By Agendas: Andres Metsoja

Total Agendas: 110

Fully Profiled: 110

2025-10-14
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Public Transport Act (725 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the state's current policy, which allows ticket revenue to be redistributed among regions that offer free public transport. The opposition is policy-driven and concerns the unfairness of financial mechanisms that penalize regions contributing their own share.
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Planning Act and Other Related Acts (683 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific adversaries. The critique focuses on the ambiguity of the draft's content and potential conflicts with other legislation (e.g., the Nature Conservation Act), rather than targeting individuals or procedures.
2025-10-08
First Reading of the Bill (663 SE) on the Accession to the Convention Establishing the International Organization for Navigational Aids

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is directed at the actions of "neighbors" (likely Russia), who allegedly stole border markers on Lake Peipus. This is criticism based on specific actions, framed within the context of state border violation and security threats.
2025-10-08
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (658 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Develop a Plan for Increasing Competition in the Mobile Communications Market and Accelerating Number Portability"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the state, which erred by failing to impose obligations on market participants through spectrum auctions intended to service sparsely populated areas. The state is deemed inefficient due to the absence of a "demanding master" (or strong oversight). Telecommunications companies are also criticized for price hikes and manipulating service quality, which places the customer in a position akin to serfdom.
2025-10-08
2025 Report by the Minister of Social Affairs on the Implementation of the National Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker questions the effectiveness of the municipalities' current focus, noting that despite the construction of new sports facilities, young people are not attending the events. The criticism is aimed more at the results of policy implementation than at specific individuals.
2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, focusing on structural deficiencies in budget allocation (roads) and fiscal policy. Specifically, they are faulted for lacking a plan to move away from reliance on subsidies and for disregarding local municipalities during revenue sharing. The criticism is policy-based and intense, demanding clear answers and changes.
2025-09-25
Debate on the key national issue "The impact of price rises on economic competitiveness and people's livelihoods: What to do?"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

The main adversary is the government, which is being sharply criticized for its poor performance and inability to offer solutions. The criticism is performance-based, focusing specifically on the government's failure to ensure the public's well-being.
2025-09-24
Draft law amending the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (649 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed at the current legal framework, which generates unjustified bureaucracy and inconvenience, particularly concerning the automatic application of mandatory insurance to rarely used trailers. Furthermore, objections raised within the commission are also criticized for failing to account for practical real-life logic. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2025-09-17
Draft law (667 SE) for the third reading amending the Atmosphere Protection Act and other laws (partial transposition of amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme Directive)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

Criticism is directed against the government's policy and legislative practices, which are accused of undermining legal certainty and implementing retroactive taxation. The opposition is intense and politically motivated, calling for the bill not to be supported, arguing that it will drive the economy into the ground.
2025-09-17
Completion of the thematic plan for mineral resources in Rapla and Pärnu County.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The primary criticism is leveled against the state and the Land and Spatial Planning Authority, which proposed discontinuing the planning of mineral resources. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the state of generating uncertainty and fostering regional inequality by creating a more advantageous situation within the "golden circle." The state's activities concerning special planning for wind farms are being contrasted with its approach to mining planning.
2025-09-17
Tax Festival Continues

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, whose policies and results are strongly criticized, being labeled as failures and sources of chaos. The criticism is aimed at specific policies, such as the unfair car tax and the neglect of rural areas.
2025-09-16
The Chancellor of Justice's report on the conformity of legislative acts with the Constitution and the performance of other duties assigned to the Chancellor by law.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

The opposition is directed at state regulations that restrict property rights and economic activity, particularly concerning environmental protection within Natura sites. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the argument that the restrictions have gone too far and have created unfair antagonism among landowners.
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

