government side's irregularities, and a recess is demanded to protect the rights of the opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Confusing substitution activity

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.

The primary targets are members of the government, specifically the Minister of Education and the Minister of Regional Affairs, as well as the Social Democrats regarding the constitutional amendment. Criticism is intense and focuses on procedural errors, such as ignoring traditional negotiations and squandering money on ineffective measures. The government’s actions are being labeled an unreasonable conspiracy theory and mere political infighting.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary conflict involves the government and the bill's rapporteur, who is being criticized both for substantive errors and procedural deficiencies, such as the submission of faulty tables of amendments. The government is being accused of incompetence and confusion regarding tax policy, citing the prime minister's statements concerning "tax peace" and the security tax. Instead of a compromise, they are demanding that the reading be suspended and the errors corrected.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Draft law amending the Citizenship Act (522 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary targets of criticism are the current governing coalition and the Minister of the Interior, who is being slammed for overly broad discretionary powers and unfair administrative practices. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, accusing the government of having granted citizenship in a short period to individuals who are repeat offenders. The Minister of the Interior’s stance, which permits the granting of citizenship even to those convicted of crimes against humanity, is facing particular scrutiny.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-05
Second reading of the Basic Education Act bill (419 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Ministry of Education and Research, the Cultural Committee, and the ruling coalition, all of whom are sharply criticized for the subpar handling of draft legislation. The criticism is directed at both procedural violations (the dismissal of opposition proposals) and controversial constitutional interpretations. The speaker accuses the coalition of seeking to eliminate inconvenient proposals and engaging in unconstitutional activity.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government coalition (the Finance Committee) and the leadership of the Riigikogu (the Speaker). The criticism is intense and primarily procedural, accusing them of violating the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, silencing the opposition, and cultivating an improper management culture. Compromise is ruled out until the amendments that were illegally excluded are formally registered.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is directed at the Ministry and the Minister, who are accused of ignorance and inaction concerning the takeover of adult high schools. The criticism is intense and focuses on irregularities in budget planning, a lack of transparency, and the failure to provide basic answers.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-03
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-21
Second reading of the bill amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act, and the bill amending the Income Tax Act (509 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is with the government coalition, whose actions are being labeled as irrational and detrimental to the country's governance. Criticism is aimed both at procedures (a constant parade of restructurings) and at the substance, particularly the abolition of the requirement for the State Secretary to hold a higher education degree in law. The speaker makes it clear that compromise is out of the question, demanding that the second reading be suspended so that the draft bill can be amended.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the coalition parties (especially the Social Democrats), who are accused of lacking statesmanship due to the coalition agreement and being held hostage by the Social Democrats' "red line." Criticism is aimed at the legal ambiguity of the opponent's draft bill (the registration provision) and the political compromise that leaves voting rights to stateless persons. He/She also criticizes the opposing side's procedural approach, which initially failed to seek broad-based inclusion.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is directed against the Social Democrats, who are accused of harassing the coalition and holding parliament hostage. The criticism is both political-ethical and substantive, asserting that the Social Democrats are attempting to maximize the preservation of their electorate, irrespective of the voters' loyalty to the Estonian state. Furthermore, the threats made by the Minister of the Interior (SDE) about 'losing Narva' are criticized as empty rhetoric lacking any genuine security policy analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-20
Amendment of the Constitution

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The primary opponents are the governing coalition, and specifically the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding the parliamentary majority hostage and spreading baseless scare stories. The criticism is sharp, accusing the coalition of voting down the opposition’s bill and avoiding compromise, despite the fact that common ground could be found.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-18
Inquiry regarding tax changes (no. 657)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session

