By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The speaker adopts a passionate and confrontational style, utilizing direct address to the Estonian people ("speaking from the heart") and employing highly emotional language regarding the negative significance of this historical day. He levels strong criticism and accusations against his opponents (fudging the facts, outright lying, and going back on their word) and backs up his own stance by citing authoritative sources, specifically the Chancellor of Justice and President Karis.

The rhetorical style is critical and inquisitive, focusing on logical appeals and challenging the rationality of the draft proposal. The speaker employs repetitive questioning to highlight the proposal’s deficiencies and inconsistencies, maintaining a formal tone throughout. He disputes the relevance of the examples introduced by the presenter.

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and penetrating, describing the demographic situation as a "catastrophe" and accusing the government of inaction. Both specific data (birth rate statistics, subsidy amounts) and emotional appeals are used, emphasizing the economic insecurity of families and their lack of trust in the state. The speaker also utilizes the reversal of opponents' narratives, referring to a better situation during the EKREIKE government compared to the period under the Reform Party.

The rhetorical style is direct, formal, and interrogative, addressing the respected rapporteur. The speaker employs a logical line of reasoning ("which is, naturally, the logical approach") to call into question the coalition's voting behavior, establishing a skeptical yet procedural tone.