No direct political opponent is criticized; instead, the opposition is aimed at the existing legal framework and its unreasonable consequences, which either create administrative burdens or threaten national defense. There is also criticism regarding the court's intervention in hunting matters, which has halted the culling of nuisance animals. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on inefficient administration and regulations.
2025-06-18
Draft law (667 SE) for amending the Atmosphere Protection Act and other laws (partial transposition of amendments to the directive on greenhouse gas emissions trading system) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the ministry that introduced the draft legislation and the government, criticizing them mainly for procedural errors (retroactive enforcement) and insufficient economic analysis. Criticism is also leveled at the broader government support policy, which fosters a "society of learned helplessness" and weakens the economic model.
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The confrontation is directed against officials and politicians operating during the bill drafting phase who fail to take into account feedback from the industrial sector. The criticism is both procedural and intense, as it obstructs progress and renders cooperation futile. The speaker also criticizes the general culture of "talking points" within parliament.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the State Audit Act, the Political Parties Act, and other laws (control body for political party funding) – first reading.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the regulatory framework and its inconsistent application, questioning whether the established procedure applies to similar events. The objection is procedural, emphasizing the ambiguity of the rules and the unfair differentiation among public figures.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Industrial Emissions Act (628 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main opponents are the Environment Committee, which deemed the draft bill unreasonable and likely to increase bureaucracy, and developers, who view the integrated permit as an additional burden. The speaker sharply criticizes the state and the government for distancing themselves from their role as partners to local residents, thereby creating an unequal situation. Criticism is also aimed at the activities of Enefit Green/Enefit and the government’s illogical development decisions.
2025-06-04
Draft law amending the Environmental Levies Act (615 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the state's governing machinery and planning process, which are accused of setting incorrect goals, causing chaos, and lacking transparency. The attitude towards rural residents is criticized particularly sharply; these residents are being encouraged to join an inclusive society, based on studies that portray them as poorly informed and uneducated.
2025-06-04
Infrastructure investments

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

There is no direct criticism or confrontation with specific political opponents. The criticism is instead directed at the lack of clarity in funding principles and priorities, particularly regarding the use of the national defense fund to support cultural objects.
2025-06-04
Rail Baltic

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing

There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups or individuals. The criticism is aimed at previous ineffective design decisions that failed to anticipate the need for a highway bridge and the necessary financial resources, and the sensibility of constructing separate bridges is being questioned.
2025-05-15
Draft law amending the Nature Conservation Act, the Hunting Act, and the State Property Act (612 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opposition is directed at the minister and the government's proposed bills 610 and 612, criticizing both procedural errors (lack of impact analysis, lack of drafting intention) and substantive infringements. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the state of treating owners unequally and punishing them for preserving their forests. The opposition culminates in a motion for rejection submitted on behalf of the Isamaa faction.
2025-05-15
Draft law (610 SE) for amending the Nature Conservation Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (Nature assessment) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for violating the constitution, irresponsible lawmaking, and the unfair treatment of landowners. The criticism is intense, ranging from procedural errors (the concealment of documents) to accusations that the policy is akin to nationalization. Compromise is ruled out, as a motion to reject Draft Law 610 will be presented at the end of the address on behalf of the Isamaa faction.
2025-05-14
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

No direct criticism is leveled at political opponents. However, opposition is indirectly mounted against the judiciary, emphasizing that the will of the legislature must be clearly expressed and should permit action regardless of what the court has decided.
2025-05-14
Taxes