The primary target of criticism is the government and the prime minister, who are being slammed for both procedural failures (lack of consultation, short notice periods) and political decisions (tax hikes). The backlash is intense, with critics accusing the government of outright deception or dishonesty in its dealings with businesses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-18
Inquiry Regarding the Involvement of Interest Groups (no. 656)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the prime minister, accusing them of a duplicitous legislative culture and concealing their true plans from the electorate. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural violations (uncoordinated decisions) and political unaccountability. The speaker regrets that the entire parliament is held responsible for the damaged reputation caused by the government's actions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary criticism is leveled against the government coalition and the Ministry of Finance, accusing them of incompetence, opacity, and illegal procedures (specifically, the elimination of proposed amendments). Jürgen Ligi, in particular, is criticized for evading questions regarding public transport funding. The criticism is both intense and fundamental, particularly regarding the violation of legal certainty in the context of raising the land tax.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary opposition is aimed at the Finance Committee and the coalition, who are accused of violating the Rules of Procedure Act and of maliciously and misleadingly interpreting Isamaa’s amendments. The opposition is intense and resolute, demanding that the leading committee "rectify its errors." The criticism is primarily procedural, but it also concerns the substantive treatment of the budget.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

Direct opposition or criticism toward political opponents is not expressed, but dissatisfaction with the result of the previous vote is noted ("it certainly didn't go well"). The criticism is directed rather at the ineffective procedure or the voting outcome, not at the political substance of the opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the Weapons Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (468 SE) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the Steering Committee’s decisions concerning the bundling of Isamaa’s amendments, viewing this as an unfair procedure compared to the proposals put forward by the National Defence Committee. Furthermore, the criticism leveled by colleague Kaljulaid regarding Isamaa’s engagement with national defence issues is rejected. The criticism itself is primarily procedural and politically defensive.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Regional policy

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the minister and the "overzealous officials" within his ministry, who stand accused of imposing illogical and artificial regions and exerting undue pressure on local municipalities. The criticism is both political and procedural, claiming that officials seek to centralize the management of financial resources and the decision-making process through the absence of a proper administrative unit.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Minister of Finance, who is being intensely criticized both politically (for expressing an unconstitutional opinion) and personally. The criticism is aimed at the minister's allegations regarding the parliament's superficiality and his attempts to reduce the parliament's budgetary role. The speaker calls into question the legitimacy of the entire session.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Minister of the Interior's political statement on internal security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the inaction of the Minister of the Interior and, indirectly, the Social Democrats regarding the voting rights of citizens of the aggressor state. The criticism is policy- and procedural-based, accusing the minister of ambiguity and delaying tactics. The speaker questions the minister's distinction between their official role and their role as party leader.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-23
Red symbolism in public spaces

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing

The primary confrontation is directed against the Prime Minister, who is accused of repeatedly spreading false information during the Riigikogu (Parliament) information hour. The criticism is intense and focuses on the Prime Minister's inability to read the draft bill before making a public appearance, which constitutes both a procedural and a substantive attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary confrontation is directed against the government and the minister, who are being criticized for using a dishonest and non-transparent methodology in preparing the budget—a methodology that misleads both those reviewing the budget and the general public. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, accusing the government of deliberately concealing expenditures.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government and the executive branch (the minister), criticizing their choice regarding the non-earmarked solution for the security tax. The criticism is procedural and political, focusing on the lack of transparency and the risk that the tax revenue will be used to plug budget holes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
State security

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The confrontation is aimed directly at the Minister of the Interior and the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding Estonia’s internal security hostage and neutralizing right-wing parties. The criticism is intense and systematic, focusing on political inaction regarding critical security issues, and it is suggested that government members are engaging in internal squabbling rather than leading the country.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The objection is aimed primarily at excessive procedural rigidity and the obstructive role of the rules of procedure, which could hinder parliamentary work. There is no direct political or personal confrontation with other factions; instead, the need for flexibility is being emphasized.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other laws thereof (505 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

Strong opposition is aimed at the government coalition and the Prime Minister, who are being criticized for person-specific legislation (referencing Keit Kasemets) and procedural errors. The draft bill is also criticized because the changes have already been implemented de facto by the Prime Minister’s order, essentially turning the Riigikogu (Parliament) debate into a mere formality or "eulogy." The unconvincing nature of the government's explanations is also subject to criticism.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-14
Draft law amending the Family Benefits Act and other laws (507 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the ruling coalition. The criticism is both procedural (insufficient explanatory note, lack of competence) and political (reduction of family benefits, tax hikes). Separately, the views of Kristina Kallas, the chair of the coalition partner Eesti 200, are highlighted to demonstrate the internal discord within the coalition regarding the shift to making social benefits needs-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

