By Months: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2025
17 Speeches
The style is analytical, critical, and forceful, focusing on logical arguments grounded in facts, legislation, and international reports. Numerous rhetorical questions are employed to emphasize the system's opacity and lack of trust, along with comparisons to other countries (Russia, Venezuela) to intensify the criticism. The tone is formal and detailed, yet it also expresses frustration over the absence of answers.
10.2025
70 Speeches
The style is inquisitive, persistent, and critical, especially when the speaker returns to their initial question to elicit a clear response. Logical argumentation and rhetorical questions are employed to challenge the government's justifications, also incorporating a quote from a government colleague (Kristina Kallas) concerning the availability of budgetary funds.
09.2025
126 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly combative and insistent, often using emotional and sharp expressions (e.g., "complete mess," "catastrophic demographic situation," "a farce"). The argumentation is strongly supported by statistics and European comparisons (e.g., the number of holidays, the length of the working week). Rhetorical questions are often used to challenge the decisions and inaction of ministers and the government.
06.2025
50 Speeches
The rhetorical style is critical, often urgent and highly combative, particularly when engaging with members of the government. It heavily utilizes logical arguments and statistics (such as Eurostat data concerning pensioner employment) alongside historical comparisons. Rhetorical questions are frequently employed to challenge government decisions, and the coalition is accused of political uncouthness and demagoguery.
05.2025
34 Speeches
The speaker’s tone is predominantly critical, concerned, and at times combative, especially towards the government and specific ministers. They use both logical arguments (constitutional violation, statistics) and emotional appeals (concern for low-income people and children). The style is direct, employing strong judgments like "ridiculous step," "catastrophe," and "in conflict with the constitution," and accuses opponents of demagoguery ("loud words").
04.2025
31 Speeches
The speaker's style is combative and critical, often employing urgent language (e.g., "catastrophe," "blatant economic slump"). They rely heavily on logical arguments and legal references, contrasting their approach with the coalition's "Excel" mentality. The speeches are formal, yet include direct appeals to the "Estonian people," emphasizing concern for ordinary citizens.
03.2025
22 Speeches
The rhetorical style is critical, urgent, and full of pathos, especially concerning the demographic situation and voting rights—a topic referred to as a potentially negative historical day. The speaker attempts to speak "from the heart" directly to the Estonian people, combining legal analysis with powerful emotional accusations regarding government injustice and bullying. Rhetorical questions are repeatedly employed concerning the government's motives and the objectives of its actions.
02.2025
56 Speeches
The speaker adopts a predominantly combative, critical, and emotionally charged style, particularly when commenting on the government's actions (e.g., calling the foreign minister's behavior "embarrassing"). The speaker frequently employs rhetorical questions and accusations of demagoguery. They strongly appeal to logic and facts to expose the government's contradictions (such as the closure of the Kopli fire station versus the existence of unused budget funds) and emphasize the violation of the principles of the rule of law.
01.2025
34 Speeches
The style is analytical and critical, often employing rhetorical questions regarding the proportionality and justification of government decisions. The tone is particularly anxious and urgent concerning the topics of demography and the closure of the rescue squad, describing the situation as "catastrophic." It utilizes numerous fact-based arguments, references to experts (the Chancellor of Justice, lawyers, Liia Hänni), and specific incidents covered in the media.