15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic, which is being criticized for decisions restricting economic activity (a forestry ban on over 40,000 hectares) and for procedural shortcomings. The criticism is aimed at the fact that these restrictions are being imposed without a proper impact assessment.
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the procedural amendments to the draft legislation, specifically regarding the diffusion of responsibility and the elimination of the plan adoption phase. The criticism is policy-based, raising the question of whether the public disclosure of a plan without prior coordination constitutes the new norm.
2025-05-06
Second reading of the bill amending the Hunting Act (553 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism targets the coalition's inaction and sluggishness (they should have been "more proactive and quicker") in initiating the legislative amendment following the court ruling. Simultaneously, the role of the opposition (the Isamaa faction) in submitting the necessary draft legislation for deliberation is recognized. The criticism is procedural, not personal.
2025-05-06
The Minister of Finance's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the development directions of the public service in 2024)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main objection is aimed at the excessively large public sector and bureaucracy, which is deemed unaffordable for the taxpayer. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the vagueness of the government's agenda and the absence of fiscal projections regarding bureaucracy reduction.
2025-04-23
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (555 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the state's strategic management and the monopolistic grid operator, Elering, whose connection fees are unreasonable and impede small-scale production. Additionally, criticism is directed at those who devalue residents of sparsely populated areas, labeling them as having lower levels of education and awareness. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the opposing side of strategic confusion.
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker indirectly criticizes the government's inaction in addressing the problem of regional balance and demands clarification regarding the funding of foundations and hobby groups. The criticism targets political leadership and procedures, is not personal, and expresses concern about the worsening situation (the decline in the number of participants).
2025-04-16
Draft law amending the Energy Sector Organisation Act (574 SE) – First Reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The primary targets of criticism are the management decisions made by the state-owned company Enefit Green and the government’s energy policy, which permits the subsidization of outdated technology. The criticism is directed at the political and commercial irrationality and lack of transparency, suggesting that prices can only be driven down through intervention, rather than relying on market mechanisms.
2025-04-16
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submission of a plan of action for the development of Estonia's electricity production capacities and electricity networks to the Riigikogu by the Government of the Republic, to ensure energy security" (575 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The objection targets the outcome of the vote in the Economic Affairs Committee, where the speaker’s amendment proposal concerning the zeroing of the renewable energy charge was voted down. The state’s actions are being criticized for failing to ensure tangible benefits for local residents stemming from renewable energy production. The criticism focuses on deficiencies in policy implementation.
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main standoff is between the government and the minister who submitted Bill 612 to the Riigikogu. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, calling into question the bill's compliance with the state's core policies and strategic mandate.
2025-04-09
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is directed at the government/coalition, which is accused of lacking strategy, patching holes, and implementing flawed taxes. The opposition is intense, stressing that the car tax is inherently skewed and cannot be fixed, meaning there is no room for compromise. The mindset that one tax must immediately be replaced by the next is also criticized.
2025-04-09
Defence Industry Park

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing

Direct opposition to the government is not expressed, but the doubts and resistance of local residents (the people of Ermistu) are highlighted regarding the investment's location and potential hazards ("why in my backyard"). The speaker acts as an intermediary for local concerns, demanding answers from the government to alleviate these fears.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Administrative Cooperation Act, and the Water Act (531 SE) – third reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the part of the draft bill concerning the restriction of drilling methods, criticizing the incomplete nature of the process and the lack of proper analysis. The intensity of the opposition is high, as the Isamaa faction confirms it cannot support the legal amendment. The criticism is leveled against the regulators who are implementing the rules but are unable to provide the necessary statistical evidence.
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at those who, in the Riigikogu chamber, question the actions of the Estonian state regarding the issue of gray passport holders. The criticism is intense and principled, accusing them of belittling the state and searching for the wrong culprit.
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Administrative Cooperation Act, and the Water Act (531 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the government and the ministry, accusing them of duplicity and a lack of transparency, particularly concerning the concealment of the prohibition of the drilling method behind a subordinate legal act. There is also opposition to the stance that trusts local municipalities regarding water permits but dictates a land tax increase to them, demonstrating the state's inconsistent approach to trusting local authorities.
2025-03-19
Overload fee

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

The criticism targets the system and policies that prevent the use of congestion charges to lower electricity bills. There is opposition to the explanations provided by the Ministry of Climate representative (Rein Vaks), who cited European Union legal restrictions, on the grounds that these restrictions do not apply to Finland.
2025-03-19
Government austerity plan

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.

Criticism is aimed at the political choices made by the government coalition, which prioritize large cultural projects while leaving road maintenance unfunded. The criticism is policy-driven, questioning whether the new coalition intends to review its priorities. The speaker contrasts the government's inaction with the crucial importance of infrastructure, as highlighted by business owners.
2025-03-11
The Prime Minister's address for 2025 on the implementation of the long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including an overview of the situation of research and development activities and the government's policy in this area).

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at ideas favoring regional centralization, which are linked to plans originating from the "previous coalition." The criticism is political and centers on strategic ambiguity, as well as doubts over whether the situation was merely "a mess."
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Direct opponents are not criticized, but indirect procedural criticism is leveled at the commission. The criticism centers on the question of why a significant research finding—concerning the desire of residents with undetermined citizenship to contribute—was not addressed in the context of the debate.
2025-02-12
Draft law amending the Local Government Organisation Act (537 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