It directly opposes the "honorable members of the coalition," criticizing their procedural conduct and their desire to rush the draft bill through. The criticism is aimed at the procedure, not the content of the bill itself, specifically opposing the consultation with the minister by phone during the session's recess.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is directed at the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture and the government's policy, specifically citing a lack of strategy and competence in the protection of fertile land. The critique is rooted in policy and procedure, charging the government with the fragmentation of transport management and the unfair redistribution of income. A second speaker openly doubts the minister's command of the portfolio.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Income Tax Act and the Defence Service Act (432 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the Reform Party, whose tax plan is being called the "most expensive election promise" and who is accused of increasing instability. The entire governing coalition is criticized for creating budget deficits and violating good legislative practice (the six-month principle). The Social Democrats are accused of extreme hypocrisy, as they support a tax plan that favors the wealthy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-25
Security

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for procedural inaction and a lack of political will. They are accused of deliberately avoiding the issue, shelving the draft bill, and torpedoing the willingness of other parties to consult. The criticism is aimed both at political indecisiveness and the disregard for security priorities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the presiding officer and the technical capacity of the Riigikogu, which has obstructed the proceedings. The objection is procedural, focusing on the disorderly organization of work during an extraordinary situation. The speaker criticizes the lack of information regarding the expected waiting time and demands clarification on the rules governing the session (the order for submitting questions, and the process for formal confirmation/roll call).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The main opponents are the Government of the Republic, the Minister of the Interior, and the Social Democrats (SDE), who are being criticized for blocking the resolution of crucial security issues. The criticism is intense, targeting both political decisions (migration policy, redundancies within the Defence League) and underlying values (SDE is accused of inciting class hatred). The Minister, specifically, has been criticized for being tight-lipped and delivering a soporific presentation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The speaker is clearly playing an opposition role, criticizing both the current government (for its inability to pursue accelerated capability development and solve the shortage of instructors) and the former Minister of Defence Laanet for cutting positions in the Defence League. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-09
Interpellation Regarding the Technical Failure of the Joint Entrance Exams for State Gymnasiums (No. 627)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Education and the Minister, citing procedural failure and a vague definition of accountability. The criticism is intense, suggesting the Ministry fails to grasp the level of responsibility that must accompany issues concerning the future of young people. The criticism targets both action (or inaction) and perceived injustice.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The opposition is aimed at the Minister of Infrastructure and the Social Democratic Party, criticizing their ambiguous stance on security issues and their support for voting rights for Russian citizens. The criticism is intense and ranges from the political substance to accusations of violating parliamentary procedural rules.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Third Reading of the Draft Motor Vehicle Tax Act (364 UA)

The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.

The main criticism is directed at the presiding officer of the Riigikogu session and the Bureau over the inconsistent interpretation of the rules. The criticism is procedural and institutional, stressing that the differing practice is "very bad" and acknowledges a deterioration of the culture.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponent is the government, whose tax policy is being sharply criticized as unfair and disruptive to regional balance. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of employing a tactic of pitting local municipalities against each other ("divide and rule") and increasing the state budget at the expense of local authorities. The opposition is intense, but a compromise is allowed through amendments to the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary opponent is the Government of the Republic and the coalition, who are accused of making poor choices, creating a leadership crisis, and waging a tax war against their own people. Criticism is also directed at the bill’s rapporteur (Annely Akkermann), whose responses are deemed insufficient, illogical, and absurd. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure, and compromise is ruled out, as the demand is for the termination of the bill’s reading.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The main adversary is the Reform Party and the governments it has led, which are sharply criticized for fiscal missteps, tax hikes, and the weakening of security. The criticism addresses both policy and procedure, demanding that the ruling party acknowledge its mistakes and take responsibility.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-15
Extraordinary Election of the Riigikogu Vice-Speakers

