By Months: Aleksei Jevgrafov
Total Months: 19
Fully Profiled: 19
10.2025
3 Speeches
The primary opponent is the Minister (and the government), whose financial strategy concerning the Health Insurance Fund is being called into question. The criticism is strictly policy-based and focuses on the conflict between promises and forecasts. The intensity of the opposition is high, noting that the situation is "in complete contradiction" with the Minister's claim.
09.2025
20 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the inaction of the sector minister and the ministries regarding the resolution of the Health Insurance Fund deficit and their failure to commission necessary impact assessments. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, centering on systemic inefficiency that fails to guarantee patients access to medical care. Furthermore, members of the Legal Affairs Committee are being directly questioned about the justifications for their votes when rejecting the draft legislation.
06.2025
7 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the government and its ministers, citing the failure to deliver on promises (over 19 years) and the insufficient prioritization of issues facing the Ida-Virumaa region. Criticism is also leveled against the inefficiency of policies and procedures (specifically mentioning the Narva-Jõhvi road and the Narva border queues). In one particular instance, the speaker notes that they do not agree with all the charges brought against the minister.
05.2025
15 Speeches
The primary opponents are the government coalition, and specifically the Social Democratic Party (SDE), who stand accused of pursuing an irresponsible energy policy and ignoring the social issues plaguing Ida-Viru County. The criticism is policy-driven, casting doubt on their motives for failing to introduce CO2 capture technology. Furthermore, specific criticism is directed at Narva Mayor Katri Raik (SDE) for disregarding the interests of Narva residents.
04.2025
5 Speeches
The main criticism is aimed at coalition politicians and the government, particularly Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, whose economic claims are considered unfounded. The Minister of the Interior is under intense pressure regarding the critical staff shortage in the East Prefecture, with demands for concrete steps to resolve the situation. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, not personal.
03.2025
4 Speeches
The main opponents are the government and former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is accused of blaming the residents of Narva and mishandling the border issues. The speaker criticizes Isamaa for its populist moves and accuses the Riigikogu (Parliament) of dividing society with its decisions. The criticism targets both the political substance (the nullification of integration) and the procedures (justification based on security concerns, and the lack of analysis).
02.2025
15 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the ruling coalition (including the Reform Party), accusing them of squandering taxpayer money, protecting bank profits, and ramming through flawed legislation. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, alleging that ministers are evading questions and engaging in deliberate obfuscation. Opposition is particularly fierce regarding the administrative oversight of Narva municipal schools, which critics have dubbed an "inquisition."
01.2025
3 Speeches
The opposition is directed at a specific colleague ("Esteemed Eerik-Niiles") and the rapporteur, whose claims regarding the Georgian elections are considered insufficiently substantiated. The criticism is procedural and fact-based, focusing on shortcomings in the content of the official reports (OSCE). He demands the disclosure of sources in order to verify the accuracy of the claims.
12.2024
4 Speeches
The speaker is in strong opposition to the government, criticizing both its economic policy (tax hikes) and procedural lack of transparency (the classification of representation expenses). The criticism is intense and points to the government’s generally opaque mode of operation, which is also evidenced by the vague presentation of the state budget.
11.2024
2 Speeches
The confrontation is directed at those who voted against the Centre Party's draft bill, with the speaker demanding the public naming of those individuals. The criticism is indirect, focusing instead on procedural transparency and accountability, rather than being a direct personal attack.
10.2024
9 Speeches
The main opposition is directed at government ministers and their policies, particularly concerning healthcare budget cuts and the raising of fees. The criticism is both political (citing insufficient security tax and unfair consultation fees) and competence-based, drawing attention to the minister's ignorance regarding the name of the Health Insurance Fund (Tervisekassa). The speaker also questions the justification and consequences of the government's decisions.
09.2024
15 Speeches
The main criticism is directed at the government and ministries, accusing them of inaction and poor political decision-making. The criticism is intense, focusing on political failures that are causing direct hardship for residents (border queues, the subsistence level). Fact-checking is also being carried out regarding data presented by ministers (specifically, jobs in Ida-Virumaa).
07.2024
1 Speeches
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the coalition, which is sharply criticized for its political choices (the car tax, tax hikes) and procedural violations (the rejection of substantive amendments under the label of obstruction). The intensity of the attack is high, accusing the government of deliberately trying to make people's lives difficult and failing to present an economic rescue plan. Compromise is ruled out on the car tax, which they will vote against.
06.2024
16 Speeches
The primary opponent is the Reform Party government and coalition, which stands accused of poor economic management, arrogance, and obstinacy. The criticism is intensely policy-driven, focusing specifically on tax increases, cuts to family benefits, and the disregard for expert recommendations. The speaker describes the government's actions as "cynical and out of touch," noting that the opposition's proposals have simply been tossed in the bin.
05.2024
23 Speeches
The main opposition is aimed squarely at the government and the ruling coalition, particularly the Minister of Education and Research, who stands accused of shirking responsibility and blaming others for the existing problems. Criticism is also leveled against the government's budget policy and the planned redundancies, which are widely viewed as unjust.
04.2024
11 Speeches
The main opponent is the governing coalition (Reform Party, Eesti 200, SDE), which is being accused of the economic downturn, unfair tax policy, and failing to deliver on promises. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (tax hikes, cuts) and procedural issues (bureaucratic delays, drafting legislation in the party office). The confrontation regarding the government’s fiscal policy is intense and uncompromising.
03.2024
9 Speeches
The primary confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized both for its political decisions (tax hikes, cutting funding for the School Sports Union) and for unethical behavior. The speaker accuses the minister of deliberate misinterpretation aimed at portraying Narva as being opposed to the law. He strongly opposes the tax on sweetened beverages, considering it ineffective and an attack on people's wallets.
02.2024
8 Speeches
A strong oppositional stance against the government and its tax policy, criticizing the introduction of the car tax and the abolition of free public transport. The criticism is aimed both at political decisions and the organization of parliamentary work, specifically accusing the committee chairman of obstructing the vote on the opposition's proposal (the initiation of a draft bill). Furthermore, the Prime Minister is accused of failing to answer questions and evading responsibility.
01.2024
14 Speeches
The criticism is aimed directly at the government and the prime minister, accusing them of causing the economic recession and the deepening of social problems. The criticism is policy-driven, linking rising unemployment and high electricity prices directly to government decisions, including the hike in VAT. Radical proposals are being put forward, such as considering exiting the electricity market.