Criticism is aimed at the solution methods proposed in the draft bill, deeming them insufficient and ineffective. Specifically, the basis and size of the sanction measures (fines) are criticized, along with the financial structure where the local government unit bears the costs, but the fine revenue is collected by the state budget. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedural concerns.
2025-02-12
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Prime Minister Kristen Michal, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and ministries, particularly concerning the poor coordination of planning processes and the failure to assist local communities. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting the state's operational failures that fuel opposition to major projects. Through their questions, the speaker attempts to help bring forward the arguments of those opposing wind farms, thereby exposing the state's shortcomings.
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The speaker does not directly criticize political opponents. Instead, they point out weaknesses in policies or projects (like Rail Baltic), which have unfortunately turned out to be "quite weak." The criticism is aimed more at procedural or performance deficiencies rather than at the individuals themselves.
2025-01-29
The Chancellor of Justice's proposal to align the Electricity Market Act with the Constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the existing regulatory exception that allows for the waiver of the ash disposal fee, and the resulting subsidized energy. No direct opponents or groups are named or personally criticized.
2025-01-29
The Ombudsman's proposal to align the law on industrial emissions with the constitution.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is primarily directed at failed legislation and regulatory discrepancies that have caused public frustration and financial damage. Specifically, critics target the stance of ministry representatives who claim that renewable energy facilities supposedly do not pollute and do not require an integrated permit. Also criticized are those who exploit regulatory loopholes to fight against new technology. The criticism is procedural and policy-based.
2025-01-29
Sideteenused

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed at Interior Minister Läänemets, questioning his understanding of how the communications market operates, despite the fact that he leads SMIT. Also criticized is the mutual finger-pointing among government members and the resistance from market participants to the regulation concerning the cross-use of infrastructure. The criticism targets both the incompetence of politicians and unfair market practices.
2025-01-28
Draft law amending the Hunting Act (553 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at centralized governance and bureaucracy, which breeds resentment and contempt for the state itself by treating citizens as ignorant and effectively teaching them helplessness. Specific criticism is leveled against the rigid nature conservation law and the lengthy processing times of the Environmental Board when issuing permits to cull problem animals. Furthermore, the trend toward "total conservation," which excludes people from protected areas, is also under fire.
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the leadership of the security sector and the responsible officials who are failing to ensure adequate surveillance capabilities. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on inefficiency in the execution of critical security tasks. The speaker publicly references messages disseminated via high-ranking officials of the Defense Forces to underscore the gravity of the problem.
2024-12-16
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - third reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's policy (the car tax and the related bill), criticizing it on the grounds of political unfairness and legal deficiencies. The criticism is policy-based, highlighting that the proposed tax law puts various regions and demographic groups at a disadvantage. There is clear opposition to the bill, even though certain individual details are acknowledged as commendable.
2024-12-12
Draft law amending the Construction Code Act, the Act on Administrative Cooperation, and the Water Act (531 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the minister and the government’s proposed solutions regarding the division of responsibility between the state and local governments in managing resource deposits. The criticism is policy-based, stressing that the proposed solution is not proportional and fails to guarantee sufficient protection for the environment and drinking water resources. The speaker criticizes a situation where the state essentially vanishes and leaves the local municipality to fend for itself.
2024-12-11
Second reading of the draft law amending the Subsoil Act (435 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opponents are the bill's initiators (the government or the ministry), who face criticism for subverting the principles of the rule of law and for the unjust treatment of the private sector. The criticism targets both the underlying policy and the procedural aspects, specifically citing the preferential treatment given to the state-owned company Enefit in the allocation of oil shale resources. The speaker contends that the bill is designed to corner private market participants, a move that is neither fair nor sensible.
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law amending the Waste Act and the Packaging Act (430 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

There is no direct confrontation, but the criticism is aimed at a political priority that largely favors funding the development of collection infrastructure (a park of plastic containers) over industry (factories). He/She also indirectly criticizes previous failed waste management solutions (tire shredding).
2024-12-10
Draft law amending the Waste Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (461 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is directed at the government's policy, specifically criticizing both the unjust motor vehicle tax and the deficiencies of Bill 461 SE concerning property rights protection. The criticism is sharp and politically charged, accusing the state of exacerbating existing problems rather than providing solutions, and of creating a nanny state. The opposition is also procedural, challenging the committee’s working methods and the way amendments are handled.
2024-12-04
Draft law amending the 2024 State Budget Act (517 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The primary criticism is aimed at the government's budget procedure and transparency, accusing them of violating agreements and improper planning. The opposition is intense, rhetorically asking whether such a budget process is even transparent and legitimate.
2024-11-21
Draft law (447 SE) for amending the Education Act of the Republic of Estonia and amending other laws accordingly (establishing compulsory schooling) – Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Criticism is directed at the government and the drafters of the bill, accusing them of flawed analysis, insufficient funding, and ignoring the negative opinions of interest groups. The criticism is heavily procedural and policy-based, warning that the amendments were made "a bit haphazardly" and that this undermines the state's credibility.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts related thereto (505 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opposition is directed at the government’s reform policy, criticizing both the procedural focus (a person-centered process) and the substantive approach, which is object-based and lacks a holistic vision. The resistance is intense because the changes are viewed as detrimental to the residents and regions of Estonia, effectively dismantling functioning systems.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (527 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The resistance is directed at the process managers and the drafters of the bill, who are being criticized for failing to involve the opposition and for manipulating the agenda. The criticism is intense, accusing them of a dishonest "false start" and of creating potentially dangerous, abstract legislative text. The criticism is both procedural and substantive.
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the procedure used to draft the bill and the thoroughness of the analysis, rather than being directed explicitly at political opponents. The speaker questions whether the bill's drafters have sufficiently analyzed the security threat posed by hidden citizenship. There is no clear confrontation with specific groups or individuals.
2024-11-20
Infrastructure

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The criticism is aimed squarely at the central government's spending cuts, specifically because they disproportionately affect rural areas. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, demanding clarification and reassurance from the government to dispel the circulating rumors and allegations. No direct personal attacks have been launched; instead, the focus remains strictly on the lack of transparency surrounding the government's actions.
2024-11-20
Energetics

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.

The main opposition is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for ill-conceived decisions and creating needless bureaucracy. The criticism focuses primarily on the lack of legal certainty and the absence of a comprehensive plan, which is causing confusion even among officials.
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, accusing them of failing to listen to entrepreneurs and umbrella organizations, and treating engagement as a mere formality. The criticism is intense, labeling the government's actions as "very poor governance" and accusing them of fostering a climate of hopelessness in the economic environment.
2024-11-12
Second reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in connection therewith (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Cadastre Enterprise)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

Criticism is directed at the solution proposed by the government (the Land and Spatial Planning Agency) and previous administrative decisions that created a void in regional governance. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the system's inability to ensure legal certainty for developers and local governments. In particular, critics argue that the new agency cannot replace local coordination.
2024-11-11
Draft law on the partial repeal of the Value Added Tax Act Amendment Act (489 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed squarely at the governing coalition, who are being criticized for rushing things, failing to assess the impacts, and the potential introduction of new taxes (a waste tax, and the removal of the ceiling on land tax increases). The criticism is intense and focuses on political incompetence and the possible negative side effect of repealing a poorly drafted law.
2024-11-06
Continuation of the first reading of the draft law repealing the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the government's tax policy, particularly the motor vehicle tax, which Isamaa strongly wishes to repeal. The criticism is political, focusing on the lack of a comprehensive approach to taxation and the negative impact these taxes have on the economic environment. There are no personal attacks.
2024-11-06
Security

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

The main criticism is directed at the government coalition, especially the Social Democrats, for their slow response and insufficient grasp of security threats. The Riigikogu Board is also facing criticism for failing to facilitate the search for a broad-based solution to the issue of voting rights. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and procedural delays.
2024-11-06
RMK term contracts

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the government's actions concerning the utilization of RMK's cash flows and the inefficiency of processing state special plans. The objection is policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing that the realization of resources released onto the market by the state has not been well thought out.
2024-11-06
Vana-Vigala Technical and Service School Closure

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing

The criticism is aimed at the state's actions and decisions regarding school closures and the reform of the education network, particularly due to the lack of strategic vision and coordination. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, as decisions are being made concurrently with the drafting of the education agreement, while previous reforms remain unfinished.
2024-11-05
Draft law invalidating the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (488 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The confrontation is aimed squarely at the coalition and the government, who are being criticized for their unfair tax policy and for proposing inadequate solutions. The criticism is both intense and substantive, highlighting contradictions (such as promises of free public transport versus the actual rise in ticket prices) and labeling the government's recommendations as "sheer nonsense."
2024-11-05
Overview of the Government of the Republic’s Activities in the Implementation of European Union Policy

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The speaker is acting in opposition to the government, criticizing its inability to fulfill EU obligations and avoid infringement procedures. The criticism is aimed at specific political failures, such as the problem concerning the impact assessment of Natura sites and the risk of failing to meet waste targets.
2024-10-23
A written request for a vote of no confidence in Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, submitted by 29 members of the Riigikogu.