15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism is aimed at the work arrangements of the current Riigikogu Board, which are considered ineffective, and whose work Reinsalu could organize better. The opposition is procedural and results-oriented, not personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-14
Second Reading of the Draft State Supplementary Budget Act for 2024 (456 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session

There is no direct confrontation; the criticism is not aimed at specific individuals or policies. The warning about "consequences" suggests indirect opposition or concern regarding the potential impact of certain political decisions, but this remains general.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The confrontation is aimed at the coalition, the minister, and the representative of the Finance Committee, sharply criticizing their superficiality and lack of preparation (the committee representative neither attended the session nor possessed the draft bill). The coalition is being criticized for misplaced priorities (local government revenues versus landowners) and for failing to keep promises when amending the law. Compromise is ruled out, and they demand that the proceedings be terminated.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-06
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the State Fee Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (417 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized for its panicked and unreasonable policies during the economic crisis. The criticism targets both the tax hikes and the creation of instability within family policy. The speaker further alleges that the government failed to take into account any of the opposition’s proposed amendments, demonstrating an attitude that views compromise as unnecessary.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the government coalition and the Finance Committee, accusing them of lying, breaking promises (specifically regarding pensions and the pledges made by Eesti 200), and a gross violation of the Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act. The criticism is intense, labeling the government's conduct as hypocritical and deceitful, and warning that they "are sawing off the very branch they are sitting on." Furthermore, the statement criticizes the fact that the appeal bearing 80,000 signatures was simply thrown in the trash without any substantive debate.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Tax Policy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The opposition maintains a strong stance, criticizing the ruling coalition (including the Social Democrats and their partners) for both breaching political trust and pursuing an unfair tax policy. Criticism is also aimed at the Foreign Minister, who is currently serving as acting Prime Minister, and is accused of failing to understand budgetary policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-05
Tax policy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being accused of incompetence, deceit, and breaking promises. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political dishonesty (lying after the elections) and specific policy decisions (cutting pensions and family benefits). The speaker warns that the government's actions are undermining the credibility of politicians and the Riigikogu.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
Third reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

The primary opponents are the ruling coalition—the Reform Party, the Social Democratic Party, and Estonia 200. The criticism is extremely intense, accusing them of lying both before and after the elections, as well as breaching the coalition agreement. The attacks are both political (focusing on budget cuts) and personal/character-based, labeling the government the "government of lies" and warning of a fatal loss of public trust.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the government, accusing them of pitting local authorities against landowners and presenting inadequate analysis. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the policy and the legislative procedure, particularly the violation of legal certainty.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-28
Second Reading of the Bill for the Amendment of the Income Tax Act (416 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are criticized for their handling of election promises (such as the abolition of the tax hump) and for breaking other pledges (like the income tax exemption for pensions). The criticism is intense, accusing the government of pursuing policies that are harmful and dangerous to the national economy. The Reform Party, in particular, is criticized as the force standing behind the entire fiasco.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-15
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Workplace Violations of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism targets the coalition, which stands accused of ignoring substantive input and perpetuating poor procedural practices. The criticism is rooted in both policy and procedure, pointing out that during the previous term, the Isamaa faction actively stalled the handling of the draft legislation. The opposition is intense, and compromise is ruled out for the final vote.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-13
Interpellation regarding the suffrage of Russian citizens in Estonian local government elections during Russia's war against Ukraine (No. 624)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary opponent is the governing coalition, specifically the Social Democrats (SDE) and the Minister of the Interior, who is accused of failing to provide substantive solutions and contradicting himself. The criticism is both political (SDE's "red line" regarding the suspension of voting rights) and procedural (the inability to fulfill the promise made in the coalition agreement). The speaker further accuses the minister of manipulating the assessments provided by security agencies and offering empty responses.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Local Government Council Election Act (387 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary opponents are the parties of the governing coalition, particularly the Social Democrats, who are the fiercest critics of the bill, and the Reform Party, which stands accused of deliberate inaction and a lack of political will. The criticism targets both political incompetence (such as drafting a legally impossible provision into the coalition agreement) and procedural breaches (namely, disregarding good legislative practices during the adoption of tax laws).
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Food Act (378 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The opposition is aimed at the motives of the individual presenting the specific proposal, as well as the relevance of the proposal. The criticism is procedural and skeptical, calling the sincerity of the proposal into question.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Second Reading of the Draft Act on the Protection of Whistleblowers Reporting Work-Related Infringements of European Union Law (257 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

The main opponents are the Legal Affairs Committee and its chairman, who are accused of the unlawful and aggressive bundling of amendments and of misleading the Riigikogu (Parliament). The criticism is intense and focuses on the violation of procedural rules and the necessity of protecting the rights of the opposition. Furthermore, the Riigikogu Board is also being criticized for its passivity in responding to the situation that has developed.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-08
Election Promises and the Fulfillment of Agreements

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main confrontation is directed at the government, particularly the prime minister and the Reform Party, who are accused of inaction, shifting responsibility, and failing to fulfill the promises of the coalition agreement. The criticism is intense and focuses on the lack of political will and failed procedures (e.g., the rejection of Isamaa’s initiatives). The adversaries are accused of "secretive silence" and clinging to an unrealistic solution.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Second Reading of the Draft Act Amending the 2024 State Budget Act (389 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary point of contention revolves around the tax policy implemented by the Reform Party and the government, criticizing their claims regarding the tax curve and the supposed reduction of the tax burden. The criticism is intense, branding the opposing side's claims as "completely false" and "misleading." This opposition is directed both at the substance of the policy itself and the opposing side's incompetence in managing the topic.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-07
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and the Amendment of Other Related Acts (Bill 344 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is leveled against the Government of the Republic, as the initiator, and the Constitutional Committee, accusing them of disregarding expert observations and committing procedural violations. The criticism is intense and focuses both on substantive deficiencies (security, uniformity) and the unlawful consolidation of proposed amendments and their classification as "insincere." Furthermore, the actions of the Presidium are criticized regarding the calling of recesses during the period of obstruction.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Strong criticism has been leveled at the coalition for its unwillingness to address the revocation of voting rights for Russian citizens, a measure deemed crucial for national security. A colleague (Juku-Kalle) is being criticized for inaccuracy and making sweeping statements, with demands for precision in the official transcript. The Minister of the Interior is also facing indirect criticism for the 'creative presentation' of security risks.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opponents are the governing coalition, the minister, and the Social Democrats, who are accused of implementing a cascade of taxes and reneging on election promises. The criticism is both political (tax war, unfairness) and procedural (violation of good legislative practice). The speaker rules out compromise, proposing to reject the bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition stance is directed against the Riigikogu Board and the leading committee, sharply criticizing the "violent" bundling of amendments as a violation of the fundamental rights of Riigikogu members. The governing coalition is also criticized for ignoring risks related to election security, emphasizing that this undermines trust in the elections. It denies that the current activity constitutes the long-term and extensive obstruction related to paralyzing parliamentary work, as defined by the Supreme Court.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-08
Interpellation concerning the incitement of hatred towards families with children (No. 612)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the Minister of Social Protection and the Reform Party-led government, who are accused of dismantling family policy and breaking their promises after the elections. The criticism is intense and is directed both at political decisions (such as benefit cuts and tax policy) and procedural shortcomings (making decisions before the necessary analysis has been completed). The government is also accused of violating the principle of legal certainty and behaving irresponsibly.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
National Security