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, less because of his policies and more because of his statements and the way he belittles Parliament. The criticism is intense and grounded on philosophical and procedural principles, arguing that such conduct warrants a vote of no confidence in a parliamentary democracy.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The confrontation is aimed at the government, criticizing its budget policy and the unwise nature of internal security investments during a crisis. The criticism is sharp and focuses on political inefficiency and a lack of fiscal prudence. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.
2024-10-16
Draft law amending the Prison Law (506 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the minister and the administrative areas under the government, focusing on procedural shortcomings and inconsistencies in the reorganization of the service. The attempt to delegate costs and obligations to local authorities (KOV) without a clear mandate and funding is particularly criticized. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2024-10-16
Ferry ticket price increase

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing

The main opponent is the government and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who is being criticized for tax hikes and the poor state of the economic environment. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, emphasizing the government's inability to resolve issues concerning the revenue base and autonomy of local municipalities. The opposition is intense, suggesting that the government's actions have passed the point of no return.
2024-10-15
Draft law amending the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel and Electricity Excise Tax Act and other laws (510 SE) – first reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the government's excise policy and the economic rationale, which requires adapting to high input costs. The criticism is political and focuses on the economic damage, warning that companies might move their production out of Estonia.
2024-10-09
Draft law (496 SE) for amending the Social Welfare Act and the Act Regulating the Provision of Health Care Services (regarding the provision of independent nursing care in 24-hour special care services) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker criticizes the current system for its excessive centralization into care centers. The criticism is aimed at the system's inefficiency in ensuring regional accessibility, not at individuals or procedures.
2024-09-25
Draft law amending the Act on Responding to Complaints and Information Requests and Submitting Collective Petitions (475 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the proposed solution in the draft bill, criticizing it for failing to anticipate the danger of growing bureaucracy and the replacement of substantive work with mere procedures. The criticism is purely policy-based, focusing on the procedural consequences and the wasting of officials' working time.
2024-09-25
The Regional Affairs and Agricultural Minister's 2024 presentation on the implementation of the state’s long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism targets both the regional minister’s policy (arguing that subsidies are not the solution) and, more broadly, the government and its Tallinn-centric approach to policymaking, which is accused of failing to grasp regional specificities. A separate point of criticism concerns the negative image of Southeast Estonian residents ("angry people") created by the previous prime minister.
2024-09-18
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Waste Act, the Traffic Act, and the State Fees Act (461 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the logic and structure of the draft bill, particularly concerning the appropriateness of the 800-euro environmental levy. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, warning that the deterrent measure will provoke defiance and result in abandoned wrecks being left lying around in real life.
2024-09-18
Second reading of the Draft Act (359 SE) on amendments to the Law on the Organization of the Energy Economy, the Electricity Market Act, and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management System Act

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The criticism is primarily aimed at the government/state planning process, which is inefficient and causes social friction, marginalizing rural residents. It stands in contrast to radical opposition to renewable energy, but also criticizes the ideology of the draft bill, which attempts to steamroll the community. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, not personal.
2024-09-17
Report by the Chancellor of Justice on the compliance of legal instruments with the Constitution and the performance of other duties imposed on the Chancellor of Justice by law.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's actions, which plan to impose nature conservation restrictions without the budgetary funds required to pay compensation. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on state budget deficits and hinting at the necessity of obstruction.
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The primary opposition is directed at the political decisions made by the government (the minister), particularly concerning the closure of Paikuse College and the justification for the 80 million euro investment. The criticism is rooted in policy and budgetary concerns, calling into question the wisdom of the decision given the context of national security and the current economic situation.
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

The opposition is directed against earlier state decisions concerning the closure of the Pärnu battalion and the Police and Border Guard College. The criticism is policy-driven and highlights the negative impact on local security and the community.
2024-07-29
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.

The primary target is Minister of Infrastructure Vladimir Svet, whose reliability is being questioned due to his past activities (specifically, his presence at the Bronze Soldier monument) and his stances on citizenship policy. The criticism is intense, focusing on the minister's personal disposition and political history. Indirectly, the Social Democrats' position regarding the voting rights of Russian citizens is also being criticized.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism targets the government’s policy concerning the funding of local municipalities (LGUs) and the fallout from the regional reform. The speaker sharply criticizes the reallocation of funds, claiming that the money generated by the dissolution of county governments has simply stayed within the state budget—a move they dismiss as "sleight of hand." The critique is also aimed squarely at the political leadership and the procedures involved.
2024-07-29
Second Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 UA)

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The criticism is aimed at the government's political choices, particularly concerning tax hikes and regional policy. Opponents reject the government's ideological premise that taxation can be used to nudge people toward environmental sustainability, pointing out the negative consequences this entails. The critique is rooted in policy and ideology, accusing the government of increasing inequality and focusing on the wrong details.
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The main opponent is the current ruling coalition and Prime Ministerial candidate Kristen Michal. Criticism is aimed both at tax policy (tax hikes, dropping the sweetened drinks tax) and the inability to advance crucial development strategies. They ask directly whether the issue with adopting the development plan lies with the coalition partner.
2024-06-12
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.

The primary criticism targets the state and the legislature, accusing them of creating bureaucracy, imposing burdens on property owners, and ignoring local government revenues (specifically, the failure to compensate for lands designated as nature reserves). This criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the detrimental effect of the legislation on the economy and property rights. No willingness to compromise on the tax increase is expressed; instead, there is a call not to support the draft bill.
2024-06-05
Second reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for opting for a blanket, nationwide car tax and for failing to understand the lifestyle of rural residents. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the government of political foolishness and dishonesty. As a member of Isamaa, any compromise regarding support for the bill is ruled out.
2024-05-29
First reading of the Bill amending the Land Tax Act (437 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism targets the state's failure to act on promises made to local municipalities regarding increasing their revenue base. The opposition is political, highlighting the government's inability to resolve the issue of land tax compensation for protected areas.
2024-05-15
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the Building Code and other Acts (Acceleration of the Deployment of Renewable Energy) (308 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at state institutions and the Ministry of Climate, which are accused of failing to strike a balance between the interests of energy and environmental protection. The criticism is both procedural and political, highlighting contradictory decisions (bog restoration versus a wind farm) and the inability to adhere to established planning documents, which is causing confusion in society.
2024-05-15
The 2024 Report by the Minister of Climate on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the bureaucratic inertia of the government or ministry and their alleged inability to find solutions regarding the issue of land exchange. The criticism is procedural, highlighting the inconsistency that resources were allocated for assessing impacts, but not for considering exchange possibilities.
2024-05-02
Continuation of the first reading of the Bill on the Tax on Sweetened Beverages (418 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The standoff is aimed directly at the government's policy, specifically criticizing the sugar tax as an ineffective means of improving public health. The critique is policy-driven, stressing that the stated objectives have not been met and that this is simply the wrong instrument for the job.
2024-04-18
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the State Assets Act and the Land Cadastre Act (380 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition, but the criticism is aimed at the Riigikogu's earlier decision not to proceed with the draft bill, as well as the committee's current uncertainty regarding the necessity of the legislative amendment. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on the inability to resolve a serious legal problem.
2024-04-10
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Initiate Drafts of Legal Acts Ensuring the Clarity and Predictability of the Development of the School Network" (285 OE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition is aimed at the practices of local governments and school boards that create exceptions to the national education policy, particularly concerning the transition to Estonian as the language of instruction. Criticism is directed at the policy's inconsistency and the disregard for rules, which undermines previous parliamentary decisions.
2024-04-09
Report by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary critique is aimed at the government’s inaction in regional policy and the state’s failure to consult with regions (e.g., Pärnu County) before implementing national interests (renewable energy). The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of acting unilaterally.
2024-04-03
Country Life

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The main opposition is directed at the regulatory course set by the state and the European Union, which imposes burdensome restrictions on seasonal work. Criticism is aimed at the fining practices of the Labor Inspectorate and towards the government, which fails to provide a positive message for rural areas. The criticism is policy- and procedure-focused, accusing the system of killing small businesses.
2024-04-02
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Abandon the Imposition of the Car Tax and Withdraw the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill from the Riigikogu Proceedings" (374 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed squarely at those implementing the car tax (implicitly, the ruling coalition), criticizing their policy as irresponsible and untrustworthy. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on how imposing the tax contradicts the reality of Estonia's population distribution and road conditions. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they promise a victorious fight against the tax.
2024-04-01
Interpellation concerning the renewal of the Rail Baltic South Pärnu County spatial plan (No. 530)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The direct political opponent is not criticized; instead, the opposition is aimed at procedural hurdles and systemic inefficiency stemming from the Supreme Court's ruling and inadequate environmental impact assessment. Criticism is leveled against the "gauntlet of endless delays" and the inability to adequately hear the concerns of local government leaders. The criticism is directed at procedures rather than individuals.
2024-03-20
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amending the Atmospheric Air Protection Act (393 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

There is no direct opposition to specific political groups; the criticism is aimed at the ambiguity of the draft's provisions and the complexity of administrative procedures (Local Authorities vs. the Health Board). The speaker focuses more on the inherent logical flaws of the law itself rather than attacking political opponents.
2024-03-13
Rule of Law

15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

The criticism is directed at the actions taken by the government's leadership, which have created "room for interpretation" and raised suspicions of political interference in the administration of justice. The confrontation is procedural and institutional, requiring the government to provide explanations and restore control. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, focusing on eliminating inconsistencies and resolving public misunderstanding.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the state and the minister, who are pushing through a car tax despised by the public. The criticism is intense, focusing on political decisions that harm rural regions. Opponents accuse them of taxing rural residents as polluters while simultaneously failing to upgrade gravel road surfaces and leaving the issues of power outages unresolved.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the collective passivity of the West and Europe regarding the implementation of sanctions and the sanctioning of the economic environment. The speaker accuses Europe of excessive sluggishness and remaining in its comfort zone, which is preventing the defeat of Russia.
2024-02-05
Interpellation regarding the abolition of the special VAT rate for accommodation establishments (No. 289)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting

The main confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, criticizing the inconsistency of their fiscal policy and the uncertainty surrounding taxation. Particular attention is drawn to the coalition partners' public messaging regarding cuts, which does not align with the actual tax policy.
2024-01-23
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (345 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The confrontation is directed against the reliability of the budget calculations presented by the government coalition or the rapporteur. The criticism is policy-based, demanding an explanation as to why a measure supporting economic competitiveness should be detrimental to the state budget. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, manifesting itself as a question and a request for data.
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed against the policies of the state and the government, which fail to provide entrepreneurs with the confidence needed to invest in innovative projects that add value to the national wealth. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, citing failures and limited results.
2024-01-22
Inquiry concerning the reliability of electricity supply (No. 590)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the government and the grid company (Elektrilevi) regarding the lack of investment and the failure to create a long-term vision. Specifically criticized is the failure to implement the cross-usage directive and the failure to resolve the issue of obsolete lines. The opposition is based on policy and performance, demanding that the government take the matter seriously and make tangible investments.
2024-01-22
Inquiry Regarding the Electricity Supply of Saaremaa (No. 68)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the lack of clarity in the implementation of government policy, particularly in the context of the land-clearing charge (or deforestation fee). There is no direct confrontation or personal attack; instead, what is being demanded is an official clarification regarding the interpretation of the law. The disagreement is purely a procedural matter concerning policy implementation.
2024-01-17
Economic competitiveness

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and its ministers, who are being blamed for failing to present a clear economic recovery plan and for allowing the investment climate to deteriorate. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing specifically on industrial policy, permitting procedures, and fiscal balance issues.
2024-01-09
First Reading of the Draft Bill on Amendments to the State Assets Act and the Land Cadastre Act (327 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism targets the existing legal framework and procedural deficiencies, particularly concerning the Economic Affairs Committee, which failed to involve other relevant committees (specifically, the National Defence Committee and the Environment Committee). The opposition is also aimed at the actions of private developers who utilize defense-related planning documents to appreciate land value and acquire development rights, an action that conflicts with the comprehensive general plan.