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opponent is the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, who stand accused of voting down Isamaa's security-related draft legislation and neglecting national security. Separate criticism is leveled at the Minister of the Interior, who is deemed an additional security threat due to the arbitrary interpretation of reports issued by security agencies. The criticism is intense and addresses both the substance of the policy and procedural inaction.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-02
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Abandon the Imposition of the Car Tax and Withdraw the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill from the Riigikogu Proceedings" (374 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The primary opponent is the ruling coalition, particularly the Social Democrats, with Läänemets and Ossinovski being named specifically. The criticism targets both procedural unfairness (the forceful imposition of measures) and political inconsistency (the implementation of a tax policy that runs counter to the Sots' ideology). Compromise is ruled out, as the situation is characterized as the inevitable triumph of the majority over the rights of the minority.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Improving Teachers' Working Conditions" (373 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition's stance is aimed squarely at the actions of the coalition and the Minister of Education, criticizing both the negotiation timeline and the potential uncertainty surrounding the signing of the agreements. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting the risk that the agreement may not ultimately be signed because the coalition failed to secure internal funding.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-11
Question Regarding the Financing of Cultural Buildings of National Significance (No. 600)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at a specific Riigikogu decision or amendment, criticizing its unreasonableness, impracticality, and legal questionability. The criticism is procedural and political, not personal, and focuses on the problems created by the new regulation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
Coalition Agreement

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing

The main opponent is the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats) and the prime minister, who is accused of unethical conduct and making decisions detrimental to national interests. The criticism is intense, focusing on policy (tax hikes) and ethical shortcomings (breaking promises). The Social Democrats are separately criticized for bargaining over the security issue and setting conditions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-05
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Recall of a member of the Supervisory Board of the State Forest Management Centre and appointment of a new member" (386 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism and challenge are aimed at the Reform Party, calling into question their criteria for the distribution of political representation. The criticism is procedural, asking why the right of representation is allocated only to an MP who is not part of a faction, rather than to other factions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-21
The voting rights of Russian citizens

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opponents are the Social Democrats and the ruling coalition, who face fierce criticism regarding security issues for engaging in political point-scoring and demonstrating a lack of resolve. The criticism is intense, accusing the opposing side of having squandered crucial time and treating vital security matters as mere quid pro quo bargaining.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First reading of the draft Act amending the Aliens Act (European Union Blue Card) (349 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government, which is being criticized for sending contradictory signals and failing to make fundamental decisions regarding migration policy. Criticism is also leveled at officials in Europe and Estonia who devise new regulations that are not actually necessary. The opposition is focused on both policy and procedure, demanding the rejection of the draft bill.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main opposition is the government led by the Reform Party and the Minister of Finance, who are being criticized both for the poor quality of the draft bill and for their inadequate responses. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of waging a "tax war"; compromise has been ruled out, with a proposal made to reject the bill during its first reading. Separately, Eesti 200 is being criticized for breaking an election promise.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-14
Immigration

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary opposition is directed at the ruling coalition, criticizing its inconsistent communication and the contradictory positions held by ministers (the Minister of Social Affairs and the Minister of Economic Affairs). The criticism focuses on the substance of the policy and the government's failure to establish a unified stance, also pointing to the Social Democrats' previous attempts at liberalization.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
Tax Policy

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized both for their policies (harmful tax hikes) and their procedure (presenting an unprepared bill). The criticism is intense and highly political, emphasizing the detrimental impact of the government's actions on the economy and the general population. The prime minister is also being criticized for ignoring the proposals put forward by the coalition partner.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
Motor Vehicle Tax

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the ineffectiveness of the information session—specifically, the disproportionate sharing of information—rather than being aimed at specific opponents or policies. The speaker avoids direct confrontation, noting that the board's rules are "mutually accepted," and he is not criticizing them whatsoever.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-05
Inquiry concerning immigration (No. 588)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The primary criticism targets internal government conflicts, particularly those involving the ministers Riisalod, who advocate for the immigration of cheap labor as a solution to demographic and workforce issues. This criticism is policy-driven, accusing the ministers of sending wrong signals and ignoring the development priorities crucial for the Estonian economy.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Voting rights of Russian citizens

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opponents are the Reform Party, the Minister of Justice, and the government as a whole, who are accused of deliberate stalling and hiding behind legal arguments. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to resolve the security issue and bring the draft bill to parliament.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
Money

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is aimed at the government as a whole and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is accused of failing to secure financial solutions. It criticizes the contradictory statements made by cabinet members (Läänemets, Võrklaev, Tsahkna) regarding budgetary needs and cuts, thereby highlighting internal discord. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing specifically on the inefficiency of the government's financial management.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling